Amazon given green light for U.S. drone tests, inches toward 'Prime Air' delivery

245

Comments

  • Reply 21 of 85
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by boredumb View Post

     

    Now, here's something I might be willing to march in protest of...

    One of the more egregious proposals for accelerating the uglification of the world

    since the aborted suggestion of floating geocentric "mega-billboards"

    some years back.


    Agreed - I do not want this, and when I say that I don't mean that I don't personally want a drone delivering a package to me; I mean that I don't want dozens or hundreds of drones buzzzzzzzzzzing their way across every city - not just the urban core, but pretty much by definition quieter residential areas, and hence parks too.

  • Reply 22 of 85

    Amazon PR stunt gets extension from lobbyist owned shills.

  • Reply 23 of 85
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by SockRolid View Post

     

     

    How about delivering me a Chipotle burrito.  Right to my hand, in 15 minutes.

    And I'd pay for it with my ?Watch.




    Wait for it... Amazon Fire Watch!

  • Reply 24 of 85

    I imagine that drones will have a constant GPS feedback, so if they're shot down (or otherwise fail / fall), the retailer will know the location and come looking for it.

     

    (To be clear, I'm not defending the use of drones, which I think is stupid, but I'm just saying that all the "I can shoot it with impunity" chatter is misplaced.)

  • Reply 25 of 85
    aaronjaaronj Posts: 1,595member
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by mstone View Post

     

    True but cities are full of apartment buildings. How can a drone deliver to an apartment?




    As far as I know, drones have no problem with cities or the buildings that inhabit them.

  • Reply 26 of 85
    What kind of RANGE could this possibly have?! "Line of sight" not to mention battery issues. Just how exactly do they expect to do this is any viable way???
  • Reply 27 of 85
    mstonemstone Posts: 11,510member

    I just don't see how it saves any money.

     


    • They have to hire professional pilots or train them


    • They have to lease a bunch of small local dispatch locations


    • Many deliveries will not be drone compatible


    • Expensive equipment that probably has a substantial failure rate


    • Incompatible with bad weather conditions


    • Increased liability and insurance costs


    • Strong opposition by general public damaging brand


    • Vandalism and theft opportunists issues


     

    Where is the upside?

  • Reply 28 of 85
    paxmanpaxman Posts: 4,729member
    slurpy wrote: »
    I'm not one for guns, am for sane gun control, but I would be completely onboard with people shooting these down. 
    Watch shotgun sales soar.
  • Reply 29 of 85
    mstonemstone Posts: 11,510member
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by AaronJ View Post

     
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by mstone View Post

     

    True but cities are full of apartment buildings. How can a drone deliver to an apartment?




    As far as I know, drones have no problem with cities or the buildings that inhabit them.


    I meant apartments that have interior hallways, multiple floors or other types of physical restrictions.  We have an apartment in the city like that where you have to press the intercom and get buzzed in to unlock the gate.

  • Reply 30 of 85
    aaronjaaronj Posts: 1,595member
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by DeeGee48 View Post



    What kind of RANGE could this possibly have?! "Line of sight" not to mention battery issues. Just how exactly do they expect to do this is any viable way???

     

    They have enough range for the US military to use them on a regular basis to assassinate people out in the middle of nowhere.

     

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by mstone View Post

     

    I meant apartments that have interior hallways, multiple floors or other types of physical restrictions.  We have an apartment in the city like that where you have to press the intercom and get buzzed in to unlock the gate.


     

    Ahh.  Gotcha.

     

    I would guess that they've thought of this stuff, and worked out solutions.

  • Reply 31 of 85
    solipsismysolipsismy Posts: 5,099member
    dewme wrote: »
    This is living and spinning battery operated proof that just because something CAN be done doesn't mean it SHOULD be done.

    If I'm living out in a rural area, man this thing is just too damn tempting to engage....

    Pull! 

    Quad Fail. 

    12 ga. #8 birdshot 1, Amazon drone 0.

    It's like a game with the prize being whatever is in the box.

    Why assume this would be available in a rural area?
  • Reply 32 of 85
    xixoxixo Posts: 449member
    mstone wrote: »
    What percent of Amazon deliveries are even drone deliverable? Since the drones can't be very far from the dispatch center anyway, why not hire some college kids on bicycles instead? Whatever saves a few bucks is what they will do I guess.

    I'm guessing Amazon has thought a lot about what percentage of their packages are drone deliverable. I'm guessing most stuff is under a pound or two.

    We have a major Amazon distribution center just outside the city. A company subcontractor, LaserShip, delivers many packages from the center to your door.

    The employees of LaserShip are underpaid and exploited. (My sister used to work for them; LaserShip has the business ethics of pond scum). This way Amazon gets ordinary humans to drive their own personal vehicles instead of owning a fleet of trucks.

    None of their drivers have CDLs or business insurance. They are "independent contractors". If they lose a package or have an accident it is entirely on the driver. They are fired if they screw up even once.
    mstone wrote: »
    Isn't a professional drone pilot going to earn more than double what you would pay a bicyclist. Plus a bicyclist can deliver 100% of the small to medium size packages.

    Delivery navigation will be totally automated. Amazon will establish standard air routes and operating altitudes. I'm thinking IBM will be selling them a WATSON or two.

    The distribution center in our city is located in an area deadly to bicyclists.

    I'm guessing larger drones will deliver large cargos of packages to more localized centers where the individual packages are then grabbed by smaller drones and taken to your house.

    If the drones fly above highways to get to your house, they won't be in your airspace. You can count on legislation making shooting down a drone into a felony. Plus you usually cannot discharge a firearm in a residential area (maybe in Texas & Montana).

    Amazon will have millions of these manufactured at low cost in China. If each one delivers 100 packages before it breaks and is discarded or refitted, Amazon will make a profit or break even on delivery.

    At first delivery will be limited to small packages on sunny days but eventually anything less than 20lbs will go by drone.

    You will never stop this. It's coming and will unemploy another segment of society that is scraping bottom.
  • Reply 33 of 85
    solipsismysolipsismy Posts: 5,099member
    mstone wrote: »
    I meant apartments that have interior hallways, multiple floors or other types of physical restrictions.  We have an apartment in the city like that where you have to press the intercom and get buzzed in to unlock the gate.

    Consider something less severe than than drones carrying packages to apartments. How about drones carrying packages from distribution centers to repurposed Radio Shacks that will then be picked up by customers entering those staffed stores or then delivered by hand via automobile for the "last mile."

    This allows drones to fly the same exact round trip path that could avoid potential hazards, and be recieved by an Amazon employee every atep of the way, without having to wait for full trucks to be sorted and shipped to certain destinations that are prime for one hour and same day deliveries.
  • Reply 34 of 85
    aaronjaaronj Posts: 1,595member
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by xixo View Post



    If the drones fly above highways to get to your house, they won't be in your airspace. You can count on legislation making shooting down a drone into a felony. Plus you usually cannot discharge a firearm in a residential area (maybe in Texas & Montana).

     

    It's already a felony.  Firing a weapon to destroy property that isn't yours is illegal on many levels as it stands right now.  New legislation wouldn't be needed.

  • Reply 35 of 85
    bdkennedy1bdkennedy1 Posts: 1,459member
    Absolutely nothing could go wrong with this. Nothing.
  • Reply 36 of 85
    mstonemstone Posts: 11,510member
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by SolipsismY View Post

     
    Consider something cinsiderably less severe than than drones carrying packages to apartments. How about dtones carrying packages from distribution centers to repurposed Radio Shacks that will then be picked up at stores or then delivered by hand via automobile for the "last mile."



    This allows drones to fly the same exact round trip path that could avoid potential hazards, and be recieved by an Amazon employee every atep of the way, without having to wait for full trucks to be sorted and shipped to certain destinations that are prime for one hour and same day deliveries.

    Perhaps, but as of now the pilots need to be licensed .

     

    I'll check the thread tomorrow, going to bed.

  • Reply 37 of 85
    calicali Posts: 3,494member
    You do know the government is already experimenting with weapon equipped drones that can spy and attack citizens right?

    This Amazon initiative will eventually seal the deal for these drones.
  • Reply 38 of 85
    xixo wrote: »
    mstone wrote: »
    What percent of Amazon deliveries are even drone deliverable? Since the drones can't be very far from the dispatch center anyway, why not hire some college kids on bicycles instead? Whatever saves a few bucks is what they will do I guess.

    I'm guessing Amazon has thought a lot about what percentage of their packages are drone deliverable. I'm guessing most stuff is under a pound or two.

    We have a major Amazon distribution center just outside the city. A company subcontractor, LaserShip, delivers many packages from the center to your door.

    The employees of LaserShip are underpaid and exploited. (My sister used to work for them; LaserShip has the business ethics of pond scum). This way Amazon gets ordinary humans to drive their own personal vehicles instead of owning a fleet of trucks.

    None of their drivers have CDLs or business insurance. They are "independent contractors". If they lose a package or have an accident it is entirely on the driver. They are fired if they screw up even once.
    mstone wrote: »
    Isn't a professional drone pilot going to earn more than double what you would pay a bicyclist. Plus a bicyclist can deliver 100% of the small to medium size packages.

    Delivery navigation will be totally automated. Amazon will establish standard air routes and operating altitudes. I'm thinking IBM will be selling them a WATSON or two.

    The distribution center in our city is located in an area deadly to bicyclists.

    I'm guessing larger drones will deliver large cargos of packages to more localized centers where the individual packages are then grabbed by smaller drones and taken to your house.

    If the drones fly above highways to get to your house, they won't be in your airspace. You can count on legislation making shooting down a drone into a felony. Plus you usually cannot discharge a firearm in a residential area (maybe in Texas & Montana).

    Amazon will have millions of these manufactured at low cost in China. If each one delivers 100 packages before it breaks and is discarded or refitted, Amazon will make a profit or break even on delivery.

    At first delivery will be limited to small packages on sunny days but eventually anything less than 20lbs will go by drone.

    You will never stop this. It's coming and will unemploy another segment of society that is scraping bottom.

    You're deluded, to put it mildly.
  • Reply 39 of 85
    tallest skiltallest skil Posts: 43,388member
    Originally Posted by mstone View Post

    I just don't see how it saves any money.

     


    • They have to hire professional pilots or train them


    • They have to lease a bunch of small local dispatch locations


    • Many deliveries will not be drone compatible


    • Expensive equipment that probably has a substantial failure rate


    • Incompatible with bad weather conditions


    • Increased liability and insurance costs


    • Strong opposition by general public damaging brand


    • Vandalism and theft opportunists issues


     

    Where is the upside?


     

    It’s funny, but every single one of your points applies to this.

     

  • Reply 40 of 85
    aaronjaaronj Posts: 1,595member
    Quote:

    Originally Posted by cali View Post



    You do know the government is already experimenting with weapon equipped drones that can spy and attack citizens right?



    This Amazon initiative will eventually seal the deal for these drones.



    If the government wanted to attack and kill citizens using drones, they certainly wouldn't need to experiment.  They already do that overseas.  All the freakin' time.

     

    (If you were being sarcastic, then I am sorry. :) )

Sign In or Register to comment.