Every single species that is known to practice sexual reproduction has also been observed practicing same sex behavior. Only one one species is judgmental about it. But people are just sure it is natural behavior that that ends a civilization. Pathetic.
Right, but have you seen those flipping Amoebas? All these years after convincing us they didn't do it, these damn scientists are now admitting they will join with any other amoeba they wish, filthy little cells! They'll not be welcome in the Carolinas any more!
I laughed when I read your first post in this thread, because I knew you were lying, and planned to obsessively refresh this thread even after your statement of "this is my only post". How pathetic. No doubt, that one will not be your last either.
If AI deleted posts, and I assume they were so nasty they deserved to be deleted. They have a right to do so.
AI has actually deleted a lot of my posts, but not when I'm saying anything vicious, just when I mention Christianity. I've gone to my profile to see if they're there, but they go missing from there, too.
Today, the only thing a religious "leader" needs to do to refuse a marriage is to say no. They don't even need to give a reason. Nor will they need to at any time in the future. Anyone claiming that clergy of any faith will be required to perform marriages they disagree with is simply an ignorant moron who failed to follow the law, read the first amendment, or educate themselves on the issue. Full stop.
AI has actually deleted a lot of my posts, but not when I'm saying anything vicious, just when I mention Christianity. I've gone to my profile to see if they're there, but they go missing from there, too.
That's weird I was lucky enough to take part in a massively long very intellectually stimulating from all sides thread last year, that was all about religion, Christianity included and nothing was deleted.
I'm quite sure when those that don't believe / understand science eventually have to face to truth on that subject they will convince themselves God did it to punish humans for gay marriage. How's that for topically on message?
Hahahahahaha! No it is the small minded rightwing bigots that go totalitarian. As anyone from Texas should know.
On a related note, I love this topic, because it is filling my block list with simple minded bigots, "libertarians" and RWNJs....
Maybe we need two AI sites. Like Netflix 'who's watching?' screen. On log in you have a choice ... ... "simple minded bigots, "libertarians" and RWNJs.... please click here"
Comments
Wouldn't the strictest libertarian reject the whole concept of marriage?
No. If the marriage (however one chooses to interpret the meaning) is consensual, then there is no issue.
Two cans and a length of string.
Two cans and a length of string.
"Two turntables and a microphone..." —Beck
Oh, and couldn't have Cook come up with something else than rehashing the "Crazy Ones"?
"Two turntables and a microphone..." —Beck
I remeber that.
Hahahahahaha! No it is the small minded rightwing bigots that go totalitarian. As anyone from Texas should know.
On a related note, I love this topic, because it is filling my block list with simple minded bigots, "libertarians" and RWNJs
Bigot.
Liberals favorite weapon.
Right, but have you seen those flipping Amoebas? All these years after convincing us they didn't do it, these damn scientists are now admitting they will join with any other amoeba they wish, filthy little cells! They'll not be welcome in the Carolinas any more!
http://www.livescience.com/13366-amoeba-sex-reproduction.html
AI has actually deleted a lot of my posts, but not when I'm saying anything vicious, just when I mention Christianity. I've gone to my profile to see if they're there, but they go missing from there, too.
Right and there goes most of the scientific community. I'm guessing you don't read too many science journals though.
Today, the only thing a religious "leader" needs to do to refuse a marriage is to say no. They don't even need to give a reason. Nor will they need to at any time in the future. Anyone claiming that clergy of any faith will be required to perform marriages they disagree with is simply an ignorant moron who failed to follow the law, read the first amendment, or educate themselves on the issue. Full stop.
^worth repeating^
Right and there goes most of the scientific community. I'm guessing you don't read too many science journals though.
Like "climate change"? LOL
Al Gore got rich on that one.
That's weird I was lucky enough to take part in a massively long very intellectually stimulating from all sides thread last year, that was all about religion, Christianity included and nothing was deleted.
No. If the marriage (however one chooses to interpret the meaning) is consensual, then there is no issue.
But there's all the contractual responsibilities and restrictions that the government mediates in regard to marriage.
I'm quite sure when those that don't believe / understand science eventually have to face to truth on that subject they will convince themselves God did it to punish humans for gay marriage.
Like "climate change"? LOL
Al Gore got rich on that one.
How many people get rich off of preaching God's word?
But there's all the contractual responsibilities and restrictions that the government mediates in regard to marriage.
At the state level. Not the federal.
Right ... But ... isn't that why most of them do it?
Right ... But ... isn't that why most of them do it?
Mmm... no. Some religious leaders certainly do make out like bandits though.
At the state level. Not the federal.
So if it should only be recognized at the State level would any marriage be null and void once you cross state lines?
Maybe we need two AI sites. Like Netflix 'who's watching?' screen. On log in you have a choice ... ... "simple minded bigots, "libertarians" and RWNJs.... please click here"