Post your desktop

1676870727390

Comments

  • Reply 1381 of 1795
    alcimedesalcimedes Posts: 5,486member
    hey brad, what chat client is that?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 1382 of 1795
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Defiant





    This one is very nice too. Can't decide between them?




    Hey, can you post the original?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 1383 of 1795
    ...
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 1384 of 1795
    defiantdefiant Posts: 4,876member
    psgamer0921, I always have desktops from mandolux. Always, always, always. Use the link above, or follow down the rabbit hole.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 1385 of 1795
    BTW, sorry about my website (www.mandolux.com) not been accessible at the moment (my domain service provider sucks monkey ass). You can still go to the server at mandolux.mine.nu
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 1386 of 1795
    Quote:

    Originally posted by alcimedes

    hey brad, what chat client is that?



    Why, I'm glad you asked.



    Adium X



    I just created a thread about it in the software forum: Adium 2.0!! Err, I mean "Adium X 0.50"
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 1387 of 1795
    Back to pretty ladies...

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 1388 of 1795




    Click the pic for full-sized version!
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 1389 of 1795
    Quote:

    Originally posted by alcimedes

    sorry, semi unrelated, but you know that bush photo with the book is a fake, right?











    you can see that if you rotate the book so it's the right direction, the back of the book cover is flipped the wrong way in his version.




    If the real version is supposedly the inset picture then why would his tie be hanging out of his pants instead of around his neck? Look at where his tie is in the inset picture you rotated not to mention the blue background. Looks to me that the upside down version is the real one.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 1390 of 1795
    no, the point of rotating the picture was so that it becomes easier to spot the fact that the picture on the back of the books do not match up. Look closely at the back cover of the books, you can see that the pictures are mirrored. Someone took a real photo and rotated the books cover pictures, but they goofed on the back cover, exposing it as a fake.



    Edit: Here's an illustration of what I mean

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 1391 of 1795
    sroachsroach Posts: 105member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by SledgeHammer

    [B]no, the point of rotating the picture was so that it becomes easier to spot the fact that the picture on the back of the books do not match up. Look closely at the back cover of the books, you can see that the pictures are mirrored. Someone took a real photo and rotated the books cover pictures, but they goofed on the back cover, exposing it as a fake.




    Not sure what this has to do with desktop's but here is the real story on the fake picture.



    http://www.snopes.com/photos/bushbook.asp
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 1392 of 1795
    Quote:

    Originally posted by SledgeHammer

    no, the point of rotating the picture was so that it becomes easier to spot the fact that the picture on the back of the books do not match up. Look closely at the back cover of the books, you can see that the pictures are mirrored. Someone took a real photo and rotated the books cover pictures, but they goofed on the back cover, exposing it as a fake.



    Edit: Here's an illustration of what I mean





    I get what you're saying now but what's even more strange is that Bush's book is the correct one though up side down. If you rotate it so it is right side up the people sitting in the picture printed on the back cover are right side up. On the girls book they are upside down even though see is holding it right side up.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 1393 of 1795
    splinemodelsplinemodel Posts: 7,311member
    THe guy who photoshopped the bush image REFLECTED the back picture. That's why it's so confusing.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 1394 of 1795
    escherescher Posts: 1,811member
    Do we really need a picture, Photoshopped or not, to prove that Bush is an idiot? <ducks>



    Sweet dreams!



    Escher
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 1395 of 1795
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Escher

    Do we really need a picture, Photoshopped or not, to prove that Bush is an idiot? <ducks>



    Sweet dreams!



    Escher




    No, but if you want more proof, here it is:



    http://slate.msn.com/id/76886/



    Enjoy!!!
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 1396 of 1795
    Enough railing on Bush/defending Bush.



    Keep that crap in AppleOutsider.



     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 1397 of 1795
    alcimedesalcimedes Posts: 5,486member
    nice desktop brad.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 1398 of 1795
    salmonstksalmonstk Posts: 568member
    A sample from this update:

     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 1399 of 1795
    ipodandimacipodandimac Posts: 3,273member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by /mandolux/

    BTW, sorry about my website (www.mandolux.com) not been accessible at the moment (my domain service provider sucks monkey ass). You can still go to the server at mandolux.mine.nu



    until the other day i was wondering if you were the real mandolux or you just liked the site enough to make that your name. i've always enjoyed your site!
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 1400 of 1795
    escherescher Posts: 1,811member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by salmonstk

    A sample from this update:



    salmonstk: I've really enjoyed the desktops with plain backgrounds from this update and the last. However, a white background is terribly bland. You should try to play with color, e.g. light pastels or watercolor-like. I think there were two nice Pompei Red-ish ones last week.



    OTOH, I think it would be easy enough for me to add a bit of color to the background with the paint bucket tool.



    Escher
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.