'Apple Watch 2' expected to feature cellular connectivity, faster 'S2' chip
The second-generation Apple Watch, expected to arrive by this fall, may boast integrated cellular data, as well as a faster next-gen custom chip, a new report claims.
Citing unnamed sources, The Wall Street Journal claims that Apple is working on both features for its next-generation wearable device.
Apple, unsurprisingly, declined to comment, but the inclusion of an LTE radio would be a logical addition to the Apple Watch, which in its current iteration must be tethered to an iPhone for data on the go.
As for an "S2" processor, the S1 in the first-generation Apple Watch is a low-power custom chip designed to allow for a full day of usage. Initially, even the loading of apps was handled by the iPhone and wirelessly transferred to the Watch, but Apple began allowing native apps with the launch of watchOS 2 last fall.
Both moves signal Apple is looking to build a new Watch that can be used on its own on the go, without the need for an iPhone or a known Wi-Fi network. Cellular connectivity is especially important for fitness functions, as an LTE radio, in combination with a GPS receiver, could allow for fast and accurate pace and distance measurements when exercising.
The Journal also claimed that Apple sold twice as many of the Watch in its first 12 months than the company sold of the first-generation iPhone, which launched in 2007. The source of that data, however, seems to just be analyst estimates. Apple has not officially disclosed Apple Watch sales.
Apple's biggest success out of the gate remains the iPad, which sold 19.5 million units in its first year.
The "Apple Watch 2" is expected to look largely the same as the current model, with Apple instead opting to focus on internal hardware improvements. Some rumors have claimed the second-generation model will feature a larger battery and a display with improved outdoor visibility.
While a new Apple Watch is expected this year, the launch timing remains unclear. Incorrect predictions had pegged it for a March launch, while others forecast a June launch that might coincide with Apple's annual Worldwide Developers Conference. It's also possible the company could showcase an "Apple Watch 2" alongside the anticipated "iPhone 7," which is expected to be unveiled this September.
Citing unnamed sources, The Wall Street Journal claims that Apple is working on both features for its next-generation wearable device.
Apple, unsurprisingly, declined to comment, but the inclusion of an LTE radio would be a logical addition to the Apple Watch, which in its current iteration must be tethered to an iPhone for data on the go.
As for an "S2" processor, the S1 in the first-generation Apple Watch is a low-power custom chip designed to allow for a full day of usage. Initially, even the loading of apps was handled by the iPhone and wirelessly transferred to the Watch, but Apple began allowing native apps with the launch of watchOS 2 last fall.
Both moves signal Apple is looking to build a new Watch that can be used on its own on the go, without the need for an iPhone or a known Wi-Fi network. Cellular connectivity is especially important for fitness functions, as an LTE radio, in combination with a GPS receiver, could allow for fast and accurate pace and distance measurements when exercising.
The Journal also claimed that Apple sold twice as many of the Watch in its first 12 months than the company sold of the first-generation iPhone, which launched in 2007. The source of that data, however, seems to just be analyst estimates. Apple has not officially disclosed Apple Watch sales.
Apple's biggest success out of the gate remains the iPad, which sold 19.5 million units in its first year.
The "Apple Watch 2" is expected to look largely the same as the current model, with Apple instead opting to focus on internal hardware improvements. Some rumors have claimed the second-generation model will feature a larger battery and a display with improved outdoor visibility.
While a new Apple Watch is expected this year, the launch timing remains unclear. Incorrect predictions had pegged it for a March launch, while others forecast a June launch that might coincide with Apple's annual Worldwide Developers Conference. It's also possible the company could showcase an "Apple Watch 2" alongside the anticipated "iPhone 7," which is expected to be unveiled this September.
Comments
Anyway, I'm guessing it is still intended primarily as a companion device, but could gain some "independence." Perhaps this is why they are waiting to release the newer model (get the chip technology right and optimize performance and battery life).
It's not like you will be watching Netflix, though I'm sure some would like to try that.
https://www.amazon.com/dp/B013YDFHGQ/
I'm sure this full independence is in the cards for a few years down the line, but I don't believe the technology is quite there yet. I have the same technology concern for throwing in GPS functionality, with battery life a significant issue.
Alternatively/equivalently, they could have a trade-in program where people get non-trivial $$ credit towards a new Watch when trading in an old one.
If they don't do something like this then they might as well drop the Edition entirely. There just aren't that many people who are going to spend thousands on a watch that is obsolete in two years.
Why? Would 2-days make it better or just mean you'd forget which day it needs to be charged. Until battery technology evolves to the point where the thing lasts a month or more, a solid day's use is the perfect battery life. Just throw it on the charger each night. Simple.
I understand that many features should be independent in AW, but phone call. I rather have GPS than LTE in AW.
A
I don't regret my decision at all, personally. I don't need cellular connectivity and I also don't see needing faster third-party app support right now. I didn't want the sport and $599 for the SS was a bit much for me; $399 placed it in a very alluring sweet sport. If after any software updates this summer and fall it's just to slow, I'll probably be able to see it for the same $399.
Seriously though, as soon as the watch becomes independent, people will have an interesting array of devices to choose from depending on their daily needs and workflows. Do you need to always be connected to calls, email, texts, news, and social media, but often aren't in places where surfing the web is necessary or appropriate? Apple Watch is an excellent solution. If you need all that AND internet/video content, you then have screen size options from 4" up to 12.9" from which to choose. That's not to mention the same array of computing solutions Apple provides. I love having the choice to choose exactly what device will benefit me the most, rather than trying to find a one-size-fits-all device.