Just used a clamshell iBook for the first time... sweeeeet!

Posted:
in General Discussion edited January 2014
I know this sounds like a silly topic for a post, but I was at a computer store a couple days ago and I used a clamshell iBook for the first time, a graphite 366 MHz one. Wow. I have to say, I wish they still made computers like that.



The two parts that really struck me were the case material and the hinge. The entire thing was extremely smooth with just the slightest texture to it. The trackpad was very nice, better than the more heavily textured trackpads like on the TiBook my dad has. The hinge was great - it moved like a knife through hot butter while adjusting, but there was absolutely no play at all, and it stopped moving the moment I stopped moving it. No slippage.



Now I want one. Unfortunatley, the place wanted $750 for it, which is a bit of a ripoff. The trackpad also had two dents in it that didn't really affect anything, but still decrease the value. Also, I don't really have any need for one... I have a perfectly useful desktop system and I don't have much need for a laptop. But if I ever do get the need for a powerful but cheap supplemental laptop, that's definitely what I'm getting.



Any clamshell owners out there who want to sound off? I think this is really an underrated machine. People make fun of it because of the excess of case plastic, the flashy colors, the handle, and the semi-low 800x600 resolution, but as far as I know it's one of Apple's best-built laptops.
«1

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 32
    I have one. Blueberry 300 mhz to be exact. I bought it and an airport and airport card i think December of 99. Its still my main (and only) computer.



    About the track pad. Yes! you're correct. Its the best trackpad ever. Your finger slides over it much easier than any other one I've used.



    It also feels more sturdy than the newer laptops. Not flimsy and wobbly. It sure makes it seem like a well built machine.
  • Reply 2 of 32
    I only ever made fun of its 800x600 display Well, yes, it is a tad big (and heavy, ~7lbs), but then again, I'm still using a PowerBook 2400...
  • Reply 3 of 32
    lucaluca Posts: 3,833member
    My school has a laptop rental program. $3.50 per day, from 8 AM to 5 PM, and you pick either an Inspiron 3800 running Win98 or an iBook running OS 9. Either way, it's already set up for wireless internet throughout campus. I think I'll try that out some day, it's not very expensive.



    [ 12-02-2002: Message edited by: Luca Rescigno ]</p>
  • Reply 4 of 32
    emaneman Posts: 7,204member
    It wouldn't be bad if the screen was 1024x768.
  • Reply 5 of 32
    progmacprogmac Posts: 1,850member
    i just found a blueberry 300mhz original for $325 shipped. too bad i'm so nice and letting my girlfriend have it! the things one does for love.
  • Reply 6 of 32
    paulpaul Posts: 5,278member
    [quote]Originally posted by EmAn:

    <strong>It wouldn't be bad if the screen was 1024x768.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    yes, especially in OS X



    My grandmother uses this computer....



    I have not yet installed os X on it mainly because she doesnt know how to use it yet and because on a 800X600 screen, it would be impossible to use almost... :hmmmm:
  • Reply 7 of 32
    g4dudeg4dude Posts: 1,016member
    I bought a 366 iBook earlier this fall only because it was so cheap ($250). This thing kicked ass! It has such style and no new mac comes close to it. I installed OSX on it for the guy who bought it. OSX is great on it! There is no problem with the 800X600. I love these little machines and so do the ladies. I can't even count the number of chicks that came up to me and started talking to me about my cute computer. I think Apple should have revised this design and not gone to the new iBook style. And people that bitch about weight can shut up because it is not heavy at all; people just like to whine.
  • Reply 8 of 32
    pscatespscates Posts: 5,847member
    I had a Rev. B tangerine (big surprise) iBook for a little less than a year. I loved it, but it was kinda unnecessary because I also had a more powerful, larger-screen iMac DV at the time that I always found myself working on.



    I didn't travel enough to justify it, but I did enjoy it while I had it. Definitely cool-looking and an attention getter!



    I wish Apple would have a "reissue" series clamshell iBook, only this time with 800MHz G3, FireWire, etc. (all the I/O, drive sizes and optical drive choices of the current dual-USB iChiclets).



    Now THAT would be a bitching laptop: tangerine, but with a speedy processor and more up-to-date ports and specs!



    If I ever get a laptop again, it'll be one powerful and full-featured enough to be my one - and only - computer, that I use at home, lug around, etc. Either a Titanium PowerBook G4, OR snap up a G4-based iBook when that computer makes its inevitable move to that processor.



    But the "toilet seat" iBooks were indeed gorgeous and cool as hell...and the first laptop to ever make me want to OWN a laptop, so...







    [ 12-02-2002: Message edited by: pscates ]



    [ 12-02-2002: Message edited by: pscates ]</p>
  • Reply 9 of 32
    emaneman Posts: 7,204member
    [quote]Originally posted by G4Dude:

    <strong>I bought a 366 iBook earlier this fall only because it was so cheap ($250). This thing kicked ass! It has such style and no new mac comes close to it. I installed OSX on it for the guy who bought it. OSX is great on it! There is no problem with the 800X600. I love these little machines and so do the ladies. I can't even count the number of chicks that came up to me and started talking to me about my cute computer. I think Apple should have revised this design and not gone to the new iBook style. And people that bitch about weight can shut up because it is not heavy at all; people just like to whine.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    I know if it wasn't for the dual-USB iBooks I never would've gotten an iBook.
  • Reply 10 of 32
    g4dudeg4dude Posts: 1,016member
    [quote]Originally posted by EmAn:

    <strong>



    I know if it wasn't for the dual-USB iBooks I never would've gotten an iBook.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    Well, the dual USB iBooks are superior spec wise. But they could have thrown a 13.3" LCD in the toilet seat and made some refinements to the case and changes to the ports, etc. and it would have the been the most bitchin' laptop around.
  • Reply 11 of 32
    I owned a Tangerine iBook/300 for about two years. It was my first laptop and I really loved it a great deal. The handle was such a pleasant little innovation. The size was a bit constrictive, and while I could deal with lugging it around airports and dealing with the undue (or fully merited, depending on your view) attention it received from security agents, I was less than pleased with how it simply couldn't fit in my lap in coach class on an airplane. I'd love to get ahold of one again, as the old one now labors on for a friend who needed one for a summer journalism job. I replaced it with a Dual USB / Combo Drive unit right after they were released, and while I do miss the handle, just about everything else about the newer iBooks makes me ever so glad that I bought one. I just played with an 800mhz unit tonight and am terribly jealous. The iBook family has been a consistently great product from Apple in both of its form factors.
  • Reply 12 of 32
    Where are you guys finding all these iBooks for so cheap? I love those old iBooks and I want one badly.
  • Reply 13 of 32
    emaneman Posts: 7,204member
    [quote]Originally posted by G4Dude:

    <strong>



    Well, the dual USB iBooks are superior spec wise. But they could have thrown a 13.3" LCD in the toilet seat and made some refinements to the case and changes to the ports, etc. and it would have the been the most bitchin' laptop around.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    I still wouldn't have gotten it. The Dual-USB iBooks are much better looking IMO. The clamshells are cool but the dual-usb's are great looking.
  • Reply 14 of 32
    jeffyboyjeffyboy Posts: 1,055member
    In addition to sweet looks, those things are TOUGH!

    I've unintentionally put my Graphite SE through Hell.

    It's survived drops, bumps, spills, and (no joke) me slipping and sliding down a pretty steep, snowy hill at our local state park with it in my backpack!

    It still runs like a champ.



    I've never owned one of the newer models, but I find it hard to believe Apple's claims that the new 'books were more durable that the originals.



    Jeff
  • Reply 15 of 32
    you guys are crazy!!! the Clamshell iBooks suck compared to whats available now!! the Dual USB iBooks are awesome. Ive got one. 2001 model...
  • Reply 16 of 32
    lucaluca Posts: 3,833member
    Maybe so, but the new iBooks aren't as inexpensive. Try getting one for under $500!



    The old ones are more solid. Yes, they are slower, but the 466 is a great value and it has a DVD-ROM drive, which many iBooks do not.
  • Reply 17 of 32
    amorphamorph Posts: 7,112member
    I have a weak spot for the old clamshell iBooks. They were much warmer and more tactile, and incredibly comfortable to use.



    Some of the colors were dubious (the first graphite model was ugly), but the tangerine iBook ranks as one of the most stunning computers ever made. It actually seemed to glow. The first time I saw one in person, all I could do was stare.



    The new iBook is very nice, but I really wouldn't mind if it had some of the character - and some of the tactile quality - that the clamshell has.
  • Reply 18 of 32
    [quote]Originally posted by Luca Rescigno:

    <strong>

    The old ones are more solid. Yes, they are slower, but the 466 is a great value and it has a DVD-ROM drive, which many iBooks do not.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    <img src="graemlins/bugeye.gif" border="0" alt="[Skeptical]" />



    MOST of the new iBooks either come with CD-ROM, DVD-ROM or the Combo drive (CD-RW/DVD-ROM)



    So you cant say that many iBooks dont have a DVD drive...



    Also the older iBooks suck resolution wise....



    800x600 is too small for the average computer user...



    <img src="graemlins/oyvey.gif" border="0" alt="[No]" />







    [ 12-05-2002: Message edited by: Proud iBook Owner 2k2 ]</p>
  • Reply 19 of 32
    Heh... now you guys are speechless... I showed you!!
  • Reply 20 of 32
    cosmocosmo Posts: 662member
    [quote]Originally posted by Proud iBook Owner 2k2:

    <strong>

    Also the older iBooks suck resolution wise....



    800x600 is too small for the average computer user... </strong><hr></blockquote>



    800x600 is fine for users who aren't using photoshop or any other power apps. It is perfect for people who are just doing word processing, web browsing and email.
Sign In or Register to comment.