Over 1.2B profiles found in unsecured server shows severity of data collection by tech fir...

2»

Comments

  • Reply 21 of 22
    gatorguygatorguy Posts: 24,612member
    badmonk said:
    So how is “People Data Labs” not culpable?  They supply a thousand customer data profiles a month to anyone who says they will not misuse OUR data.

    Seriously???  And we think this is OK?   I am sorry....maybe these multiple small data firms are the problem and maybe big tech shouldn’t be broken up.
    According to Gartner the leading sources of marketing data points for sale (aka personal data) outside of consumer credit agencies are:
    Adobe, Salesforce, Oracle and Marketo.
    https://adage.com/article/digital/marketing-technology-explained/308661

    and this page broadly explains where People's Data Lab gets its personal data. In a nutshell 1000's of sources. 
    https://docs.peopledatalabs.com/docs/data-sources
    You can even download some free sample datasets from them, ones that most of us would consider to be personal data
    https://docs.peopledatalabs.com/docs/open-data

    So that data discussed in the AI article consisting of of "approximately 4 terabytes of personal data, amounting to about 1.2 billion records, compiled into databases." is very likely the "free" data that People Data Labs offers. The paid stuff is far more detailed, extensive, and personal. 

    edited November 2019
  • Reply 22 of 22
    gatorguygatorguy Posts: 24,612member
    torsti said:
    torsti said:
    No news about Apple. Oh! Let's just add A still from an Apple marketing campaign. Smart News. :D
    At the end of the article it mentions Cook has suggested restrictions on corporate data harvesting and data sharing to prevent exactly this sort of problem. 
    Yes, but Apple is not in the 1.2 billion.
    Who said it was?

    Lots of stories on AI cover Google, Facebook, and other big tech stories. That this data harvesting and unsecured storage on a publicly discoverable sever involves firms like Google, a competitor of Apple...
    Yup the story involved Google in the same way a story about fruit flies mentioning one was found sitting on a MacBook. It doesn't make it an Apple or Google story.

    The fact that Mr. Cook uses privacy as a defining marketing schema does make it an appropriate subject for an article IMHO tho using an iPhone would in no way prevent you being one of the 1.2 billion people whose personal and even sensitive information is for direct sale. 
    edited November 2019
Sign In or Register to comment.