Foxconn moving iPhone production to combat coronavirus production loss, says Ming-Chi Kuo
Apple analyst Ming-Chi Kuo sees significant uncertainty surrounding iPhone production in China because of the ongoing coronavirus, and has detailed what he is seeing so far at Apple assemblers Foxconn and Pegatron.
iPhone 11 (left) and iPhone 11 Pro (right)
In a note seen by AppleInsider Ming-Chi Kuo believes that there is more than just issues surrounding Foxconn for Apple. Besides just Foxconn, Pegatron will have problems soon if they haven't manifested already, and the entire supply chain has been shaken by the extended holiday ordered by the Chinese government.
Kuo believes that Apple's Zhengzhou site is the most critical iPhone production site, and is responsible for the bulk of the iPhone 11 and iPhone 11 Pro assemblies. It isn't clear when the factory will open, and Kuo thinks that the labor return rate will be between 40% and 60% of what the factory will need for full production.
Furthermore, the Shenzhen facility is impacted. Kuo sees most of the "iPhone 12" development there -- but that team didn't stop working. However, labor is impacted, with the return rate only being as high as 50% and possibly as low as 30% of pre-shutdown levels.
To hopefully deal with some of these problems, Kuo asserts that some production has been moved to India and Taiwan, but "capacities are limited" at those facilities.
Pegatron has two critical, and impacted, facilities. The first, Shanghai, resumed work on February 3, with a labor return rate of about 90%. But, Kuo is expecting resignations, lowering the workforce to about 60% after pay is doled out in February.
Kuo speculates that Pegatron's Kunshan facility is in charge of "iPhone SE 2" production. The original start date for production was February 10, but that has since been postponed. The labor return rate is predicted to be between 40% and 60% of pre-holiday levels.
In the case of Foxconn, it said at the end of January provisions were being made to meet its production obligations. Foxconn operates a facility in Wuhan, along with other firms in the Apple supply chain.
While originally speculating a reopening of production on February 10, the company has also contacted staff to warn them not to return to work on that date. It has also taken steps to quarantine returning workers for up to two weeks to prevent further infections.
Reports have also suggested Foxconn was being prevented from opening up its facilities by local officials following an inspection, with concerns over the high density of employees and circulated air systems cited. Local authorities have denied the reports, advising on Sunday discussions with the company are ongoing, including talks over plans to minimize the coronavirus' spread.
During the January 28 Apple financial results conference call, Apple CEO Tim Cook said the company was "gathering lots of data points and monitoring (the situation) very closely." Cook also raised the existence of "alternate sourcing and contingency plans" for factories in affected areas, and admitted factory reopening delays were factored into its guidance.
As of February 9, the World Health Organization reported there have been 37,558 confirmed cases of the coronavirus worldwide, and 813 deaths. The majority of infections are based in China, making up 37,251 of the total with 6,188 deemed to be "severe," and 812 deaths.
iPhone 11 (left) and iPhone 11 Pro (right)
In a note seen by AppleInsider Ming-Chi Kuo believes that there is more than just issues surrounding Foxconn for Apple. Besides just Foxconn, Pegatron will have problems soon if they haven't manifested already, and the entire supply chain has been shaken by the extended holiday ordered by the Chinese government.
Kuo believes that Apple's Zhengzhou site is the most critical iPhone production site, and is responsible for the bulk of the iPhone 11 and iPhone 11 Pro assemblies. It isn't clear when the factory will open, and Kuo thinks that the labor return rate will be between 40% and 60% of what the factory will need for full production.
Furthermore, the Shenzhen facility is impacted. Kuo sees most of the "iPhone 12" development there -- but that team didn't stop working. However, labor is impacted, with the return rate only being as high as 50% and possibly as low as 30% of pre-shutdown levels.
To hopefully deal with some of these problems, Kuo asserts that some production has been moved to India and Taiwan, but "capacities are limited" at those facilities.
Pegatron has two critical, and impacted, facilities. The first, Shanghai, resumed work on February 3, with a labor return rate of about 90%. But, Kuo is expecting resignations, lowering the workforce to about 60% after pay is doled out in February.
Kuo speculates that Pegatron's Kunshan facility is in charge of "iPhone SE 2" production. The original start date for production was February 10, but that has since been postponed. The labor return rate is predicted to be between 40% and 60% of pre-holiday levels.
Working around the virus
While the ongoing growth of the coronavirus outbreak will hurt Apple's business to a currently-unknown extent, the main hit for the company will be on the production side rather than retail. Apple's main production of its products takes place in China, the main country affected by the outbreak, with steps being taken by assembly partners involved to minimize its effects.In the case of Foxconn, it said at the end of January provisions were being made to meet its production obligations. Foxconn operates a facility in Wuhan, along with other firms in the Apple supply chain.
While originally speculating a reopening of production on February 10, the company has also contacted staff to warn them not to return to work on that date. It has also taken steps to quarantine returning workers for up to two weeks to prevent further infections.
Reports have also suggested Foxconn was being prevented from opening up its facilities by local officials following an inspection, with concerns over the high density of employees and circulated air systems cited. Local authorities have denied the reports, advising on Sunday discussions with the company are ongoing, including talks over plans to minimize the coronavirus' spread.
During the January 28 Apple financial results conference call, Apple CEO Tim Cook said the company was "gathering lots of data points and monitoring (the situation) very closely." Cook also raised the existence of "alternate sourcing and contingency plans" for factories in affected areas, and admitted factory reopening delays were factored into its guidance.
As of February 9, the World Health Organization reported there have been 37,558 confirmed cases of the coronavirus worldwide, and 813 deaths. The majority of infections are based in China, making up 37,251 of the total with 6,188 deemed to be "severe," and 812 deaths.
Comments
One more outbreak and it's game over.
The current situation is about to disrupt auto manufacturing globally, for example.
It depends. Apple is a JIT manufacturer, which implies a LOT of concurrent processes, timed to perfection. That gives them an edge in terms of profitability. Duplicating capacity, which then sits idle, would slash productivity. So no, it's not black and white.
"Second; Apple must address the hypocrisy of doing business in China and crying about human rights at the same time."
Highly simplistic POV. Apple promotes human rights at every opportunity within China. It has gone a long way towards opening up that society. Witness the hugely anti-establishment backlash to the death of Dr. Li Wenliang, the heroic Chinese 34 year old who tried to get the warning out about novel coronavirus back on December 30th.
Now, you may not agree with the "engage" versus "boycott" philosophy, and that's fine. But you can't say it isn't an alternative with a track record of some success. Contrast that with the "my way or the highway" approach of the present administration's trade war with China, that only drew back from a huge impact on our economy when that same administration back-pedaled furiously on their demands.
We have problems in the US too and I’m sure if China turns around and accuses us of violating human rights, we’d all be giving China the middle-finger and tell it to butt-out. It goes both ways.
i realise this is an apple website, however this is not Apple will be hit by production issues, rather all companies using china as a manufacturing or assembling hub will be hit.
more interesting - which will be hurt more by this.. china and chinese companies, or the companies and countries that contract the chinese...
which will endure some short term loss better.
i think we all know
https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/situation-reports/
Following graph shows it nicely :
https://www.worldometers.info/coronavirus/coronavirus-cases/
(daily cases worldwide)