Xmac is coming

135

Comments

  • Reply 41 of 85
    cyko95cyko95 Posts: 391member
    An Xserve for all of your Xservices.



    An Xmac for all of your Xfiles.



  • Reply 42 of 85
    drewpropsdrewprops Posts: 2,321member
    What a lameass thread.

    Damn, I miss the good old days of AI.

    Just Damn.
  • Reply 43 of 85
    lemon bon bonlemon bon bon Posts: 2,383member
    How about they call the new 'power'Mac next year...y'know...the 'G5' we're after...



    'Mac 5'?



    I mean...that's pretty fast...aint it?



    lemon bon bon :eek:
  • Reply 44 of 85
    [quote]Originally posted by Merlion:

    <strong>



    Dude you totally sux! Why bother posting such drivel. Where the hell is Kormac and Dorsal. These wanna-bees are killing me.



    Long live the true insiders!





    <img src="graemlins/smokin.gif" border="0" alt="[Chilling]" /> </strong><hr></blockquote>



    Well, if I remeber correctly what Dorsal said before MWNY02, it was that July would bring disappointment, and August will make us happy.



    So this could in fact fall in place for us.
  • Reply 45 of 85
    nebagakidnebagakid Posts: 2,692member
    [quote]Originally posted by tekmember:

    <strong>The "x" brand is coming soon. Xserve is just the begining. Thats about all I can say. What I know at this point is there will be at least 2 more products with the x brand at this time.</strong><hr></blockquote>





    This is not true, the only thing you have to go on

    is that there is a name. At least my crazy cell phone thread had a little evidence.... powerMac and PowerBook are great names <img src="graemlins/smokin.gif" border="0" alt="[Chilling]" />
  • Reply 46 of 85
    hobbeshobbes Posts: 1,252member
    I don't think we'll see a rebranding until Apple is ready with whatever follows the G4.



    Could "xMac" be the branding for Apple's much-speculated new, powerful, (and no doubt very expensive) workstation models, with a flavor of Power4/5?



    And can Apple really afford to have yet another product line?



    Not sure if "xMac" exactly rolls off the tongue (ex-Mac?) but anything Apple can do to improve the current situation is worth considering.
  • Reply 47 of 85
    wwworkwwwork Posts: 140member
    It seems more and more these threads are about power - whereas the lack of knowledge about future chip speeds puts the AI reader in a position of powerlessness (however slight that position might be).



    The false poster gains power (relative to these boards) in an equal amount to false repudiator/rumor-rejector. To claim a rumor is false implies an equivalency of knowledge to someone who posts a rumor as true. Within the limited range of future hardware possibilities (chip speeds 1 to 3 GHz, firewire 2 etc. & whatever) saying a rumor is false is the same as saying it is true. We might ask with the same sort of interest and zeal "How do you know the next PM will stink? What are your sources?".



    Everything is a guess until it ships. I quit.
  • Reply 48 of 85
    crusadercrusader Posts: 1,129member
    That was deep. But it makes sense, I still hold Rok in semi-godliness ever since the amazing prediction of the new imac's design to have a base and be "semicircular". Of course I don't pretend to have insider info, I just make obscure guesses about the future .
  • Reply 49 of 85
    amorphamorph Posts: 7,112member
    This really isn't news. The machines tekserve is referring to won't replace the PowerMac line: they're likely to be new entries in Apple's rack server line. We know those are coming, because Steve said as much during the XServe unveiling.



    [ 07-30-2002: Message edited by: Amorph ]</p>
  • Reply 49 of 85
    progmacprogmac Posts: 1,850member
    Will Apple release some XXX products? now THAT would be interesting!
  • Reply 51 of 85
    cooopcooop Posts: 390member
    [quote] Well, if I remeber correctly what Dorsal said before MWNY02, it was that July would bring disappointment, and August will make us happy.<hr></blockquote>Now it's true that I didn't read his thread from beginning to end but his title did clearly state that MWNY 02 was Apple's year...
  • Reply 52 of 85
    the g5the g5 Posts: 42member
    who cares about the name, or the color or any of these other superficial issues. i just want a ****ing fast computer. i don't care if it's in a beige box.
  • Reply 53 of 85
    nonsuchnonsuch Posts: 293member
    [quote]Originally posted by myahmac:

    <strong>took you long enough jd. i never thought i was going to see your telling of the doom apple and them not getting the 750 off till 2004. </strong><hr></blockquote>



    JYD's post was entirely accurate. If the 7500 is indeed still "on the drawing board," we're not goint to see it in a machine until 2004. However, I think Tekmember wasn't choosing his words quite accurately and that the 7500 is indeed due "soon," which to me suggests within 6-9 months. That would agree with most of the other rumors I think.
  • Reply 54 of 85
    satchmosatchmo Posts: 2,699member
    While the starter of this thread probably has absolutely nothing in terms of info, I do think the whole "x" brand might have legs.



    And while frankly, I'm getting tired of the whole letter branding, the "x" designation might be appropriate to distinguish the professional line from the consumer branded "i" products.
  • Reply 55 of 85
    blizaineblizaine Posts: 239member
    [quote]Originally posted by Lemon Bon Bon:

    <strong>How about they call the new 'power'Mac next year...y'know...the 'G5' we're after...



    'Mac 5'?



    I mean...that's pretty fast...aint it?



    lemon bon bon :eek: </strong><hr></blockquote>



    or 'PowerMach' 5-G's... Feel the blood rush to your head during this bake-off...
  • Reply 56 of 85
    [quote]Originally posted by tekmember:

    <strong>also the 7500 is coming soon .</strong><hr></blockquote>



    Thank god for the return of the 7500. Now maybe they will fab some more of those 1MB L2 caches. Those suckers are hard to find! I also need another drive sled but dont want to $16US+Shipping for 2 of them.



    <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" /> <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" /> <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" />
  • Reply 57 of 85
    cindercinder Posts: 381member
    Apple is going straightedge.



    xXPowerMacXx
  • Reply 58 of 85
    snoopysnoopy Posts: 1,901member
    The 7500 could be a G5 from Motorola. Maybe they came through with it in secrecy. If so, the idea of a G5 from IBM is wrong in assuming that Motorola could not produce an Apple G5 by now. If it's a G5, that is what really counts -- workstation computing power for the Mac. So this does fit the picture of what Apple needs in the way of hardware, now that they own high end video applications companies. I could see Steve calling such workstation class Macs the XMacs. All I want for XMas is an XMac. Do you think that would make it as a jingle?
  • Reply 59 of 85
    I just wanted to post what I think might just be the most ignorant attempt at starting a rumor - EVER!!!



    [quote] It is on the drawing board and coming soon. <hr></blockquote>



    Sheeeeeeeeeeeesh!



    Yes Virginia, it only takes a few weeks to go from concept to store shelves with a new technology... and by the way, there really is a Santa Clause.



    <img src="graemlins/oyvey.gif" border="0" alt="[No]" />



    [ 07-30-2002: Message edited by: idoaudio ]</p>
  • Reply 60 of 85
    To me an"Xserve" needs an "Xstation"- not an "Xmac."



    It makes sense, at least to me, that servers and assorted hardware will be differentiated from stand alone Power Macs by NOT including "Mac" in their title.



    Educational- eMac

    Consumer- iBook,iMac, iPod,(eMac??)

    Creative Professionals- PowerMac, PowerBook, Mac Server G4

    Industrial High End- Xserve, Xstation



    My bet is that August 13 will bring miniature Xstations with mobos like the Xserve and simply speed bumped Power Macs.
Sign In or Register to comment.