Apple uses WWDC to launch assaults on Google strongholds

Posted:
in General Discussion edited June 2020
Apple's upcoming stable of software updates will introduce a fiery onslaught of new features designed to lure consumers away from some of Google's legacy businesses and services.

Apple has launched a new volley of attacks on Google's stronghold services.
Apple has launched a new volley of attacks on Google's stronghold services.


At its all-virtual WWDC 2020 keynote, Apple announced iOS 14, macOS Big Sur, watchOS 7, tvOS 14 and other related software developments.

What Apple didn't announce, and what hasn't been talked about much, is the fact that many of the features of those platforms are obvious volleys at Google strongholds like Google Translate, Google Chrome and even Google Search.

Apple versus Google

Apple and Google got their start as companies with markets largely separate from each other. Apple has long been a hardware-first company, while Google was initially only a search engine. As the years have gone by, the lines have become much more blurred.

Google's Android smartphone OS launched in 2008 and the company's first-party Nexus smartphones followed in 2010. Apple has been slowly shifting to a Services business, seemingly encroaching on Google's core services year by year.

The rivalry between Apple and Google hasn't been as legendary as the one between Apple and Microsoft, of course. But the last decade has seen a rise in the two companies releasing rival services and products. For hardware, Google has released first-party devices like the Google Pixel and Google Chromebooks. Apple's software entrants over the past decade include iCloud and Apple Maps, although the latter service has had its issues over the years.

In these cases, the services and products have still been distinct. Apple's services are deeply integrated into its ecosystem and, generally, more private. Google's hardware tends to be lower-cost than Apple's premium price tags.

However, the background rivalry between Apple and Google appears to have reached a new level with Apple's recent WWDC 2020 announcements.

New attacks on Google in Apple's 2020 software

Although Apple and Google may not directly compete on every level, Apple's WWDC 2020 conference made it clear that the Cupertino tech giant is coming after some of Google's core services.

Here are a few prominent examples.

Apple Maps versus Google Maps

Guides in Apple Maps is similar in function to Google Maps' personalized recommendations, but feature human curation element.
Guides in Apple Maps is similar in function to Google Maps' personalized recommendations, but feature human curation element.


There was certainly a time when Apple Maps lagged far behind Google's navigation offering. Those days are over, and Apple is continuing to go after the mapping heavyweight.

The addition of cycling directions has eliminated a long-standing absence for urban commuters and Apple's electric vehicle routing goes a step beyond Google's simple EV charging locator. New features warning drivers of red light cameras or speed traps align Apple Maps's functionality with Google platforms like Waze.

Although Guides isn't a direct analog for Google Maps' personalized recommendations, it competes in Apple fashion: offering curated recommendations from people, rather than algorithms.

Apple's translation platforms versus Google Translate

The Translate app, as well as native translation in Safari, are coming after Google Translate's dominance.
The Translate app, as well as native translation in Safari, are coming after Google Translate's dominance.


For the longest time, when you needed a quick and simple translation, you typed "Google Translate" into your browser URL bar. In Apple's new slate of software updates, that could change.

Apple's built-in Translate app in iOS 14 seems tailor-made to be a Google Translate-killer on iPhones and iPads. The feature is also offered in Siri, offering functionality that Google Translate doesn't.

On macOS Big Sur, Apple's Safari browser is also getting native translation -- meaning that Mac Safari users won't even need to navigate to a separate web page to read content in other languages.

Safari Web Extensions versus Google Chrome extensions

During a WWDC video session, Apple showed off a new API that lets developers port existing extensions for Chrome or Firefox to Safari.
During a WWDC video session, Apple showed off a new API that lets developers port existing extensions for Chrome or Firefox to Safari.


Google Chrome is currently the world's most popular browser. And even though Safari is thoroughly baked into Apple's operating systems, there are still plenty of users who forego it for Chrome.

Although there are likely a myriad of reasons for it, Chrome has always had something that Safari hasn't. Namely, support for powerful and diverse web extensions.

In macOS Big Sur, Apple is rolling out its own Safari Web Extensions initiative that will see similar capabilities coming to the browser. It's a small change, but one that allows Safari to better compete with Chrome.

Widgets on iOS versus Android customization

Widgets add a layer of customization to iOS that Apple has long avoided.
Widgets add a layer of customization to iOS that Apple has long avoided.


Apple is not going to make iOS more like Android. But the company probably doesn't have anything against borrowing ideas that users want from its rival operating systems. Take Widgets, which were announced as a prominent feature for iOS 14.

Widgets may look and feel more like Windows Live Tiles than the Android home screen, but they take iOS customization a step in Android's direction. The ability to have weather and other useful apps on the Home screen is distinctly Android-like. The same goes for the new call and Siri user interfaces.

Apple isn't going to make iOS an Android clone. Deeper Home screen functionality and less obtrusive call interfaces has long been on the user iOS wish list. Apple is just taking those wishes into account.

Direct search on iOS and iPadOS versus Google Search

Apple's new Search feature, available on iOS and iPadOS, can take users directly to websites and sidestep Google search.
Apple's new Search feature, available on iOS and iPadOS, can take users directly to websites and sidestep Google search.


Apple isn't making a search engine, although some analysts believe Apple should buy privacy-focused engine DuckDuckGo. On the other hand, the new Search feature in iOS 14 and iPadOS 14 is an interesting step in that direction.

It isn't necessarily a search engine, but it does mimic some of the functionality of one. In addition to launching apps or finding on-device content, the new Search in iOS and iPadOS can find web answers and take users directly to websites.

That's notable because it can allow users to side-step Google entirely -- at least in some cases. If there's any feature, however small, that suggests Apple is encroaching on Google's core businesses, it's this one.

What this escalation means for Apple and Google

Apple and Google are rivals, but have been willing to partner on some projects -- such as the Exposure Notification framework.
Apple and Google are rivals, but have been willing to partner on some projects -- such as the Exposure Notification framework.


Apple and Google are not mortal enemies. Their relationship is much more complicated than that. The two companies have shown a willingness to work together on certain projects, including, most notably, the Apple-Google contact tracing API. Although there were extraordinary circumstances driving that partnership, it did represent a

Google and Alphabet CEO Sundar Pichai has since said that he's "committed" to finding other opportunities to collaborate with the Cupertino tech giant. At the time, he also noted that he regularly talks with Apple CEO Tim Cook and that the two tech giants do periodically collaborate on projects.

The two companies are still competitors, however. And they also disagree on some fundamental core values, such as data privacy.

More than that, it's likely that these new features are not necessarily direct assaults on Google. Instead, they're a natural side effect of Apple shifting away from being a hardware company and toward a services giant.

Apple's Services business is expected to overtake the iPhone as the company's primary revenue driver. With growth like that, Apple is undoubtedly going to step on toes in the software services sector.

The company has long tried to consolidate and streamline its hardware supply chain. The switch to Apple Silicon is just evidence of that. Apple is undoubtedly doing something similar for services.

By offering better first-party apps and software, Apple can keep its users on its business -- and reap some of the monetary rewards as a result. In exchange, Apple gives users services that are privacy-respective and much more deeply integrated with its hardware.

In other words, Apple's intention isn't just to go after Google. But when it creates software and app offerings that "just work" better, its competitors and contemporaries are going to feel it.
watto_cobra
«1

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 29
    The more competition that Google has especially for its basic services the better IMHO. They have had it far too easy for far too long.
    They have had it so easy to track us and build a picture of our lives.
    I have tried to avoid using google for anything for at least 9 years but it is difficult. The make life easy for devs. For example those idiotic Capta's. I have to unblock google.com about once a week just to get them to work.

    As for this move by Apple, bring it on. It won't be easy. Their 'stuff' is in just about everything we do on the internet.

    Once upon a time google told its staff 'Do No Evil'. They seem to have erased the word 'No' about 10 years ago.
    patchythepiratecornchipjony0Gabylollivercat52watto_cobra
  • Reply 2 of 29
    cpsrocpsro Posts: 3,212member
    In the keynote, I was amused by the Safari tracker blocking, when it was shown the trackers that had been blocked looked like they were all properties owned by Google.
    chasmpatchythepiratejony0lolliverF_Kent_Dcat52watto_cobra
  • Reply 3 of 29
    DAalsethDAalseth Posts: 2,842member
    Well for starters how about matching Google Drive for storage tiers and price points?
    lkruppOferCloudTalkinroundaboutnowcornchipjony0
  • Reply 4 of 29
    chasmchasm Posts: 3,390member
    Agreed with Cpsro, Mike P missed the BIGGEST assault on Google -- the tracker and analytics blocking! Otherwise a good roundup of the other ways Apple is reducing its dependence on Google (let's not call it a war -- Google will be fine so there won't be any "winner"). This will continue to attract privacy-conscious people to the Apple platform jus as it already attracts value-conscious people, and finally there will be some full-throated alternatives to some Google services for those who want that.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 5 of 29
    FatmanFatman Posts: 513member
    Frenemies ... Apple also is adopting VP9 and WebP and allowing users to select default browser and mail clients - it’s a balance. 
    lkruppwatto_cobra
  • Reply 6 of 29
    riverkoriverko Posts: 232member
    Well, for smaller regions Google sadly still remains the best option. Apple tends to ignore almost everything outside of US... even of Google isn’t perfect, still offering at least something. At this moment Apple is simply not doing enough for us even if it earns so much money that to hire few more people to get the support wouldn’t be of such costs and could bring new revenues...
    lkrupp
  • Reply 7 of 29
    bloggerblogbloggerblog Posts: 2,478member
    The problem with Apple is that they’ll do something great then abandon it for years on end before coming back to update it. Persistence is going to be the key. 
    lkruppcornchip
  • Reply 8 of 29
    First: Competition is good, it's great, it may help defuse the naive politicos that see big tech as monopolies. 
    Second: In most cases mentioned above, Apple's enhancements make the Apple experience better but have negligible impact on Google's revenue.
    Third: Two exceptions:
    - Maps: Maps provide a starting point for many revenue generation and customer stickiness items. Apple is finally catching up.
    - Extensions ++: Several services require Chrome browsers, which then forces some users to default to Chrome. Again Apple is catching up
    Fourth: Apple's Pixel seems more like an experiment, than a business. We just saw Microsoft drop their experiment in retail stores. Google may drop Pixel some day. Pixel is a barely OK business. The problem is that Pixel can only take revenue from Android clone partners, none from iPhone.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 9 of 29
    agree with all the points here, but the strongest indicator for me was the snoop tracker. when amazon’s and google’s name appeared on the example, apple made clear the writing on the wal. 
    lolliverwatto_cobra
  • Reply 10 of 29
    This is or them crap is played out and should have ended in the 90s with MS vs Apple. Stop looking for clicks AI. 
  • Reply 11 of 29
    I agree with the basic premise, and I also agree that they should purchase DuckDuckGo, and then develop their own web crawler to replace Bing.  
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 12 of 29
    chasm said:
    Agreed with Cpsro, Mike P missed the BIGGEST assault on Google -- the tracker and analytics blocking! Otherwise a good roundup of the other ways Apple is reducing its dependence on Google (let's not call it a war -- Google will be fine so there won't be any "winner"). This will continue to attract privacy-conscious people to the Apple platform jus as it already attracts value-conscious people, and finally there will be some full-throated alternatives to some Google services for those who want that.
    Unfortunately, that analytics blocking turned out to be not so true.  Updated from AI's original article:
    Update: As more information has surfaced, it appears that Intelligent Tracking Prevention (ITP) in Safari 14 is not completely blocking Google Analytics. Instead, it's blocking third-party tracking cookies and cross-site scripting requests on Google Analytics from loading. The Privacy Report feature just reflects that. It looks like first-party Google Analytics cookies aren't blocked, so it'll still function as an analytics platform.

    It's less of an assault on Google and more of an assault on 3rd party Remora companies feeding on the scraps of Google's GA shark.
    muthuk_vanalingamtenthousandthingslkruppcornchipgatorguyurahara
  • Reply 13 of 29
    ...Apple has been slowly shifting to a Services business, seemingly encroaching on Google's core services year by year.

    Given the shift toward Services, I wonder if at some point Apple might re-think device market share? It seems like the more Apple devices there are out there, the more Services business there would be...

    If Apple Silicon can reduce the hardware cost, would Apple pass the device savings to consumers in order to get more devices onto their Services? I understand that similarly priced devices from competitors struggle to be profitable, so if Apple were able to lower its device pricing, it seems that in itself could crush the competition, and have the added benefit of that many more subscribers to Services.
    Beatswatto_cobra
  • Reply 14 of 29
    mcdavemcdave Posts: 1,927member
    Apple should have built in retail/e-tail into maps too. The one thing Lockdown taught us was how inept our business discovery, ordering, payment and delivery/collection services are. Apple could re-invent retail through an existing app.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 15 of 29
    MplsPMplsP Posts: 3,965member
    Another reason many people download chrome is the number of sites that require it. I’ve lost count of the number of sites that say they require chrome or internet explorer. (Which really only leaves one option, since IE has been deprecated.) Most of the time Safari will still run these site find, but you never know. 
  • Reply 16 of 29
    crowleycrowley Posts: 10,453member
    How is Apple getting web results in direct search if they haven't built a search engine?  What is providing the results?
    cornchip
  • Reply 17 of 29
    paxmanpaxman Posts: 4,729member
    I prefer Apple Maps but the inability to plot routes, with any start point is a big negative. Hope they fix that. And I wish they'd either buy or struck a deal with DDG to use their services somehow.  I am not a DDG user most of the time but if they Apple branded it and built it into the address bar search I'd use it a lot more. Google would still be available of course. 
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 18 of 29
    paxman said:
    I prefer Apple Maps but the inability to plot routes, with any start point is a big negative. Hope they fix that. 
    Set your destination/click directions:

    the next screen says:
    To “your destination”
    from “Your location” typed in blue

    click on your location and type or choose you desired start point. Is that what you want?

    If so, already a feature in Maps. 
    cornchipFidonet127lolliverwatto_cobra
  • Reply 19 of 29
    DAalsethDAalseth Posts: 2,842member
    paxman said:
    I prefer Apple Maps but the inability to plot routes, with any start point is a big negative. Hope they fix that. And I wish they'd either buy or struck a deal with DDG to use their services somehow.  I am not a DDG user most of the time but if they Apple branded it and built it into the address bar search I'd use it a lot more. Google would still be available of course. 
    You can set Safari to use DDG as the default search engine.
    BeatsFidonet127watto_cobra
  • Reply 20 of 29
    cornchipcornchip Posts: 1,953member
    DAalseth said:
    paxman said:
    I prefer Apple Maps but the inability to plot routes, with any start point is a big negative. Hope they fix that. And I wish they'd either buy or struck a deal with DDG to use their services somehow.  I am not a DDG user most of the time but if they Apple branded it and built it into the address bar search I'd use it a lot more. Google would still be available of course. 
    You can set Safari to use DDG as the default search engine.
    Which I definitely do. Although I do end up typing g! after the query from time to time :/ 
    edited June 2020
Sign In or Register to comment.