Apple Watch may get thinner in the future with curved sensor components

Posted:
in General Discussion
Apple is looking not just at maximizing the efficiency of health sensors in the Apple Watch, but also minimizing the space they take up by creating curved sensor elements to fit better in the enclosure.

The optical sensors on an Apple Watch help with health tracking
The optical sensors on an Apple Watch help with health tracking


A new patent application from Apple is chiefly concerned with the specifics of how certain sensors could be deployed within the Apple Watch. However, ultimately it's really about ways to make the Watch thinner.

"It can be challenging to incorporate sensors such as optical sensors [which measure heart rate] into electronic devices," says Apple in "Electronic Devices Having Optical Sensors With Curved Laminated Films."

"For example," it continues, "optical components for providing an electronic device with desired functionality may be too bulky or unattractive to incorporate into the electronic device."

As with all patent applications, this one makes an attempt to cover all possibilities by saying that it covers everything from a laptop computer to "a computer monitor containing an embedded computer," or "a wristband device, a pendant device, a headphone or earpiece device," and on and on. If it can house an optical sensor, Apple wants it covered by this application.

However, it's really about the Apple Watch. "The wearable device may have a wearable housing in which the optical sensor is mounted," it says. "During operation, light from the light source may pass through a transparent portion of the housing, may reflect from an external object such as a wrist or other body part of a user, and may be received by the photodetectors after passing through light control members."

"The light control members may be arranged in a ring with a center and may have curved shapes with concave surfaces that face the center," it continues.

Detail from the patent showing one way in which a sensor may be curved
Detail from the patent showing one way in which a sensor may be curved


This is the key part, the way that such optical sensors might be arranged and also curved, to take up as little space as possible. "Each light control member may be formed from a stack of laminated bent light control films," says Apple. "The light control films for the stack may be pressed into desired bent shapes using a lamination tool with curved surfaces."

Space within the Apple Watch is already at an absolute premium. However, this patent application is credited to Tyler S. Bushell, who has previously applied for patents regarding the Digital Crown.

One is to do with turning the Crown into a touch-sensitive area that recognizes gestures, while the other proposed making it function as a joystick. Both of these could free up space by removing the Digital Crown's moving parts inside the Apple Watch casing.

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 8
    mike1mike1 Posts: 3,444member
    Thinner would certainly be a nice upgrade.
    caladanian
  • Reply 2 of 8
    I love my Apple Watch but would love it if the next Apple Watch was “flatter”. 
    If the new AS Macs and iPhones take design cues from the iPad Pro, so should the AW.
    sphericwatto_cobra
  • Reply 3 of 8
    crowleycrowley Posts: 10,453member
    Bizarre that making things curved is seen as requiring a patent.
  • Reply 4 of 8
    razorpitrazorpit Posts: 1,796member
    crowley said:
    Bizarre that making things curved is seen as requiring a patent.
    My guess is it is to cover themselves when some Android Wear manufacturer (cough Samsung) comes along and duplicates the technology. I'm sure a curved sensor was a goal early on, but for whatever reason they were either unable to mass produced it, or it wasn't up to Apple's snuff collecting the data it was designed to.

    This is not a slight on the watch, but with so many issues/features to address in the first few generations, I'm guessing this was pushed to a later release, and they finally figured it out.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 5 of 8
    SpamSandwichSpamSandwich Posts: 33,407member
    Is there any doubt at this point that the Apple Watch has completely crushed their competition in the watch market?
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 6 of 8
    entropysentropys Posts: 4,326member
    For example," it continues, "optical components for providing an electronic device with desired functionality may be too bulky or unattractive to incorporate into the electronic device."

    Like the watch band perhaps?

    As with all patent applications, this one makes an attempt to cover all possibilities by saying that it covers everything from a laptop computer to "a computer monitor containing an embedded computer," or "a wristband device, a pendant device, a headphone or earpiece device," and on and on. If it can house an optical sensor, Apple wants it covered by this application.
    TBH, a patent with this amount of ground covering vagueness should be thrown out with prejudice.


  • Reply 7 of 8
    laytechlaytech Posts: 342member
    I don't want a thinner watch, that is more feminine, I want a watch more bolder, more Bear Grills than Tiffany. Round face would be nice alternative too.
  • Reply 8 of 8
    cornchipcornchip Posts: 1,954member
    Is there any doubt at this point that the Apple Watch has completely crushed their competition in the watch market?
    I’m still using my gen0 and my memory isn’t the best, so forgive me for asking a silly question, but is it still necessary to have an iPhone to have an Watch now that they have a cell chip? Don’t get me wrong, you still see WAY more Watches than any other smart watch, but if it has to be paired to an iPhone, then it can still only be as big as the (admittedly large) iPhone-using population.

    but it’s definitely clear to me that Watch ran away with the game. Where are all those Watch doomsayers These days? Well I know a few of them, but they’re slowly, slowly coming around. 



    laytech said:
    I don't want a thinner watch, that is more feminine, I want a watch more bolder, more Bear Grills than Tiffany. Round face would be nice alternative too.

    Agree. thickness is fine, just keep packing in better battery & more features.


    edited August 2020 watto_cobra
Sign In or Register to comment.