Apple spent 2 billion? on what?

245

Comments

  • Reply 20 of 99
    maskermasker Posts: 451member
    [quote]Originally posted by O and A:

    <strong>WHERE IS THE EVIDENCE</strong><hr></blockquote>



    Don't got none.



    Here is the unparaphrased statement that I heard...



    "Apple's Cash took a huge downturn 2 weeks ago..... 50% drop according to insiders. what does a company do with 2 billion?"





    If Apple has the ability to buy a these smaller companies, what is stopping them from spending all their dough? Do they have a spending limit?



    Anyone know the rules to the corporate spending game?



    MSKR
  • Reply 22 of 99
    o and ao and a Posts: 579member
    heard from where from who when?
  • Reply 22 of 99
    thuh freakthuh freak Posts: 2,664member
    [quote]Originally posted by Masker:

    <strong>Here is the unparaphrased statement that I heard...</strong><hr></blockquote>



    who made that statement?
  • Reply 24 of 99
    jasonppjasonpp Posts: 308member
    I don't think this is real.



    It might be a mole trap, but I'm going to wait for the offical word on this one..
  • Reply 25 of 99
    gnurfgnurf Posts: 20member
    [quote]Originally posted by thuh Freak:

    <strong>



    who made that statement?</strong><hr></blockquote>



    Ben Franklin.



    <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" />
  • Reply 25 of 99
    blablablabla Posts: 185member
    Is that ~4.3 billion cold cash in the bank, or does it include Arm/Earthlink/Akamai stocks? Because the drop in the stock market is forcing Apple to write down the value of their stock portfolio when the next Q-result is presented. Apple is owning 5 %(?) of Akamai. At one point the value of that share alone was over $1 billion. Now its only worth about $6 million.



    BTW, I dont believe Apple is going to spend 2 billion.. but there are some reasons why it would make sense.. Tech stocks are not as overvalued as they used to be, and the AAPL market cap vs cash-situation makes it a great hostile buyout target.
  • Reply 27 of 99
    bellebelle Posts: 1,574member
    This seems a little dubious to me. If it's true, one thing is of interest, though: Apple used a common business "sneaky" by making the purchase right after its quarterly financials so that no formal evidence needs to be presented to shareholders or the public for three months...



    I have to agree with what's been said before. If it's true, it's got to be to do with CPUs.
  • Reply 28 of 99
    jeromejerome Posts: 17member
    [quote]Originally posted by patmcfar8:

    <strong>In light of Apple's recent purchasing spree of software companies... it made me start thinking: What's stopping Microsoft from doing the same thing. Maybe even (GASP) on a larger scale? Scary thought! </strong><hr></blockquote>

    Microsoft used to buy every company in their path, now they are on the line for it.
  • Reply 28 of 99
    jpfjpf Posts: 167member
    JULY 16, 2002 Apple press release:



    "Despite the slowdown in the market, our operational efficiency was excellent," said Fred Anderson, Apple's CFO. "Our balance sheet is very strong, with $4.3 billion in cash, and we achieved a very efficient cash conversion cycle of -36 days. We expect September quarter revenues to be approximately flat with the June quarter, and expect a slight profit for the quarter before any non-recurring items."



    Do you think a publicly traded company would spend HALF of their cash in a market like this? No way would they do that. A good CFO wouldn't allow that to happen.
  • Reply 30 of 99
    bellebelle Posts: 1,574member
    [quote]Originally posted by JPF:

    <strong>Do you think a publicly traded company would spend HALF of their cash in a market like this? No way would they do that. A good CFO wouldn't allow that to happen.</strong><hr></blockquote>

    Hmm, not sure on this one. If it provided the only way for Apple to get past 1GHz, and it has $4.3 billion, it's actually a fantastic time to be spending cash...
  • Reply 31 of 99
    xypexype Posts: 672member
    How much does SGI actually cost? Or Motorola?



    Or maybe Steve just handed himself a nice iCEO iCompensation for 2002?
  • Reply 32 of 99
    yevgenyyevgeny Posts: 1,148member
    [quote]Originally posted by JPF:

    <strong>JULY 16, 2002 Apple press release:

    Do you think a publicly traded company would spend HALF of their cash in a market like this? No way would they do that. A good CFO wouldn't allow that to happen.</strong><hr></blockquote>



    Alot can change in half a month. Do you think that Anderson would have said something like "we are about to buy out Motorola's PPC division"? NO way he would say that.



    I am not saying that this is a true rumor, but that we can sit around and talk about what Apple MIGHT have spend the money on if they did so. There is no harm in discussion, and that is why we are in future hardware- to discuss the completely unfounded rumors as if they might be true.
  • Reply 33 of 99
    bellebelle Posts: 1,574member
    [quote]Originally posted by xype:

    <strong>How much does SGI actually cost?</strong><hr></blockquote>

    Gah. If Apple's bought SGI, we might as well all shoot ourselves now. Or buy a PC, anyway.



    SGI no longer has anything to offer.

    [quote]Originally posted by Yevgeny:

    <strong>I am not saying that this is a true rumor, but that we can sit around and talk about what Apple MIGHT have spend the money on if they did so. There is no harm in discussion, and that is why we are in future hardware- to discuss the completely unfounded rumors as if they might be true.</strong><hr></blockquote>

    Exactly. This is my kind of unfounded rumor. None of this crap about tablets and PDAs and 2GHz G5s.



    Although, with my moderating hat on, should this be Future Hardware or General Discussion? Hmm...
  • Reply 34 of 99
    dxp4acudxp4acu Posts: 45member
    Lock this please! There is no evidence. It is completely sad.
  • Reply 35 of 99
    [quote] Lock this please! There is no evidence. It is completely sad. <hr></blockquote>



    If you dont like it switch thread. <img src="graemlins/oyvey.gif" border="0" alt="[No]" />
  • Reply 36 of 99
    fran441fran441 Posts: 3,715member
    [quote]Lock this please! There is no evidence. It is completely sad.<hr></blockquote>



    As of right now, there is no reason for me to lock this.
  • Reply 37 of 99
    jpfjpf Posts: 167member
    Other vendors use AltiVec, so spending $2 billion on to buy the whole boat is a little much, don't you think. Plus Apple, if I remember correctly has the rights to buy out Moto PPC's next year, correct? Little early on the gun....



    SGI market cap total market cap is $277.5M with about $1.3 billion in total revenue a year. Hell its cheaper to buy SGI than it was to buy NeXT. Apple should just buy SGI and put an end to their misery. Think of all the patents and knowhow they must have. Gawd, to hand pick those engineers. The do have the BEST HIGH-END HARDWARE on the planet and their processors top out at only 600Mhz. I've used them, its awesome stuff. Jezz, I swear I'm going to write a book "How to kill a company slowy - An examination of Bob Bishop's failure at SGI"
  • Reply 37 of 99
    yevgenyyevgeny Posts: 1,148member
    [quote]Originally posted by xype:

    <strong>How much does SGI actually cost? Or Motorola? </strong><hr></blockquote>



    Owning SGI is the kiss of death. SGI hasn't done anything right in years.



    Motorola's market cap (value of stock) is above 25 billion.
  • Reply 37 of 99
    macmediamacmedia Posts: 152member
    2 billlion???



    2 words:



    Moon Pies

    <img src="graemlins/lol.gif" border="0" alt="[Laughing]" />



    Chas

    (this is one of the dumbest rumors I've heard 'round here in some time!)
  • Reply 40 of 99
    o and ao and a Posts: 579member
    no evidence some guy tooling with everyone
Sign In or Register to comment.