Compared: Apple AirTag vs Tile Pro and Chipolo One Spot

Posted:
in General Discussion edited May 2021
Apple's launch of AirTag puts it into a growing market of tracking accessories, but how does it compare against the Tile Pro and the Find My-enabled Chipolo One Spot? We compare the trackers.




The AirTag is a long-awaited tracking chip that garnered quite a lot of attention, both before and after the "Spring Loaded" event. Leveraging Apple's existing Find My app to allow customers to recover practically any physical item it can be attached to is a big deal to its customers.

However, Apple arrives in a market that is already well serviced by several companies, and while it will most probably fare well, it still has to take on its main rivals in the market.






Arguably its biggest competitor is Tile, a company that has been around for quite a few years and has multiple tracking devices on the market. While it is best known for its clip-on accessories, it has also attacked Apple with numerous antitrust complaints over the years.

Given Tile issued a statement citing Apple's "history of using platform advantage to unfairly limit competition" hours after AirTag was officially launched, and that Tile also testified against Apple at the Senate one day later, it's safe to say there's no love lost between the two companies.

As Tile has many products already on the market, for the purposes of this comparison, we will be dealing with the Tile Pro.

While Tile is the main target for Apple, it's not the only one on the market that Apple has to be concerned about.

Find My network arrives and Chipolo

On April 7, Apple officially launched its Find My network accessory program, which allows for third-party companies to take advantage of Apple's Find My network to provide similar device-tracking capabilities. This enabled established tracking-centric companies, accessory producers who didn't typically specialize in tracking, and other newcomers to use Apple's platform to track their devices.

By using Apple's platform, third parties didn't have to build out their own system for item tracking, significantly simplifying the development process by using an already-available and proven technology. It even eliminated the need to develop an app, with users able to take advantage of the existing Find My app they already use to track down other Apple devices.

You can now use the Find My app in your iPhone to track down lost third-party devices with Find My network support.
You can now use the Find My app in your iPhone to track down lost third-party devices with Find My network support.


The initial list of vendors adding Find My support included e-bike producer VanMoof and Belkin, with the latter using it to track down wireless earbuds. Chipolo was the first third-party vendor to come up with a pure tracking chip that works on the Find My network, which also makes them an ideal third candidate for this comparison.

In this case, we are going to look at the Chipolo One Spot, a product that works exclusively with the Find My network.

Specifications

Apple AirTagTile ProChipolo One Spot
Battery Life1 Year+1 year1 year
Item DiscoveryFind My, Lost ModeTile App, Community Find Find My, Lost Mode
ConnectivityBluetooth LE, Ultra-Wideband, NFCBluetooth LEBluetooth LE
Water Resistance1 Meter, 30 minutes1.5 Meters, 1 HourSplash-proof
RangeUnknown400 feetUnknown
NoiseBuilt-in speakerBuilt-in speaker, 128dbBuilt-in speaker, 120db
KeyloopsNoYesYes
Pricing$29 each,
$99 for four
$34.99 each,
$99.99 for four
Unknown

Physical differences

The AirTag is coin-sized, measuring 1.26 inches in diameter and with a height of 0.31 inches. The Tile Pro is bigger at 42mm (1.65 inches) tall and wide, but it's slightly slimmer at 6.5mm (0.26 inches).

The Chipolo One Spot is 1.49 inches in diameter and 0.25 inches thick, making it slightly larger than the AirTag, but marginally thinner.

One styling difference is that the Tile is made up of a square with rounded corners, while the AirTag and Chipolo opt for a circular appearance. This also means that the Tile Pro takes up a lot more physical space simply because it's a square rather than a circle at these measurements.

Tile is the current major competitor to AirTag.
Tile is the current major competitor to AirTag.


There's also a difference between the tags in terms of how you will attach them to your chosen item. Depending on what you go for, this could be easier said than done, and not everyone wants to simply glue the tracker in place.

In the case of AirTag, Apple has gone down the route of deciding that users will have to buy an accessory if they want to carry the tag around. There are no holes or hooks on the tag at all, so it has to be either carried loose or placed within one of many different accessory holders, which are naturally already available.

The Chipolo One Spot is a third-party tracker with Find My network support.
The Chipolo One Spot is a third-party tracker with Find My network support.


Both Tile and Chipolo incorporate a hole, which could be used to attach the tracker to a hook, to tie it in place, or to attach it as a keyring. This makes both Tile and Chipolo more immediately usable without needing any extra attachment assistance in many cases.

There are also variances in terms of how well the different trackers handle the rigors of the real world, especially for water. Apple's AirTag is able to handle a depth of 1 meter (3.2 feet) for up to 30 minutes, and Tile Pro can deal with 1.5 meters (4.9 feet) for 1 hour.

AirTag is truly tiny (One Pound coin for scale)
AirTag is truly tiny (One Pound coin for scale)


Chipolo's less able to handle wet environments, as it is only rated to IPX5. This is described as splash-proof, so it should be able to handle rain showers fine, but not total submergence.

Signal and Noise

All three of the trackers offer Bluetooth LE connectivity at the very least, allowing them to be sensed at a distance, though there may be some variance in this between producers. Tile has said its Tile Pro's Bluetooth LE will work at ranges of up to 400 feet.

Neither Apple nor Chipolo have said how far Bluetooth detection will work for the AirTags or One Spot, but it is likely to be in a similar range to Tile's version.

Aside from Bluetooth LE, Apple's AirTags benefit from two other communications technologies built into the hardware: Ultra-Wideband and NFC.

The addition of NFC on AirTags enables a more direct form of communication with anyone who finds it. You can set up a message that will be displayed if the finder of the AirTag taps their NFC-enabled smartphone against it, which could provide extra information like contact details.

What it looks like to search for an AirTag, though environmental light could be an issue for the app sometimes.
What it looks like to search for an AirTag, though environmental light could be an issue for the app sometimes.


For Ultra-Wideband, this enables for highly accurate positional data to be acquired by a supported iPhone, dubbed Precision Finding. This is extremely handy at room-scale device losses, as it will tell you roughly how far away the AirTag is from the iPhone, as well as what direction it seems to be located.

This feature is only available for iPhones with UWB support, which consists of the iPhone 11 and iPhone 12 generations. Other earlier iPhone models can still use Bluetooth as before, but without the Precision Finding mode.

While neither Tile nor Chipolo benefit from Ultra-Wideband, they join Apple in using a more low-tech way of telling someone where a tag is nearby: sounds. All three can be triggered to make a noise that could be heard by the user, telling them whereabouts the tag is located.

Both the Tile Pro and Chipolo One Spot offer volume figures of 128 decibels and 120 decibels respectively, which is more than enough for it to be heard at a fairly decent range. AirTag does include a speaker, but while the volume is unknown, it is likely to be loud enough to do the job.

Find My network versus Tile Network

Both Apple's AirTag and Chipolo's One Spot use Apple's Find My network to keep tabs of the tracker's location. When in Lost Mode, the tracker repeatedly sends out an encrypted Bluetooth ping that can be detected by any nearby iPhones.

In turn, that iPhone relays the location anonymously to the Find My network with encrypted location data, which is then passed along to the user. The last-spotted location can then be seen within the Find My app.

While a separate system, Tile Network uses a similar approach, where the Tile sends out Bluetooth pings, which are again picked up by passing smartphones. The data, which Tile assures is anonymized and encrypted, is then used to update the user about the Tile's location.

On the face of it, the two systems boast privacy and security and offer the same basic functionality. However, there are still some crucial differences between how the two operate that may not land in Tile's favor.

In the case of the Find My network and its Lost Mode, the transmissions from the trackers are picked up by any supported iPhone without needing any apps to be preinstalled. All iPhones are automatically part of the network and will report back via Apple's platform.

Tile Pro uses its own app platform to track down lost items, not Apple's Find my network.
Tile Pro uses its own app platform to track down lost items, not Apple's Find my network.


For Tile, the Tile Network's Community Find feature relies on the Tile app being installed on all user's devices, and that Bluetooth pings are only picked up on smartphones that have the app installed. In Tile's favor is that the app works on both iOS and Android, so there's a potentially larger pool of devices that could happen upon the tracker, but that relies on everyone installing the app.

Though the two systems are similar at their core, it's a case of Tile's network being those who use its app versus Apple's Find My network relying on hundreds of millions of Apple devices around the world. The Find My network is simply going to be much larger and more capable of tracking down lost items than Tile.

One highlight feature of the Find My network is that it will warn users if someone else's AirTag finds its way into their bag or pocket and is traveling with the user. This is effectively an anti-stalking feature, preventing someone from using AirTag to track another person without their knowledge.

Other Features

All three models are powered by a CR2032 coin cell battery, one typically used in watches, which can be replaced by the user. Battery life is generally 1 year for each model, though Apple says it can be used for longer than a year per battery.

Of the three, you will have an easier time tracking down a wider variety of accessories designed for AirTag over the other models. This is partly due to Apple's initial wave of first-party and third-party accessories at launch, but mostly because Apple products are a common target for third-party vendors to produce accessories for, and it is highly likely that AirTags will have the same treatment.

There's already quite a few AirTag accessories announced and available to order.
There's already quite a few AirTag accessories announced and available to order.


There are various accessories and covers on the market for Tile products, but it is unlikely it will be long to wait before AirTag eclipses Tile for accessories. Chipolo doesn't seem to have as many accessories produced for it compared to its rivals at this time.

You can acquire the Tile Pro in five different colors, and while it is unclear how many options the Chipolo One Spot will ship in, it's likely to be similar in number to the six options for the existing Chipolo One. Apple only sells one color of AirTag, but you could customize it with an engraving, or even buy one with a special engraving along with a high-priced Hermes accessory.

Both Tile and Chipolo have a variety of different tracker options beyond the Chipolo One Spot and the Tile Pro, in case you want something more specific to your needs.

Chipolo offers the Chipolo One, the Chipolo Card, the Ocean Edition made from recycled fishing nets, and various bundles, with all working from Chipolo's app rather than the Find My network. Only the Chipolo One Spot will work with Find My.

Tile sells other models, including the cheaper Mate, the small Sticker, and the Slim. Again, various combination packs and limited-edition versions are also available.

Tile has also taken time to integrate itself with other products and services, such as the Nomad Passport Wallet with a built-in Tile tracker. This could be analogous to third-party firms signing up to Find My, but while Tile has the initial advantage here, Apple will most likely quickly catch up with other integrations.

Of the three, Tile is the only one to offer premium services. For $2.99 per month or $29.99 per year, Premium provides smart alerts when you leave something behind, free battery replacements, unlimited sharing of Tiles with friends and family, a 30-day location history, an extended 3-year warranty, and premium customer care.

For $99.99 per year, Premium Protect offers the same thing, but Tile will also offer up to $1,000 to reimburse the lost item if it cannot be found.

Pricing and Availability

Apple's AirTag is offered for $29 as a single unit, or $99 for a four-pack, with free engraving. First-party accessories start from $29 for the AirTag Loop, with the Belkin Secure Holder with Key Ring a cheaper option at $12.95. Hermes leather accessories start from $299, including the custom engraved AirTag.

Tile Pro can be bought now at $34.99 for one, $59.99 for two, or $99.99 for a four-pack. Limited-edition versions are available for higher prices, and as part of bundles.

Chipolo will start shipping the tags from June and has created a waitlist for preorders One tag costs $28, while a four-pack is $90.

Keeping track of what's best

There's not necessarily a right answer here, as choosing the right tracker depends on a few factors.

If you are heavily invested in the Apple ecosystem, either the AirTag or Chipolo One Spot seem to be good options, simply because of Find My network's vast potential reach over Tile's version. The sheer number of Apple devices out there that can feed data back into the Find My network makes any devices using it more attractive than competing systems.

If you've heavily invested into the Apple ecosystem, you're probably going to get AirTag over Tile.
If you've heavily invested into the Apple ecosystem, you're probably going to get AirTag over Tile.


Between AirTag and Chipolo, it also becomes a case of priorities. Anyone who has brand loyalty to Apple will steer that way, but also anyone with a new-enough iPhone that has UWB if they feel they will get good mileage out of its Precision Finding function.

Conversely, if you want to save a few dollars and don't care about having hyper-accurate in-room tag locating capabilities, the Chipolo One Spot may be good enough for you, if all you need is Find My network support.

That being said, there's still some attractiveness to Tile. While its network of devices may be limited, it will be more useful for households with a wider mix of devices, such as those where other family members use Android smartphones. There's also being able to trust a major name in tracking that's been on the market for quite a while.

The key here is asking yourself if you will be able to find your lost keys using your tracker of choice. For most Apple users, that answer will be positive for most of the trackers, but the UWB accuracy for local environment searches will turn that into a definite "Yes."
«1

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 36
    normmnormm Posts: 653member
    Most of the AirTag's power is presumably for BlueTooth -- UWB is extremely low power.  Hopefully there will be much smaller future tags with tiny batteries, once most iPhones have UWB.
    edited April 2021 forgot usernamewatto_cobra
  • Reply 2 of 36
    “All three models are powered by a CR2032 coin cell battery, one typically used in watches”

    I’ve owned dozens of watches, but never have I seen or heard of a watch carrying a CR2032 battery. 
    They’re huge!
    tokyojimuwatto_cobra
  • Reply 3 of 36
    sandorsandor Posts: 665member
    daniPhone said:
    “All three models are powered by a CR2032 coin cell battery, one typically used in watches”

    I’ve owned dozens of watches, but never have I seen or heard of a watch carrying a CR2032 battery. 
    They’re huge!
    "size typically used as a CMOS battery on a motherboard" 

    better?  :)
    forgot usernamepscooter63watto_cobra
  • Reply 4 of 36
    docbburkdocbburk Posts: 109member
    I’ve had a couple watched that use the CR2032 battery.  The one I remember best had vibration alerts, and also a hydration alert that could be set to vibrate at a user defined repeating interval.  The vibration uses more power than sounds. 
    forgot username
  • Reply 5 of 36
    Tile has a fatal flaw- no low battery alerts. When you activate a Tile it starts a 1 yr clock to remind you to change the battery in 12 months. But if your battery dies early you’re out of luck. Several times I’ be needed to find something, Tile couldn’t find it, and when I finally found it the old fashioned way the Tile battery was dead. I lost an expensive set of keys, keyfob, and post office key this way. Ever since then I just swap out all my Tile batteries every 6 months. 

    I’m hoping the airtags use real battery life alerts and not just time based alerts. 
    XedBeatsforgot usernamewatto_cobralibertyforall
  • Reply 6 of 36
    Bad timing for Chipolo.  Without pricing or the ability to pre-order NOW from Chipolo, that leaves the market open for people to buy the real deal AirTag.  

    If I were them, I would immediately make the Chipolo One Spot pricing (hopefully less than an Airtag) and special pre-release discounts available now to entice AirTag buyers away from Apple.

    What does Chipolo have over an AirTag (tldr, you know...)


    forgot usernamewatto_cobra
  • Reply 7 of 36
    docbburkdocbburk Posts: 109member
    Do Air Tags have the ability to make your phone make a noise if you can’t find your phone, like tile does?  This is quite handy.  There are instances where you could misplace your phone while away from home and not have access to a computer at that moment to use find my iPhone 
    forgot username
  • Reply 8 of 36
    fastasleepfastasleep Posts: 6,452member
    docbburk said:
    Do Air Tags have the ability to make your phone make a noise if you can’t find your phone, like tile does?  This is quite handy.  There are instances where you could misplace your phone while away from home and not have access to a computer at that moment to use find my iPhone 
    How does this work? You can squeeze the Tile to trigger the app on the iPhone? 
    edited April 2021 watto_cobra
  • Reply 9 of 36
    JapheyJaphey Posts: 1,772member
     Tile has also taken time to integrate itself with other products and services, such as the Nomad Passport Wallet with a built-in Tile tracker. This could be analogous to third-party firms signing up to Find My, but while Tile has the initial advantage here, Apple will most likely quickly catch up with other integrations. ”


    I’m really hoping this happens. I’ve been wanting to pick up a KeySmart keychain with Tile integration for a while, but have been waiting to see what the AirTags were all about. A KeySmart with AirTag and FindMy capabilities would be most welcome. 
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 10 of 36
    docbburkdocbburk Posts: 109member

    How does this work? You can squeeze the Tile to trigger the app on the iPhone? 
    Basically, yes.  Iv comes through like a push notification and you can customize the tone it plays.  
    forgot username
  • Reply 11 of 36
    sreesree Posts: 152member
    I think Apple is using its market power here in a little bit of anti-competitive behaviour. Airtags will get access to the full apple ecosystem for detecting tags while tile can only access the part of the ecosystem that uses tile app. So, unless apple makes available the BLE capability of the full ecosystem to Tile, they are forever handicapped and can't hope to compete with Apple. This one is going to be tough to defend in the court.
    muthuk_vanalingampscooter63Beats
  • Reply 12 of 36
    longfanglongfang Posts: 513member
    I’m definitely gonna need to get a few Air Tags, one of which is to put in my mother’s bag when we travel, cause she will inevitably wander off and forget that everyone was scheduled to meet for lunch. Then when half the group has left to look for her she will show up 10 minutes later meaning we now have to look for the searchers.

    Also calling her is not an option since she is somehow unable to hear her phone ring when she gets distracted by things to shop for.

    forgot usernameBeatswatto_cobra
  • Reply 13 of 36
    EsquireCatsEsquireCats Posts: 1,268member
    A head to head test of the devices would be interesting.

    I say this because the reddit thread about the AirTags launch included a lot of comments from aggrieved Tile owners telling their experience with Tile, some interesting and often repeated points included:

    The app:
    • Wouldn't find lost items on the "Tile network", even when a phone was open, running Tile in the foreground and physically near the lost item
    • Upon launch the app pings through all Tile products, freezing out the user until complete, many of which timeout entirely. Leaving the user waiting minutes just to select the Tile they want to search for.
    The hardware:
    • Often drops the connection, effectively making the item unfindable 
    • Clunky hardware despite being at this for years
    • Most options don't include replaceable batteries, after a year they turn into waste
    • Still only using BT, despite many other complementary technologies being available
    Now Apple comes in with a product that is comparably priced, includes a user replaceable battery, includes useful technologies like NFC and UWB to provide better finding and recovery features, then also providing a significantly more stable BT implementation, with a network that ensures user privacy and protection against stalking.

    And the likes of Tile think this is anticompetitive.
    forgot usernameBeatspscooter63Xedjony0watto_cobra
  • Reply 14 of 36
    daniPhone said:
    “All three models are powered by a CR2032 coin cell battery, one typically used in watches”

    I’ve owned dozens of watches, but never have I seen or heard of a watch carrying a CR2032 battery. 
    They’re huge!
    Should have said car keys...
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 15 of 36
    ITGUYINSD said:
    (...)
    What does Chipolo have over an AirTag (tldr, you know...)
    Three things:
    - They have a keyring loop so no need for a fob
    - They may well be cheaper
    - They may not have the anti-stalking feature. This could be a good thing if you are using it as (say) a bike anti-theft device and you don’t want the thief to get a ping!
    roakeforgot usernamekiehtanchemengin1Beatswatto_cobra
  • Reply 16 of 36
    GG1GG1 Posts: 483member
    I'll probably get a few AirTags once I start traveling again, but I'm surprised at how visible people want to make this item. Wouldn't the effectiveness be improved if other people didn't know you had this tracker attached to your item? I would bury an AirTag inside the item, such as luggage. Yes, I realize some items are too small (such as keys), so I'd use a nondescript cover in this case.

    But I realize I'm more practical/functional than fashionable.
    forgot usernameBeatswatto_cobra
  • Reply 17 of 36
    The only irritant I have so far with what I currently know about AirTags is the lack of any way to attach them to stuff without buying another accessory.  This makes AirTags effectively more expensive than the other options for for even some trivial use cases, like attaching to a keychain.

    You cannot convince me that Apple couldn't have designed this device with an attachment point, especially with the example of the others having actually done so.  That makes this is a deliberate design decision, and the cynical part of me says that it's precisely to encourage the purchase of accessories.

    And for those who going to wax eloquent about "esthetics", that's a distraction.
    edited April 2021 kiehtanchemengin1tokyojimujony0
  • Reply 18 of 36
    mike1mike1 Posts: 3,412member
    GG1 said:
    I'll probably get a few AirTags once I start traveling again, but I'm surprised at how visible people want to make this item. Wouldn't the effectiveness be improved if other people didn't know you had this tracker attached to your item? I would bury an AirTag inside the item, such as luggage. Yes, I realize some items are too small (such as keys), so I'd use a nondescript cover in this case.

    But I realize I'm more practical/functional than fashionable.
    All of these devices are to help find lost items. While they may help recover stolen items, that is NOT their primary purpose.

    The only irritant I have so far with what I currently know about AirTags is the lack of any way to attach them to stuff without buying another accessory.  This makes AirTags effective more expensive than the other options for for even some trivial use cases, like attaching to a keychain.

    You cannot convince me that Apple couldn't have designed this device with an attachment point, especially with the example of the others having actually done so.  That makes this is a deliberate design decision, and the cynical part of me says that it's precisely to encourage the purchase of accessories.

    And for those who going to wax eloquent about "esthetics", that's a distraction.
    I can easily toss one in a zippered compartment of my luggage or briefcase or numerous other items I might want to track. The only time it seems necessary to have an accessory for AirTags is to place on a key ring. I have already seen numerous 3rd-party options that are less expensive than Apple's, if that's a concern. Buying a key ring accessory is certainly not a deal breaker.
    randominternetpersonpscooter63watto_cobra
  • Reply 19 of 36
    dewmedewme Posts: 5,680member
    daniPhone said:
    “All three models are powered by a CR2032 coin cell battery, one typically used in watches”

    I’ve owned dozens of watches, but never have I seen or heard of a watch carrying a CR2032 battery. 
    They’re huge!
    My pocket computers from the 1980s all use CR2032 batteries. The 2nd generation Ring door/window sensors now use the CR2032 batteries instead of the much larger CR123A. The good news is that the CR2032 batteries are very easy to find and are inexpensive. 

    Important question: Can you get guacamole and extra queso on the Chipolo tags? 
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 20 of 36
    mike1 said:
    The only irritant I have so far with what I currently know about AirTags is the lack of any way to attach them to stuff without buying another accessory.  This makes AirTags effective more expensive than the other options for for even some trivial use cases, like attaching to a keychain.

    You cannot convince me that Apple couldn't have designed this device with an attachment point, especially with the example of the others having actually done so.  That makes this is a deliberate design decision, and the cynical part of me says that it's precisely to encourage the purchase of accessories.

    And for those who going to wax eloquent about "esthetics", that's a distraction.
    I can easily toss one in a zippered compartment of my luggage or briefcase or numerous other items I might want to track. The only time it seems necessary to have an accessory for AirTags is to place on a key ring. I have already seen numerous 3rd-party options that are less expensive than Apple's, if that's a concern. Buying a key ring accessory is certainly not a deal breaker.
    That still makes them more expensive than they need to be.  The need to buy an accessory to meet the needs of such a trivial use case raises the cost unnecessarily.
    chemengin1MplsP
Sign In or Register to comment.