Coalition for App Fairness originally Epic-funded to assist in App Store legal battles

in iPhone
Emails discovered during the Epic versus Apple suit surrounding app stores have revealed that Epic's marketing head pitched and ultimately funded the Coalition for App Fairness creation as a tool to help press coverage and rally support for its cause.

A still from Epic's parody of Apple's '1984' Super Bowl commercial
A still from Epic's parody of Apple's '1984' Super Bowl commercial

On May 15, 2020, Epic's Vice President of Marketing Matt Weissinger rounded up why Epic should form a coalition of like-minded developers. Saying in the email that "Epic is not sympathetic," Weissinger also said that if the company realigns its focus on "developers that suffer from those attacks."

In the email, Weissinger said that Epic should build a 501c4 coalition, have an agency from public affairs to manage it, come up with a list of advocacy points, and "add some other issues" besides getting rid of Apple's commission on app sales.

In the email, Weissinger suggested that Epic take the "nuclear option" to fire up the suits and coverage. Originally, Epic expected to spend up to $700,000 over the life of the Coalition.

Also disclosed in the massive data dump, and first published by The Verge, is a contract between Epic Games and The Messina Group -- a consulting firm for the foundation of the coalition. While it says that the coalition should be discrete from Epic, the day-to-day operations of the coalition will be fed through Epic's head of marketing.

At present, The Verge says that the Coalition isn't being led by Epic mandates. In a statement, Spotify says that the Coalition members report to the board of directors, where Epic has a single vote -- at present.

Spotify apparently claims that Epic versus Apple, and other suits are not included in its business, however public messaging makes that less clear. The Coalition has talked about the suit on social media, but it does not appear to have a large amount of material regarding the suit on the site itself or in other media materials.

The main triggering event for this entire saga occurred on August 13, 2020, when Epic updated the "Fortnite" app with a new feature, one that allowed consumers to pay Epic directly for in-app currency at a discount, rather than paying traditionally via Apple's App Store payment mechanism. Offering the option enabled Epic to skirt App Store rules that demanded payments for in-game currency go through the App Store payment system, paying a 30% fee in the process.

The change was not limited to just the iOS version of the game. It was similarly applied to the Android version, again going against the Google Play Store's similar policy and fees.

Apple pulled the game from the App Store for violating the App Store guidelines within hours of the update's appearance. Similarly, Google also pulled the game from the Google Play Store, though on Android, the game is still available via third-party stores and from Epic directly.

The same day as the removal, Epic filed a lawsuit against Apple in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, in retaliation for pulling the game. It laid another lawsuit against Google for its "Fortnite" removal.

The Coalition for App Fairness was launched on September 24, 2020.

"We believe that every app developer is entitled to fair treatment and that every consumer should have complete control over their own device. Our App Store Principles will ensure a level playing field for platforms like Apple and a consistent standard of conduct across the app ecosystem," the Coalition said at the time of founding. "The 10 principles outlined include that every developer should always have the right to communicate directly with its users through its app for legitimate business purposes and that no app store should charge unreasonable or excessive fees."

Included in the founding member roster are developers like Epic Games, Spotify, and Tile -- all three that led the rallying cry against Apple's behavior toward developers. Other members include Basecamp, Blix, Blockchain, Deezer, European Publishers Council, Match, News Media Europe, Prepare, ProtonMail, and SkyDemon.

The coalition is still asking more developers to join its ranks.

Read on AppleInsider


  • Reply 1 of 9
    DAalsethDAalseth Posts: 2,783member
    As I suspected, the CFAF is Astroturfing.
  • Reply 2 of 9
    Is anyone surprised by this… anyone?
  • Reply 3 of 9
    Mike WuertheleMike Wuerthele Posts: 6,827administrator
    j2fusion said:
    Is anyone surprised by this… anyone?
    I wasn't, but it's good to have proof.

    Epic hasn't responded to our emails and questions about it, and I'm not expecting them to.
  • Reply 4 of 9
    I always assumed this was a given - so no surprise here.
  • Reply 5 of 9
    docbburkdocbburk Posts: 108member
    Now if we could only get networks to talk about this in the news and shut up some of these senators trying to make it look like they are tech savvy and pro consumer and little guy by writing bills to “protect consumers” that actually does the exact opposite 
  • Reply 6 of 9
    xbitxbit Posts: 390member
    Maybe Epic could explain how ripping off the work of indie developers is helping fulfil their goal of app fairness?
  • Reply 7 of 9
    larryjwlarryjw Posts: 1,031member
    Hopefully, this data dump will give us knowledge about how these companies operate. 

    Maybe the Fed's intervention is not such a bad idea; but, they're almost guaranteed to make matters worse?
    edited August 2021 watto_cobra
  • Reply 8 of 9
    bloggerblogbloggerblog Posts: 2,457member
    The question is, is what they have done illegal and does this change anything in court proceedings?
  • Reply 9 of 9
    j2fusion said:
    Is anyone surprised by this… anyone?
    I wasn't, but it's good to have proof.

    Epic hasn't responded to our emails and questions about it, and I'm not expecting them to.
    To be fair, this honestly doesn't surprise me at all. I thought that the Coalition for App Fairness was a sham to begin with. Seeing that it is definitely a sham associated with the other sham known as Sweeney; can we finally start blasting that company publicly about this very plainly obvious affront to contractional agreements?
    edited August 2021 watto_cobrajony0
Sign In or Register to comment.