Photo reveals Apple's plastic wrap-free iPhone 13 packaging
As part of new environmental efforts announced on Tuesday, Apple said it will cut down on the material used in iPhone 13's packaging by removing the outer plastic wrap that typically enshrines the device in its box.
Apple's new packaging process was apparently revealed ahead of wide availability in an image posted to Twitter by leaker "DuanRui" on Thursday.
The photo shows an iPhone 13 package sealed with a sticker that integrates a pull tab to keep the box secure until ready to be opened. It appears that the protective label attaches to an inside section of the box top and the outer area of the box bottom.
This solution effectively keeps the box securely closed during transit and acts as a tamper-evident seal.
Apple has applied a similar tear-away system to its first-party accessories for years, with plastic stickers first appearing on small items like cables and later Apple Watch bands. Paper-based labels like the one used on iPhone 13's packaging are typically reserved for larger accessories with two-part rigid boxes.
According to Apple, the switch away from plastic wrap will avoid 600 metric tons of waste, presumably over the device's lifetime. The company has committed to removing plastic from its packaging by 2025.
Apple highlights other environmentally friendly aspects of iPhone 13 on its website, noting the handset uses 100% recycled rare earth elements in magnets, 100% recycled tin in the solder of its main logic board and battery management unit, 100% recycled gold in the plating of the main logic board and camera wire, and upcycled plastic water bottles for the dielectric material that composes iPhone's antenna lines.
Preorders for iPhone 13 and iPhone 13 Pro went live early Friday ahead of wide release on Sept. 24.
Read on AppleInsider
Apple's new packaging process was apparently revealed ahead of wide availability in an image posted to Twitter by leaker "DuanRui" on Thursday.
The photo shows an iPhone 13 package sealed with a sticker that integrates a pull tab to keep the box secure until ready to be opened. It appears that the protective label attaches to an inside section of the box top and the outer area of the box bottom.
This solution effectively keeps the box securely closed during transit and acts as a tamper-evident seal.
Apple has applied a similar tear-away system to its first-party accessories for years, with plastic stickers first appearing on small items like cables and later Apple Watch bands. Paper-based labels like the one used on iPhone 13's packaging are typically reserved for larger accessories with two-part rigid boxes.
According to Apple, the switch away from plastic wrap will avoid 600 metric tons of waste, presumably over the device's lifetime. The company has committed to removing plastic from its packaging by 2025.
Apple highlights other environmentally friendly aspects of iPhone 13 on its website, noting the handset uses 100% recycled rare earth elements in magnets, 100% recycled tin in the solder of its main logic board and battery management unit, 100% recycled gold in the plating of the main logic board and camera wire, and upcycled plastic water bottles for the dielectric material that composes iPhone's antenna lines.
Preorders for iPhone 13 and iPhone 13 Pro went live early Friday ahead of wide release on Sept. 24.
Read on AppleInsider
Comments
First we had the price reduction due to the elimination of the earphones and the 5w charger...
/s
I have no problem with efforts to curb waste and commend Apple for doing so.
With that said, I really don't see why these new USB C to lightning cables aren't being designed to last longer so they can stop including them and make the phone boxless in the future.
Don’t have any AAPL stock? Tsk tsk. It’s never been wrapped in plastic.
Removable batteries are worse for the environment — they accumulate in drawers and then get tossed into the trash.
My all-in-one iMac lasted 8 years of full-time use. By the time I replaced it even the display was outdated. This is far longer than any work-issued Windows PC.
Mini isn’t overpriced. If you can’t afford one you aren’t in the game. Save your allowance.
Greenpeace and other bodies have recognized Apple for its recycling efforts, reductions in waste, renewable energy initiatives, etc. You’re just stuck inside your own head with a narrative you wrote.
Replaceable batteries, which are removable by definition, are definitely better for the environment. (One should qualify that by saying easily replaceable batteries.) Apple’s batteries are replaceable. I don’t know if you can call them easily replaceable, but at least they can be replaced.
As I’ve said before, the best thing you can do for the environment is not buy a device in the first place. Barring that, buying a durable device and keeping it longer is best. Apple’s devices have, in general, a significantly longer usable lifespan than many of it’s competitors. They also tend to break down less frequently. Both of these help to offset the somewhat higher initial device cost and make them more environmentally friendly.
Do I think Apple can do better? Absolutely. Part of being environmentally friendly is designing products that can be serviced. I this area, Apple falls behind. (The butterfly keyboards on MBPs are a good example.) Still they do far better than a lot of companies and as I said above, even ‘small’ changes like the plastic shrink wrap make a difference so kudos to them for doing this.