Tim Cook calls spatial computing in Apple Vision Pro an 'aha moment' in a user's life

Posted:
in Apple Vision Pro

Apple CEO Tim Cook believes spatial computing is a profound technology, with it adding more ways for developers to succeed on top of the already "outstanding" App Store.

Apple CEO Tim Cook
Apple CEO Tim Cook



Cook was in the UK to end his tour of Europe on behalf of the company, and spoke as part of his visit to Apple's Battersea Power Station headquarters in London. As well as commenting on Apple's work on AI, he also discussed apps and the Apple Vision Pro.

"I think the apps today are outstanding," Cook said according to the Independent.. "It's a reminder of the empowerment of the App Store. I'm still amazed that an entrepreneur in any country in the world in a basement can start a company and it can be global like that."

As well as the existing success of the App Store, Cook also talked about the Apple Vision Pro, a headset using spatial computing that is expected to arrive in early 2024.

Cook offers that developers are looking forward to the headset's release. "We have developer labs in London and Munich, and we're seeing some incredible work. There's so much excitement out there."

The Apple Vision Pro is now part of Cook's nightly routine, which helps further his understanding of how it could become a major product down the road. He is also keen on getting others to don the head-mounted display for themselves.

"There are huge differences in how people look at it, depending on if they're read about it or actually tried it," he explained. "I believe even more about how profound spatial computing is. When you've tried it, it's an aha moment, and you only have a few of those in a lifetime."

The CEO also touched upon the view that Apple considers itself "tool makers" for people to change the world.

"We've always believed our tools should be as easy to use as our products, so we try to make the developer tools simple. It's the developer's idea that's the big lift, not the act of doing it themselves. It's great to see the validation of that playing out."

Read on AppleInsider

FileMakerFeller
«1

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 31
    Is an “aha moment” like when Navin Johnson discovered his “special purpose”?
    thinkman100000000FileMakerFellerwilliamlondonwatto_cobra
  • Reply 2 of 31
    Is an “aha moment” like when Navin Johnson discovered his “special purpose”?
    I wonder how many will recognize Navin……hint, youngins, it's from one of the funniest movies ever made!
    FileMakerFellerwatto_cobra
  • Reply 3 of 31
    mayflymayfly Posts: 385member
    If I spent $3,500 on a toy, it would cost me way more when my wife filed for divorce. And that was MY Aha! moment.
    designrFileMakerFeller
  • Reply 4 of 31
    designrdesignr Posts: 961member
    As in "Aha! I just spent $3,500 so I could isolate myself from everyone and look like a dork!"? That kind of "aha" moment?

    mayflywilliamlondon
  • Reply 5 of 31
    mayflymayfly Posts: 385member
    designr said:
    As in "Aha! I just spent $3,500 so I could isolate myself from everyone and look like a dork!"? That kind of "aha" moment?

    Or, uh oh, "You just spent the money for little Timmy's braces on a toy?" kind of "aha" moment.
  • Reply 6 of 31
    StrangeDaysStrangeDays Posts: 12,666member
    mayfly said:
    If I spent $3,500 on a toy, it would cost me way more when my wife filed for divorce. And that was MY Aha! moment.
    Hey remember when people said the original Macintosh (and GUIs, and PCs even) was just a toy? Yeah. Good times. 
    edited October 1 danoxFileMakerFellerwilliamlondonchasmwatto_cobrajony0
  • Reply 7 of 31
    StrangeDaysStrangeDays Posts: 12,666member
    designr said:
    As in "Aha! I just spent $3,500 so I could isolate myself from everyone and look like a dork!"? That kind of "aha" moment?

    Isolate from who? When I’m computing behind a screen I’m not enjoying a family dinner. You seem to be confusing the use cases. 
    radarthekattmaydanoxFileMakerFellerwilliamlondonwatto_cobrajony0
  • Reply 8 of 31
    radarthekatradarthekat Posts: 3,800moderator
    Is an “aha moment” like when Navin Johnson discovered his “special purpose”?
    I wonder how many will recognize Navin……hint, youngins, it's from one of the funniest movies ever made!
    It was funnier at the time than it would be to anyone watching today.  But, “he hates those cans” is gold! 
    FileMakerFellerwatto_cobra
  • Reply 9 of 31
    AniMillAniMill Posts: 147member
    Wow. I’d never had believed I’d ever see a The Jerk reference in an Apple blog.

    I wonder, is the Apple VR Cook’s Newton?
    williamlondon
  • Reply 10 of 31
    mayflymayfly Posts: 385member
    mayfly said:
    If I spent $3,500 on a toy, it would cost me way more when my wife filed for divorce. And that was MY Aha! moment.
    Hey remember when people said the original Macintosh (and GUIs, and PCs even) was just a toy? Yeah. Good times. 
    No, I don't. Can you quote a few people calling the Macintosh just a toy, please?
  • Reply 11 of 31
    designrdesignr Posts: 961member
    designr said:
    As in "Aha! I just spent $3,500 so I could isolate myself from everyone and look like a dork!"? That kind of "aha" moment?

    Isolate from who? When I’m computing behind a screen I’m not enjoying a family dinner. You seem to be confusing the use cases. 
    You seem to be the one confused here. This is an isolation device. Failure to recognize that can most likely be attributed to Apple Fanboy-ism™.
    gatorguywilliamlondon
  • Reply 12 of 31
    danoxdanox Posts: 2,405member
    designr said:
    designr said:
    As in "Aha! I just spent $3,500 so I could isolate myself from everyone and look like a dork!"? That kind of "aha" moment?

    Isolate from who? When I’m computing behind a screen I’m not enjoying a family dinner. You seem to be confusing the use cases. 
    You seem to be the one confused here. This is an isolation device. Failure to recognize that can most likely be attributed to Apple Fanboy-ism™.
    Like driving a car? most cars are isolation devices, and have basically been so for the last hundred years, currently most of those big SUVs rolling on the road only has one person in it 90% of the time, the very definition of an isolation device. Keyboards would also be an example of an isolation device.
    edited October 2 FileMakerFellerwilliamlondonwatto_cobra
  • Reply 13 of 31
    gatorguygatorguy Posts: 23,951member
    danox said:
    designr said:
    designr said:
    As in "Aha! I just spent $3,500 so I could isolate myself from everyone and look like a dork!"? That kind of "aha" moment?

    Isolate from who? When I’m computing behind a screen I’m not enjoying a family dinner. You seem to be confusing the use cases. 
    You seem to be the one confused here. This is an isolation device. Failure to recognize that can most likely be attributed to Apple Fanboy-ism™.
    Like driving a car? most cars are isolation devices, and have basically been so for the last hundred years, currently most of those big SUVs rolling on the road only has one person in it 90% of the time, the very definition of an isolation device.
    Can we put two heads behind those Apple goggles the other 10% of the time you're guessing at, maybe place the kids heads in behind those too when going to soccer practice or being picked up from school? 
    edited October 2 designr
  • Reply 14 of 31
    Amazingly, it's the first product Apple has ever introduced that no one actually wants to use. Oh, some people want the experience it unlocks, for sure. But no one actually wants to use the product...they will use it in spite of it. No one actually wants a gigantic, heavy, nausea-inducing, world-isolating headset. Not for anything. And certainly not for what amounts to an iPad strapped to their head. So every single user will be someone who is putting up with that awful hardware in order to get access to an interesting software experience. What kind of potential does that actually have?

    I feel like Apple is doing an awful lot of pretending here. And those championing the product are too. Riding the coattails of other confident successes where Apple was right to be confident. There are seeing if they can actually fake the confidence, and create a market as a result. I just don't see it, because you will never fake people into spending $3500+, and you won't fake them into wearing it for any length of time.

    No one ever looked at the iPhone and said, "Ugh I have to hold this thing in order to use it?" 
    No one ever looked at the Apple Watch and said "Ugh I have to wear this thing in order to use it?"
    No one ever looked at the HomePod and said "Ugh I have to plug this thing in and put it out of the way somewhere in order to use it?"
    No one ever looked at the AppleTV and said "Ugh I have to plug this thing into my TV and watch it?"

    These are not objectionable products. The VisionPro is objectionable hardware from the start. People in the microscopic VR community seem to take for granted that shitty uncomfortable hardware is to be expected if you want such an experience. That shouldn't be acceptable to Apple, because it certainly isn't acceptable to average consumers.
    gatorguywilliamlondondesignrmuthuk_vanalingamdanox
  • Reply 15 of 31
    Amazingly, it's the first product Apple has ever introduced that no one actually wants to use. Oh, some people want the experience it unlocks, for sure. But no one actually wants to use the product...they will use it in spite of it. No one actually wants a gigantic, heavy, nausea-inducing, world-isolating headset. Not for anything. And certainly not for what amounts to an iPad strapped to their head. So every single user will be someone who is putting up with that awful hardware in order to get access to an interesting software experience. What kind of potential does that actually have?

    I feel like Apple is doing an awful lot of pretending here. And those championing the product are too. Riding the coattails of other confident successes where Apple was right to be confident. There are seeing if they can actually fake the confidence, and create a market as a result. I just don't see it, because you will never fake people into spending $3500+, and you won't fake them into wearing it for any length of time.

    No one ever looked at the iPhone and said, "Ugh I have to hold this thing in order to use it?" 
    No one ever looked at the Apple Watch and said "Ugh I have to wear this thing in order to use it?"
    No one ever looked at the HomePod and said "Ugh I have to plug this thing in and put it out of the way somewhere in order to use it?"
    No one ever looked at the AppleTV and said "Ugh I have to plug this thing into my TV and watch it?"

    These are not objectionable products. The VisionPro is objectionable hardware from the start. People in the microscopic VR community seem to take for granted that shitty uncomfortable hardware is to be expected if you want such an experience. That shouldn't be acceptable to Apple, because it certainly isn't acceptable to average consumers.
    It's amazing how much your argument covers desktop computers as well. Sitting down at a table or desk to operate a machine was unusual behaviour back in the day but, as with typewriters, people happily made the adjustment for the benefits provided.

    When the Mac was released, people who were used to computers scoffed at the need to use a mouse and derided it as an under-powered toy. But within 15 years every desktop computer sported a GUI and a pointing device, despite the compromises that required.

    So I'm quite bullish on the future of the Apple Vision Pro specifically and spatial computing in general. As with earlier devices we will see miniaturisation and performance improvements that will make the first generation seem antiquated after a mere decade. Having worn spectacles for 35 years now and having worn a helmet for kart racing I'm not averse to having a potentially heavy object on my head as long as the balance is correct and the experience the object enables brings benefits that outweigh the drawbacks. Nausea is the only troublesome aspect but from all reports Apple have managed to minimise that issue as well as the "world-isolating" aspect of VR headsets, so I expect the product to be quite successful.
    danoxfastasleepwatto_cobrajony0
  • Reply 16 of 31
    mayfly said:
    mayfly said:
    If I spent $3,500 on a toy, it would cost me way more when my wife filed for divorce. And that was MY Aha! moment.
    Hey remember when people said the original Macintosh (and GUIs, and PCs even) was just a toy? Yeah. Good times. 
    No, I don't. Can you quote a few people calling the Macintosh just a toy, please?
    https://fortune.com/2009/01/12/jan-1984-how-critics-reviewed-the-mac/
    https://lowendmac.com/1999/the-mac-is-a-toy/
    https://forums.macrumors.com/threads/the-macintosh-is-a-toy.804946/

    No direct quotes, but the implication is clear.
    danoxwatto_cobrajony0
  • Reply 17 of 31
    fastasleepfastasleep Posts: 6,376member
    Amazingly, it's the first product Apple has ever introduced that no one actually wants to use. Oh, some people want the experience it unlocks, for sure. But no one actually wants to use the product...they will use it in spite of it. No one actually wants a gigantic, heavy, nausea-inducing, world-isolating headset. Not for anything. And certainly not for what amounts to an iPad strapped to their head. So every single user will be someone who is putting up with that awful hardware in order to get access to an interesting software experience. What kind of potential does that actually have?

    I feel like Apple is doing an awful lot of pretending here. And those championing the product are too. Riding the coattails of other confident successes where Apple was right to be confident. There are seeing if they can actually fake the confidence, and create a market as a result. I just don't see it, because you will never fake people into spending $3500+, and you won't fake them into wearing it for any length of time.

    No one ever looked at the iPhone and said, "Ugh I have to hold this thing in order to use it?" 
    No one ever looked at the Apple Watch and said "Ugh I have to wear this thing in order to use it?"
    No one ever looked at the HomePod and said "Ugh I have to plug this thing in and put it out of the way somewhere in order to use it?"
    No one ever looked at the AppleTV and said "Ugh I have to plug this thing into my TV and watch it?"

    These are not objectionable products. The VisionPro is objectionable hardware from the start. People in the microscopic VR community seem to take for granted that shitty uncomfortable hardware is to be expected if you want such an experience. That shouldn't be acceptable to Apple, because it certainly isn't acceptable to average consumers.
    The more posts like this I see, the more I'm convinced this thing is going to be a hit. Sounds like Ed Colligan or Steve Ballmer before the iPhone.

    I personally cannot wait. 
    chasmwatto_cobrajony0
  • Reply 18 of 31
    designrdesignr Posts: 961member
    Amazingly, it's the first product Apple has ever introduced that no one actually wants to use. Oh, some people want the experience it unlocks, for sure. But no one actually wants to use the product...they will use it in spite of it. No one actually wants a gigantic, heavy, nausea-inducing, world-isolating headset. Not for anything. And certainly not for what amounts to an iPad strapped to their head. So every single user will be someone who is putting up with that awful hardware in order to get access to an interesting software experience. What kind of potential does that actually have?

    I feel like Apple is doing an awful lot of pretending here. And those championing the product are too. Riding the coattails of other confident successes where Apple was right to be confident. There are seeing if they can actually fake the confidence, and create a market as a result. I just don't see it, because you will never fake people into spending $3500+, and you won't fake them into wearing it for any length of time.

    No one ever looked at the iPhone and said, "Ugh I have to hold this thing in order to use it?" 
    No one ever looked at the Apple Watch and said "Ugh I have to wear this thing in order to use it?"
    No one ever looked at the HomePod and said "Ugh I have to plug this thing in and put it out of the way somewhere in order to use it?"
    No one ever looked at the AppleTV and said "Ugh I have to plug this thing into my TV and watch it?"

    These are not objectionable products. The VisionPro is objectionable hardware from the start. People in the microscopic VR community seem to take for granted that shitty uncomfortable hardware is to be expected if you want such an experience. That shouldn't be acceptable to Apple, because it certainly isn't acceptable to average consumers.
    The more posts like this I see, the more I'm convinced this thing is going to be a hit. Sounds like Ed Colligan or Steve Ballmer before the iPhone.

    I personally cannot wait. 
    You keep telling yourself that.  :D
  • Reply 19 of 31
    designrdesignr Posts: 961member
    danox said:
    designr said:
    designr said:
    As in "Aha! I just spent $3,500 so I could isolate myself from everyone and look like a dork!"? That kind of "aha" moment?

    Isolate from who? When I’m computing behind a screen I’m not enjoying a family dinner. You seem to be confusing the use cases. 
    You seem to be the one confused here. This is an isolation device. Failure to recognize that can most likely be attributed to Apple Fanboy-ism™.
    Like driving a car? most cars are isolation devices, and have basically been so for the last hundred years, currently most of those big SUVs rolling on the road only has one person in it 90% of the time, the very definition of an isolation device. Keyboards would also be an example of an isolation device.

    muthuk_vanalingam
  • Reply 20 of 31
    designrdesignr Posts: 961member
    This quote from Steve Jobs, I think, represents exactly the problem I see with Apple Vision:

    "Vision for Apple was: What incredible benefits can we give to the customer? Where can we take the customer ? Not starting with 'let's sit down with the engineers, and figure out what awesome technology we have and how we're gonna market that.'" — Steve Jobs, WWDC, 1997

    The Apple Vision product seems like the exact opposite of this. It has this vibe that feels a lot like "what awesome technology do we have and how can we market it?" It feels like it's a solution in search of a real problem. A problem that no one—or at least very few people—has.

    muthuk_vanalingam
Sign In or Register to comment.