Microsoft briefly edged out Apple as the most valuable company in the US

Posted:
in AAPL Investors edited January 11

In intraday trading on Thursday, Apple was usurped as the most valuable company in the US for about two hours, with Microsoft temporarily taking the crown more than two years after the last time it happened.

Sign out in front of Microsoft's headquarters
Credit: Microsoft



The cross-over happened at about 9:50 AM ET, shortly after the market opened, and reversed itself around 11:10 AM ET. Apple has been hit by a few downgrades to its stock in the last few days, and Microsoft has seen the opposite.

Trading has been slightly above-average overall on Thursday, with the NASDQ down by about a half-percent. Apple's stock has been hit by about $3 a share for losses today. Microsoft stock is down now, after briefly being up from Wednesday's close.

In August 2020, Apple became the first publicly-traded US company to reach a $2 trillion market cap, and Microsoft became the second one in June 2021.

Later in October 2021, Microsoft took over the top spot, and for a few months was more valuable than Apple by $100 billion.

Microsoft's stock rose 57% in 2023, compared to Apple's which rose 48%. Microsoft shares have also seen slimmer losses at the start of 2024.

Apple, ohas seen its shares take a considerable drop in recent days. The first hit was taken following a claim by Barclays that iPhone demand is weakening and that the iPhone 16 range will not offer any compelling new features to tempt upgraders.

The analyst view that Apple is dependent on iPhone sales is part of why Microsoft is doing better. Analysts see Microsoft has being less attached to any hardware, and more attached to subscription software such as Office 365, and so therefore less attached to any falling demand for phones or computers.

And, Microsoft has launched an AI tool in Copilot, while Apple has not unveiled any similar ChatGPT-style app or service. Analysts appear to be ignoring that Apple has been using AI for many years, under the name Machine Learning, though, and also that it is never first to a market, even ones that it later comes to dominate.

Update January 11, 11:36: Updated with Apple going back into the lead.



Read on AppleInsider

«1

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 26
    Does it really matter?
    baconstangdewmewatto_cobra
  • Reply 2 of 26
    nubusnubus Posts: 386member
    Does it really matter?
    It hurts. M$ copied the Mac - it can never be #1. And then MS lost on mobile, on tablets (at least round one), on MP3 players (Zune), and AWS started eating into their server business. And now that company is worth more than Apple. And the main reason for that is Apple.

    So, Mac and iPad sales are dropping big time, iPhone is static, R&D is going to an Apple Car that seems stuck, and then Microsoft understood AI, while we in 2023 had the same old Siri and the option to buy a new HomePod, which was exactly the same as... the old HomePod. Flatlining companies don't attract the best talents. We need for Apple to grow, add more users, and enter big markets (cars). Competing with Zuckerberg on doing the heaviest headset is taking away talent, and now MS is once again #1.
    elijahg
  • Reply 3 of 26
    Heaviest headset, how do we need this, in a fitness gymnasium?
  • Reply 4 of 26
    Does it really matter?
    If you are an investor who actively trades to get the best returns it does.
    grandact73watto_cobra
  • Reply 5 of 26
    ronnronn Posts: 658member
    Both are fluctuating with Apple currently ahead ~$30-35B. Let's see today's closing price, and more importantly, the after hours price in exactly three weeks (Feb 1st earnings report).
    gilly33byronlwatto_cobra
  • Reply 6 of 26
    22july201322july2013 Posts: 3,573member
    Blame or credit AI (not the website) and VP (not the Vice President.)
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 7 of 26
    XedXed Posts: 2,573member
    Blame or credit AI (not the website) and VP (not the Vice President.)
    VP = Apple Vision Pro?
    edited January 11 watto_cobra
  • Reply 8 of 26
    mknelsonmknelson Posts: 1,127member
    Maybe MS could afford to reopen some support lines and hire some support staff…

    They're one of the most painful companies to open a support ticket with at the moment.
    geekmeeronndewmebyronlwatto_cobraBart Y
  • Reply 9 of 26
    geekmeegeekmee Posts: 631member
    It’s comparing Apples to…If you’ll excuse the pun…oranges.
    Microsoft has abandoned technology and now is purchasing stock to grow ‘by any means necessary.’

    While Apple has done it by introducing new technology.
    Apple is introducing Vision Pro next month, while Microsoft has renamed Office.
    edited January 11 ronnbaconstangAfarstardewmewatto_cobra
  • Reply 10 of 26
    MarvinMarvin Posts: 15,326moderator
    nubus said:
    Does it really matter?
    It hurts. M$ copied the Mac - it can never be #1. And then MS lost on mobile, on tablets (at least round one), on MP3 players (Zune), and AWS started eating into their server business. And now that company is worth more than Apple. And the main reason for that is Apple.

    So, Mac and iPad sales are dropping big time, iPhone is static, R&D is going to an Apple Car that seems stuck, and then Microsoft understood AI, while we in 2023 had the same old Siri and the option to buy a new HomePod, which was exactly the same as... the old HomePod. Flatlining companies don't attract the best talents. We need for Apple to grow, add more users, and enter big markets (cars). Competing with Zuckerberg on doing the heaviest headset is taking away talent, and now MS is once again #1.
    They are in completely different markets when looking at their revenues.

    Microsoft made $211b in 2023 where $54b is personal computing, the rest is from cloud and business. Total revenue they attribute to cloud services is $111b. Net income $72b. Operating income $88b (of which personal computing is $16b).
    Apple made $383b in 2023 on personal computing, most from iPhone sales ($200b), then $30b Mac, $30b iPad, $40b wearables and accessories, $85b services. Net income $97b. Operating income $114b (of which non-service income is $109b).

    AI is mainly being deployed as a cloud service so it suits Microsoft's operations more closely, especially considering they own Github, Visual Studio Code and LinkedIn and provide compute services via Azure.
    A headset is personal computing hardware so fits more closely with Apple's product line.

    Microsoft is gaining stock value along with Nvidia due to the hype around the possibilities of AI. This will lead to growth in server hardware purchases (Nvidia) and cloud services (Azure). Apple doesn't operate enterprise AI cloud services that other businesses can leverage and they don't need to, they can do some things at the device level.

    Apple's future growth will come from consumer services and probably some from AR hardware over the long-term.

    Some of Apple's ex-employees wanted Apple to move into cloud computing but they didn't want to. They have said a few times they aren't trying to do everything, they want to stick with products and services where they can make a difference and excel at.
    ronnAfarstardewmebyronlwatto_cobra
  • Reply 11 of 26
    nubusnubus Posts: 386member
    geekmee said:
    While Apple has done it by introducing new technology.
    Apple is introducing Vision Pro next month, while Microsoft has renamed Office.
    Last year Apple relaunched the HomePod, didn't upgrade a single iPad, gave us MBA 15" with features from the 2022 13" - didn't even bother to give it Wifi 6E. Microsoft added AI to products while M3 didn't improve on the Neural Engine. The market is pretty smart this time. While the engineers in Cupertino are having neck pain from Vision Pro the Redmond team is doing LLM AI.

    byronl
  • Reply 12 of 26
    baconstangbaconstang Posts: 1,108member
    Does it really matter?
    If you are an investor who actively trades to get the best returns it does.
    Yeah.  That's why this article makes more sense being in a money mag.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 13 of 26
    ronnronn Posts: 658member
    Market Cap Standings at the end of the trading day :

    AAPL = $2.886T
    MSFT = $2.859T

    Tomorrow is another day for chart watching amongst the behemoths.
    byronlwatto_cobra
  • Reply 14 of 26
    nubus said:
    geekmee said:
    While Apple has done it by introducing new technology.
    Apple is introducing Vision Pro next month, while Microsoft has renamed Office.
    Last year Apple relaunched the HomePod, didn't upgrade a single iPad, gave us MBA 15" with features from the 2022 13" - didn't even bother to give it Wifi 6E. Microsoft added AI to products while M3 didn't improve on the Neural Engine. The market is pretty smart this time. While the engineers in Cupertino are having neck pain from Vision Pro the Redmond team is doing LLM AI.

    What, you think all of Apple was working on VP?

    They do have a LLM team and from what I’ve heard, they have been making products, most of them are internally, like the program that retail uses to grade devices for trade ins. It’s not determined by humans anymore over the condition of the device. The salesperson uses their device to scan temporary pictures of the front and back and it comes back with a price. From what I saw when the iPhone 15 came out, it was pretty much on the money for analyzing the condition and determining the trade in value. When I asked the salesperson what happens if it’s wrong, she told me they just run it again and most of the time it resolves the misquote. It even gave value for a damaged device after another salesperson told his customer their damaged phone wasn’t worth anything. 

    LLM AI is also used in the camera app along with the LiDAR sensor to help take better pictures faster and determining where exactly your focal point is. 

    The reason why you think they’re not doing anything is because they’re not jumping on the chatGPT bandwagon like everyone else is. 
    It’s the new buzzword since B2B. 
    ronnwatto_cobra
  • Reply 15 of 26
    danvmdanvm Posts: 1,409member
    nubus said:
    Does it really matter?
    It hurts. M$ copied the Mac - it can never be #1. And then MS lost on mobile, on tablets (at least round one), on MP3 players (Zune), and AWS started eating into their server business. And now that company is worth more than Apple. And the main reason for that is Apple.

    So, Mac and iPad sales are dropping big time, iPhone is static, R&D is going to an Apple Car that seems stuck, and then Microsoft understood AI, while we in 2023 had the same old Siri and the option to buy a new HomePod, which was exactly the same as... the old HomePod. Flatlining companies don't attract the best talents. We need for Apple to grow, add more users, and enter big markets (cars). Competing with Zuckerberg on doing the heaviest headset is taking away talent, and now MS is once again #1.
    From what I know, both MS and Apple copied Xerox, so I suppose they are the one supposed to be hurt, right?
  • Reply 16 of 26
    danvmdanvm Posts: 1,409member
    nubus said:
    geekmee said:
    While Apple has done it by introducing new technology.
    Apple is introducing Vision Pro next month, while Microsoft has renamed Office.
    Last year Apple relaunched the HomePod, didn't upgrade a single iPad, gave us MBA 15" with features from the 2022 13" - didn't even bother to give it Wifi 6E. Microsoft added AI to products while M3 didn't improve on the Neural Engine. The market is pretty smart this time. While the engineers in Cupertino are having neck pain from Vision Pro the Redmond team is doing LLM AI.

    What, you think all of Apple was working on VP?

    They do have a LLM team and from what I’ve heard, they have been making products, most of them are internally, like the program that retail uses to grade devices for trade ins. It’s not determined by humans anymore over the condition of the device. The salesperson uses their device to scan temporary pictures of the front and back and it comes back with a price. From what I saw when the iPhone 15 came out, it was pretty much on the money for analyzing the condition and determining the trade in value. When I asked the salesperson what happens if it’s wrong, she told me they just run it again and most of the time it resolves the misquote. It even gave value for a damaged device after another salesperson told his customer their damaged phone wasn’t worth anything. 

    LLM AI is also used in the camera app along with the LiDAR sensor to help take better pictures faster and determining where exactly your focal point is. 

    The reason why you think they’re not doing anything is because they’re not jumping on the chatGPT bandwagon like everyone else is. 
    It’s the new buzzword since B2B. 
    It's not only the ChatGPT bandwagon, but integrating AI in their products and services, like MS is doing with Copilot and MS Office, Windows and GitHub.  And from what I have seen, it works very nice.  We'll have to wait and see what Apple have this year in WWDC. 
    byronl
  • Reply 17 of 26
    danvmdanvm Posts: 1,409member
    geekmee said:
    It’s comparing Apples to…If you’ll excuse the pun…oranges.
    Microsoft has abandoned technology and now is purchasing stock to grow ‘by any means necessary.’

    While Apple has done it by introducing new technology.
    Apple is introducing Vision Pro next month, while Microsoft has renamed Office.
    You haven't heard about Copilot or Azure, right?
    byronl
  • Reply 18 of 26
    XedXed Posts: 2,573member
    danvm said:
    nubus said:
    Does it really matter?
    It hurts. M$ copied the Mac - it can never be #1. And then MS lost on mobile, on tablets (at least round one), on MP3 players (Zune), and AWS started eating into their server business. And now that company is worth more than Apple. And the main reason for that is Apple.

    So, Mac and iPad sales are dropping big time, iPhone is static, R&D is going to an Apple Car that seems stuck, and then Microsoft understood AI, while we in 2023 had the same old Siri and the option to buy a new HomePod, which was exactly the same as... the old HomePod. Flatlining companies don't attract the best talents. We need for Apple to grow, add more users, and enter big markets (cars). Competing with Zuckerberg on doing the heaviest headset is taking away talent, and now MS is once again #1.
    From what I know, both MS and Apple copied Xerox, so I suppose they are the one supposed to be hurt, right?
    Apple asked for permission to tour Xerox PARC and there were some that, as I recall, were not too happy about both the touring and the slowed use of their concept being implemented legally by Apple. In an alternate reality Xerox would've had more people higher up that would've seen what brilliant inventors they had and it would be Xerox having to defend itself from having too many monopoles on the world's most popular tech. It's kinda sad to see Xerox fall so far in my lifetime.

    I don't recall ever reading about MS getting such permission.
    byronlwatto_cobra
  • Reply 19 of 26
    davidwdavidw Posts: 2,053member
    Does it really matter?
    If you are an investor who actively trades to get the best returns it does.

    The term ....... "an investor who actively trades" ......... is an oxymoron.



    For AAPL and MSFT traders who profits from trading on short term spikes in stock prices, whether up or down, it doesn't matter to them whether Apple or Microsoft is the more valuable company. So long as the news promotes volatility in the short term stock prices of both AAPL and MSFT.

    For AAPL investors on the other hand, it doesn't matter at all as investors did not invest in AAPL because it was the most valuable company (by market cap). No investor want to see the market cap of AAPL go up because Apple issued more shares. They rather see it go down because of buybacks. I know, as having been an investor in AAPL for over 25 years now, that I sure as Hell hope Apple purchased back billions of dollars of their stocks during this (hopefully short term) drop in AAPL share price. If AAPL investors really care about the market cap of AAPL, they would rally against Apple spending tens of billions of dollars every year on buybacks, thus reducing the number of outstanding shares used to calculate AAPL market cap.


    byronlwatto_cobra
  • Reply 20 of 26
    davidwdavidw Posts: 2,053member
    danvm said:
    nubus said:
    Does it really matter?
    It hurts. M$ copied the Mac - it can never be #1. And then MS lost on mobile, on tablets (at least round one), on MP3 players (Zune), and AWS started eating into their server business. And now that company is worth more than Apple. And the main reason for that is Apple.

    So, Mac and iPad sales are dropping big time, iPhone is static, R&D is going to an Apple Car that seems stuck, and then Microsoft understood AI, while we in 2023 had the same old Siri and the option to buy a new HomePod, which was exactly the same as... the old HomePod. Flatlining companies don't attract the best talents. We need for Apple to grow, add more users, and enter big markets (cars). Competing with Zuckerberg on doing the heaviest headset is taking away talent, and now MS is once again #1.
    From what I know, both MS and Apple copied Xerox, so I suppose they are the one supposed to be hurt, right?

    This was Gates famous quote during the Apple vs Microsoft trial with Apple accusing Microsoft of stealing the Mac GUI .....

    "I think it’s more like we both had this rich neighbor named Xerox and I broke into his house to steal the TV set and found out that you had already stolen it."

    Gates admitted that he "stole" from Apple but felt he wasn't really "stealing" from Apple because he thought Apple "stole" from PARC. But Apple did not steal anything from PARC. Apple paid Xerox for licenses to use some of the features they saw on the Xerox Alto computer GUI, for their own Apple System 1 GUI, that Apple was already working on before the visit to PARC. Apple visit to PARC  was more about the Mac team trying to convince Jobs that a GUI was the way to go with the first Mac. Up until then, PARC had the first and only fully working computer that was based on a GUI. Many members of the Mac team came from PARC and knew about the GUI on the Xerox Alto and were working on one for the first Mac, before Jobs visit to PARC. It's a myth that Apple first got the idea for a GUI, after their visit to PARC.   

    Plus the GUI that Microsoft developed from "copying" the Xerox Alto was the like of Windows 3.1. Which actually was more like the GUI on the Xerox Alto than the first Mac Apple System 1 GUI (which actually appeared first on the Apple Lisa computer). Only Windows 3.1 is just a shell on top of DOS. What most associate with Microsoft copying Apple GUI was Windows 95. Neither Mac OS System 7 (at the time) or Windows 95, were anywhere near similar to the GUI on the Xerox Alto. So Microsoft could not have copied the original GUI seen at PARC, for Windows 95. No one had any doubt that Microsoft Windows 95 copied heavily from Mac OS System 7, not even Microsoft. But Apple was in no condition to sue in 1995. Specially after soundly losing their first trial over Microsoft copying the first Mac Apple System 1 GUI, over the concept of "look and feel". Jobs wasn't even at Apple in 1995.




    ronnbyronlwatto_cobra
Sign In or Register to comment.