The next Apple CEO: Who could succeed Tim Cook?

Posted:
in General Discussion

Apple CEO Tim Cook is planning to exit Apple within the next ten years. Here are the strongest contenders to be his replacement as chief executive.

Apple CEO Tim Cook and potential candidates to replace him
Apple CEO Tim Cook and potential candidates to replace him



Tim Cook's time at the top of Apple is limited, according to the man himself. In an interview from April 2021, Cook discussed the iPhone maker's succession plans and confirmed he intended to depart.

"Ten more years? Probably not," Cook responded to a query of another decade of his governance.

That same year, in August, a report said that the belief inside Apple was that Cook wanted to stick around for one more major new product category, potentially augmented reality glasses. With the launch of the Apple Vision Pro, it's arguable that the headset meets that particular requirement.

A few years later, in November 2023, Cook updated the talk of his departure, in that there are really multiple succession plans being worked on at the same time. In part because Cook "could step off the wrong curb tomorrow," the CEO joked. "Hopefully that doesn't happen."

When pressed about who would replace him, he didn't name names but did offer that there was a number of possibilities. "I would say my job is to prepare several people for the ability to succeed," he hinted.

Furthermore, he admitted he really wants "the person to come from within Apple, the next CEO. And so that's my role is to make sure that there's several for the board to pick from."

Outside of Cook's comments, there is practically no chance of knowing who exactly will take the position of chief executive until that fateful statement is issued from Apple's newsroom. At least, not officially.

Whomever the board decides should be the next CEO, it will be selected with great care and an assumption that they will push the company forward. At the same time, due to its size and value, it also needs to be someone who won't rock the boat for investors either.

There are clear frontrunners for the biggest job in tech. All are selections that can reassure shareholders and consumers alike, and just like Cook, could stick around for quite some time.

Safe Hands: Jeff Williams, Craig Federighi, Greg "Joz" Joswiak



The most obvious choices for the top of the list are those at the top of the company, especially those who have a major hand in steering Apple's future course.

In his role of Chief Operating Officer, Jeff Williams is in a key position that was previously occupied by Cook himself before he took over from Steve Jobs. It would be plausible that a similar managerial movement could occur, especially considering the role is very pivotal for all of Apple's work.

Apple COO Jeff Williams
Apple COO Jeff Williams



Of the group, Williams hasn't spent the most time at Apple, joining in 1998 and being a key part in the creation of the first iPhone, as well as the Apple Watch.

Counting against Williams is his age. If Cook departed ten years after his declaration, he would be aged 70, and Williams would be 68, making the COO unlikely to have a long tenure at the top.

Another top-man choice could be Craig Federighi, the SVP of Software Engineering. He has helped push Apple's software forward, with his history going back to NeXT.

Craig Federighi, SVP of Software Engineering
Craig Federighi, SVP of Software Engineering



Federighi is also one of the big personalities at Apple, with his appearance at Apple events becoming meme-worthy at times. Following the outspoken Jobs and the calm Cook, the board could easily pick someone willing to make a show of things.

The software SVP also benefits from age. Following the same ten-year period for Cook's departure, Federighi would be 61, which could be a good opening for the executive.

Then there's Greg "Joz" Jozwiak. The SVP of Worldwide Marketing joined Apple in 1986, was around for the launch of the original iPod, helped make the original iPhone, and has repeatedly appeared at Apple keynotes.

Greg
Greg "Joz" Jozwiak, SVP of Worldwide Marketing



His 30 years of experience in Apple's marketing department would also be a big bonus for a company so well-known for advertising. However, his Cook-departure age of 66 does put him in the middle ground when considering his potential tenure.

All three of the above could easily fill the slot of CEO, with personalities and experience that would be acceptable to investors and employees alike.

Visible and possible: Eddy Cue and Phil Schiller



Of course, there are far more candidates for CEO than just three, with Eddy Cue and Phil Schiller both capable of doing the same thing. Both have been with the company in high-profile roles since the time of Steve Jobs, but they may be beaten to the post by the top three.

Eddy Cue, SVP of Internet Software and Services
Eddy Cue, SVP of Internet Software and Services



In the case of Cue, the SVP of Internet Software and Services, he has his hands all over Apple's Services business. This high-level growth center for the company has become one of its most important sources of revenue and is continuing to get even bigger.

As an employee since 1989, Cue has the history behind him, but with a potential age of 66 at Cook's ten-year departure time, he's a better choice sooner rather than later.

Schiller also has a similar lengthy history at Apple, with three decades of work on products and marketing at the company. As the man in charge of the App Store and Apple Events, he is also involved in very key elements of the Apple empire.

Phil Schiller, Apple Fellow
Phil Schiller, Apple Fellow



What Schiller has in his favor is that he's not an SVP: he's an Apple Fellow, meaning he has a reduced role within the company. This could be beneficial to Schiller, as it means he could more easily take the CEO role without disrupting the positions of other executives.

Age is a factor, though, and being the same as Cook, that would mean Schiller could be 70 by the time Cook leaves, making his occupancy of the CEO role a bit trickier to justify.

Third tier: Deirdre O'Brien, Johny Srouji, Lisa Jackson, and John Ternus



All four of these names are major players in the executive pack, making them still viable options for the board, but not necessarily the most likely picks for CEO.

Deirdre O'Brien is the SVP of Retail, carrying on the work of renovating and opening new storefronts around the world and managing Apple's online teams. Managing customers is certainly an important part of why Apple users love the company.

Apple SVP Deirdre O'Brien
Apple SVP Deirdre O'Brien



She has also worked for Apple for over 30 years and worked on every Apple product launch since joining. Her experience as the chief of People will also be a benefit when dealing with the army of employees.

Johny Srouji is Apple's SVP of Hardware Technologies, and has played a pivotal role in creating its silicon and technology engineering teams. The work of his teams has helped make Apple's products faster, smaller, more power efficient, and with the A-series chips and Apple Silicon, groundbreaking.

Johny Srouji, SVP of Hardware Technologies
Johny Srouji, SVP of Hardware Technologies



He joined in 2008 to help make Apple's chips, which isn't much of a tenure compared to others, but his work's impact on the company certainly counts in his favor.

Lisa Jackson is the VP of Environment, Policy, and Social Initiatives, which doesn't sound like a natural fit for CEO of the biggest tech company in the world. Joining Apple in 2013 also seems like a short timespan compared to others, possibly too short.

Lisa Jackson, SVP of Environment, Policy, and Social Initiatives
Lisa Jackson, SVP of Environment, Policy, and Social Initiatives



However, having previously served as administrator for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency before joining Apple, this gives her managerial experience others can't match. There are also her prominent appearances during Apple presentations, giving her considerable visibility to the public.

Lastly, John Ternus is Apple's SVP of Hardware Engineering, a position he was moved to in 2021 after previously being VP of Hardware Engineering since 2013. He has been on Apple's Product Design Team since 2021 and has worked on every generation and model of iPad, as well as iPhone and AirPods.

John Ternus, SVP of Hardware Engineering
John Ternus, SVP of Hardware Engineering



Ternus benefits from being the defacto face of the Apple Silicon transition, as well as his age. Based on graduating from the University of Pennsylvania in 1997, Ternus is probably in his late 40s, making him one of the youngest candidates who also has considerable time at the company.

Invisibles: Other Apple executives



In many companies, installing a new CEO from a roster of existing SVPs, VPs, and C-level executives would be fairly painless. Everyone at those levels will have proven themselves capable of performing the role in their work, with little effort required to switch metaphorical seats.

One of the problems for the other members of Apple's leadership is that they aren't visible enough to be seriously considered for the job at the world's biggest company. As a major household name where keynotes and product launches are global news, Apple would need a new CEO who ideally would be a known entity, who could easily become a figurehead.

Apple CFO Luca Maestri [right] is best known from Apple's quarterly results calls.
Apple CFO Luca Maestri [right] is best known from Apple's quarterly results calls.



The other real problem is that they can be positions where it seems unlikely that a move would be that useful to the company. For example, it's hard to imagine Luca Maestri switching from being the financial muscle for Apple to being its main cheerleader, since he is so enmeshed in its accounting.

Likewise for John Giannandrea. His role as SVP of Machine Learning and AI Strategy, and his extensive experience in the field, would arguably be better suited to furthering Apple's AI and ML goals.

It's the same story for Katherine Adams who serves as SVP of Legal and Global Security. While high in the corporate chain and with an important role in maintaining IP, litigation, and corporate governance, Adams may be viewed as better in her current role.

Sometimes, a candidate can be ruled out because they're better off serving the company's needs where they are than in the CEO's chair.

Sometimes, they can be ruled out because they are on the way out.

On March 3, a report claimed Dan Riccio, a former SVP of Hardware Engineering, is "nearing retirement" after over 25 years at Apple.

Riccio gave up his SVP role to work on a "special project" in 2021, which turned out to be the Apple Vision Pro. With the headset now released, Riccio is now looking towards arranging his retirement.

He does have an extensive history at Apple, including work on Touch ID, Face ID, iPad, and the move to bring chip design in-house. But with retirement on the cards, it puts a Riccio leadership bid in doubt.

Improbables: Former employees and external candidates



It is highly likely that Apple will opt for someone with a history and who has "lived" Apple for a significant time to take the mantle of CEO. That is especially evident considering Cook's hope for the next board choice.

However, there's always the possibility of Apple looking outside the company. Among the six CEOs who preceded Cook were former PepsiCo CEO John Sculley who boosted the company with his marketing skills, and former National Semiconductor CEO Gil Amelio, who served on Apple's board for two years before taking on the role.

Apple could convince another CEO or a high-level executive with the right skill set to jump into the position to shake up the company. But then again, Apple's board and investors may not necessarily want to rock the boat too much.

There's also the possibility of looking to former Apple executives as potential candidates.

Angela Ahrendts, who was previously SVP of Retail, does have the experience of captaining a titan of industry, having previously led Burberry for eight years. But at the same time, she is the same age as Cook, which leads to the role tenure problem.

Apple's former design chief Jony Ive has an outside chance of becoming CEO.
Apple's former design chief Jony Ive has an outside chance of becoming CEO.



Then there's Jony Ive, the famed designer who is synonymous with Apple. However, the circumstances of his departure from the company, and the freedom of running his own design firm LoveFrom, makes a return to Apple doubtful.

Apple's board may find it is a difficult task to bring someone from the outside in to helm the company. Maybe impossible.

But then again, with so many decent internal candidates available, it could be just as hard to pick the best one for the job.



Read on AppleInsider

«134

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 68
    Customers (remember them?) will be disappointed if the new CEO doesn't grok the spirit of the company, no matter how good an administrator they happen to be. I think that's why Tim Cook suggests his replacement should come from inside, so the new person has been steeped in Apple culture. Gil Amelio failed terribly. Angela Ahrendts was smart enough to understand but had trouble executing. And Jony Ive is not CEO material for a large organization. Let's leave him alone to design thin things.
    Zahlenhmurchisonbyronlradarthekatelijahgmacxpress
  • Reply 2 of 68
    blastdoorblastdoor Posts: 3,308member
    Based on public appearances, I like Federighi or Ternus. But of course it’s hard as an outsider to really know who is best. 

    I think Ive would be a huge mistake. He’s great at one thing and can see only one perspective. A CEO needs to be broader.
    iOS_Guy80damn_its_hotmuthuk_vanalingamhmurchisonbyronlradarthekatcitpekselijahg
  • Reply 3 of 68
    I agree that Ive would be the biggest mistake because he could not possibly put his ego aside. As an outsider, my first choice would be Greg Jozwiak despite his age, then Jeff Williams. Federighi would not be on my list because he's too much of a showboater, not bringing much gravitas to such a high position.
    byronlwilliamlondonchasm
  • Reply 4 of 68
    damn_its_hotdamn_its_hot Posts: 1,209member
    I also believe Federighi could be the best move considering his possible longevity & his time with the company. He also has had some negative reaction in the media at times — some of it unfair and uneducated; that may leave a bad taste in the board/stockholders mouths. I guess we will have to see. 

    No matter who the board picks it would be wise for Cook to bring up and make them look more like CEO material or did not have familiarity with the product line. Look what happened to the guys that were outsiders (eg, Scully:soda pop, Amilio:semiconductors). They had no credibility and the Mac was still trying to grow with no clear path (ie, the idea that it had to be a business machine but without support from software to make it a.viable business machine).

     It is anybody’s guess at this point, that’s my guess, shad’s yours?
    Zahlenbyronlcg27radarthekat
  • Reply 5 of 68
    twolf2919twolf2919 Posts: 112member
    Small correction: 'There are clear frontrunners for the biggest job in tech" - isn't that the Microsoft CEO position?  Apple's market cap is $2.6T and Microsoft's is $2.9T.  Apple lost the crown a few weeks back.
    byronlwilliamlondonanantksundaram
  • Reply 6 of 68
    Personally I would be good with either Craig or John just the way they are in the Keynotes they become recognizable 
  • Reply 7 of 68
    ZahlenZahlen Posts: 2member
    One of the key issues as to who it will be is the timing of the change. Should Tim Cook become incapacitated for any reason in the immediate future, the obvious choice is Jeff Williams.  He’s the right hand man, and has the ability to takeover on short notice.  

    Should the event be in the medium term, then it’s most likely Craig Federighi.  He has a long enough runway in front of him to provide stability for the company for a few years, and similarly he’ll have time to add the gravitas that was mentioned by another poster. 

    If Tim takes another 5-7 years before he walks way, then it’s more likely one of two people, John Ternus or someone of a similar demographic who’s currently at the VP level or even a Senior Director who’s a superstar within Apple that we on the outside don’t yet know.  One thing for sure with Apple is that they are VERY predictable, and don’t like to rock the boat - there’s just too much at stake now and having a CEO that has the longevity to see major new products through, from conception to realization is an important consideration.  Also given that many of the leaders in tech are younger, Apple will want to also nurture this as well.
    hammeroftruthradarthekatelijahg
  • Reply 8 of 68
    blastdoorblastdoor Posts: 3,308member
    twolf2919 said:
    Small correction: 'There are clear frontrunners for the biggest job in tech" - isn't that the Microsoft CEO position?  Apple's market cap is $2.6T and Microsoft's is $2.9T.  Apple lost the crown a few weeks back.
    I’m not sure how to define “biggest job in tech” but I think it should be based on more than just the market cap of the company (though I agree that’s a factor). 

    For example, I think the CEO of Intel is a much more important job than intel’s market cap might imply. And I think pat gelsinger is doing a great job. Conversely, I think the CEO of Meta is a much less important job than market cap would imply.

    I personally do think Apple ceo is the biggest job, though, because it’s kind of like being the CEO of AMD and Microsoft all at once, in terms of the breadth of technological innovation you oversee.
    avon b7radarthekatcitpeksrezwits
  • Reply 9 of 68
    JobsFanJobsFan Posts: 4member
    Great article. Ultimately however, it won't be up to you or me or even Tim. Wall Street firms such as Bl*ckR*ck are taking control of the Board and will do to Apple what they've done to Boeing. Like Sculley or Gordon Gecko on steroids.
    edited March 6 byronlwilliamlondondope_ahmine
  • Reply 10 of 68
    40domi40domi Posts: 68member
    John Ternus would be my outstanding choice, however I guarantee it's likely to be a female 😏
  • Reply 11 of 68
    Gil Amelio actually saved Apple! 

    He recognised that he was a good manager, but knew little about Apple or it's business. He hired an outsider - Ellen Hancock - who did know computer systems, who correctly reported that Apple's current OS strategy, Copland, was a failure. Gil then immediately went out to purchase for Apple an off-the-shelf OS, which could be "Apple-ised", and it was he who discovered that the favourite option - BeOS - was half finished; Gil recommended Apple purchase the NextStep OS. If Apple had gone on with Copland/Gershwin, there would literally be no Apple today, so thanks Gil.

    My vote - Steve Wozniak!
    ronnbyronlwilliamlondonam8449radarthekatelijahg
  • Reply 12 of 68
    arnold65 said:
    Gil Amelio actually saved Apple! 

    He recognised that he was a good manager, but knew little about Apple or it's business. He hired an outsider - Ellen Hancock - who did know computer systems, who correctly reported that Apple's current OS strategy, Copland, was a failure. Gil then immediately went out to purchase for Apple an off-the-shelf OS, which could be "Apple-ised", and it was he who discovered that the favourite option - BeOS - was half finished; Gil recommended Apple purchase the NextStep OS. If Apple had gone on with Copland/Gershwin, there would literally be no Apple today, so thanks Gil.

    My vote - Steve Wozniak!

    That's not how it went.   And Woz isn't a business guy at all.
    byronlnubuswilliamlondon
  • Reply 13 of 68
    It's going to be Jeff Williams unless he leaves the company before Cook steps down. 
    radarthekat
  • Reply 14 of 68
    hmurchisonhmurchison Posts: 12,425member
    Gil Amelio was brought in for his specific skillset which was "cost cutting" without damaging the company too much.    He was never brought in to be the visionary. 

    I think you have to look at what departments have achieved over the last half decade.   I think it's hard to argue that the stewardship of Fed and Ternus hasn't been one of stability in their respective areas of focus. 

    I like Jeff Williams a lot but my fear is he's a status quo guy and Apple's going to need to push forward into new areas and take on risk.  

    Eddie Cue -  not a chance his big moment was to negotiate favorable deals with the music industry and he flopped.   When the industry publicly laughed at his negotiating strategy,  "We're Apple",  I knew he done. 

    Johnny Ive.   Get's homesick for the UK and his passion is design.  Not a good fit. 

    Phil Schiller - likable but bzzzt.   He was the guy that announced the trash can Mac with a "Apple can't engineer my arse" and they promptly had to scuttle the design years later. 


    elijahgbyronl
  • Reply 15 of 68
    hammeroftruthhammeroftruth Posts: 1,313member
    Zahlen said:
    One of the key issues as to who it will be is the timing of the change. Should Tim Cook become incapacitated for any reason in the immediate future, the obvious choice is Jeff Williams.  He’s the right hand man, and has the ability to takeover on short notice.  

    Should the event be in the medium term, then it’s most likely Craig Federighi.  He has a long enough runway in front of him to provide stability for the company for a few years, and similarly he’ll have time to add the gravitas that was mentioned by another poster. 

    If Tim takes another 5-7 years before he walks way, then it’s more likely one of two people, John Ternus or someone of a similar demographic who’s currently at the VP level or even a Senior Director who’s a superstar within Apple that we on the outside don’t yet know.  One thing for sure with Apple is that they are VERY predictable, and don’t like to rock the boat - there’s just too much at stake now and having a CEO that has the longevity to see major new products through, from conception to realization is an important consideration.  Also given that many of the leaders in tech are younger, Apple will want to also nurture this as well.
    I totally agree. I think one big thing that will be a determining factor in Cook’s retirement is how well the AVP does in the next 2 years. If it does well enough to warrant a second generation and has ample software for it, then he will probably carry on with his plan. If not, I believe he will retire sooner. It is possible that the technology and talent behind the car development will be used for VP. I think that will help the timeframe of deploying needed apps for the VP to survive another generation. Otherwise it could be Tim’s cube. 
  • Reply 16 of 68
    charlesncharlesn Posts: 842member
    GREAT article. An example of AppleInsider at its best. These are tenuous times for Apple and I would think Cook might want to navigate the choppy waters ahead, for as long as that takes, before leaving. No, Apple is not doomed. Hardly. But it is stalling as a high-growth company with no clear indication what might power the next stage of its growth. Also worrying from a growth perspective is that its Services business sector, which has been an unsung hero of growth in recent years, seems to be in the crosshairs (unfairly, IMO) of government regulators worldwide. And now that we have to stop "wishing on a car," will future iterations of Vision Pro be that engine of new growth? Really hard to predict and, in any case, an answer probably won't be known for several years, at least, when/if Vision Pro transitions into more of a mainstream product which v1.0 was clearly not intended to be. 

    Of course, Apple doesn't "need" to be a high-growth company. It could settle in as a slow growth company that continues reaping big profits and adding to its cash pile every quarter from its existing product lines. But that would be the anti-thesis of what Apple has ever been. Unfortunately, and at least so far, Apple investors are feeling the effects of the company being left out of the AI conversation on Wall St. I won't even point to companies like NVDA or AMD, but just look at its traditional closest competitor, MFST: its share price has gone from $265 to over $400 in the past year, while Apple's share price is almost back to where it started at this point last year. We'll see if they can become part of the conversation with what they roll out at WWDC this year--I think it's fair to say that conference has never been more important to what lies ahead for Apple. 
    radarthekatelijahgbyronl
  • Reply 17 of 68
    sully54sully54 Posts: 108member
    Apple needs a Satya Nadella. 
    Massiveattack87nubusJackGleewilliamlondon
  • Reply 18 of 68
    sully54 said:
    Apple needs a Satya Nadella. 
    Or someone who can drive the stock price higher. 

    Now, Apple moves like a rotten apple. 
    williamlondon
  • Reply 19 of 68
    hammeroftruthhammeroftruth Posts: 1,313member
    arnold65 said:
    Gil Amelio actually saved Apple! 

    He recognised that he was a good manager, but knew little about Apple or it's business. He hired an outsider - Ellen Hancock - who did know computer systems, who correctly reported that Apple's current OS strategy, Copland, was a failure. Gil then immediately went out to purchase for Apple an off-the-shelf OS, which could be "Apple-ised", and it was he who discovered that the favourite option - BeOS - was half finished; Gil recommended Apple purchase the NextStep OS. If Apple had gone on with Copland/Gershwin, there would literally be no Apple today, so thanks Gil.

    My vote - Steve Wozniak!

    That's not how it went.   And Woz isn't a business guy at all.
    Ok then you explain how it went. 

    If Gil didn’t look at NEXT, Apple would have gone down the shitter in a few months. 

    He didn’t pick Jean-Louis Gassée‘s BeOS which even Jean-Louis said NEXT was the right choice to save Apple. If you look at the YouTube video of him introducing Steve Jobs, you can see on his face he knows his days are numbered. He knew that Steve could do what he couldn’t which is get the employees to listen and fire the ones who don’t. 
    elijahg
  • Reply 20 of 68
    thttht Posts: 5,452member
    I thought Jeff Williams had a deputy that is the de facto COO. The person who does the day-to-day running of Apple which allows Williams to be the C-suite operations strategist and allows him to lead all the other things he has to manage. The blood-glucose sensor for the Apple Watch is one of those high payoff R&D tech projects that warrants a push.

    It's definitely Jeff Williams in the immediate future. He will be acting CEO if Cook decides to take a one month vacation. Sometime after 5 years? Who knows. A lot can happen in 5 years, like the retirement of most of the 60+ year olds on this list. Not mentioned on the list is Mike Rockwell, who led the Vision work, and is in control of all the special technology projects at Apple, no?

    Too bad Scott Forstall is done as a tech manager. I think in hindsight, it was a huge fork in the road when Cook decided to keep Jony Ive over Scott Forstall. There have been excesses in "design" from Apple in the past 10 years while there would have been differently things happening everywhere. Swift would be different if Forstall was SVP of software at Apple. The iPads would have more PC features. Machine learning would be further ahead.

    I'd like to see a more computer oriented product person be the CEO. 
    canukstormelijahghmurchisonbyronl
Sign In or Register to comment.