Apple calls 128GB 'lots of storage' in new iPhone 15 ad
The entry 128GB storage tier for iPhone 15 hasn't stopped Apple from claiming its latest models have "lots of storage for lots of photos."
128GB doesn't cut it when many popular apps bloat to 10GB or more
There was a time when 128GB could fit the entire catalog of video games in existence, but as time passed, storage needs increased. However, as we approach four years with the 128GB base storage, it is clear that it isn't quite enough despite what Apple's latest ad might say.
The short 30-second ad shows a man considering deleting some of his photos, but they cry out "don't let go" as the song with the same title plays. The message -- iPhone 15 has "lots of storage for lots of photos."
It doesn't feel like it was that long ago that we were complaining about the 64GB base storage, but that went away with iPhone 13 in 2021. Apple previously jumped from a base of 32GB to 64GB with the iPhone X in 2018.
So, here we are at the end of what seems like a three-year cycle for pushing storage higher, and Apple claims the iPhone 15 has plenty. For context, an average user can easily fill half of 128GB with app storage alone, let alone photos and video.
Thankfully, iCloud exists -- if you're willing to pay. If 128GB on an iPhone seems low, 5GB free in iCloud is downright criminal.
From our experience, most people would rather delete precious photos and videos than pony up the cash for more iCloud storage. Those same people are more likely to buy base model configurations to save on the already expensive product.
Sure, Apple offers a 1TB iPhone 15 Pro, but that'll cost you $1,499 -- $700 more expensive than the base model. Perhaps it would be better to take that $700 and pay for nearly six years of 2TB storage on iCloud+.
For anyone upgrading from a previous iPhone with 64GB, that 128GB will feel immense by comparison. But that feeling will be short-lived as that new iPhone with its 48MP camera gets packed with new high-resolution photos and video.
If Apple wants to make an ad bragging about storage, then it should push the base up to 256GB with the iPhone 16 in the fall. Or, at the least, finally, give customers more than 5GB of iCloud by default.
Read on AppleInsider
Comments
However, on the subject of cloud storage, I recently took advantage of a QNAP offer (100GB free for 'life') so in case any QNAP users are interested...
https://www.qnap.com/en/campaign/myqnapcloud-storage-backup-offer
Phone > NAS > cloud
It's going to be clunky when compared to a native iCloud/Drive solution but it's free.
I don't even trust iCloud to be around for the rest of my life, which is why I keep an old 2TB iMac around for local backup.
Buying more iCloud space is the smarter way to go. With over 17,000 photos in my library and a 100GB iCloud photo library, my phone is a 128GB model and has 64G free.
200GB of iCloud storage is $3/mo. or $36/year. upgrading to 256GB is $100, which addresses the local storage but not the backup issue. 3Y of iCloud 200GB is about the same price, and gives you both the storage AND the backup.
Buy more iCloud space, not more phone storage - especially if you upgrade your phone more than once every 3Y.
That said, I don't shoot much video, so if you are shooting alot of 4K video, this may not work for you, but them I would say you aren't a typical user of the 128GB or even 256GB phone.
BTW...I have iCloud storage for photos (sync'd to my Macs) and I use iTunes Match.
I just tried it on my obsolete 7+ and it works, but it isn't very intuitive.
2a) I feel that Apple’s free tier of 5 GiB of iCloud storage going for 15(?) years now, is ridiculously cheap on their part. To their (minor) credit, they do give you a free allotment of temporary space if you're using it to back up to move to a new device. Of course, that does usually mean you've purchased another iPhone so it makes sense for them from a financial standpoint to make upgrading to a new iPhone as easy as possible.
2b) I don't like Apple iCloud pricing tiers so I keep my expenses to a minimum by only having my iPhone on iCloud which I pay 99¢ per month for the 50 GiB tier. Then each month I will plug my iPhone into my Mac — which isn't tied to iCloud for Photos — and transfer the photos to my Mac. I then delete from my iPhone the ones I don't want to keep on there (which is most of them) and then clean up and label the photos for the month. This allows me to save a couple bucks per month and keep my photos more organized on my Mac, which is also backed up to a Time Machine NAS.
There's far less issues with 128 GB storage on iPhones than shipping Macs with 8 GB of RAM.
128gb is plenty for the vast majority, anyone that has 60gb in apps alone is not an average user!!! The writer is referring to a small minority of users.
I have a 256gb and use less than 60gb, with 2000 photos & videos and half of those are garbage that like most users I can't be bothered to go through and remove. The only reason I buy 256gb is for the faster read & write speeds.
iCloud is dirt cheap, what is it with people in the modern world wanting everything that costs money, to get it for free 😡
If you want spare capacity and future proofing pay for it or buy something else, if you're not happy with Apple!
I am currently using iPhone 15 Pro with 128GB storage and still have more than 50% free space. If I am moving all pictures, then it should free up to 80%.
Question is how long Apple can charge storage and RAM price as much as 3-4 times higher than normal market price.
I don't think Apple will kill 128GB base line soon, so only choice is reducing price to upgrade but if that happen most people buy higher capacity.
If that so then why bother. Just kill base 128GB and move on to 256GB as new base.
According to wiki, iPhone storage upgrade from 32 to 64 at XR, and then 13 to 128 as base. So Around 4 years term Apple upgrade base storage.
So, I guess iPhone 17 or 18 will be 256 as base. At least Pro line up bump up first.
Where the storage fails is if you are an app hoarder or a music buff that needs stuff to stay on the phone. Or... you are dealing with apps that create large files without any auto-offloading support.