M4 Mac mini review: The first redesign in years hides incredible computing power

Posted:
in Current Mac Hardware edited November 18

Apple's long-overdue overhaul of the Mac mini shrinks an already great package even more, yet it still punches far above its weight class.

Silver Apple device with rounded edges and ports on top, featuring a black Apple logo on one side, placed on a tiled surface.
M4 Mac mini



I've owned a Mac mini since the very first G4 model. In an era of bulky towers and a G4 Cube just years before that impressed but didn't deliver, the little box brought Apple power to a small desktop package, and I was enthused.

And since then, I've had one in service 24/7 constantly. Even now with a Mac Studio on my desk, there's one upstairs in use with a family member, one in the other room silently humming away acting as my network attached storage and test platform, and a few more on my shelf that I've hoarded over the years, just waiting for an application.

Beyond devotee excitement, it has also been the most accessible option for switchers. The low price made it an ideal first Mac for PC users curious about changing their computing ecosystem.

It's had the same footprint since inception, and held roughly the same aluminum design for 15 years or so. Optical drives have gone, and the upgradeability has varied somewhat over the years, but the footprint has remained the same.

That is, until 2024. This is the first major external design change in years. So, let's talk about it.

M4 Mac mini review - Design and dimensions



The previous external enclosure for the Mac mini had a rounded-off square footprint at 7.75 inches long and wide, along with the heigh of 1.41 inches.

To a point, you could say that the new Mac mini follows a similar path. From above, it's still a rounded square, but it's a lot smaller at 5 inches across and deep.

Two stacked devices on a checkered surface; the top is a silver Mac mini with the Apple logo, and the bottom is black.
M4 Mac mini review - It's got a much smaller footprint than existing accessories



Shrinking the footprint does force Apple into making compromises, and the first one is the height. It is taller at 2 inches, but it's not really that much bigger than the last one.

It's still a square aluminum puck with an Apple logo on the top. It's just more svelte when looking top-down than before.

Another compromise is one that actually works out to be a benefit to end users. There's not enough space for all of the ports to exist on the rear.

Silver electronic device with various ports including power, Ethernet, HDMI, and three Thunderbolt ports, photographed on a white tiled surface.
M4 Mac mini review - Not all ports are around the back



What that has done is force Apple to relocate some elements, with a few making their way to the front of the body. Apple took this approach with the Mac Studio in 2022, and apparently they feel that this was a good move. I think so too.

But let's talk about that power button. It's been shifted underneath the enclosure, under one of the corners.

The position of the power button may force you to lift up the Mac mini to reach it, but it's not going to be something users will do that often.

Black electronic device with a circular power button and grill vents on a white tiled surface.
M4 Mac mini review - The power button's new location



It's still not fabulous, given that Apple has stripped auto power-on and power-off timings out of the Settings menu and is forcing users perhaps brand new to Mac to figure out the Terminal to do it. We're sure accessories are going to pop out that will deal with this.

All told, this isn't a show stopper. It's just annoying.

M4 Mac mini review - Specifications, versus M2 Mac mini





SpecificationsM4 Mac mini (2024)M4 Pro Mac mini (2024)M2 Mac mini (2023)M2 Pro Mac mini (2023)
Launch starting price$599
Best M4 Mac mini prices
$1,399
Check M4 Pro Mac mini prices
$599
Best M2 Mac mini prices
$1,299
Best M2 Pro Mac mini prices
Dimensions (inches)5.0 x 5.0 x 2.05.0 x 5.0 x 2.01.41 x 7.75 x 7.751.41 x 7.75 x 7.75
Weight (pounds)1.51.62.62.8
ProcessorApple M4 10-core CPUApple M4 Pro 12-core CPU,
Apple M4 Pro 14-core CPU
Apple M2 8-core CPUApple M2 Pro 10-core CPU,
Apple M2 Pro 12-core CPU
Graphics10-core GPU16-core GPU,
20-core GPU
10-core GPU16-core GPU,
19-core GPU
RAM16GB,
24GB,
32GB
24GB,
48GB,
64GB
8GB,
16GB,
24GB
16GB,
32GB
Networking802.11ax Wi-Fi 6E wireless networking
IEEE 802.11a/b/g/n/ac compatible,
Bluetooth 5.3,
Gigabit Ethernet, 10Gig upgradable
802.11ax Wi-Fi 6E wireless networking
IEEE 802.11a/b/g/n/ac compatible,
Bluetooth 5.3,
Gigabit Ethernet, 10Gig upgradable
802.11ax Wi-Fi 6E wireless networking
IEEE 802.11a/b/g/n/ac compatible,
Bluetooth 5.3,
Gigabit Ethernet, 10Gig upgradable
802.11ax Wi-Fi 6E wireless networking
IEEE 802.11a/b/g/n/ac compatible,
Bluetooth 5.3,
Gigabit Ethernet, 10Gig upgradable
Storage256GB,
512GB,
1TB,
2TB
512GB,
1TB,
2TB,
4TB,
8TB
256GB,
512GB,
1TB,
2TB
512GB,
1TB,
2TB,
4TB,
8TB
Display SupportMaximum of 3:
Two 6K 60Hz over Thunderbolt
and one 5K 60Hz over HDMI,
or one 5K 60Hz over Thunderbolt
and one 8K 60Hz or 4K 240Hz over HDMI
Maximum of 3:
Three 6K 60Hz over Thunderbolt or HDMI,
or one 6K 60Hz over Thunderbolt
and one 8K 60Hz or 4K 240Hz over Thunderbolt or HDMI
Maximum of 2:
One 6K 60Hz over Thunderbolt
and one 5K 60Hz over Thunderbolt
or 4K 60Hz over HDMI
Maximum of 3:
Two 6K 60Hz over Thunderbolt
and one 4K over HDMI.
Up to 8K resolution or 240Hz possible over HDMI
PortsHDMI,
Three Thunderbolt 4,
Two USB 3 Type-C (front)
Gigabit Ethernet,
3.5mm headphone (front)
HDMI,
Three Thunderbolt 5,
Two USB 3 Type-C (front)
Gigabit Ethernet,
3.5mm headphone (front)
HDMI,
Two Thunderbolt 4,
Two USB-A,
Gigabit Ethernet,
3.5mm headphone
HDMI,
Four Thunderbolt 4,
Two USB-A,
Gigabit Ethernet,
3.5mm headphone

M4 Mac mini review - Port shifts and wireless connectivity



USB-A is gone. We've been saying for years that USB-C is best embraced, and Apple is making it clear with the new Mac mini that it's time to shift.

It's not a big deal now, and it wasn't nine years ago when the 12-inch MacBook shipped with USB-C only. We don't recommend adapters, as that's just one more connection that can be problematic.

Instead, if you've got a non-USB-C peripheral, just get the cable you need, which is probably a USB-C to USB-B cable. They're plentiful and cheap.

Anyway, in the older Mac mini design, there were a pair of USB-A ports, HDMI, Gigabit Ethernet, a headphone jack, and two Thunderbolt 4 ports on the M2 non-Pro Mac mini.

Silver rectangular device with rounded edges, front view showing multiple ports, placed on a white tiled surface.
M4 Mac mini review - Two USB-C ports and the headphone port at the front



For the M4, Apple's limited space meant it had to rethink what the back of the Mac mini looks like. HDMI and Gigabit Ethernet is available as usual around the back. More on monitor support in a bit, but if you need bleeding-edge networking, you can still upgrade the Ethernet to a 10-gig version.

Like I said, there's no more USB-A. Also around back with the HDMI and ethernet, Apple decided to offer a trio of Thunderbolt 4 ports instead.

The headphone jack and a pair of USB-C ports with USB 3's 10Gb/s speeds live on the front.

No Wi-Fi 7 here, but that's okay. It's going to be a while before Wi-Fi 7 is reasonably priced. Wi-Fi speeds are as you'd expect, with no notable deviations from normal.

Bluetooth remains at 5.3, which is also not worth much discussion. Your AirPods, keyboards, and other Bluetooth peripherals will work just fine. Smooth operation is the hallmark of the Mac mini, so this isn't a surprise.

M4 Mac mini review - M4 and other internals



The base M4 consists of a ten-core CPU with four performance and six efficiency cores, along with a 10-core GPU. The GPU benefits from hardware-accelerated ray tracing, which can help games that use it look even better.

There's still the 16-core Neural Engine, which is primed and ready for Apple Intelligence. There's also the Media Engine, returning to handle hardware-accelerated video encoding and decoding duties.

Obviously, the big thing here are the performance improvements. They're beefy.

Geekbench single-core benchmarks
Geekbench single-core benchmarks



Most tasks rely on a single-core. For most users, the single-core M4 generational boost will be the most impactful speed improvement.

Bar chart comparing Geekbench multi-core benchmarks for four Mac mini models, highlighting the M4 Mac mini with the highest score at 15,012.
Geekbench multi-core benchmarks



Geekbench 6.3 multicore: 15,012 - about the same as M2 Pro.

Bar chart comparing Geekbench Metal scores: M4 Mac mini 57,914, M2 Pro Mac mini 81,216, M2 Mac mini 46,246, M1 Mac mini 32,818.
Geekbench Metal benchmarks



And, in marketing, Apple wants to call the M4 Macs gaming machines. We've seen hot takes that the new Mac mini is a good replacement for the new PlayStation or Xbox, given the inclusion of ray tracing.

We won't go that far. Despite there being some merit to the concept overall given the performance of the machine, the Mac gaming landscape remains terrible.

That landscape is the biggest impediment to the whole "Mac mini as gaming console" concept. Until that's fixed, it's not a good replacement for a console, or an Intel or AMD-based gaming PC.

Sure, there are big-name titles like Baldur's Gate 3, No Man's Sky, and the forthcoming Civilization 7 that will work fine. Don't expect to play Destiny 2, or most of the AAA titles on the market.

And even if you do, don't get them from the Mac App Store. Get them from Steam instead.

As far as storage goes, as we've said before, Apple has chosen to use slotted SSDs for the M4 Mac mini. At present, this is more so Apple doesn't need to have multiple SKUs for motherboards, and can just slot in SSDs at assembly time.

The repair mavens at iFixit have swapped out the 256GB SSD with a 512GB module from a donor unit, with the help of Apple Configurator. So, upgrades are possible. We'll see with time.

There remains a pretty large difference between the 256GB module and higher storage capacities. Using BlackMagic Disk Speed test, we saw about 2 gigabytes per second write, and 3 gigabytes per second read on the 256GB capacity.

The M4 1TB version has symmetrical read and write speeds at about 3 gigabytes per second. This is a notable speed difference, but not as notable as the M1 mini demonstrated between the low capacity and high capacity models.

We'll be discussing this more in a future review, but the M4 Pro Mac mini delivers about 6 gigabytes per second read speed max, and 5 gigabytes per second write.

As always, you know what you're getting if you buy the $599 config. More speed costs more money.

And, we are not fans of Apple's SSD pricing. External storage is almost always a better and hugely more cost-effective option for desktops.

At full retail, upgrading the 256GB model to 512GB costs an additional $200. Going to 1TB boosts that to $400.

M4 Mac mini review - More powerful than the Mac Pro it's leaning on
M4 Mac mini review - More powerful than the Mac Pro it's leaning on



Street prices for 1TB external high-speed Thunderbolt or USB4 SSDs are about $160, if you shop right, or build your own. Or, 2TB drives can be had for about $250.

And, across Thunderbolt, these drives will only be very slightly slower than an upgraded storage Mac mini. They'll be significantly faster than the 256GB capacity.

As I just about always have, I recommend external local storage, or network attached storage instead of paying Apple's exorbitant SSD prices. Maybe do what I do, and use a Mac mini a generation or two old as a server connected to your television, with a massive amount of hard drives.

Use your upgrade money for extra RAM, maybe. Apple's RAM prices are steep too. In a desktop form factor, that's money better spent than internal storage.

Regardless, be mindful. The M4 Pro Mac mini is just a rung up the ladder or two, and it's easy to get to that price point adding upgrades.

Speaking of that RAM, the Mac mini now ships with 16GB of RAM standard. This is more than enough for most of the target market for this device, as even 8GB is sufficient for word processing and most of the use that a Mac mini sees.

That said, the savvy AppleInsider reader, for the most part, has been butting up against the limits of that default capacity for some time. The 16GB is welcome, especially since Apple Intelligence will chew a bit of that.

M4 Mac mini review - wider monitor support



The main complaint from AppleInsider readers about Apple Silicon has been the lessened monitor support, versus the last Intel Macs.

The non-Pro models of Apple Silicon were limited to a pair of displays. This manifested in the portables as the internal screen and one external, and on the Mac mini as one on HDMI, and one on Thunderbolt.

We've spoken about this a bit in this review already in the spec table above, but Apple has changed that with M4.

In short, you can now have three monitors connected to a base M4 Mac mini, versus two. For three monitors, you can connect two 6K monitors at 60Hz, over Thunderbolt, with a 5K 60Hz display over HDMI.

Two stacked silver Mac Mini computers on a tiled surface.
M4 Mac mini review - The new model on top of the old one



If you only need two monitors, The HDMI port is probably where you want to connect your main monitor. With one 5K60 display connected over Thunderbolt, that HDMI port can support one 8K 60Hz or 4K 240Hz display over HDMI.

I don't presently have a 8K monitor to test this with, unfortunately. They're still spendier than the budget allows. Should I be able to beg, borrow, or steal one, we'll update this.

But, what I can say, is that I was able to swap out my Mac Studio on my desk, and connect my main monitor at 4K120 over HDMI, and two portrait-oriented monitors at 4K60 just fine.

M4 Mac mini review - New design, same goal



Apple has always focused on a few specific markets for the Mac mini, and it's spread a bit to others. At its core, the Mac mini was designed provide consumers with a Mac that won't break the bank, and get going with minimal effort.

It's spread to enthusiasts like me who jam them places where others would put a Raspberry Pi. Data centers like MacStadium like them too, and they already have a plan for racking up the new model.

There was a day where the Mac was the main product and the iPhone was the "halo" one that the Mac would draw people towards. This hasn't been the case in a long time.

Instead, the new Mac mini remains an entire Mac experience that at $499 under education pricing, is half the cost of an iPhone 16 Pro.

We're all for squeezing every last dime out of a capital investment in computers. That said, if you're interested in performance on the cheap, the only reason to stick with an Intel Mac mini at this point is Boot Camp.

And there's arguments to be made that the M1 is getting a little long in the tooth for folks that read AppleInsider on the regular.

It's been almost five years since the Apple Silicon transition. Nearly all the important software is Apple Silicon-native now, and non-native Mac software is faster under Rosetta than it ever was on an Intel mini.

The external design is different for the first time in years. The footprint is now radically changed for the first time in 20 years. We're sure that the new footprint has confounded accessory designers, but we're also sure that they're on the case already.

What hasn't changed is the fact that Apple's new M4 Mac mini remains the best balance of computing power to cost for the computer-as-appliance crowd that you can get for the money.

M4 Mac mini review - Pros

  • M4 has big speed gains over M2 in the last mini

  • Unchanged $599 retail price

  • New design, for the first time in years, but...

M4 Mac mini review - Cons

  • The new design is also a con for accessories that fit the same footprint

  • No USB-A, but this isn't major nine years after Apple first used it

  • Really strange power button placement -- but this too isn't major

  • Terrible SSD and RAM upgrade pricing

Rating: 4.5 out of 5

Where to buy Apple's M4 Mac mini at a discount



Every 2024 Mac mini configuration is on sale in our M4 Mac mini Price Guide, with prices starting at $549 at press time.



Save on the retail models at Amazon, with the configure-to-order (CTO) models eligible for a promo code discount of up to $200 off with code APINSIDER at Apple Authorized Reseller Adorama.



Read on AppleInsider

«1

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 34
    MacProMacPro Posts: 19,851member
    It makes one wonder what the Mac Studio M4 Ultra will be like!
    dewmechasmmattinozAlex1Ndanoxunbeliever2Alex_Vwatto_cobra
  • Reply 2 of 34
    No USB-A on a Mac Mini isn’t a big deal, but it’s a huge deal on a MacBook. I just bought an M1 MacBook Air, and I like it, but there is no real replacement for my low profile USB-A thumb drive. I’m going to have to use a fragile 90 degree adapter to connect my USB-A thumb drive to one of the two USB-C ports. Not a great solution.
    williamlondonwatto_cobra
  • Reply 3 of 34
    chasmchasm Posts: 3,601member
    Very fair and balanced review, prioritizing what’s actually important about these machines.

    Around 95-99 percent of the people I know who are not full-time geeks would be blown away by the base model and get seven or more years out of it. Fantastic value for $600 that blows Windows machines at that price point out of serious consideration.

    You know who’s going to make a killing off this new Mini? The first company that creates a small travel case that neatly fits the Mini, a keyboard and mouse or trackpad with room for the power cord and an HDMI cable, effectively making this a portable, that’s who. About all I’d need beyond that is a lightweight screen and I could work just about anywhere.
    Alex1NdewmeAlex_Vwilliamlondonwatto_cobra
  • Reply 4 of 34
    chasmchasm Posts: 3,601member
    mbmoore said:
    No USB-A on a Mac Mini isn’t a big deal, but it’s a huge deal on a MacBook. I just bought an M1 MacBook Air, and I like it, but there is no real replacement for my low profile USB-A thumb drive. I’m going to have to use a fragile 90 degree adapter to connect my USB-A thumb drive to one of the two USB-C ports. Not a great solution.
    I have a small hub that does all that for my MBP.

    Or you could switch to one of these growing number of USB-C thumb drives.
    Alex1NchiaOferStrangeDaysAlex_Vwilliamlondonwatto_cobra
  • Reply 5 of 34
    you can get 4tb NVME drives for $250 If ya time it right
    Alex1Napple4thewinAlex_Vwatto_cobra
  • Reply 6 of 34
    thttht Posts: 5,695member
    The stackable accessories will come. Port docks with NVMe SSDs, 2.5in HDD enclosures, 3.5in HDD enclosures, TB5 NVMe RAID enclosures. I'd want a two bay 3.5" HDD enclosure. It's going to be like 6.5" tall and when stacked on top of a Mac mini, you are going to have yourself a mini tower of something like 5 x 5 x 10.

    It interesting accessory would be a radiator fin accessory. It's just dumb piece of finned metal thermal pasted or thermal padded to the top of the enclosure. You can make it look like a piece of art even, but it will add some convective cooling to the top of the box. Might nick at how many times you hear the fan running.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 7 of 34
    Great review, Mike, as usual! 
    Alex_Vwatto_cobra
  • Reply 8 of 34
    jvm156 said:
    you can get 4tb NVME drives for $250 If ya time it right
    Yes, and warning to Mac Mini buyers looking for external storage - for now it's best to avoid Sandisk Extreme / Pro external USB SSDs due to many reports of hardware failures over the past 2 years on those models.  (Also avoid Western Digital SSDs, same company different labels.)  Sandisk used to be my go-to recommendation, but now I recommend the Samsung T7 Shield or T9 instead as similarly high performance, decently priced SSD options. (The claimed extra speed of the T9 is not possible on a Mac, both T7 and T9 run about the 10Gbps USB 3.2 limit and no faster.)

    If you're willing to spend a little more, a USB4 / Thunderbolt 4 or 5 SSD will offer 2-3X faster speeds than USB 3.2 too.
    edited November 13 Alex_VAlex1Nwatto_cobra
  • Reply 9 of 34
    chasm said:
    Very fair and balanced review, prioritizing what’s actually important about these machines.

    Around 95-99 percent of the people I know who are not full-time geeks would be blown away by the base model and get seven or more years out of it. Fantastic value for $600 that blows Windows machines at that price point out of serious consideration.

    You know who’s going to make a killing off this new Mini? The first company that creates a small travel case that neatly fits the Mini, a keyboard and mouse or trackpad with room for the power cord and an HDMI cable, effectively making this a portable, that’s who. About all I’d need beyond that is a lightweight screen and I could work just about anywhere.
    "Around 95-99 percent of the people I know who are not full-time geeks would be blown away by the base model and get seven or more years out of it"

    With only 256GB of storage?
    williamlondon
  • Reply 10 of 34
    This is actually the third redesign of the mini.  First, from 2005-2009 was 6.5" sq and 2" tall, second, from 2010-2023 was 7.75" sq and 1.4" tall, and now 5" sq and back to 2" tall.  Volumes of first two iterations were about the same, but new one is roughly half.
    dewmeAlex_VAlex1Nwatto_cobra
  • Reply 11 of 34
    Mike WuertheleMike Wuerthele Posts: 6,928administrator
    jvm156 said:
    you can get 4tb NVME drives for $250 If ya time it right
    Yes, and warning to Mac Mini buyers looking for external storage - for now it's best to avoid Sandisk Extreme / Pro external USB SSDs due to many reports of hardware failures over the past 2 years on those models.  (Also avoid Western Digital SSDs, same company different labels.)  Sandisk used to be my go-to recommendation, but now I recommend the Samsung T7 Shield or T9 instead as similarly high performance, decently priced SSD options. (The claimed extra speed of the T9 is not possible on a Mac, both T7 and T9 run about the 10Gbps USB 3.2 limit and no faster.)

    If you're willing to spend a little more, a USB4 / Thunderbolt 4 or 5 SSD will offer 2-3X faster speeds than USB 3.2 too.
    We like building your own.

    edited November 13 OferAlex_Vwatto_cobra
  • Reply 12 of 34
    mbmoore said:
    No USB-A on a Mac Mini isn’t a big deal, but it’s a huge deal on a MacBook. I just bought an M1 MacBook Air, and I like it, but there is no real replacement for my low profile USB-A thumb drive. I’m going to have to use a fragile 90 degree adapter to connect my USB-A thumb drive to one of the two USB-C ports. Not a great solution.
    They make USB C drives. Just one example.

    https://www.amazon.com/SanDisk-Ultra-Drive-Type-C-Flash/
    edited November 13 chiaOferStrangeDaysAlex_Vwatto_cobra
  • Reply 13 of 34
    mbmoore said:
    No USB-A on a Mac Mini isn’t a big deal, but it’s a huge deal on a MacBook. I just bought an M1 MacBook Air, and I like it, but there is no real replacement for my low profile USB-A thumb drive. I’m going to have to use a fragile 90 degree adapter to connect my USB-A thumb drive to one of the two USB-C ports. Not a great solution.
    Agreed - that is one downside to usb-c I'm afraid.  Haven't been able to find a usb-c equivalent to the absolutely tiny usb-a one I have for car use.
    watto_cobra
  • Reply 14 of 34
    Is this almost a benchmark, clearly illustrating sockets are still viable for storage/memory upgrades...

    The 2011 i7 2.7ghz GPU dual drive mini is an enduring favourite design for me still in daily use...
    The 2018 i7 I appreciate more now too running a V56 eGPU for roughly the power of a maxed out 2010 mac pro, both Mojave capable...

    Alex_Vwatto_cobra
  • Reply 15 of 34
    chasm said:
    mbmoore said:
    No USB-A on a Mac Mini isn’t a big deal, but it’s a huge deal on a MacBook. I just bought an M1 MacBook Air, and I like it, but there is no real replacement for my low profile USB-A thumb drive. I’m going to have to use a fragile 90 degree adapter to connect my USB-A thumb drive to one of the two USB-C ports. Not a great solution.
    I have a small hub that does all that for my MBP.

    Or you could switch to one of these growing number of USB-C thumb drives.
    Actually, neither of those solutions works for me. On my old 11 inch Air, I leave my LOW PROFILE (1/4” protrusion) 512gb thumb drive in the USB-A port practically all the time—it’s a permanent appendage to it and it’s where I save all of my data files. Because of USB-C’s limits to minimization, there is no pathway to that size drive footprint, and I need the extra storage to avoid using up my internal drive space. The only solution is to add structural support to the adapter. I certainly use hubs and other thumb drives occasionally, but not permanently attached. In this configuration, I can pick up my Air and walk out the door without worrying about wagging a bag of attachments with me. Apple throws a monkey wrench into things when they don’t include USB-A—major oversight IMO. I know why they do it—it’s an easy way to coerce buyers into upgrading to a more expensive model, but I’m on a limited budget.

    williamlondon
  • Reply 16 of 34
    Someone should tell the author that the first Apple Silicon Macs were released in November 2020, which was 4 years ago, not 'nearly five years ago' as mentioned in the article.

    The bad thing about the Mac mini is the audio out on the front.  The mini has a pathetic speaker and powered speakers are required.  Not everyone is wasting $1600 for an Apple Display, so powered speakers will be plugged in, sticking out of the front.  They should not call it carbon friendly with the power button out of reach on the bottom, making people leave it on 24/7.  Soon the Mac Studio with M4 Max will be here.  When you upgrade the mini with usable memory and storage, you are about $200 shy of the same configured Mac Studio, making the mini a poor choice.  You will get so much more performance, ports, and better port layout, with only $200 more.  You still need a monitor with the Mac Studio as well.

    USB-A was a great feature of the prior mini because many people have and use USB flash drives, which are all USB-A.  Now you need an adapter.  The Mac mini is great, until you upgrade it and realize you get a much better Mac with the Mac Studio for only $200 more.
  • Reply 17 of 34
    charlesncharlesn Posts: 1,169member
    Nice review, Mike. My only surprise is that this didn't get the full five stars. Very rarely (if ever?) does Apple nail a product at its price point better than this. But I guess there's always room for a 1/2 star of improvement. Speaking of which: it's late 2024 and Apple really should be on board with Wifi 7 for the products it's releasing now--devices that will be in use years into the future. No, it's not going to be a while before wifi 7 router prices come down. Lower prices are here. TP-Link Archer's BE230 is WiFi 7 with dual multi-gig ports for $99. And Asus has released the Wifi 7 versions of its super popular 86U and 88U routers with prices competitive with what the Wifi 6 models sold before Wifi 7 came along. Yes, the absolute bleeding edge routers will still cost you $500 and more, but's always the case. 
    danoxAlex_VAlex1Nwatto_cobra
  • Reply 18 of 34
    dewmedewme Posts: 5,751member
    The current Mac mini is Apple’s best rendition of a computing appliance, just like Intel’s NUC was for Windows PCs starting about a decade ago. I have nothing but praise for Apple’s latest Mac mini. 

    When it comes to things like USB ports and WiFi support there’s always a tradeoff between supporting legacy and rolling out support for all the latest stuff. There is no perfect solution. People want to get as much value from what they’ve already bought and manufacturers want to move their customers forward to the newer standards. 

    There are some who’ve tried keeping older platforms updated through modular replaceable components but when the rate of change in the technology is occurring at a rapid pace, even those systems will hit a roadblock at some point because the underlying technology and architecture for achieving modular replacement is always changing too. Apple figured this out years ago but still produces one product that holds on to that approach, but that market is shrinking fast, especially when there are some applications that can be extremely well served by a Mac mini at a fraction of what a Mac Pro costs. 

    Like it or not, progress is often very unforgiving. But so is obsolescence. 
    edited November 13 thtStrangeDaysAlex_VAlex1Nwatto_cobra
  • Reply 19 of 34
    danoxdanox Posts: 3,417member
    The base Mac Mini M4 Pro with Thunderbolt 5 is the buy of the decade for Apple computer buyers, the location of the power button, SSD replacement or USB-A port are just wasted distractions….. If these things bother you find an equivalent replacement oh that’s right you can’t.

    The coming of Thunderbolt five and the continued iteration of Apple Silicon M series is huge, however as usual many people are getting lost in the woods.
    edited November 14 Alex_VAlex1Nwatto_cobra
  • Reply 20 of 34
    rob53rob53 Posts: 3,311member
    For those of you wondering whether you can get a non-Apple replacement storage card, check out the kickstarter site https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/polysoftservices/studio-drive/posts/4247624 that has been building storage cards for the M1 Mac Studio. They are already working on storage cards for the M4 Mac mini. 
    Alex_VAlex1Nwatto_cobra
Sign In or Register to comment.