Apple stock hammered for third consecutive market day, falls on news of more tariffs

Jump to First Reply
Posted:
in AAPL Investors edited April 7

While markets fluctuated insanely on rumors, the third consecutive trading day after the blockbuster tariffs announcement has again ended very badly for Apple, with it seeing billions more bled off of valuation.

Donald Trump in the oval office. Trump holds a signed document, displaying it prominently. A golden curtain and a blurred seal are visible in the background.
Donald Trump showing off his signed tariff plan



Apple's shares were trading at $223.89 on April 2, 2025, before Trump imposed raised the cost of it doing business with every single one of its overseas suppliers. As with all stocks, Apple's shares took an immediate hit, dropping 7.5% overnight.

And, on Monday, the sell-off continued. At the close of business, Apple stock ended a tumultous trading day at $181.46, a $6.92 hit from Friday's close.

And during the day, historically bullish Morgan Stanley also revised its worst-case estimate that Apple shares would drop no lower than $200, because they did. When the shares were just under $200, Morgan Stanley estimated the cost to Apple was around $33 billion.

It wasn't over, though. By noon ET on April 7, Apple shares were down still further to $178.62.

They had continued to fall steadily since the announcement of the tariffs, but then Trump threatened to raise the China tariffs to from 54% to 104%. In one Truth Social post, Trump doubled Apple's costs of importing its components or devices from China.

Trump's White House also extinguished the closest AAPL has come to any sign of recovery. A claim that Trump was considering pausing the tariffs dubiously extracted from a Fox News interview saw the stock market jump back up -- only to be smashed right back down again when officials called it "fake news."

Two men in suits, one with glasses, smile and converse animatedly at a formal setting with a microphone visible.
Donald Trump (right) with Tim Cook in 2020 -- image credit: Apple



The S&P 500 index rose 7% on the basis of the rumor, only to fall back again. Overall, on Monday, the S&P 500 dropped 69.56 points -- or 1.46% -- by noon eastern time.

At that point it was listed as 4998.32. Immediately prior to the original tariff announcement, it was at 5670.97. The S&P closed at 5062.25, down .11% on the day.

Trump's tariffs have had a similarly calamitous impact on stock markets around the world, which has in turn rebounded on the US. Following overseas falls, US stocks themselves dropped around 20%, and consequently the S&P 500 briefly entered a bear market status on Monday.

A bear market is when stocks fall 20%, and while it does not automatically mean a country is heading for recession, it can be a precursor to that. The S&P 500, at least briefly, rose back out of the bear market status, but the Nasdaq Composite Index is in one.

Apple has been hit the hardest by the tariff tumult



Apple is repeatedly said to be at least one of the worst-affected companies, because of its near total dependence on overseas firms. The company did manage to step up imports ahead of tariffs to avoid these extra costs, but even adding five flights full of iPhones will only help for so long.

And, it won't help September's iPhone 17 at all.

It was already believed inevitable that Apple will have to raise prices for consumers. But with all firms having to raise prices, consumers' ability to buy goods will be dramatically cut, so even a price increase will not mitigate Apple's losses.



Read on AppleInsider

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 15
    AppleZuluapplezulu Posts: 2,352member
    I don’t see where the constituency for these tariffs is, in the medium to long term. Anyone involved with the tech sector can’t be happy with this. The very wealthy can’t be happy as their portfolios lose value. Corporate America is surely taking a financial bath as well. The impulsiveness and chaos of this “policy” does not lay the groundwork for making long-term investments to do anything like move manufacturing here. Based on some of the comments here, the MAGA crowd is currently buying the talking points, but that’ll drop off eventually as reality sets in with inflation and recession. Inside traders and market speculators are probably happy right now, but that’s not sustainable either. Gamblers eventually lose money and inside traders have nothing if they drop off the most favored crony list, and for that, it’s worth observing that Donald Trump does not have any old friends. 
    darbus69napoleon_phoneapartStabitha_ChristieFileMakerFellerkellieglnfthedba
     6Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 2 of 15
    This is all illegal and unconstitutional. The IEEPA is intended to be used for sanctions against foreign governments. It make no mention of tariffs or taxes. 

    "Under art. 1, § 8 of the Constitution, Congress has sole authority to control tariffs, which it has done by passing detailed tariff statutes. The President cannot bypass those statutes by invoking “emergency” authority in another statute that does not mention tariffs. His attempt to use the IEEPA this way not only violates the law as written, but it also invites application of the Supreme Court’s Major Questions Doctrine, which tells courts not to discern policies of “vast economic and political significance” in a law without explicit congressional authorization. If the IEEPA were held to permit this executive order, then the statute would run afoul of the nondelegation doctrine because it lacks an “intelligible principle” to limit or guide the president’s discretion in imposing tariffs."

    https://nclalegal.org/press_release/ncla-sues-to-stop-trump-admin-from-imposing-emergency-tariffs-that-congress-never-authorized/
    edited April 7
    DAalsethdarbus69dewmenapoleon_phoneapartFileMakerFellermattinozglnfthedba
     7Likes 0Dislikes 1Informative
  • Reply 3 of 15
    Xedxed Posts: 3,086member
    AppleZulu said:
    I don’t see where the constituency for these tariffs is, in the medium to long term. Anyone involved with the tech sector can’t be happy with this. The very wealthy can’t be happy as their portfolios lose value. Corporate America is surely taking a financial bath as well. The impulsiveness and chaos of this “policy” does not lay the groundwork for making long-term investments to do anything like move manufacturing here. Based on some of the comments here, the MAGA crowd is currently buying the talking points, but that’ll drop off eventually as reality sets in with inflation and recession. Inside traders and market speculators are probably happy right now, but that’s not sustainable either. Gamblers eventually lose money and inside traders have nothing if they drop off the most favored crony list, and for that, it’s worth observing that Donald Trump does not have any old friends. 
    Outside of the idiotic MAGA lickspittles here, there are what I'd call a jaw dropping number of MAGA diehards that are asking Mr. Mar-a-Cloggo himself to get rid of the tariffs, or at least give their companies a free pass.

    PS: Did you see that he wants to have a North Korea-esuqe military parade in DC on his 79th birthday. So much for reducing gov't waste... which we all knew was a lie to find to new ways to grift 
    the American taxpayer.
    DAalsethwilliamlondondarbus69dewmenapoleon_phoneapartFileMakerFellerglnfthedba
     8Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 15
    We’ll see if Apple goes forward with their announced $500B investment to build data centres. Big corps are shutting their investment wallets due to all the volatility caused by the orange orangutang. 
    DAalseth9secondkox2darbus69ssfe11kelliethedba
     4Likes 2Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 15
    9secondkox29secondkox2 Posts: 3,320member
    We’ll see if Apple goes forward with their announced $500B investment to build data centres. Big corps are shutting their investment wallets due to all the volatility caused by the orange orangutang. 
    It would definitely help toward sourcing more from the USA and avoiding tariffs (and foreign government intrusion) altogether. Strengthening the homeland is only a good thing in the face of increasingly adversarial moves by abusive regimes. 
    Wesley Hilliardforegoneconclusiondarbus69kellielondor
     1Like 4Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 6 of 15
    Mike Wuerthelemike wuerthele Posts: 7,012administrator
    We’ll see if Apple goes forward with their announced $500B investment to build data centres. Big corps are shutting their investment wallets due to all the volatility caused by the orange orangutang. 
    Nearly all of that investment was announced years ago.

    https://appleinsider.com/articles/25/02/25/apples-500-billion-us-investment-announcement-is-business-as-usual

    it's not new spending, and most of it is with the company's manufacturing partners. I don't think anything is going to change in that regard.
    williamlondonforegoneconclusionglnf
     3Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 7 of 15
    If i was a foreign government i would be buying up all the USA tech companies at bargain basement prices.   Trump deserves nothing less.
    DAalsethssfe11glnf
     3Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 8 of 15
    Fair-weather investors certainly frighten easily.  I wonder if most of Apple's investors buy shares on margin and that's why they're desperate to dump their shares.  I'm not concerned as long as Apple is buying back plenty of shares on the cheap.  I'm eagerly waiting for the number of outstanding shares to fall below 15B.  I've owned my shares for over 20 years, and I'm not selling.  I'll ride this downturn as I did all the previous downturns, and I expect Apple to recover at some point.  I'm retired, and I don't live paycheck to paycheck.  My passive income isn't being affected by this tariff panic.  Hopefully, things will calm down later this year.  Many people were saying Warren Buffett was a fool for dumping a large chunk of his Apple stock, but Berkshire Hathaway now has plenty of cash to buy any stocks they choose.  Tim Cook has plenty of work to do to restructure the Apple supply chain.  I wish him the best of luck.  Wall Street may have given up on Apple, but I haven't.  I'm not smart enough to understand all of this tariff stuff, but I hope Apple is able to find ways to lessen the damage.
    ssfe11irwinmauriceFileMakerFeller
     3Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 9 of 15
    ssfe11ssfe11 Posts: 129member
    In less than 4 years if Trump doesn’t start Nuclear War this will all be a forgotten memory. Apple isn’t going anywhere but Trump is. 
    glnf
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 10 of 15
    Strengthening the homeland is only a good thing in the face of increasingly adversarial moves by abusive regimes. 
    Sigh. You think it's only the USA taking that stance?

    Collaboration beats competition every time.
    glnfscottishwildcatlondor
     3Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 11 of 15
    kelliekellie Posts: 75member
    We’ll see if Apple goes forward with their announced $500B investment to build data centres. Big corps are shutting their investment wallets due to all the volatility caused by the orange orangutang. 
    Apple has to build AI data centers.  That’s not a maybe, it’s an absolute.  They probably need to build them around the world as well.  I can’t say if they are investing more now in the US than they would have before tariffs, so they can look good.  Perhaps some manufacturing could be done in the US.  Certainly not iPhones.  Perhaps Mac Minis or iMacs? 
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 12 of 15
    kelliekellie Posts: 75member
    This is all illegal and unconstitutional. The IEEPA is intended to be used for sanctions against foreign governments. It make no mention of tariffs or taxes. 

    "Under art. 1, § 8 of the Constitution, Congress has sole authority to control tariffs, which it has done by passing detailed tariff statutes. The President cannot bypass those statutes by invoking “emergency” authority in another statute that does not mention tariffs. His attempt to use the IEEPA this way not only violates the law as written, but it also invites application of the Supreme Court’s Major Questions Doctrine, which tells courts not to discern policies of “vast economic and political significance” in a law without explicit congressional authorization. If the IEEPA were held to permit this executive order, then the statute would run afoul of the nondelegation doctrine because it lacks an “intelligible principle” to limit or guide the president’s discretion in imposing tariffs."

    https://nclalegal.org/press_release/ncla-sues-to-stop-trump-admin-from-imposing-emergency-tariffs-that-congress-never-authorized/
    Seems like all we do is govern this country through the courts. I’m tired of a country run by lawyers.  
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 13 of 15
    nubusnubus Posts: 768member
    kellie said:
    We’ll see if Apple goes forward with their announced $500B investment to build data centres. Big corps are shutting their investment wallets due to all the volatility caused by the orange orangutang. 
    Apple has to build AI data centers.  That’s not a maybe, it’s an absolute.  They probably need to build them around the world as well.  I can’t say if they are investing more now in the US than they would have before tariffs, so they can look good. 
    Microsoft pulled back from several U.S. data centers after the tariffs were announced. Apple might have to do the same:
    1. The number of Americans being able to afford an AI enabled phone will go down due to tariffs ($2000 iPhones). That old phone could last a few years more and so Apple shouldn't go online with capacity too early. A global recession due to tariffs = same story.
    2. Servers and solar panels are now much more expensive as they are hit by tariffs. This makes U.S. data centers more expensive.
    Placing data centers just across the border could make sense. My bet would be on Canada. Reduced need for cooling, cheaper energy, and a stable political environment. Apple could let Foxconn own the centers to hide the investment.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 14 of 15
    This is all illegal and unconstitutional.
    Neither of those things bother Trump. Why should they, when he's never suffered any notable consequences for doing illegal and unconstitutional things in the past.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 15 of 15

    ssfe11 said:
    In less than 4 years if Trump doesn’t start Nuclear War this will all be a forgotten memory. Apple isn’t going anywhere but Trump is. 
    Unfortunately, there is an increasingly long line of Trumpalikes waiting to take his place, and an increasing number of people around the world willing to vote for them.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.