Oppo Find N5 foldable phone review: Apple's now on notice

Jump to First Reply
Posted:
in General Discussion

The Oppo Find N5 is the first foldable phone I've spent any real time with, and it's really taken hold. I'm now desperate for Apple to get into the foldable game, but if it does, the iPhone Fold will have its work cut out to beat this thing.

A hand holds a foldable smartphone displaying apps, with a vibrant, colorful background of autumnal trees and bokeh lighting effects.
Oppo Find N5 review: Once you go bendy, it's hard to go back.



When you've been using phones for as long as I have, it's very rare that someone new comes along. The iPhone 16 is the best iPhone that Apple has ever made, but it's still an iPhone.

If we're all honest, phones haven't changed in the last eight years or so. The last big upgrade came when Apple ditched the Home button with iPhone X in 2017, and of course, Android phones followed suit.

But in the last couple of years, a new type of phone has started to come to the fore. Previously an expensive yet flawed idea, the foldable phone is starting to reach the mainstream -- despite Apple's reluctance to get involved.

Oppo has shown no such reluctance and has released a flurry of foldable phones in recent years. The biggest and best of those is the Oppo Find N5, a book-like foldable that fixes two of the biggest things I've always disliked about foldable phones.

The first of those is thickness. The Find N5 is incredibly thin, even when folded closed.

The second is the outer display that's normally small and of relatively poor quality. Oppo fixed that by slapping a stunning display on the outside of the Find N5.

The combination of these two things does something magical. Closed, the Find N5 feels like a normal phone. And that's huge.

It's so huge that I find myself using the Find N5 in lieu of my iPhone 15 Pro Max, making it the first Android phone to oust my iPhone in a long time.

But more importantly, it's made me excited for new phones again. More specifically, a foldable iPhone.

I think that, by the time you've finished reading, you'll understand why. But I hope it'll also stand as a warning to Apple and its extremely capable engineers.

It's a warning that needs to be heeded, too. Because while it's clear that a foldable iPhone is coming, it has a lot to live up to. Will it be up to the task?

If you're a long-time iPhone owner, it's probably unlikely that you'll jump ship any time soon. But if Apple is going to make a splash, it needs to compete right out of the gate.

As you'll read, the Oppo Find N5 is exactly what I want from a foldable iPhone. Put iOS on this thing, and I'm there day one.

I'll sell one of the kids if I have to. Maybe both.

Oppo Find N5 review: Specs



The first thing that we have to get into when discussing specs is those displays. Plural.

Displays



The star of the show is undoubtedly the internal 8.12-inch foldable display, which provides a 96% screen-to-body ratio. On the outside, we have a 6.62-inch display, which gives the Find N5 a 92% screen-to-body ratio.

Smartphone displaying apps on a colorful background with a retro city skyline and sun design.
Oppo Find N5 review: Closed, the Find N5 looks like any other phone.



These aren't low-resolution, low refresh rate parts, either. Both offer a variable 120Hz refresh rate, like ProMotion, so animations and scrolling are buttery smooth.

For pixel-peepers, the internal display's 2480 x 2248-pixel resolution and cover screen's 2616 x 1140-pixel resolution should be more than enough. That equates to 412 pixels-per-inch (PPI) and 431 PPI, respectively. Websites, images, videos, and apps all look great no matter which display they're on.

The specs just keep on coming, too. Both displays support 100% DCI-P3 and 100% sRGB, and they're plenty bright with 2,100 nits (inner display) and 2,450 nits (cover display) peak brightness.

How does that compare to Apple's finest?

We have to go to the iPhone 16 Pro Max to find anything close to the size of the outer display on the Find N5 -- 6.9 inches for the iPhone compared to the Find N5's 6.62-inch offering.

The iPhone has a 120Hz Super Retina XDR Display with a 2868 x 1320-pixel resolution at 460 ppi, with P3 Wide Color and all the good HDR stuff included. If you can tell the difference between 460 PPI and 431 PPI, you've better eyes than I.

I've said it before, but it warrants repeating. These displays are stunning, and that goes for the inner, foldable display in a way that other foldables haven't matched -- the crease.

It's a fact of foldables that their displays have a crease where they bend. Early foldable phones had terrible creases, but things have improved greatly with recent iterations.

In the case of the Oppo Find N5, the crease is simply invisible when you're using it. Even at an angle, when looking for it, that crease is so minimal as to be inconsequential.

That foldable display is a marvel made possible by a cool hinge that also helps to keep the phone flat when open. You can also half-open it to create a sort of laptop effect, should you really want to.

These displays are what Apple will need to replicate when it finally enters the foldable phone market. Now I've seen what's possible, anything less will be a huge letdown.

Cameras



Cameras are often where foldable phones let themselves down, but the Find N5 is different. Thanks in part to the huge camera bump that gives Oppo some space to fit some hardware into an otherwise svelte frame.

A hand holds a silver smartphone with a circular camera module, against a vibrant, colorful background of illuminated, abstract trees.
Oppo Find N5 review: Now that's what I call a camera bump.



The main wide-angle camera has a 50-megapixel sensor with autofocus and optical image stabilization included. Electronic image stabilization is also present, so shots are nice and blur-free.

Car side mirror reflecting a street scene; foreground shows sunlight peeking through a metal fence, with some greenery and rocks.
Oppo Find N5 review: A shot taken using the main rear camera.



Moving to the telephoto camera, we again have a 50-megapixel sensor with autofocus and optical image stabilization. The 8-megapixel ultra-wide camera rounds things out, again with the same autofocus and optical image stabilization included.

Up front, we have two identical selfie cameras. 8-megapixel sensors are used, one under the cover display and another under the foldable, internal display.

In terms of supported formats, the Find N5's rear cameras can capture 4K video at 60fps with HDR shooting supported. There's also support for slow-motion video capture at 1080p and 240 fps.



Comparing all of this with the iPhone 16 Pro Max again, there isn't all that much between the two devices. Apple's phone has a 48-megapixel Fusion main camera paired with a 12-megapixel 5x telephoto shooter.

A 48-megapixel ultra-wide camera rounds things out at the rear, while a 12-megapixel camera handles selfies.



Apple supports plenty of capture options, including Smart HDR 5, spatial photos, and more. Video recording tops out at 120 fps when recording in 4K Dolby Vision -- an upgrade over the Find N5's 1080p.

If slow motion is the main reason you use your phone's camera, the iPhone wins it. But my testing has shown the two phones to be neck and neck in every other way.



Chip, colors, and more



With the displays and cameras covered, the next port of call is the chip that powers it all. Oppo has used the Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite, a 3nm chip that's about as fast as anything in the Android world.

The silicon is backed up by 16GB of RAM, and the only storage option is a plentiful 512GB. That's more than enough space to install your favorite apps and games.

Topping up the 5,600mAh battery is incredibly fast thanks to support for 80W SuperVOOC charging. That's faster than an M4 MacBook Air and makes the iPhone 16's 30W charging seem ridiculous.

The charging gets crazier, too. If you have a wireless charger that can match it, the Find N5 supports 50W wireless charging, which is, frankly, unbelievable.

Apple's iPhones top out at around 30W when charging using a USB-C cable and Qi2 speeds of 20W when charging wirelessly. There's a clear winner here.

Speaking of wireless, the Find N5 supports Wi-Fi 7 and Bluetooth 5.4. A USB-C port with USB 3.1 Gen 2 support handles wired connectivity and charging.

Oppo Find N5 review: Design



You can buy the Oppo Find N5 in one of two colors. The one I've been testing is the Misty White model, and it's gorgeous. There's also a Cosmic Black if you aren't feeling the white, too.

You, of course, get four colors to choose from when buying an iPhone 16 Pro Max, and they're all good. But there's something about the Misty White that makes me want it on my next iPhone.

Two smartphones lying flat, showing their ports and sides, with a blurred keyboard and gaming controllers in the background.
Oppo Find N5 review: This is one thin foldable phone.



Moving on, we have to talk about dimensions. I'm not normally all that interested in these figures, but this time is different.

To be more accurate, I'm interested in the thickness of the Find N5 when it's in the closed position. Or should that be thinness?

Closed, the Find N5 measures just 8.93mm, which is barely thicker than the iPhone 16 Pro's 8.25mm girth. Open, this thing is just 4.21mm thick, which makes it a dream to hold.

This phone is incredibly light, too, at just 229 grams. The iPhone 16 Pro Max weighs 227 grams, so essentially the same as the Find N5.

These stats are what make the Find N5 such a delight, both in the pocket and in the hand. I can't overplay that fact, and you'll need to hold one to appreciate it. Which is an issue we'll get to shortly.

Oh, and despite the foldable design, the Find N5 has achieved the highest possible level of water resistance, which is impressive. I'm not sure I'd dunk it underwater on purpose, but I wouldn't panic at the first sign of rain, either.

Oppo Find N5 review: Software



I've already said that using the Oppo Find N5 is a great experience, but I'm sure some of you are already wondering about one key thing. Yes, the Find N5 runs Android. Android 15, to be specific.

A hand holds a touchscreen device displaying a tech news website with various articles, set against a vibrant, blurred background of trees with orange and red leaves.
Oppo Find N5 review: Android runs well on the larger display.



I knew that using Android would be the biggest issue during my time with the Find N5, and I was right. But only because it meant missing out on something that was entirely predictable: iMessage.

In the year 2025, most apps have an Android and an iPhone version, and, for the most part, it's just as good. I missed apps from smaller developers, like Good Links and Reeder, but these things can be worked around -- iMessage in a family full of iPhone owners, not so much.

If I were switching long-term, I'd have to ask everyone to migrate to WhatsApp for our family chats. It would be fine, and it would work, but it wouldn't be ideal.

RCS support would solve the problem if our carrier of choice supported it. Hopefully, it'll get around to doing that sooner rather than later.

The Android 15 installation itself is obfuscated slightly by ColorOS 15, Oppo's customized version of Google's software. I enjoyed using it, perhaps because there is a clear iOS-like look and feel to it.

I enjoyed the bloatware less, though. Oppo installs a ton of apps that I don't want or need, and many of them are aimed at the Chinese market. It's an age-old problem for Android users, but it can all be uninstalled, thankfully.

All of this being said, as much as Android has improved in the last decade, it isn't iOS. For better and for worse.

Oppo Find N5 review: The best phone you can't buy



It should be very obvious by now that I'm a huge fan of the Oppo Find N5. I think it's a technical marvel that it's this thin and this nice to hold, yet somehow bends in the middle.

Two smartphones on a retro-themed background; one with a circular camera module, the other with a square camera module.
Oppo Find N5 review: The iPhone 15 Pro Max and Find N5 look good together.



I can even cope with the idea of it running Android -- it's come on leaps and bounds since I last used it full time a decade or so ago. But there's one huge problem that potential buyers must reckon with, and that's the fact you can't actually buy it.

The chances are good that you're reading this in the United States, which is a problem. The Oppo Find N5 isn't available in the US, although it is offered in around 75 countries worldwide.

American foldable fans can choose to import the phone via a variety of methods, but I wouldn't recommend it. The warranty situation is a gray area, and any issues will be a nightmare to get fixed.

That's a giant shame, too, because until Apple's foldable iPhone arrives, this is the next best thing. It's an iPhone Fold running Android and with an Oppo logo on the back, and I'm convinced of that.

In fact, when Apple does ship a foldable, I expect it to look very similar to this device in terms of dimensions and display technology. If it doesn't, I'll be disappointed, and you should be too.

What I do know is that this phone has rekindled my interest in modern phones, especially a future Apple foldable.

The idea of having an iPhone Pro Max that opens up to become an iPad mini excites me. It's the ultimate in flexibility, especially with iOS 26's new windowed multitasking features.

My only concern is the price. The technology used by Oppo isn't cheap, and I see no reason why Apple's version will be any cheaper.

But if you want the best experience, and you have to have iOS, I wager that it will be worth every single penny.

If you're in the Android world, I can definitely say the same about the Oppo Find N5 right here, right now.

Oppo Find N5: Pros

  • The ultimate in flexibility

  • Stunning displays inside and out

  • An incredibly thin-yet-sturdy design

  • Dust and water resistance

Oppo Find N5: Cons

  • You probably can't buy it

  • Android might put some people off

  • Some preinstalled bloatware

Oppo Find N5: Rating 4 out of 5

Where to buy the Oppo Find N5



You can't officially buy the Oppo Find N5 in the United States right now. Imported models are sometimes available at Amazon, but prices are often around the $2,500 mark.



Read on AppleInsider

muthuk_vanalingamappleinsideruser
«1

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 22
    22july201322july2013 Posts: 3,844member
    Next: trifold phones.
    macgui
     0Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 2 of 22
    Mike Wuerthelemike wuerthele Posts: 7,186administrator
    Next: trifold phones.
    I feel like I saw one at MWC.
    muthuk_vanalingamcommand_f
     1Like 0Dislikes 1Informative
  • Reply 3 of 22
    anthogaganthogag Posts: 132member
    To combat foldables Apple could make a Pro+ iPad mini. 
    CurtisHight
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 22
    canukstormcanukstorm Posts: 2,797member
    Next: trifold phones.
    I feel like I saw one at MWC.
    HUAWEI Mate XT ULTIMATE DESIGN - HUAWEI Malaysia
    muthuk_vanalingamwilliamlondoncharlesn
     2Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 22
    9secondkox29secondkox2 Posts: 3,670member
    yeah... I don't think apple's goalposts are what other's goals are. Apple isn't worried about getting it to be thin, etc. Apple isn't looking to solve the problems with someone else's product. 

    Apple wants it to have a reason to exist beyond... "Dude, it folds."

    When it makes sense for the category and when It is every bit as reliable as the current, solid bar iPhone, and when it adds something worthwhile to the phone, Apple will release such a thing.

    Currently, Apple hasn't seen the need ro benefit. I have to agree.

    That's not to say next year won't be a different story. Perhaps it will. But when Apple actually goes in that direction, it will be don't in such a way as to be plain common sense. it could be that Appel has an entirely different idea in mind than another flip phone with a flexible screen. 
    StrangeDaysjeffharris
     2Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 6 of 22
    Nice to AppeInsider covering one of the best foldable phones in the Android world, from Chinese OEMs. There are other equally good foldable phones from other Android OEMs (Huawei, Honor, Vivo) as well, all of them from China. Samsung is WAY behind in terms of technology (definitely not in display, but other key areas such as Design, Thickness, Weight, Battery Capacity, Crease visibility etc). And people in USA get to see only that, which is a shame.
    williamlondonavon b7
     1Like 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 7 of 22
    command_fcommand_f Posts: 439member
    Sounds like a nice piece of hardware, though the question with folding displays is how they perform after a year or two's use. However, I didn't get a clear idea of why I might want to fold my phone.
    My dishwasher is WiFi-enabled, which is jolly clever, but it prompts the same question of why you would want a WiFi-enabled dishwasher.
    StrangeDaysdanox
     2Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 8 of 22
    AppleZuluapplezulu Posts: 2,535member
    That's a great review, but it failed to answer the biggest question: What is the use for this, beyond, "hey look, it folds"? Despite how nifty that might be, folding phones are apparently only 3% of the Chinese market, which, according to others here, is the only place that has the good ones. Also, while the review speaks to the thinness of this device as well as its water resistance, it doesn't address durability. Other reviews out there suggest it's fairly delicate. So why would Apple bother to make and sell one of these? FOMO doesn't seem justified, and would not be consistent with Apple's past behavior. A new phone model that's the most expensive and also much more prone to warranty claims? Why would Apple risk its customer satisfaction reputation just to provide a very expensive novelty?
    StrangeDaysappleinsiderusercommand_fCurtisHightdanox
     5Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 9 of 22
    StrangeDaysstrangedays Posts: 13,215member
    AppleZulu said:
    That's a great review, but it failed to answer the biggest question: What is the use for this, beyond, "hey look, it folds"? Despite how nifty that might be, folding phones are apparently only 3% of the Chinese market, which, according to others here, is the only place that has the good ones. Also, while the review speaks to the thinness of this device as well as its water resistance, it doesn't address durability. Other reviews out there suggest it's fairly delicate. So why would Apple bother to make and sell one of these? FOMO doesn't seem justified, and would not be consistent with Apple's past behavior. A new phone model that's the most expensive and also much more prone to warranty claims? Why would Apple risk its customer satisfaction reputation just to provide a very expensive novelty?
    But…it folds!
    appleinsideruserAppleZuludanox
     3Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 10 of 22

    Unfolded, the Oppo Find N5 is nearly square. One point of differentiation could be for Apple to outfit a folding iPhone with square image sensors, decoupling holding from framing. Along for the ride could be stacking the flash directly above the sensors, which would allow the flash to be in the (generally) optimal position to each. With that being said, is a $2,500 small iPad something I will choose to purchase?

    williamlondon
     0Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 11 of 22
    charlesncharlesn Posts: 1,546member
    AppleZulu said:
    That's a great review, but it failed to answer the biggest question: What is the use for this, beyond, "hey look, it folds"? Despite how nifty that might be, folding phones are apparently only 3% of the Chinese market, 
    I don't think the use case is all that hard to discern: it's a mobile phone and a tablet in a package that's just a tiny fraction thicker than a Pro Max and about the same weight. That's pretty compelling. There's certainly a market for it. I also think having an exterior screen that's the equal of a Pro Max eliminates the need to open the phone when you just want to use it as a smartphone. And not mentioned in this review is that the camera system was developed with Hasselblad, one of the most storied names in photography. What makes this all a whole lot less compelling is this: $2500. And that's how you end up with 3% market share. The best of the folding phones are priced for a very small high end niche. 

    I do think the main point of this review, vis a vis Apple, is very well taken. Apple arriving late to the party for a given product is not unusual, but when it does arrive, it's often with a highly innovative, best-in-class piece of hardware. Well, let's pretend the Chinese phones don't exist for a moment and consider this: if Apple had released something like this Oppo in response to the current Samsung and Google folding phone options, this would have been that highly innovative, best-in-class product that blew past the competition and set the bar much higher. Problem is, the Oppo does exist, and a year earlier (at the very least) from when Apple is supposedly launching the iPhone Fold. I have no idea what Apple might be planning for an iPhone Fold--and that's IF there is an iPhone Fold--but it would have to be absolutely astounding in ways we haven't yet seen to significantly top what Oppo is offering today. 

    command_f said:
    However, I didn't get a clear idea of why I might want to fold my phone.
    My dishwasher is WiFi-enabled, which is jolly clever, but it prompts the same question of why you would want a WiFi-enabled dishwasher.
    I'm with you on the dishwasher! As for the folding phone, it's a simple proposition, especially with this Oppo: it's a phone and a tablet in a package that's roughly the same size and weight as a Pro Max. Plus, it has an exterior screen that's the equal of a Pro Max, so you only need to unfold it when you want that tablet-sized screen. If you don't have a need for that larger screen capability, then there's little to recommend a folding phone for your use cases. And even if you did find that phone/tablet combo appealing, it comes at a VERY steep price--at which point you may decide that carrying a Pro Max and an iPad Mini really ain't so bad after all. 
    edited July 25
    9secondkox2CurtisHight
     2Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 12 of 22
    yeah... I don't think apple's goalposts are what other's goals are. Apple isn't worried about getting it to be thin, etc. Apple isn't looking to solve the problems with someone else's product. 

    Apple wants it to have a reason to exist beyond... "Dude, it folds."

    When it makes sense for the category and when It is every bit as reliable as the current, solid bar iPhone, and when it adds something worthwhile to the phone, Apple will release such a thing.

    Currently, Apple hasn't seen the need ro benefit. I have to agree.

    That's not to say next year won't be a different story. Perhaps it will. But when Apple actually goes in that direction, it will be don't in such a way as to be plain common sense. it could be that Appel has an entirely different idea in mind than another flip phone with a flexible screen. 
    How about "iPad Mini in your pocket" ?

    Being an iPhone user for freakin' 18 years, this is the first time I ditch iPhone 15 Pro Max for Oppo Find N5. It's a game changer dude. It is as thin as the latest Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7. Pick one up and you'll feel that long lost feeling again.
    9secondkox2williamlondondanox
     0Likes 3Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 13 of 22
    AppleZulu said:
    That's a great review, but it failed to answer the biggest question: What is the use for this, beyond, "hey look, it folds"? Despite how nifty that might be, folding phones are apparently only 3% of the Chinese market, which, according to others here, is the only place that has the good ones. Also, while the review speaks to the thinness of this device as well as its water resistance, it doesn't address durability. Other reviews out there suggest it's fairly delicate. So why would Apple bother to make and sell one of these? FOMO doesn't seem justified, and would not be consistent with Apple's past behavior. A new phone model that's the most expensive and also much more prone to warranty claims? Why would Apple risk its customer satisfaction reputation just to provide a very expensive novelty?
    How about carrying an iPad Mini ...in your pocket ?
    9secondkox2williamlondondanox
     0Likes 3Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 14 of 22
    zeus423zeus423 Posts: 291member
    To think people laughed at my flip phone that I held onto for years and years. I was just ahead of my time!
    9secondkox2kiltedgreen
     2Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 15 of 22
    All of the rumors I've read say the iFold will have a sub 8" inner screen and a 5.5-5.8" external screen - a far cry from your favored N5...
    9secondkox2williamlondonmacgui
     0Likes 3Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 16 of 22
    Pemapema Posts: 250member
    Oliver write: I'll sell one of the kids if I have to. Maybe both. 
    Sounds like an extreme statement. Do your kids know that they are on borrowed time? 
    :| 


    kiltedgreenmacgui
     2Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 17 of 22
    9secondkox29secondkox2 Posts: 3,670member
    Sibeheng said:
    yeah... I don't think apple's goalposts are what other's goals are. Apple isn't worried about getting it to be thin, etc. Apple isn't looking to solve the problems with someone else's product. 

    Apple wants it to have a reason to exist beyond... "Dude, it folds."

    When it makes sense for the category and when It is every bit as reliable as the current, solid bar iPhone, and when it adds something worthwhile to the phone, Apple will release such a thing.

    Currently, Apple hasn't seen the need ro benefit. I have to agree.

    That's not to say next year won't be a different story. Perhaps it will. But when Apple actually goes in that direction, it will be don't in such a way as to be plain common sense. it could be that Appel has an entirely different idea in mind than another flip phone with a flexible screen. 
    How about "iPad Mini in your pocket" ?

    Being an iPhone user for freakin' 18 years, this is the first time I ditch iPhone 15 Pro Max for Oppo Find N5. It's a game changer dude. It is as thin as the latest Samsung Galaxy Z Fold 7. Pick one up and you'll feel that long lost feeling again.
    LOL. I’m other words: “Dude… it folds.”

    yeah, no thanks. I have an iPad. And an iPhone. They don’t fold and they’re the better for it. In fact, I still have my original 2007 iPhone. And it still works. Such a thing will not be said about the oppo whatever it’s called. 

    I’ve checked out the Samsung folding phones. Ine just feels like it’s going to break well before it’s time. And the other folds in such a way as to be a total waste as you end up with either a tall phone screen, or a little square. That’s not an iPad in your pocket. That’s just a waste of a foldable screen. 

    Apple has a lock on what makes a top quality smartphone. That’s why everyone else rushed to all these gimmicks. Without them, they couldn’t stand out. 

    If and when Apple does such a thing, a reason for it to exist along with a way to make it solidly reliable for many years will have been discovered. 

    Until then, I’ll be happy to observe the other guys build the Frankenstein phones. But I’ll BUY the Apple one. 
    jeffharris
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 18 of 22
    Next: trifold phones.
    Trifold phones would be more functional as it would allow for an unfolded screen proportion that actually makes sense relative to entertainment uses like games and movies/TV. The only advantage that this particular Oppo phone gives a user is for web browsing. Widescreen games and movies/TV are going to be almost the same size unfolded as folded.
    edited July 26
    CurtisHight
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 19 of 22
    chasmchasm Posts: 3,779member
    Folding is ... nice, I guess ... but at double the price of an iPhone, foldables from any brand (even Apple if they decide to go that route) are a hard pass for me and most other working-class people.

    Right now, foldables are "playthings for the rich" with no serious advantage over slab phones IMO.
    jeffharriswilliamlondondanox
     2Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 20 of 22
    AppleZuluapplezulu Posts: 2,535member
    Sibeheng said:
    AppleZulu said:
    That's a great review, but it failed to answer the biggest question: What is the use for this, beyond, "hey look, it folds"? Despite how nifty that might be, folding phones are apparently only 3% of the Chinese market, which, according to others here, is the only place that has the good ones. Also, while the review speaks to the thinness of this device as well as its water resistance, it doesn't address durability. Other reviews out there suggest it's fairly delicate. So why would Apple bother to make and sell one of these? FOMO doesn't seem justified, and would not be consistent with Apple's past behavior. A new phone model that's the most expensive and also much more prone to warranty claims? Why would Apple risk its customer satisfaction reputation just to provide a very expensive novelty?
    How about carrying an iPad Mini ...in your pocket ?
    This is fan fiction stuff. iPadOS diverged from iOS several years ago because the devices had become different enough that accommodating the particulars of both introduced too much bloat in the single operating system. App developers also had to introduce bloat so that their apps would scale to either form factor, or otherwise be a disappointing, crappy iPhone-sized app in the middle of your iPad screen. Remember those? Separating the two operating systems eliminated bloat and limited variables that each has to anticipate. This is how Apple continues the “it just works” reputation and ethos. Compared to their competitors, each Apple operating system has a very short list of devices and configurations that must be accommodated. This is also why there’s no hybrid touchscreen FrankenMac tablet. Whatever that thing would be would have to carry the same OS as a Mac Pro. A jack of all trades is an expert in none.  

    So with an iPhone that also folds open to also be a square tablet, which OS would it run? If it’s iOS, then every iPhone up and down the line would have to carry a lot of bloated code that they will never use, just to accommodate the 3% who buy an expensive folding phone. If it’s iPadOS, then every iPad would have to once again carry bloated code to run the phone on the back of the folding tablet. App developers across the board would have to include code bloat to accommodate use of their apps in either folded or unfolded mode, including code to accommodate the square aspect ratio of the unfolded device, which is different from the rectangular screen of every other iPad.

    This is why I think if Apple develops a folding screen device, it will just be a folding iPad. Folded, there’s no screen on the outside, just the hard shell that can easily be tucked into your purse. Unfolded, it’s an iPad, with the same aspect ratio of the screen of every other iPad. There’s no need for bloated operating systems, and every app that works on an iPad will already work on that one, too. Leave the niche bells and whistles to the others, because I don’t think Apple is going to break everything else just to give a few rich people the momentary thrill of saying “look, it folds!”
    danox
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.