Tim Cook: We spent on AI companies in the quarter, but nobody big

Jump to First Reply
Posted:
in AAPL Investors edited August 1

Apple is increasing its investment in artificial intelligence and made seven acquisitions in 2025, according to CEO Tim Cook.

Person in black pants and blue sweater standing against a pastel gradient background, with large colorful text reading 'Apple Intelligence' above.
Apple acquires AI companies



In a recent CNBC interview following the company's earnings call, Cook said Apple has acquired seven companies in 2025. He explained that the deals covered different parts of the company and weren't all focused on AI.

"None of those have been huge in terms of dollar amount," Cook said. "But we're open to M&A that accelerates our roadmap, and we're not closing anything off there."

Apple has a history of buying smaller companies that bring in useful technology or talent. The company rarely publicizes its acquisitions, and the purchases are usually designed to strengthen existing products or infrastructure.

Its biggest deal so far remains Beats Electronics, which it bought for about $3 billion in 2014.

The latest round of deals continues that pattern. Apple is staying focused on strategic moves that fit its long-term goals rather than chasing headline-making acquisitions.

AI spending steps up in back-to-back quarters



Cook also said Apple is putting more money into AI. While he didn't give a specific number, he confirmed that spending increased in the June quarter and is set to rise again in the September quarter.

The company previewed Apple Intelligence during WWDC in June. The platform powers new features like improved Siri, writing tools, and custom emoji. It uses a mix of on-device processing and private cloud services to protect user privacy.

Apple's strategy is focused on keeping control. Instead of chasing scale for its own sake, the company is building AI features that work closely with its hardware and software.

That focus on integration helps Apple maintain quality and privacy, but it could limit how fast it moves in areas that depend on massive data or compute power. Even so, the increase in AI spending shows that Apple knows it can't sit still.

The tech world is changing quickly, and users expect smarter tools. Apple is responding in a way that fits its brand and mostly behind the scenes.

Siri revamp still in progress



Apple has delayed the launch of its AI-enhanced Siri, but Cook said the company is "making good progress on a personalized Siri." The assistant will play a central role in Apple's AI efforts.

In a Reuters interview, Cook emphasized Apple's broader approach to AI. "Apple has always been about taking the most advanced technologies and making them easy to use and accessible for everyone," he said, "and that's at the heart of our AI strategy."

Unlike rivals that have poured billions into large language models and data centers, Apple has so far avoided massive capital spending on AI infrastructure. Even so, Cook confirmed the company is "significantly growing" its AI investments.

During the earnings call with analysts, Cook confirmed that Apple's efforts with the upgraded Siri is going as planned and will launch in 2026. That's in line with previous reports.



Read on AppleInsider

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 13
    mattinozmattinoz Posts: 2,688member
    Sounds like a good solid plan now they have the infrastructure right. 
    grandact73
     0Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 2 of 13
    Not going to be lots of "Thanks" coming from the hundreds of millions who purchased the iPhone 16 models that were falsely advertised last year they would have a working "Siri assistant" in 2024/2025.

    Folks should just pass on the iPhone 17 series that is rumored to get 12GB of ram when next year we will see 16GB of ram on every Apple product as the minimum for Apple AI (what ever that means) and all prior generations will have crippled performance due to insufficient memory.

    The tariffs will just add insult to injury to the buying public. Hopefully, Apple sales tank and they have an awakening that lying to the customer base has consequences.

    Somehow, from 1990 to 2024, Apple was able to introduce new products without a bunch of significant lies. The deceptive advertising happened on Tim Cook's watch and there should be negative responses from the Board of Directors and certainly NO bonus money or stock options. Somebody has to be held accountable that is currently employed or soon to be a "former" employee of Apple.
    pulseimagesmuthuk_vanalingamJavert24601mbenz1962TheSparklegrandact73libertyandfreedanoxrussw
     4Likes 5Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 3 of 13
    anthogaganthogag Posts: 145member
    "Nobody big", no one over 6 ft? 

    They're significantly growing AI investments. They're watering their AI every day. 
    williamlondonrussw
     1Like 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 13
    ApplePoor said:
    Not going to be lots of "Thanks" coming from the hundreds of millions who purchased the iPhone 16 models that were falsely advertised last year they would have a working "Siri assistant" in 2024/2025.

    Folks should just pass on the iPhone 17 series that is rumored to get 12GB of ram when next year we will see 16GB of ram on every Apple product as the minimum for Apple AI (what ever that means) and all prior generations will have crippled performance due to insufficient memory.

    The tariffs will just add insult to injury to the buying public. Hopefully, Apple sales tank and they have an awakening that lying to the customer base has consequences.

    Somehow, from 1990 to 2024, Apple was able to introduce new products without a bunch of significant lies. The deceptive advertising happened on Tim Cook's watch and there should be negative responses from the Board of Directors and certainly NO bonus money or stock options. Somebody has to be held accountable that is currently employed or soon to be a "former" employee of Apple.
    Blimey, someone’s tired. 
    russw
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 13
    Mike Wuerthelemike wuerthele Posts: 7,225administrator
    ApplePoor said:
    Not going to be lots of "Thanks" coming from the hundreds of millions who purchased the iPhone 16 models that were falsely advertised last year they would have a working "Siri assistant" in 2024/2025.

    Folks should just pass on the iPhone 17 series that is rumored to get 12GB of ram when next year we will see 16GB of ram on every Apple product as the minimum for Apple AI (what ever that means) and all prior generations will have crippled performance due to insufficient memory.

    The tariffs will just add insult to injury to the buying public. Hopefully, Apple sales tank and they have an awakening that lying to the customer base has consequences.

    Somehow, from 1990 to 2024, Apple was able to introduce new products without a bunch of significant lies. The deceptive advertising happened on Tim Cook's watch and there should be negative responses from the Board of Directors and certainly NO bonus money or stock options. Somebody has to be held accountable that is currently employed or soon to be a "former" employee of Apple.
    What I bolded and italicized is revisionist history, looking back at Jobs, Sculley, and Amelio with rose-tinted glasses.

    iOS is not macOS, and the replacement cycles are not the same. "Crippled performance" is hyperbole.
    edited August 1
    williamlondondanoxrussw
     3Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 6 of 13
    The AI suggested responses to emails on macOS are mostly inane. I'm not sure why they would even bother with that type of use. 
    williamlondondanox
     0Likes 2Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 7 of 13
    tshapitshapi Posts: 378member
    Apple is well known for limiting new features to new devices/ devices that can handle the new features. So the updated version of Apple intelligence won’t “cripple” previous models, because it won’t be available to them.  I’m ApplePoor said:
    Not going to be lots of "Thanks" coming from the hundreds of millions who purchased the iPhone 16 models that were falsely advertised last year they would have a working "Siri assistant" in 2024/2025.

    Folks should just pass on the iPhone 17 series that is rumored to get 12GB of ram when next year we will see 16GB of ram on every Apple product as the minimum for Apple AI (what ever that means) and all prior generations will have crippled performance due to insufficient memory.

    The tariffs will just add insult to injury to the buying public. Hopefully, Apple sales tank and they have an awakening that lying to the customer base has consequences.

    Somehow, from 1990 to 2024, Apple was able to introduce new products without a bunch of significant lies. The deceptive advertising happened on Tim Cook's watch and there should be negative responses from the Board of Directors and certainly NO bonus money or stock options. Somebody has to be held accountable that is currently employed or soon to be a "former" employee of Apple.

    williamlondondanox
     0Likes 2Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 8 of 13
    ApplePoorapplepoor Posts: 395member
    That is the whole point of my post. The iPhone 16s were sold as AI ready when there is no way they will run AI in two years. Apple knows that so the iPhone 17 purchasers will find that out when the iPhone 18 comes put with 16GB RAM.
    williamlondondanox
     0Likes 2Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 9 of 13
    ApplePoor said:
    Not going to be lots of "Thanks" coming from the hundreds of millions who purchased the iPhone 16 models that were falsely advertised last year they would have a working "Siri assistant" in 2024/2025.

    Folks should just pass on the iPhone 17 series that is rumored to get 12GB of ram when next year we will see 16GB of ram on every Apple product as the minimum for Apple AI (what ever that means) and all prior generations will have crippled performance due to insufficient memory.

    The tariffs will just add insult to injury to the buying public. Hopefully, Apple sales tank and they have an awakening that lying to the customer base has consequences.

    Somehow, from 1990 to 2024, Apple was able to introduce new products without a bunch of significant lies. The deceptive advertising happened on Tim Cook's watch and there should be negative responses from the Board of Directors and certainly NO bonus money or stock options. Somebody has to be held accountable that is currently employed or soon to be a "former" employee of Apple.
      This is some over the top scolding from someone who obviously has never been part of a technology product development cycle.  Sometimes the goals are aggressive and you miss. That’s what taking risks means. 
    danox
     1Like 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 10 of 13
    ApplePoorapplepoor Posts: 395member
    The issue is veracity or truthfulness which was sadly lacking. Apple employees knew the "AI & Siri" .software was non-operational and should have b been scrubbed from the presentation the day before the dog and pony show. Many folks believed Apple saying the AI was working and thus bought some model of iPhone 16.

    One normally does not take risks that jeopardize a companies reputation.

    As we now know a full year later there was NO releasable AI or Siri software then or now. There was no magic hat that could have produced a rabbit during the last twelve months and they have admitted it will now be "perhaps" in 2026.

    The iPhones we had (iPhone 13 Pro Max and iPhone 14 Pro Max) were working just fine and we would NOT have acquired two iPhone 16 Pro Max units if the feature set diid not have improved Siri and AI per the presentation.

    I was working with the source code of a full Manufacturing and Accounting software package back in the 70s and 80s that ran on DEC PDP-11 and Vax and know quite a bit about software development. I started in the computer world in the early 70s and still like to do custom work all these years later. I have used Apple products since 1990 and this false announcement was one of their more memorable screw ups.

    We are probably about a month away from the next dog and pony show. During this last year, Apple seems to have moved all other product lines to 16GB of memory for AI they said. The iPhone 17 is rumored to have 12GB while the iPhone 16 was  raised to 8GB. The iPhone 18 most likely will have 16GB of memory and that will be probably announced as the minimum necessary for AI. So the two prior year models will be obsolete and under powered memory wise.

    Neat way to really shaft the customer base. But some prior customers may leave and never come back as their trust of Apple's word is gone. Deceptions have a way of coming around and biting a vendor in the back side at the most inconvenient or embarrassing time.
    williamlondon
     0Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 11 of 13
    Mike Wuerthelemike wuerthele Posts: 7,225administrator
    ApplePoor said:


    The iPhones we had (iPhone 13 Pro Max and iPhone 14 Pro Max) were working just fine and we would NOT have acquired two iPhone 16 Pro Max units if the feature set diid not have improved Siri and AI per the presentation.

    ...

    Neat way to really shaft the customer base. But some prior customers may leave and never come back as their trust of Apple's word is gone. Deceptions have a way of coming around and biting a vendor in the back side at the most inconvenient or embarrassing time.
    Sue Apple about it. See how it goes. Precedent is not on your side.
    williamlondonrussw
     2Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 12 of 13
    danoxdanox Posts: 3,901member
    Security, Siri, the five Apple systems, Apple Silicon, Apple hardware in general, will always be works in progress. That’s just the way it goes for a vertical computer company hopefully we won’t see Apple listing at sea anytime soon like Intel or IBM. Do I wish Apple would do certain things differently yes, but once again in comparison to their competition, Apple is doing quite well across the board with their arsenal of software and hardware. 

    Who is this other tech/computer company that has a better hand across software and hardware? It isn’t Google, Meta, Microsoft, Qualcomm, or Samsung.
    neoncat
     0Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 13 of 13
    ApplePoorapplepoor Posts: 395member
    And that is the issue.

    Is Apple  too big to be held accountable by even DOJ?  

    Seems like their customer base is being played for fools and there is no redress for possible wrongs committed. With perhaps a dozen or so exceptions (including the billionaires), no private individual has the resources to use our court system to seek redress.

    And that is before mentioning that many folks in power are bought and paid for by special interests.

    As a long time customer of Apple and having spent more than many others, I feel powerless and realize the John Wayne comment applies 

    "Suck it Up Buttercup" cause an individual like me can do nothing to get Apple's attention.
    edited August 1
    williamlondon
     0Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.