alcimedes, didn't the anthrax scare here in the US and the MOUNTAIN of stories written about it teach you anything at all about effectiveness of bio weapons? delivery systems, much?
I guess that would be too much to ask from you, wouldn't it?
Quote:
the internet rules sometimes.
But it doesn't do you any good if it's just information being viewed without background knowledge or actual thought.
I don't understand Saddam Hussein's behavior, then. Why didn't he just open everything up? Ego? He wanted to defy the US just to look tough, even though it meant his defeat? It doesn't make sense, gievn his historical emphais on survival.
Blix put it well:
Quote:
If that were the case, he said, Iraq's evasive behaviour in recent years could be due to Saddam Hussein's fixation with Iraqi honour and a wish to dictate the conditions under which people could enter the country.
"For that reason, he said 'no' in many situations and gave the impression he was hiding something," he said.
Oh, and look what else he said:
Quote:
?I am obviously very interested in the question of whether or not there were weapons of mass destruction, and I am beginning to suspect there possibly were none. ? The fact that [Iraqi Lt. Gen Amer] al-Saadi surrendered and said there were no weapons of mass destruction has led to me to ask myself whether there actually were any. ? I don't see why he would still be afraid of the regime, and other leading figures have said the same?
Comments
I guess that would be too much to ask from you, wouldn't it?
the internet rules sometimes.
But it doesn't do you any good if it's just information being viewed without background knowledge or actual thought.
Originally posted by BRussell
I don't understand Saddam Hussein's behavior, then. Why didn't he just open everything up? Ego? He wanted to defy the US just to look tough, even though it meant his defeat? It doesn't make sense, gievn his historical emphais on survival.
Blix put it well:
If that were the case, he said, Iraq's evasive behaviour in recent years could be due to Saddam Hussein's fixation with Iraqi honour and a wish to dictate the conditions under which people could enter the country.
"For that reason, he said 'no' in many situations and gave the impression he was hiding something," he said.
Oh, and look what else he said:
?I am obviously very interested in the question of whether or not there were weapons of mass destruction, and I am beginning to suspect there possibly were none. ? The fact that [Iraqi Lt. Gen Amer] al-Saadi surrendered and said there were no weapons of mass destruction has led to me to ask myself whether there actually were any. ? I don't see why he would still be afraid of the regime, and other leading figures have said the same?
http://www.guardian.co.uk/Iraq/Story...962405,00.html
PAUL FUKCING WOLFOWITZ
and
DONALD RUMSFELD
and some of you sad people are still trying to justify it: there may be weapons, it's a big place, there are these labs ...
No. You've been had. And you're so damn loyal you're lapping it up.
That would be awesome!