Best CD-R/CD-RW Media?
Is there a particular brand/type of CD-R or CD-RW media that is best? I seem to recall someone mentioning Yamaha Professional CD-R discs once a long time ago. I see that Maxell sells something called CD-R Pro for archiving/masters as well. Is this just sales hype or are some really much better than others? I know there are some real cheap spindles of media that have a high failure rate but I don't buy those. Just looking for the best. Any ideas?
Comments
g
Originally posted by thegelding
shoot...i always get TDK...never had a bad burn yet...but perhaps i should try verbatim next time
g
Have the exact same experience with TDK. Never a bad burn. Have had a couple o' boxes with Verbatim too, and no bad burns there either as far as I can remember.
something about using a different form of dye. the other brands break down over time. they weren't supposed to either.
I had problems with Sony CDs
Taiyo-Yuden, Mitsubishi Chemical, Ritek, CMC, Mitsui, TDK, etc.
Verbatim disks are usually Mitusbishi Chemical manufactured, as are the Yamaha DiscT@2 disks I use. They're very good. TDK and Taiyo-Yuden disks are also fine. I would stay away from Ritek disks, which Memorex and FujiFilm use.
Originally posted by Dog Almighty
Don't get Memorex.
I'll second that.
And I'll throw in another in support of Verbatim. My brother (on the opposite side of the country) got me a 10-pack "Digital Vinyl" set for Christmas. I haven't used them all yet, since I use my other brother's (younger brother) cheapo TDKs to do anything before I consider burning on one of these -- I guess I'm a bit weird, but the phonograph effect on the top layer is just too cool.
And Xionja is right. On the long run the best media IS the cheapest because you don´t waste time with double burns, don´t have to restore data you thought was safe on the CD, lose papers aso. Very different from the untrue statement "the cheapest is the best"
Too bad I can't get my MP3/AAC colleciton perfect (AKA flawless rippsat 320kbps and ID3 tags perfect). It now seems that I will be going to AIFF storage of all my CD's (140-150 bu the time) when I get a new Mac in late 2004 to replace my Beige G3 266.
I still have 30 CD's left from my orginal Kodak pack I bought in 2001. I am so picky on getting my archive CD's perfct. since 10.2 I think, I can't get Toast 5.2.1 to burn CD titles longer then 32 charactors in 10.1 I could do full 256 charactor CD titles fine.
looks like I won't be getting any more high quality CD-R's since I am moving to DVD-R next year as well with my new Mac. too bad DVD-R's in Caanda will be a bare min of $4 Canadain due to the $2.50 piracy tax.
why are memorex bad? someone just burned me cd on memorex, i haven't listened to it yet though
Originally posted by Anders the White
Did anyone mention Verbatim yet?
And Xionja is right. On the long run the best media IS the cheapest because you don´t waste time with double burns, don´t have to restore data you thought was safe on the CD, lose papers aso. Very different from the untrue statement "the cheapest is the best"
Originally posted by burningwheel
"The best is the cheapest."
"The cheapest is the best."
Anders is mistaken if he thinks these statements are contradictory, though the second is stylistically uncommon.
(ex. "The cheapest option is the better media since it'll be more reliable.")
Anders is saying that in the long run more expensive CD-R media will cost you less overall because you won't burn as many coasters or lose valuable data to corrupted media.
Concerning the converse statements above, it's true that "if A then B" doesn't always allow for "if B then A," but not in this case or the one below.
"The PC is the cheaper option."
"The cheaper is the PC option."
...