Toggle navigation
All Forums
Recent Posts
Sign In
970 Production info redux
«
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
»
Comments
Reply 121 of 123
macjedai
Posts:
263
member
February 27, 2003 10:01PM
[quote]Originally posted by Amorph:
<strong>Ah ha. So the nature of Apple PI becomes clearer.
So I'm guessing Apple has their own companion chip (or analogous interface) ready and waiting.
Whee.
</strong><hr></blockquote>
Yup, It's been around for a while now.
================================================== ==
Different sig: Ask me no questions, I'll tell you no lies
0
Likes
0
Dislikes
0
Informatives
Reply 122 of 123
ast3r3x
Posts:
5,012
member
February 27, 2003 10:13PM
[quote]Originally posted by sc_markt:
<strong>
Yeah but the IBM powerpc roadmap shows rapidio on it. Nothing about HT.
</strong><hr></blockquote>
i love how extremely vague these things are...somewhere between 1999 and 2009 there will be better processors then now
0
Likes
0
Dislikes
0
Informatives
Reply 123 of 123
boy_analog
Posts:
315
member
February 28, 2003 4:37AM
[quote]Originally posted by ast3r3x:
<strong>
i love how extremely vague these things are...somewhere between 1999 and 2009 there will be better processors then now</strong><hr></blockquote>
<cheap shot>
Sure, but for Motorola, that's by no means a certainty!
</cheap shot>
0
Likes
0
Dislikes
0
Informatives
«
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
»
Sign In
or
Register
to comment.
Comments
<strong>Ah ha. So the nature of Apple PI becomes clearer.
So I'm guessing Apple has their own companion chip (or analogous interface) ready and waiting.
Whee.
Yup, It's been around for a while now.
================================================== ==
Different sig: Ask me no questions, I'll tell you no lies
<strong>
Yeah but the IBM powerpc roadmap shows rapidio on it. Nothing about HT.
i love how extremely vague these things are...somewhere between 1999 and 2009 there will be better processors then now
<strong>
i love how extremely vague these things are...somewhere between 1999 and 2009 there will be better processors then now</strong><hr></blockquote>
<cheap shot>
Sure, but for Motorola, that's by no means a certainty!
</cheap shot>