Wow, you really are sensitive. I'm surprised other threads in here don't actually make you break down and cry.
What you haven't caught onto, yet, is that your approach here is the problem. I'm not having a problem in other topics, because there aren't any problems there to be had. Do you see the difference? It is YOU. Besides, if you are content to believe that I am truly "crying" or breaking down over this, then we can similarly believe that you indeed are elitist. See how absurd all of this is? Just admit that your comment was a bit misdirected. You were mistaken to presume that all dial-up users were a problem. Instead, you should have simply noted that the comment by a particular member was unnecessarily caustic, regardless of his means of accessing the Internet. It's that simple, with the exception of your unable to swallow your pride for just a moment.
What you haven't caught onto, yet, is that your approach here is the problem. I'm not having a problem in other topics, because there aren't any problems there to be had. Do you see the difference? It is YOU. Besides, if you are content to believe that I am truly "crying" or breaking down over this, then we can similarly believe that you indeed are elitist. See how absurd all of this is? Just admit that your comment was a bit misdirected. You were mistaken to presume that all dial-up users were a problem. Instead, you should have simply noted that the comment by a particular member was unnecessarily caustic, regardless of his means of accessing the Internet. It's that simple, with the exception of your unable to swallow your pride for just a moment.
That will be all I care to address you on this.
I didn't presume that all dialup users were a problem, I did note that it was an individual comment I reacted to, and there is no pride swallowing needed. Christ, I access the net with dialup a fair bit myself. If I happen to click a link to a large movie, I don't flame the guy for it, I just don't watch it.
What you haven't caught onto, yet, is that your approach here is the problem. I'm not having a problem in other topics, because there aren't any problems there to be had. Do you see the difference? It is YOU. Besides, if you are content to believe that I am truly "crying" or breaking down over this, then we can similarly believe that you indeed are elitist. See how absurd all of this is? Just admit that your comment was a bit misdirected. You were mistaken to presume that all dial-up users were a problem. Instead, you should have simply noted that the comment by a particular member was unnecessarily caustic, regardless of his means of accessing the Internet. It's that simple, with the exception of your unable to swallow your pride for just a moment.
I didn't presume that all dialup users were a problem, I did note that it was an individual comment I reacted to, and there is no pride swallowing needed. Christ, I access the net with dialup a fair bit myself. If I happen to click a link to a large movie, I don't flame the guy for it, I just don't watch it.
Get a ****ing clue.
Here's the clue you need to get- adding large red disclaimers with a mocking tone only shows further your extreme disdain for those who do not have broadband. Is that what you were shooting for? If not, then you spectacularly failed at your intent. It certainly isn't a sign of your supposed consideration for others. You took an opportunity to amend your initial approach and chose to make it even more offensive by being snide about it. Well done. Now you have taken to lashing out at anyone who would raise an eyebrow over your little tantrum. Even if you do use dial-up yourself, that makes your over-the-top defensiveness of this matter all the more boggling. You are simply trying too hard to save face over a very, very small deal.
The mocking tone is aimed at you, for making such a big thing over nothing.
I am mocking you with those things, not anyone else.
This is getting funnier by the second. Disdain for those who do not have broadband? OH MY GOD MAN, I have no problem for people on dialup! (is sounds hilarious to even say that)
That isn't a problem at ALL, my problem is with you!
So you chose to express that mocking in something that may well be addressed to others, as well? You seem to have a knack for misdirected anger then. Far be it for anyone to address you on something you could have approached better. All of a sudden, they become your target. I dunno, maybe you are just an extremely abrasive person, by nature. You think by doing all of this, you are being funny, clever, witty? Being that you now have admitted this is being done completely at someone else's expense, it only digs your own hole that much deeper that you are prone to showing great disrespect to people over the smallest matters. Can you honestly go over your series of posts here and conclude that you have done your best to chill down a situation? Do you honestly think it was prudent to tell someone to "let it go" and then call them a "suckhole"? How was that to accomplish anything? Absolutely not. (read it- it's all right there for all to see) Your purpose has been to escalate, all along. For what good reason, I have no idea.
My great-great-grandfather had the same ailment as you there Randy. It took nearly 20 full-grown men and a few farm beasts to pull that monster out of his ass.
For the record, it has been mihrbot that has been quite inflammatory in numerous posts so far, whereas I have responded in a calm manner. Then when I fire off a mihrbot-like response to 709 (seeing as how being abrasive seems to be just fine here today, for some reason), all of a sudden that's not cool, right? Wonderful.
If I told you to "let it go, you big suckhole", would that be acceptable to you? Seriously, you should be fine with that, right?
So you chose to express that mocking in something that may well be addressed to others, as well? You seem to have a knack for misdirected anger then.
OK you stupid bastard, let me spell it out for you. I directed my anger at artman for calling me a butt****, simply for linking to a movie.
I then directed some anger at you for being such a whiny little bitch about the whole thing. I even posted a light hearted post after yours, complete with , but you chose to go after me for the post.
Quote:
Being that you now have admitted this is being done completely at someone else's expense, it only digs your own hole that much deeper that you are prone to showing great disrespect to people over the smallest matters.
My first post was too general for you, so I spelled it out exactly who I was directing it at. In fact, you suggested that I do this.
Quote:
Can you honestly go over your series of posts here and conclude that you have done your best to chill down a situation?
I never said I was trying to chill down a situation. I post a simple link to a funny movie, get called a butt**** for doing so, then when I flame back to the original poster, you go on the offensive with me. I'm not trying to chill anything out, never said I was. I am telling artman that he is an asshole for saying what he did to me, and you are a whiny little SUCKHOLE. I thought most men had thicker skin than this... you are like a freaking 12 year old girl.
Quote:
Do you honestly think it was prudent to tell someone to "let it go" and then call them a "suckhole"?
You are acting like one, so yes, I felt it prudent to call you that. Actually I hope you don't let it go, because I am enjoying your girlish posts.
I really like your post directed at 709, BTW, how very CAUSTIC of you. Your purpose has been to escalate, all along. For what good reason, I have no idea.
Quote:
Posted by Randy to rageous:
If I told you to "let it go, you big suckhole", would that be acceptable to you? Seriously, you should be fine with that, right?
Well, if he was acting like a raving suckhole, I'd hope that he would admit it.
Comments
Originally posted by mihrbot
BTW Randy, I have seen you edit your post 3 times now, how the hell is anyone supposed to comment on what you post?
Simple. Just wait a few minutes.
"it's a hell of a forgery!"
Originally posted by mihrbot
Wow, you really are sensitive. I'm surprised other threads in here don't actually make you break down and cry.
What you haven't caught onto, yet, is that your approach here is the problem. I'm not having a problem in other topics, because there aren't any problems there to be had. Do you see the difference? It is YOU. Besides, if you are content to believe that I am truly "crying" or breaking down over this, then we can similarly believe that you indeed are elitist. See how absurd all of this is? Just admit that your comment was a bit misdirected. You were mistaken to presume that all dial-up users were a problem. Instead, you should have simply noted that the comment by a particular member was unnecessarily caustic, regardless of his means of accessing the Internet. It's that simple, with the exception of your unable to swallow your pride for just a moment.
That will be all I care to address you on this.
Originally posted by Randycat99
What you haven't caught onto, yet, is that your approach here is the problem. I'm not having a problem in other topics, because there aren't any problems there to be had. Do you see the difference? It is YOU. Besides, if you are content to believe that I am truly "crying" or breaking down over this, then we can similarly believe that you indeed are elitist. See how absurd all of this is? Just admit that your comment was a bit misdirected. You were mistaken to presume that all dial-up users were a problem. Instead, you should have simply noted that the comment by a particular member was unnecessarily caustic, regardless of his means of accessing the Internet. It's that simple, with the exception of your unable to swallow your pride for just a moment.
That will be all I care to address you on this.
I didn't presume that all dialup users were a problem, I did note that it was an individual comment I reacted to, and there is no pride swallowing needed. Christ, I access the net with dialup a fair bit myself. If I happen to click a link to a large movie, I don't flame the guy for it, I just don't watch it.
Get a ****ing clue.
Originally posted by Randycat99
What you haven't caught onto, yet, is that your approach here is the problem. I'm not having a problem in other topics, because there aren't any problems there to be had. Do you see the difference? It is YOU. Besides, if you are content to believe that I am truly "crying" or breaking down over this, then we can similarly believe that you indeed are elitist. See how absurd all of this is? Just admit that your comment was a bit misdirected. You were mistaken to presume that all dial-up users were a problem. Instead, you should have simply noted that the comment by a particular member was unnecessarily caustic, regardless of his means of accessing the Internet. It's that simple, with the exception of your unable to swallow your pride for just a moment.
That will be all I care to address you on this.
I'll give you something to swallow...
Originally posted by mihrbot
I didn't presume that all dialup users were a problem, I did note that it was an individual comment I reacted to, and there is no pride swallowing needed. Christ, I access the net with dialup a fair bit myself. If I happen to click a link to a large movie, I don't flame the guy for it, I just don't watch it.
Get a ****ing clue.
Here's the clue you need to get- adding large red disclaimers with a mocking tone only shows further your extreme disdain for those who do not have broadband. Is that what you were shooting for? If not, then you spectacularly failed at your intent. It certainly isn't a sign of your supposed consideration for others. You took an opportunity to amend your initial approach and chose to make it even more offensive by being snide about it. Well done. Now you have taken to lashing out at anyone who would raise an eyebrow over your little tantrum. Even if you do use dial-up yourself, that makes your over-the-top defensiveness of this matter all the more boggling. You are simply trying too hard to save face over a very, very small deal.
I am mocking you with those things, not anyone else.
This is getting funnier by the second. Disdain for those who do not have broadband? OH MY GOD MAN, I have no problem for people on dialup! (is sounds hilarious to even say that)
That isn't a problem at ALL, my problem is with you!
Let it go, you big suckhole.
BTW, hilarious pic rageous!!
If I took anything seriously in this forum I would be a hateful bitter person......so nothing has changed.
"Where's the tower? Where's my gun? Where's the tower? Where's my gun? My penis makes me a bad boy, that's what they told me!"
Here's a photo from the family archive:
Oh, no need for you to be offended now. It's just words...
If I told you to "let it go, you big suckhole", would that be acceptable to you? Seriously, you should be fine with that, right?
So you chose to express that mocking in something that may well be addressed to others, as well? You seem to have a knack for misdirected anger then.
OK you stupid bastard, let me spell it out for you. I directed my anger at artman for calling me a butt****, simply for linking to a movie.
I then directed some anger at you for being such a whiny little bitch about the whole thing. I even posted a light hearted post after yours, complete with
Being that you now have admitted this is being done completely at someone else's expense, it only digs your own hole that much deeper that you are prone to showing great disrespect to people over the smallest matters.
My first post was too general for you, so I spelled it out exactly who I was directing it at. In fact, you suggested that I do this.
Can you honestly go over your series of posts here and conclude that you have done your best to chill down a situation?
I never said I was trying to chill down a situation. I post a simple link to a funny movie, get called a butt**** for doing so, then when I flame back to the original poster, you go on the offensive with me. I'm not trying to chill anything out, never said I was. I am telling artman that he is an asshole for saying what he did to me, and you are a whiny little SUCKHOLE. I thought most men had thicker skin than this... you are like a freaking 12 year old girl.
Do you honestly think it was prudent to tell someone to "let it go" and then call them a "suckhole"?
You are acting like one, so yes, I felt it prudent to call you that. Actually I hope you don't let it go, because I am enjoying your girlish posts.
I really like your post directed at 709, BTW, how very CAUSTIC of you. Your purpose has been to escalate, all along. For what good reason, I have no idea.
Posted by Randy to rageous:
If I told you to "let it go, you big suckhole", would that be acceptable to you? Seriously, you should be fine with that, right?
Well, if he was acting like a raving suckhole, I'd hope that he would admit it.