Flaming from anyone is dumb, but you simply will not let the argument die.
Believe me, your calm demeanor has more than demonstrated your absolute superiority over mihrbot as a human being and internet diplomat. We all strive to reach such heights.
But eventually, one needs to let a dumbass net argument go.
OK you stupid bastard, let me spell it out for you. I directed my anger at artman for calling me a butt****, simply for linking to a movie.
Well, you tried to. Unfortunately, you ended up slagging dial-up users in general (as if we were to read your mind that only one particular dial-up user was your target). Then you realized your error and attempted to backpeddle. (Oh no, I only meant this one person when I said that.)
Quote:
I then directed some anger at you for being such a whiny little bitch about the whole thing. I even posted a light hearted post after yours, complete with , but you chose to go after me for the post.
Naturally, your opponent is then a "whiny little bitch", so that makes your demeanor acceptable however low you choose to go. What does that then make you? Instead of just following with a lighthearted post, you should have just corrected your mistake- Mistake #2.
Quote:
My first post was too general for you, so I spelled it out exactly who I was directing it at. In fact, you suggested that I do this.
I suggested you address the person specifically with the problem at hand- your not appreciating his overly caustic remark, not whether or not he was a dial-up user you happened to be pissed off at. That was your opportunity to take the "dial-up user" connotation out of this. You instead chose to make the recipient to your comment more specific, but maintain the negative dial-up user condition (actually, you decided to emphasize that part even further)- Mistake #3.
Quote:
I never said I was trying to chill down a situation.
Your better judgement should have told you to do so. Unfortunately, you did not catch on- Mistake #4.
Quote:
I post a simple link to a funny movie, get called a butt**** for doing so, then when I flame back to the original poster, you go on the offensive with me.
You chose a poor way to flame w/o drawing collateral fire. Once again, your bad judgement. When the obvious consequences arose, you get pissy. What you refuse to acknowledge to this very moment, is that you brought all of this upon yourself, yet you choose to blame someone else for where you ended up.
Quote:
I'm not trying to chill anything out, never said I was.
Bad choice. You could have prevailed far more gracefully.
Quote:
I am telling artman that he is an asshole for saying what he did to me,...
No, you ended up implying what a nuisance he must be because he is a dial-up user.
Quote:
...and you are a whiny little SUCKHOLE. I thought most men had thicker skin than this... you are like a freaking 12 year old girl.
Evidently, it is you that is still bitching and moaning over where your poor decisions have brought you. 12 yr old girl?...indeed you are...
Quote:
You are acting like one, so yes, I felt it prudent to call you that. Actually I hope you don't let it go, because I am enjoying your girlish posts.
You chose to use the term because you are clearly unable to express yourself in any manner other than insults. What does that say of you?
Quote:
I really like your post directed at 709, BTW, how very CAUSTIC of you. Your purpose has been to escalate, all along. For what good reason, I have no idea.
Evidently, you did not see yourself being satired by that example?
Quote:
Well, if he was acting like a raving suckhole, I'd hope that he would admit it.
We'll get inline right behind you, when the moment arises...
You'd think I had said something about blacks, for chrissakes.
Yes, do that and see what happens. It pays off to be more specific and selective when conjuring a flame. Indiscriminant constructions simply draw collateral fire and puts your effort to poor use. Hope you learned something today.
Quote:
As if I give a flying **** about how someone gets online.
Your original flame would suggest otherwise, evidently. Had you been more literal to your intent, you could have avoided quite a bit.
Why the **** are you hanging on so hard to this? I POSTED RIGHT AFTER HIM, obviously my comment is directed at him. I even spelled it out afterwards, but that's not enough for you?
You know what, this is so bloody ridiculous, I feel embarassed to even be continuing it in public.
PM me, or look for me on iChat later- murbot @ mac.com.
I'd rather deal with it directly, if you want to, or I'll just let the ****ing thing die.
I won't be posting again in this thread. If you have the class you claim to, you won't either, and will direct any comments to me personally instead.
Believe me, your calm demeanor has more than demonstrated your absolute superiority over mihrbot as a human being and internet diplomat. We all strive to reach such heights.
Funniest flame thread in a while.
But you know, this is the part of the after-school special when mom brings out milk and cookies and everyone plays nice-nice.
This is getting funnier by the second. Disdain for those who do not have broadband? OH MY GOD MAN, I have no problem for people on dialup! (is sounds hilarious to even say that)
i feel an exception should be made for AOL dial-uppers.
Comments
Flaming from anyone is dumb, but you simply will not let the argument die.
Believe me, your calm demeanor has more than demonstrated your absolute superiority over mihrbot as a human being and internet diplomat. We all strive to reach such heights.
But eventually, one needs to let a dumbass net argument go.
Let.
It.
Die.
Originally posted by mihrbot
OK you stupid bastard, let me spell it out for you. I directed my anger at artman for calling me a butt****, simply for linking to a movie.
Well, you tried to. Unfortunately, you ended up slagging dial-up users in general (as if we were to read your mind that only one particular dial-up user was your target). Then you realized your error and attempted to backpeddle. (Oh no, I only meant this one person when I said that.)
Quote:
I then directed some anger at you for being such a whiny little bitch about the whole thing. I even posted a light hearted post after yours, complete with
Naturally, your opponent is then a "whiny little bitch", so that makes your demeanor acceptable however low you choose to go. What does that then make you? Instead of just following with a lighthearted post, you should have just corrected your mistake- Mistake #2.
Quote:
My first post was too general for you, so I spelled it out exactly who I was directing it at. In fact, you suggested that I do this.
I suggested you address the person specifically with the problem at hand- your not appreciating his overly caustic remark, not whether or not he was a dial-up user you happened to be pissed off at. That was your opportunity to take the "dial-up user" connotation out of this. You instead chose to make the recipient to your comment more specific, but maintain the negative dial-up user condition (actually, you decided to emphasize that part even further)- Mistake #3.
Quote:
I never said I was trying to chill down a situation.
Your better judgement should have told you to do so. Unfortunately, you did not catch on- Mistake #4.
Quote:
I post a simple link to a funny movie, get called a butt**** for doing so, then when I flame back to the original poster, you go on the offensive with me.
You chose a poor way to flame w/o drawing collateral fire. Once again, your bad judgement. When the obvious consequences arose, you get pissy. What you refuse to acknowledge to this very moment, is that you brought all of this upon yourself, yet you choose to blame someone else for where you ended up.
Quote:
I'm not trying to chill anything out, never said I was.
Bad choice. You could have prevailed far more gracefully.
Quote:
I am telling artman that he is an asshole for saying what he did to me,...
No, you ended up implying what a nuisance he must be because he is a dial-up user.
Quote:
...and you are a whiny little SUCKHOLE. I thought most men had thicker skin than this... you are like a freaking 12 year old girl.
Evidently, it is you that is still bitching and moaning over where your poor decisions have brought you. 12 yr old girl?...indeed you are...
Quote:
You are acting like one, so yes, I felt it prudent to call you that. Actually I hope you don't let it go, because I am enjoying your girlish posts.
You chose to use the term because you are clearly unable to express yourself in any manner other than insults. What does that say of you?
Quote:
I really like your post directed at 709, BTW, how very CAUSTIC of you. Your purpose has been to escalate, all along. For what good reason, I have no idea.
Evidently, you did not see yourself being satired by that example?
Quote:
Well, if he was acting like a raving suckhole, I'd hope that he would admit it.
We'll get inline right behind you, when the moment arises...
Anyway, I have no idea why you have this "dial up user" fetish. You'd think I had said something about blacks, for chrissakes.
As if I give a flying **** about how someone gets online.
Originally posted by mihrbot
You'd think I had said something about blacks, for chrissakes.
Yes, do that and see what happens. It pays off to be more specific and selective when conjuring a flame. Indiscriminant constructions simply draw collateral fire and puts your effort to poor use. Hope you learned something today.
Quote:
As if I give a flying **** about how someone gets online.
Your original flame would suggest otherwise, evidently. Had you been more literal to your intent, you could have avoided quite a bit.
You know what, this is so bloody ridiculous, I feel embarassed to even be continuing it in public.
PM me, or look for me on iChat later- murbot @ mac.com.
I'd rather deal with it directly, if you want to, or I'll just let the ****ing thing die.
I won't be posting again in this thread. If you have the class you claim to, you won't either, and will direct any comments to me personally instead.
Originally posted by rageous
Randy:
Believe me, your calm demeanor has more than demonstrated your absolute superiority over mihrbot as a human being and internet diplomat. We all strive to reach such heights.
Funniest flame thread in a while.
But you know, this is the part of the after-school special when mom brings out milk and cookies and everyone plays nice-nice.
Originally posted by mihrbot
This is getting funnier by the second. Disdain for those who do not have broadband? OH MY GOD MAN, I have no problem for people on dialup! (is sounds hilarious to even say that)
i feel an exception should be made for AOL dial-uppers.
i really think they're turd-burglers
this thread has reached new levels of patheticness.
Originally posted by applenut
where's the hitting head against wall emoticon when you need it.
this thread has reached new levels of patheticness.
The problem is : how long will it required to reach the next level ?
For Tiger's sake this thread is closed