Rummy in his own words

addaboxaddabox
Posted:
in General Discussion edited January 2014
A new ad from moveon.org: here



You can belittle the organization, but this is after all unedited footage of the Donald answering questions and nothing more.....
«13

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 44
    messiahtoshmessiahtosh Posts: 1,754member
    That is a little bit ridiculous, I have to admit.
  • Reply 2 of 44
    pfflampfflam Posts: 5,053member
    Our great leaders . . ..



    Leaders of our great country . . . .



    Leaders of our fine young men and women in the military . . .



    in one of those statements the positive adjective should not be applied . . and, its lack denigrates the statement below it which insults the one below it . .



    it makes me sad
  • Reply 3 of 44
    709709 Posts: 2,016member
    That was awesome.



    See my sig.
  • Reply 4 of 44
    messiahtoshmessiahtosh Posts: 1,754member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by 709

    That was awesome.



    See my sig.



  • Reply 5 of 44
    gilschgilsch Posts: 1,995member
    Ouch. Double ouch. Love the stuttering. Isn't it beautiful when a liar is proven to be lying? Loved when at first he went on the offensive..."you and a few other critics are the only people I've heard use the phrase "immediate threat"..I didn't, the president didn't"...oooook....LMAO. OOPS!
  • Reply 6 of 44
    akumulatorakumulator Posts: 1,111member
    I would Jello wrestle Donald Rumsfeld.... if he'd let me.
  • Reply 7 of 44
    moogsmoogs Posts: 4,296member
    Oh common now guys... stop burying your heads in the sand. People just bash Bush and Rummy and Dick because it's popular, not because it's warranted. Turn on your brains, already!



  • Reply 8 of 44
    agent302agent302 Posts: 974member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Messiahtosh

    That is a little bit ridiculous, I have to admit.



    Feel the cognitive dissonance flowing...
  • Reply 9 of 44
    giantgiant Posts: 6,041member
    Puts some perspective on the whole word-parsing defense the bushies tried to use. That junk just doesn't fly in the real world.
  • Reply 10 of 44
    scottscott Posts: 7,431member
    Starving Iraqis under UN sanctions == legal under international law



    Ending brutal anti-Semitic dictatorship in violation of UN sanctions and protecting terrorists == illegal under international law



    Is that how it flies in the real world gaint?





    [george jetson] Jane! Get me off this crazy thing! [/george jetson]
  • Reply 11 of 44
    giantgiant Posts: 6,041member
    Whoa. The board glitched and were getting posts from 2002.
  • Reply 12 of 44
    chu_bakkachu_bakka Posts: 1,793member
    We must enforce the UN resolutions!!!!



    We will put it to a Security Council vote no matter what.



    We don't have the votes... so we'll skip it.



    We must use force without the UN!!!!





    They just couldn't make up their minds.
  • Reply 13 of 44
    scottscott Posts: 7,431member
    It was the UN that failed. It didn't mean what is said. The SC was compromised by oil deals with the regime they were trying to bring under control.
  • Reply 14 of 44
    shawnjshawnj Posts: 6,656member
    ah...well...um...we believe.....my view is......



  • Reply 15 of 44
    brbr Posts: 8,395member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Scott

    Starving Iraqis under UN sanctions == legal under international law



    Ending brutal anti-Semitic dictatorship in violation of UN sanctions and protecting terrorists == illegal under international law



    Is that how it flies in the real world gaint?





    [george jetson] Jane! Get me off this crazy thing! [/george jetson]



    That's all fine and dandy but will you just admit that Rumsfeld is a fvcking liar?
  • Reply 16 of 44
    messiahtoshmessiahtosh Posts: 1,754member
    Being a liar and being a stupid, bumbling retard are different things.
  • Reply 17 of 44
    brbr Posts: 8,395member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Messiahtosh

    Being a liar and being a stupid, bumbling retard are different things.



    You would know.
  • Reply 18 of 44
    messiahtoshmessiahtosh Posts: 1,754member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by BR

    You would know.



    Would I?
  • Reply 19 of 44
    gilschgilsch Posts: 1,995member
    BR, you can't ask a fanatic to admit one of his gods is a liar.
  • Reply 20 of 44
    faydrauthafaydrautha Posts: 127member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Scott

    It was the UN that failed. It didn't mean what is said. The SC was compromised by oil deals with the regime they were trying to bring under control.



    Yes it was and it remains a neutered organization. However that was not the excuse or reasoning used by Bush and his Administration. That reasoning makes sense and is based on a previous decision by the U.N. What they claimed was that Iraq was an immediate threat to the security and safety of the country. And it wasn't.



    Rumsfeld is a ****ing liar. One among many.
Sign In or Register to comment.