Pat Tillman (ex-NFL player) killed in Afghanistan (merged)

Jump to First Reply
Posted:
in General Discussion edited January 2014
I hate to hear this. Although I may not agree with all aspects of the war, I do respect someone who would give up his career of millions to do what he believes in. My prayers go out to his family.



Link
«1

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 36
    hmurchisonhmurchison Posts: 12,445member
    When I saw the heading I knew it was Pat Tillman. Damn. RIP Pat. He was one hell of a player. Watched in amazement as he played Linebacker for ASU for 3 years at like 215lbs.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 2 of 36
    rageousrageous Posts: 2,170member
    What grinds me is that he never made a big deal about it, and did everything he could to not make himself a story. And the minute he dies the god damn media is all over it and making a big production of his death. Which is exactly the opposite of everything he stood for.



    Media: you suck.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 3 of 36
    a_greera_greer Posts: 4,594member
    while some here loath him, the best commentary I have heard was the opening to Rush Limbaugh, the first segement was an increadibly touching, he also made a great point -





    "Every person who died serving this great country is a Pat Tillman, they all gave up EVERYTHING, family, home and a relatively comfortable existance to give freedom to a place that has been oppressed for so manny years and at the same time defend our freedom"



    that isnt exact but close, the transcript should be on the net tonight.



    Untill today, the press has in my opinion treated deaths like a strange platform for political speach, now they are handling it in a reverant way, kootos to them for that, but when the next coffin isnt a celeb, is it back to nomal for the news services in this country? lets hope not.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 36
    a_greera_greer Posts: 4,594member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by rageous

    What grinds me is that he never made a big deal about it, and did everything he could to not make himself a story. And the minute he dies the god damn media is all over it and making a big production of his death. Which is exactly the opposite of everything he stood for.



    Media: you suck.




    amen, but at least they arernt pissing on the tombstone by saying we should pull out (yet, primetime is still hours off)
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 36
    bungebunge Posts: 7,329member
    You can't convince me that communication is detrimental.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 6 of 36
    artman @_@artman @_@ Posts: 2,546member
    Football Hero...now War Hero.



    I was walking home after work and saw the ticker on CNN run this by and I asked who's Pat Tillman?



    "Tillman, who walked away from a $3.6 million contract as a safety with the Arizona Cardinals to join the military after the Sept. 11 attacks, was in an area where numerous U.S. troops have been killed in battles with suspected al Qaeda and Taliban fighters.



    Link



    I think this may have more of a twist to it than those coffin photos will. He died in a firefight in Afganistan. Yeah, we're still still fighting there too...He's a football star...[i]I[i] think he is a hero.



    I feel that because he's one who died for a purpose...to get the real target we should aways have been looking for. Many others have too, but not one this popular.



    Rest in Peace, Pat Tillman...our first war hero.



    ...timed out...hope I don't...
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 7 of 36
    artman @_@artman @_@ Posts: 2,546member
    I'm sorry, I didn't see someone already posted this topic...



     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 8 of 36
    buonrottobuonrotto Posts: 6,368member
    I merged the two threads on this, even though Artman's original thread didn't have any replies. I thought his comment was worth getting in.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 9 of 36
    artman @_@artman @_@ Posts: 2,546member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by BuonRotto

    I merged the two threads on this, even though Artman's original thread didn't have any replies. I thought his comment was worth getting in.



    Thanks BuonRotto.



    The whole point is that he's a popular and recognizable figure (did you see the photo with the article?). I'm not saying that his death was more important really, just newsworthy. I'm waiting for which candidate will come up with something...Bush could even use this...frightening.



    My sympathies go out to the family.



    \
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 10 of 36
    shawnjshawnj Posts: 6,656member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Artman @_@

    I feel that because he's one who died for a purpose...to get the real target we should aways have been looking for. Many others have too, but not one this popular.



    Superb point. Can we argue that he died generally because of the war in Iraq- the unfortunate consequence of stretching our military resources too thin? Just a thought- one that applies to all soldiers fighting in Afghanistan.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 11 of 36
    brbr Posts: 8,395member
    The saddest thing is he died fighting for freedoms that our very own government has begun to take away.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 12 of 36
    Quote:

    Originally posted by ShawnJ

    Superb point. Can we argue that he died generally because of the war in Iraq - the unfortunate consequence of stretching our military resources too thin?



    You can but should you?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 13 of 36
    bungebunge Posts: 7,329member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by zaphod_beeblebrox

    You can but should you?



    Hell yes. This guy doesn't mean any more than any American, Iraqi or Afghanistani that has died in the past two years. He tried to be a hero and lost. I'd say he was misguided. We're now left without his abilities on the football field.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 14 of 36
    Quote:

    Originally posted by bunge

    Hell yes...



    I didn't ask you.
    Quote:

    ... This guy doesn't mean any more than any American, Iraqi or Afghanistani that has died in the past two years...



    And I'm sure he would have been the first to agree with you but that has NOTHING to do with what Shawn or I asked.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 15 of 36
    shawnjshawnj Posts: 6,656member
    Zaphod's right- nothing really to do with what we were talking about. As far as my question- I'm leaning towards "No." But I think we can argue the Iraqi war certainly endangers our troops around the world by stretching our military resources too thin. I don't know though. I'm wading into territory I'm admittedly unfamiliar with. Definitely open to persuasion.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 16 of 36
    brussellbrussell Posts: 9,812member
    I don't think you can say this guy was killed because of Iraq. But I have to wonder if the reaction would have been of the same type if he had been killed in Iraq rather than the "good war" in Afghanistan. What if he had enlisted after 9/11, and then got sent off to Iraq and killed there by Sadr?



    I know a guy in the National Guard here who just got two weeks notice that he's going to Iraq for 18 months. He has a small business with three employees - lawn work - that's going to go under. He has a wife and two small children. Yeah, he knew this was possible when he signed up. But I get the feeling from talking to him that he feels quite differently about going to Iraq than he would have going to hunt down the perpetrators of 9/11.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 17 of 36
    brbr Posts: 8,395member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by bunge

    Hell yes. This guy doesn't mean any more than any American, Iraqi or Afghanistani that has died in the past two years. He tried to be a hero and lost. I'd say he was misguided. We're now left without his abilities on the football field.



    Bullshit. He was a volunteer in the truest sense of the word. It had nothing to do with socioeconomic conditions like so many recruits these days. It had nothing to do with signing up for a college education and hoping no war breaks out. And bullshit he wasn't misguided.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 18 of 36
    chinneychinney Posts: 1,019member
    Two points ? not really connected:



    First point - Regardless of what I think of any of war generally, I do have admiration for someone who turns down millions to play in pro sport to do, instead, what he thinks is right ? and to do it in a way that does not seek any particular recognition or glory.



    Second point ? Now almost three years after 9/11, I still sit here in wonder that the U.S., invaded Afghanistan, but then left it rather quickly to its own devices, with a relatively small force that plays little role in securing the country as a whole. Instead, they invaded Iraq and talk endlessly of rebuilding it and installing democracy there (although I don?t believe that these are their real motives). Why not spend billions rebuilding Afghanistan instead? Why not endless propaganda about building democracy in Afghanistan? Even immediately after 9/11, Afghanistan was seen as just an interim little skirmish on the road to the real goal, which was Iraq all along. The real reasons behind this are as complex and they are, in my view, unworthy, and we have all spend a lot of time debating them at length on these forums. Without getting into all of the reasons and the debate, let me just say that I am still amazed that the Administration actually invaded Iraq, and received a good deal of support for doing it. Meanwhile, Afghanistan has never really been secured and has been little rebuilt, and there is no indication that it is the intention of the U.S. to play much of a role in doing this. Just bloody amazing.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 19 of 36
    scottscott Posts: 7,431member
    You are ignorant. Afghanistan has more than US troops there now. They continue to operate and help secure the country. The $87 billion that Kerry voted against has funding for Afghanistan too. So the US didn't "cut and run" in Afghanistan. I'm surprised at how well the new government is doing there.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 20 of 36
    shawnjshawnj Posts: 6,656member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Scott

    You are ignorant.



    I think a better way to phrase that is "Your points ignore..." Come on, Scott. We have to police ourselves sometimes to replace personal attacks with vibrant arguments. Agreed?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.