Posted by Pfflam If one was from consensual sex with her boyfriend then the case for being raped seems reinforced by the extra semen there . . .
How exactly does it do that? How does it prove anything other than the fact that this chick might like to f*** around? A rape victim does not go around bragging about the size of the rapist's dick. Come on.
Tonton: you could be right about those text messages. That could be the case right there.
How exactly does it do that? How does it prove anything other than the fact that this chick might like to f*** around? A rape victim does not go around bragging about the size of the rapist's dick. Come on.
Tonton: you could be right about those text messages. That could be the case right there.
That's not what Im referring to . . . the two semen in her underpants is. If I were arguing that that is not an indicator of her willingness then I would point out that she, in fact, had been relatively recently engaged in consensual sex with her BF and didn't want the sex that was forces on her.
I'm not taking sides, I'm merely showing that the statement that Trumpt made need not paint her as willfully partaking in the semen gathering activity in the second-semen-scenerio. Nothing indicates that it got there with her consent. . . and vic-a-versa.
Im not sure but Im glad that the better team won in an NBA finals. It only took a few years but the nightmare that is the lakers is finally over. Way to go Pistons.
That's not what Im referring to . . . the two semen in her underpants is. If I were arguing that that is not an indicator of her willingness then I would point out that she, in fact, had been relatively recently engaged in consensual sex with her BF and didn't want the sex that was forces on her.
I'm not taking sides, I'm merely showing that the statement that Trumpt made need not paint her as willfully partaking in the semen gathering activity in the second-semen-scenerio. Nothing indicates that it got there with her consent. . . and vic-a-versa.
You talk about a second scenario as if you are sure it occurred before the rape with Bryant. The woman contends it did and also said she used a condom. So how does the sperm from the condom show up three days later in her underwear along with blood?
You will note that the underwear from the night of the sex with Bryant did not test for blood. It is the underwear she wore the next morning, with her blood and someone elses semen that tested as supporting rape.
So you tell me if that isn't reasonable doubt?
Now as for the finals. Yes the Lakers lost, but of course they had a key injury. I hope they will pull it together and be back nice and strong next year.
Now as for the finals. Yes the Lakers lost, but of course they had a key injury. I hope they will pull it together and be back nice and strong next year.
Nick
Doubtful. People are starting to call it the end of a dynasty.
Ya I think it will be the end of the Lakers as they are seen today. Maybe they finally realized that money cant (always) buy a championship. I expect that they will be trying to rebuild the team over the next few years.
Comments
Shaq says:
"The pressure is on them. They have to close it out."
Glad he cleared that up.
3-1 b*tches
what excuses are the Fake Show "fans" gonna make now????
Go Stones!
Originally posted by groverat
Oh I'm sure he will. The rich are rarely held accountable for their crimes.
Well you don't have to be rich to believe that having two sets of semen in your shorts would prove "reasonable doubt."
Nick
Originally posted by trumptman
Well you don't have to be rich to believe that having two sets of semen in your shorts would prove "reasonable doubt."
Nick
If one was from consensual sex with her boyfriend then the case for being raped seems reinforced by the extra semen there . . .
But I say wait to see how it plays out in court before you either convict or acquit.
Posted by Pfflam If one was from consensual sex with her boyfriend then the case for being raped seems reinforced by the extra semen there . . .
How exactly does it do that?
Tonton: you could be right about those text messages. That could be the case right there.
Originally posted by Gilsch
How exactly does it do that?
Tonton: you could be right about those text messages. That could be the case right there.
That's not what Im referring to . . . the two semen in her underpants is. If I were arguing that that is not an indicator of her willingness then I would point out that she, in fact, had been relatively recently engaged in consensual sex with her BF and didn't want the sex that was forces on her.
I'm not taking sides, I'm merely showing that the statement that Trumpt made need not paint her as willfully partaking in the semen gathering activity in the second-semen-scenerio. Nothing indicates that it got there with her consent. . . and vic-a-versa.
(Sorry-- didn't mean to talk about basketball. You can resume your semen discussion.)
Pistons have a TEAM and a hell of a COACH. Congrats Motown, you deserved and earned the championship!
Owned. Big time. What a great performance.
I guess Kobe now knows how the hotel worker in Colorado feels.......cuz he just got raped by the Pistons
Originally posted by TigerWoods99
I guess Kobe now knows how the hotel worker in Colorado feels.......cuz he just got raped by the Pistons
Yeah, and rape is always great to joke about!!!
Jackass. You're not a real Pistons fan, just another classless bandwagon man.
Though the Stanley Cup may be a large, it works.
Originally posted by rageous
Yeah, and rape is always great to joke about!!!
Jackass. You're not a real Pistons fan, just another classless bandwagon man.
where did I say I was? just hate the Fakers that's all
Originally posted by pfflam
That's not what Im referring to . . . the two semen in her underpants is. If I were arguing that that is not an indicator of her willingness then I would point out that she, in fact, had been relatively recently engaged in consensual sex with her BF and didn't want the sex that was forces on her.
I'm not taking sides, I'm merely showing that the statement that Trumpt made need not paint her as willfully partaking in the semen gathering activity in the second-semen-scenerio. Nothing indicates that it got there with her consent. . . and vic-a-versa.
You talk about a second scenario as if you are sure it occurred before the rape with Bryant. The woman contends it did and also said she used a condom. So how does the sperm from the condom show up three days later in her underwear along with blood?
Take a look at this link. MSNBC
You will note that the underwear from the night of the sex with Bryant did not test for blood. It is the underwear she wore the next morning, with her blood and someone elses semen that tested as supporting rape.
So you tell me if that isn't reasonable doubt?
Now as for the finals. Yes the Lakers lost, but of course they had a key injury. I hope they will pull it together and be back nice and strong next year.
Nick
Originally posted by trumptman
Now as for the finals. Yes the Lakers lost, but of course they had a key injury. I hope they will pull it together and be back nice and strong next year.
Nick
Doubtful. People are starting to call it the end of a dynasty.