Future eMac

Jump to First Reply
Posted:
in Future Apple Hardware edited January 2014
What will the specs be??

When it be??
«1

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 27
    Quote:

    Originally posted by krzysiek

    What will the specs be??

    When it be??




    I'm not sure when the new eMac will come out, but I think it will be very soon. I think it may feature anywhere from a 1.5 - 1.8 GHz G4 processor and hopefully 512 mb ram standard although I doubt it. Also, it will probably feature FireWire 800. I wonder if Apple will move to an LCD screen. This is the only Apple computer that still features a CRT. I hope the eMac gets refreshed before Christmas.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 2 of 27
    thttht Posts: 6,016member
    It'll be a 1.5 GHz G5 with 17" CRT, some 32 MB vid card, ATA disk drive, 256 MB PC2700 DDR SDRAM.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 3 of 27
    One more bump this Fall with the current form factor, but I anticipate a complete redesign next Spring for the big 2005 EDU buying season. It will become an LCD based AIO with a very simple, wedge design. Nothing spectacular like the iMac, just a clean triangular appearance with a small footprint built to take abuse. It will remain G4 and be based around the 1280x854 15.2" LCD from the Powerbook line, offering widescreen on a budget.



    Here are my proposed specs:



    1.8 GHz Freescale G4

    ATi Radeon 9600 64MB

    80 GB HD

    SuperDrive

    $999



    1.6 GHz Freescale G4

    ATi Radeon 9600 32MB

    80 GB HD

    ComboDrive

    $799



    1.25 GHz G4

    ATi Radeon 9200 32MB

    80 GB HD

    No Optical Drive

    EDU/Enterprise Only

    $699
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 27
    stoostoo Posts: 1,490member
    Nice eMacs, but they look a little optimistic. A 1.8GHz G4 with a 9600 (any higher than the base 9600) and a Superdrive would whup the low end iMac, unless it too is revised. May I push the boat out and venture an integrated memory controller on the G4?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 27
    I doubt that the eMacs will go LCD. The eMacs were created for two reasons:



    1. The CRT is cheaper than LCD.

    2. The iMac of the time was not a true AIO.



    But since the current iMac has become a true AIO, the eMac only exists for reason #1. When LCD prices become low enough to put in a eMac, that's when the eMac will retire.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 6 of 27
    Quote:

    Originally posted by THT

    It'll be a 1.5 GHz G5 with 17" CRT, some 32 MB vid card, ATA disk drive, 256 MB PC2700 DDR SDRAM.



    More likely than 1.8G G4's. But, dont rule out 1.42G G4's as a more typical apple update.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 7 of 27
    Quote:

    Originally posted by BeigeUser

    2. The iMac of the time was not a true AIO.



    Huh? What was "untrue" about it? It wasn't modular. How exactly could it have been more AIO?



    Are you saying this because the screen was on an arm?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 8 of 27
    wizard69wizard69 Posts: 13,377member
    Apple could very well go the high integration 32 bit route for a year or more on the eMac. With the right chip set they could give the machine a very reasonable speed boost and lower the price at the same time.



    It is interesting that Freescale is sampling high integration devices as we speak. The question remains is will they ever start shiping the chip in volume at a speed that Apple could make use of. so far what I've seen would make a better iBook processor than anything but we can always hope for something a little spiffier for the eMac.



    At best though Apple only has about two years left for 32 bit desk top hardware. After that I that the market will be almost entirely 64 bit. All it will take is the right software and OS features to drive the 64 bit adoption.



    Dave





    Quote:

    Originally posted by Stoo

    Nice eMacs, but they look a little optimistic. A 1.8GHz G4 with a 9600 (any higher than the base 9600) and a Superdrive would whup the low end iMac, unless it too is revised. May I push the boat out and venture an integrated memory controller on the G4?



     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 9 of 27
    Quote:

    Originally posted by jouster

    Huh? What was "untrue" about it? It wasn't modular. How exactly could it have been more AIO?



    Are you saying this because the screen was on an arm?




    The speaker was external. Kids could do all kinds of things with that speaker. I guess that schools could have used a soundless iMac in class but for software that requires audio, the eMac was a must.



    The arm is iffy. Was it capable of withstanding years of abuse by children? Only teachers will know.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 10 of 27
    I think the eMac will stay. It's a very good and cheap education computer (which is another big reason as to why it's here).
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 11 of 27
    naplesxnaplesx Posts: 3,743member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by BeigeUser

    The speaker was external. Kids could do all kinds of things with that speaker. I guess that schools could have used a soundless iMac in class but for software that requires audio, the eMac was a must.



    The arm is iffy. Was it capable of withstanding years of abuse by children? Only teachers will know.




    iMac had internal speaker... what are you talking about?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 12 of 27
    hobbeshobbes Posts: 1,252member
    I think the eMac will definitely stick around as Apple's low-cost entry-level model -- in the same, or very slightly minimized, form factor.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 13 of 27
    amorphamorph Posts: 7,112member
    Well, the 7448 isn't appearing until the middle of next year according to one article, so we won't be seeing eMacs with 1.8GHz anything for a good long while... unless Apple rolls out a G5 eMac.



    Actually, depending on how much the G5 costs, I can actually see them doing that. They've got the chipset in the iMac already.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 14 of 27
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Amorph

    ...unless Apple rolls out a G5 eMac.



    That's assuming IBM can produce the chips in sufficient quantities.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 15 of 27
    Quote:

    Originally posted by BeigeUser

    I doubt that the eMacs will go LCD. The eMacs were created for two reasons:



    1. The CRT is cheaper than LCD.

    2. The iMac of the time was not a true AIO.



    But since the current iMac has become a true AIO, the eMac only exists for reason #1. When LCD prices become low enough to put in a eMac, that's when the eMac will retire.




    I second this!
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 16 of 27
    The Freescale 7448 processor might debut next spring in the eMac. For the obvious reason that everyone is having trouble moving their processors to 90nm, Freescale is probably being very conservative about any suggestion of when the 7448 will be available. However if all goes well it would make sense for both Freescale and Apple to get this in the eMac sooner rather than later. 1.6GHz might not seem that fast in 2005 but with that 1MB cache it will be fast enough for the eMac.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 17 of 27
    Most of you seem to not know about the education model of the new iMac.



    $1,099.00



    With it's totally serviceable chassis, it's a no brainer for education.



    Why? Because in-house IT departments need access to replace parts (just like PCs), not shelve the entire unit.



    I believe the eMac will be EOL'ed any day now.



    Hey, I'm an eMac owner too. So I'm not bashing the eMac. It's a great machine.



    Yes, cost is a major factor. But there are two ways to look at cost. One is consumer cost, and one is manufacturing cost. Having two entirely different models doesn't make sense from a manufacturing cost perspective. At the end of the day, Apple is a company. Something has to give somewhere.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 18 of 27
    Quote:

    Originally posted by FormatC2

    Most of you seem to not know about the education model of the new iMac.



    $1,099.00



    With it's totally serviceable chassis, it's a no brainer for education.



    Why? Because in-house IT departments need access to replace parts (just like PCs), not shelve the entire unit...




    Yes, the educational iMac would be a valuable asset to schools. However, you do not seem to know about the education model of the eMac.



    $599.00



    The eMac won't be going anywhere until the iMac becomes much more affordable.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 19 of 27
    sluslu Posts: 23member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by s_sarinana

    I'm not sure when the new eMac will come out, but I think it will be very soon. I think it may feature anywhere from a 1.5 - 1.8 GHz G4 processor and hopefully 512 mb ram standard although I doubt it. Also, it will probably feature FireWire 800. I wonder if Apple will move to an LCD screen. This is the only Apple computer that still features a CRT. I hope the eMac gets refreshed before Christmas.



    Why in the world would a new eMac have FW 800 when the new iMac does not? Why would it have 512MB RAM standard when the new iMac does not?



    So you basically want a G4 instead of a G5 in the new iMac, with two extra features..for half the price and we will call that an eMac?



    Crazy.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 20 of 27
    The interesting part of the new iMac is the parts.



    You actually know what's in the thing... So add up the cost.



    What can they make cheaper? The answer to that question = eMac.



    I just don't think they can afford to keep the eMac line running... The CRT is unique, and thus must run up the cost of production.



    LCDs on the other hand, are used across every other computer they sell.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.