Apple sued over iTunes software interface

13

Comments

  • Reply 41 of 61
    http://www.freepatentsonline.com/pat...68/5864868.pdf



    Anyways, why should this be successful ? Things just overlap a bit



    and theres another point... being agressive gets back on you - are they really sure they have it all set straight enough? :-D



    "

    Music eBusiness expert David Contoiswill share the success story of how

    he transformed his family's Essex Junction piano and organ business into

    eMusicGear.com,one of America's top e-commerce retailers of Yamaha Music

    Products and other popular brands. "



    Oh, he seems to be a big guy now (url this tkn frm: http://campus.champlain.edu/vitc/Lea...spdf031504.pdf)
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 42 of 61
    stormchildstormchild Posts: 104member
    What a load of bullshit.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 43 of 61
    majormattmajormatt Posts: 1,077member
    It is sad that when a business cant make a product sucessful it must sue another who does.



    I wouldnt worry especially when Apple came up with the collumn view concept in 1980!
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 44 of 61
    sunilramansunilraman Posts: 8,133member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Xool

    .....In comparison, what do people think of Apple's iTunes patents, including the 3-state burn button that irises open when you prepare to burn a CD?



    i'm no lawyer, but it's quite clear how it works, why it works, how it is unique, and if some other Tunes-like application just copies it, well, thats just wrong



    that's the benefit of good user-interface concept and visual design.



    show a layperson jury the iris thing, they'll be all like ooh and aahh and hey i think my son can do that...!



    show a layperson jury that piece of shit contois drawing and they'll be like, wtf ??



    it'll be hard to come up against the iPod-familiar public, unless the lawyer spins it as Apple is a big heartless corporation that built an empire by 'ripping off' a poor, honest man's visionary work
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 45 of 61
    sunilramansunilraman Posts: 8,133member
    gawd that sounded so nasty... it's the full moon, i swear
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 46 of 61
    Quote:

    Originally posted by bergz

    Still can't view appleinsider images in Camino. Is it me or do you not support Camino? Not the first time this has been mentioned.



    Safari , of course, works dandy.



    --B




    Images work fine with my Camino. I'm using the nightly updates though, which might be the difference.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 47 of 61
    theres other music software out there that allows people and such to download to music players and what not.. a big one would be limewire... and thats not legal... hmm....
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 48 of 61
    buonrottobuonrotto Posts: 6,368member
    As others have said, prior art is probably going to make this difficult to prove. The browse feature works a hell of a lot like column view, whch has been in NeXT operating systems since the late 80's. I would think you would have to convince people that the browse button along with the column view and the categories used, as one construct, is that particular patent. Implementation is everything.



    I dunno, I think they have a shot, but it's always tough to prove anything specific like this. It is strange that it took this long to get around to the lawsuit. When was this actualy filed?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 49 of 61
    arty50arty50 Posts: 201member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by 00100011

    James goes to NAMM in 1996 while going to college. Six years later, James is hired by Apple for software development. Three years later, James gets a letter from a man named Contois: "F**K U JAMES!!!1 F**K U & UR APPLL!¡! SSHUV iPUNES ^ UR AS*!¡!11 I'M SUEING HAHAHLOLOL!!!!!!11"



    Heh. The thing is, SoundJam looked absolutely nothing like iTunes. Apple was all about the metal interface though when they bough SoundJam. So they asked James to rewrite the UI. Does it resemble the other software? Well kinda. But there are lots of programs that are similar. I'd hardly call iTunes a copy though. In fact, I think iTunes more closely resembles the UI for Claris Emailer than this other piece of swill. Ahhhh...Emailer...my long lost friend.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 50 of 61
    jamesgjamesg Posts: 63member
    Let's look at this logically, shall we?



    The burden of proof will be on Contois to prove that his patent has been infringed upon. The evidence is pretty clear that it has been. (Read next paragraph before flaming.)



    Mind you, I do believe the US patent system is complete nonsense. I am seeing stuff patented that has been in use for years. In this case, a media playing interface has been around for as long as a computer has been able to play media. I can think of GEOS on the Commodore 64 playing AIFF sound clips, to name one. I would think that Apple's primary goal would be to shoot holes in the patent itself.



    An injunction would be a showstopper for Apple. I am not sure if it will be granted but it could be decimating.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 51 of 61
    my one simple question is... has anyone outside of their area ever heard of these gus before today?



    simply rephrased... Who?



    Get a job!
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 52 of 61
    pdubyupdubyu Posts: 13member
    The problem with reading a published patent is that distinguishing the "innovation" from the generic wordsmithing around it can be next to impossible. Without further investigation, the language may just be a scarecrow.



    A bunch of lawyers are going to exchange letters/phone calls/faxes as well as seek clarifications from the USPTO concerning with all the submitted paperwork before anyone knows anything. Unfortunately, the general public probably won't be privy to this information.



    I find it ironic how the Contois interface elements are supposedly being infringed upon. Apple's own "look and feel" suit comes to mind except no patent was involved back then as far as I remember though (design or utility).
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 53 of 61
    bergzbergz Posts: 1,045member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by almostwise

    Images work fine with my Camino. I'm using the nightly updates though, which might be the difference.



    My CaminoKnight didn't last a week. very frustrating.



    --b
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 54 of 61
    Quote:

    Originally posted by JamesG

    Let's look at this logically, shall we?



    SNIP



    An injunction would be a showstopper for Apple. I am not sure if it will be granted but it could be decimating.




    Logically, this is much like the Tiger Direct case. Not a chance they get a preliminary injunction. If iTunes shipping for the last 4 years hasn't already damaged them irreparably, having it continue to ship during the trial certainly isn't going to.



    To win a preliminary injunction they would have to show a likelihood they'd win--not at all clear to me in this case--and that immediate redress is needed to prevent further harm. Since they have no competing product, and no other patent licensees, I don't see the harm argument flying at all.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 55 of 61
    I think Microsoft is behind this one! Mwuahahahah....
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 56 of 61
    i like the way how in their picture of itunes, contis have made the source column reallyh wide to try to make it look more like their image, in fact the contis thing doesnt even have a source column, and so they layout of this area is quite different.



    stu
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 57 of 61
    I should have become a patent lawyer... Boy they must be busy and rich these days...
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 58 of 61
    maccrazymaccrazy Posts: 2,658member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Nine-Seventy

    My god, look at that picture on the right - IT LOOKS JUST LIKE ITUNES!!



    I know!



    The strage thing is if this had been the other way round we would be slagging off the other company. MusicMatch has a similar layout to iTunes, so does WMP but the reason is there's a design system for showing music. How many othere ways are there to do it?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 59 of 61
    Quote:

    Originally posted by nagromme

    Ummm... ITunes' columns are a NESTED HIERARCHY like the NeXT column view in OS X.



    Source > Genre > Artist > Album > Song.



    I don't see how category-composer-artist-song is the same thing. Somtimes that makes a hierarchy, but not always.



    Still, I like how they resized the iTunes art area to make it LOOK more similar




    They have indeed, the default iTunes setup does not have the source pane stretched like that or the browser viewable. I rarely use the browser anyway, the common method seems to be searching by keyword, which bares little resemblence at all to Contois, no more than any other ID3 tag sorting application like foobar2000.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 60 of 61
    wow, you just resurrected a very very dead post
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.