Don't EVER base your car buying decision on Consumer Reports. A bigger rag can't be found. They are absolutely clueless about cars and electronics.
Perhaps they can handle home appliances but thats about it.
In this case, I have three other sources that confirm that Volvo is in the middle of the pack reliability-wise, while Acura is on top of the pack.
(1) JD Power
(2) Lots of observing of Volvo owner's forums and lots of observing of Acura owner's forums.
(3) Discussions with lots of people who have owned Volvos, and lots of people who have owned Hondas/Acuras.
Sure, there are some Honda/Acura lemons out there. And there are some Volvos that run forever and a day with only scheduled maintenance. But I've run into a LOT more Volvo owners than Honda/Acura owners who have mentioned problems with their electronics or their power equipment sometime during the vehicle's life.
As for reviews of other things besides reliability (ie handling, ride quality, interior quality, et cetera)--Consumer Reports is terrible. I agree 100% there. My assessment of these cars is based on my first-hand experiences test-driving them, though I've also been known to read Motor Trend, Car & Driver, and Road & Track.
The Civic's interior looks like it was designed by a cross-eyed Mandrill.
I've test-driven one. The interior is dang ugly, and the exterior isn't much better. And except for the wheel, which was nice-feeling for a plastic wheel, the interior felt really, really cheap.
That's 50% better than the EPA rating for the T5 AWD, which is 20mpg city, 27 highway. Very impressive.
Quote:
it's a bit small but for her she can fit the kids. the interior could use more cubbyholes and a wider glove box but this thing scoots
Yeah, the lack of room on the interior is one real disadvantage of the Volvo to the TSX. I want a car that's small on the exterior (to fit into parking spaces), but I'm worried that the S40 might be a bit too small on the interior as well. EDIT: I checked their EPA interior volumes, and they're practically idential for every dimension. The Acura just looks bigger, and has bigger center console and door pockets. And the Acura is 7 inches longer, with no corresponding increase in interior or trunk space.
Quote:
it handles just like the 3 series.
Now that's got to be a bit of exaggeration, the 3-series is universally regarded by the automotive press as the best-handling sport sedan out there. And it's RWD.
Quote:
i think you can get an interface for the ipod.
Actually, you can't. Not yet at least. But I don't own an iPod, so that's okay.
Quote:
get the t5 awd.
If I get the S40, I'm not going to get the AWD. I don't need AWD here in Oregon, and the T5 FWD gets 10-20% better fuel mileage. And I might get the 2.4i. It's slower, but it's a lot cheaper, and it handles exactly the same as the T5. They downgraded the engine but not the chassis or the suspension. And I'm more into handling than straight-line performance.
Don't EVER base your car buying decision on Consumer Reports. A bigger rag can't be found. They are absolutely clueless about cars and electronics.
Perhaps they can handle home appliances but thats about it.
I think Consumer Reports has the largest privately-owned car testing facility in the states. Their reliability reports are based on people reporting all problems they have had with particular cars to the organization. other than that, they are the only major tester who doesn't allow cars to use their ratings as a basis for advertising, so they are clearly not biased.
Just because Consumer Reports gives your car bad reliability/whatever ratings, however, doesn't mean that you're not allowed to still like your car.
Complaints against them always just seem like sour apples to me.
Now that's got to be a bit of exaggeration, the 3-series is universally regarded by the automotive press as the best-handling sport sedan out there. And it's RWD.
I have driven both, and preferred the S40. The manual transmission in the Volvo is worlds better than the BMW manual transmission, and the suspension and steering are about equal.
My wife prefers the S60 AWD over both the BMW 3 series and the S40, while I think that the S60 is way too soft. I don't think that the "common wisdom" that BMW is best is very useful, because people like such different things that everyone will pick a different favorite.
One thing to also keep in mind is how close and nice the various dealerships are. The BMW/mini/porsche/subaru and Mazda dealerships near my house are so slimy that I refuse to buy anthing or get service there. My local Honda and Volvo dealerships are great, and the Nissan dealership is OK but not great. How good your dealership experience is will have a big impact on your total car experience.
A car is just a tool. Buy a 5-7 year-old car that does what you need it to do; hauling, milage, etc. (goto kbb.com and check out what you're buying first)
Unless the car is a hobby, anything else is hubris of the worst kind.
A car is just a tool. Buy a 5-7 year-old car that does what you need it to do; hauling, milage, etc. (goto kbb.com and check out what you're buying first)
Unless the car is a hobby, anything else is hubris of the worst kind.
I think that just means you're not into cars. I demand that you provide a list of all your other possessions, plus a description of your place of residence, so I can scour it for hubris by other means.
That's 50% better than the EPA rating for the T5 AWD, which is 20mpg city, 27 highway. Very impressive.
That would make it the best performing gas engine car in America, coming in with numbers just under hybrids and diesels. I'm sure it's a very fine ride, but that MPG seems a little unlikely.
That would make it the best performing gas engine car in America, coming in with numbers just under hybrids and diesels. I'm sure it's a very fine ride, but that MPG seems a little unlikely.
He has a computer that shows him his current instantanious mpg. The average EPA results can be improved dramatically if you watch what happens to that number in various gears. My 17 mpg car has shown instantanious results as low as 2 mpg and as high as 45 mpg depending on what I am doing.
Unless the car is a hobby, anything else is hubris of the worst kind.
Actually, cars ARE a hobby of mine. I really really like driving at a spirited pace down a twisty road. I rode sportbikes since I was 16, but a knee injury makes riding them for more than an hour rather painful nowadays. I'm looking for a compact sport sedan with very good handling and a fun powerband, but which also fulfills my practical needs (safe, fuel efficient, decent room for two people and a big dog, or four people, et cetera). Of all the cars I've looked at, these two fit the bill the best for me.
I think that just means you're not into cars. I demand that you provide a list of all your other possessions, plus a description of your place of residence, so I can scour it for hubris by other means.
Don't get me wrong, cars as art is one thing, but this business of 'look at me, I drive an _________. ¡Es Horrible!
Don't get me wrong, cars as art is one thing, but this business of 'look at me, I drive an _________. ¡Es Horrible!
How the heck did you get THERE from my posts?! I never once mentioned caring what other people think of the car I drive. Because I don't. I was comparing ergonomics, amenities, performance, reliability, my own personal taste in aesthetics, et cetera. Never once did I mention prestige value.
Neither of these cars are really prestigious anyway. Do you ever hear people saying "hey, look at so-and-so, he drives a VOLVO, he must really be rich?" Hell no. Same with Acura. These companies aren't exactly Mercedes-Benz or Bentley.
How the heck did you get THERE from my posts?! I never once mentioned caring what other people think of the car I drive. Because I don't. I was comparing ergonomics, amenities, performance, reliability, my own personal taste in aesthetics, et cetera. Never once did I mention prestige value.
Neither of these cars are really prestigious anyway. Do you ever hear people saying "hey, look at so-and-so, he drives a VOLVO, he must really be rich?" Hell no. Same with Acura. These companies aren't exactly Mercedes-Benz or Bentley.
You don't think maybe you're being just a teensy-weensy bit touchy?
(It was just advice, I'm not trying to divine your motives. Although, when you find yourself going into debt for wants and not needs, you should be honest as to why.)
That's 50% better than the EPA rating for the T5 AWD, which is 20mpg city, 27 highway. Very impressive.
Yeah, the lack of room on the interior is one real disadvantage of the Volvo to the TSX. I want a car that's small on the exterior (to fit into parking spaces), but I'm worried that the S40 might be a bit too small on the interior as well. EDIT: I checked their EPA interior volumes, and they're practically idential for every dimension. The Acura just looks bigger, and has bigger center console and door pockets. And the Acura is 7 inches longer, with no corresponding increase in interior or trunk space.
Now that's got to be a bit of exaggeration, the 3-series is universally regarded by the automotive press as the best-handling sport sedan out there. And it's RWD.
Actually, you can't. Not yet at least. But I don't own an iPod, so that's okay.
If I get the S40, I'm not going to get the AWD. I don't need AWD here in Oregon, and the T5 FWD gets 10-20% better fuel mileage. And I might get the 2.4i. It's slower, but it's a lot cheaper, and it handles exactly the same as the T5. They downgraded the engine but not the chassis or the suspension. And I'm more into handling than straight-line performance.
Such a hard decision...I like both cars a lot.
our dicision tree required awd--so the tsx, tl, etc were out so was the bmw (my wife drove both and said the volvo was better) also when we were looking the bmw 3 awd old design was smaller in the rear seat than the volvo and she didn't want to wait--she preferred the volvo interior--i would have gotten what ever she wanted (marriage rule 2) it was a toss between the a4 and t5 the bmw dropped out due to small rear seat. she loved her a6 and thought nothing would replace it--now she just adores this volvo zip problems for 6 months this is a really underappreciated vehicle. i am a car guy and i am impressed every time she "lets" me drive it. the t5 with fwd may have torque steer problems drive it to be sure.i would like to drive the redisigned bmw awd against this t5 awd. other cars to consider hmmmmmm i'd have to think about it. what are the absolute criteria that must be met??? as far as the mpg--no kidding with cruise this thing makes gas--i was shocked some cars do better than the epa most worse. the epa thing is a computer model for a lab. the cars that do the worst in real life mpg are THE HYBRIDS.
guess what this car guy drive???? i'll give you a hint--it has a spoiler--buat holds my two car seats (4 and 2yrs) very well---give up---toyota ....gulp....sienna minivan---i know i know but it's sweet for my family i'd like a wrxi 5sp but that has to wait 3 yrs.
Car A, which meets your objective criteria excellently and your subjective criteria decently, or
Car B, which meets your objective criteria decently and your subjective criteria excellently.
I'm using "objective criteria" as a shorthand for performance, passenger and trunk space, reliability, fuel economy, and list of features and amenities. I'm using "subjective criteria" as a shorthand for interior design, exterior design, the sound of the car, the feel of the car, and most nebulous, the "character" of the car.
Later added:
Quote:
Okay, okay. Car A is the Acura TSX; Car B is the Volvo S40. I really like the looks, interior design, and character of the Volvo, but its reliability has been hit-or-miss. The Acura is more clinical--it feels like a machine, not a living thing--but it's got fantastic handling, an enormous amount of features for the price, and I've owned three Hondas before and always been impressed by their reliability.
And:
Quote:
I'm looking for a compact sport sedan with very good handling and a fun powerband, but which also fulfills my practical needs (safe, fuel efficient, decent room for two people and a big dog, or four people, et cetera). Of all the cars I've looked at, these two fit the bill the best for me.
According solely to the information you gave here about your own evaluation of these two cars (I know little about either model) as well as about your own preferences,? the Volvo.
In this case, I have three other sources that confirm that Volvo is in the middle of the pack reliability-wise, while Acura is on top of the pack.
(1) JD Power
(2) Lots of observing of Volvo owner's forums and lots of observing of Acura owner's forums.
(3) Discussions with lots of people who have owned Volvos, and lots of people who have owned Hondas/Acuras.
Sure, there are some Honda/Acura lemons out there. And there are some Volvos that run forever and a day with only scheduled maintenance. But I've run into a LOT more Volvo owners than Honda/Acura owners who have mentioned problems with their electronics or their power equipment sometime during the vehicle's life.
As for reviews of other things besides reliability (ie handling, ride quality, interior quality, et cetera)--Consumer Reports is terrible. I agree 100% there. My assessment of these cars is based on my first-hand experiences test-driving them, though I've also been known to read Motor Trend, Car & Driver, and Road & Track.
Thats the way to go. Talk to people who have actually owned the cars.
Now, Honda and Toyota are probably at the top reliability wise, but if Volvo owners have had minor problems then CR would have panned the car because they dont care if they are minor or not.
But you are researching the right way. I also suggest going to www.epinions.com
Comments
Don't EVER base your car buying decision on Consumer Reports. A bigger rag can't be found. They are absolutely clueless about cars and electronics.
Perhaps they can handle home appliances but thats about it.
Originally posted by steve666
One other thing:
Don't EVER base your car buying decision on Consumer Reports. A bigger rag can't be found. They are absolutely clueless about cars and electronics.
Perhaps they can handle home appliances but thats about it.
In this case, I have three other sources that confirm that Volvo is in the middle of the pack reliability-wise, while Acura is on top of the pack.
(1) JD Power
(2) Lots of observing of Volvo owner's forums and lots of observing of Acura owner's forums.
(3) Discussions with lots of people who have owned Volvos, and lots of people who have owned Hondas/Acuras.
Sure, there are some Honda/Acura lemons out there. And there are some Volvos that run forever and a day with only scheduled maintenance. But I've run into a LOT more Volvo owners than Honda/Acura owners who have mentioned problems with their electronics or their power equipment sometime during the vehicle's life.
As for reviews of other things besides reliability (ie handling, ride quality, interior quality, et cetera)--Consumer Reports is terrible. I agree 100% there. My assessment of these cars is based on my first-hand experiences test-driving them, though I've also been known to read Motor Trend, Car & Driver, and Road & Track.
Originally posted by steve666
The Civic's interior looks like it was designed by a cross-eyed Mandrill.
I've test-driven one. The interior is dang ugly, and the exterior isn't much better. And except for the wheel, which was nice-feeling for a plastic wheel, the interior felt really, really cheap.
Originally posted by NOFEER
get 38-42mpg at 65
it's a bit small but for her she can fit the kids. the interior could use more cubbyholes and a wider glove box but this thing scoots
Yeah, the lack of room on the interior is one real disadvantage of the Volvo to the TSX. I want a car that's small on the exterior (to fit into parking spaces), but I'm worried that the S40 might be a bit too small on the interior as well. EDIT: I checked their EPA interior volumes, and they're practically idential for every dimension. The Acura just looks bigger, and has bigger center console and door pockets. And the Acura is 7 inches longer, with no corresponding increase in interior or trunk space.
it handles just like the 3 series.
Now that's got to be a bit of exaggeration, the 3-series is universally regarded by the automotive press as the best-handling sport sedan out there. And it's RWD.
i think you can get an interface for the ipod.
Actually, you can't. Not yet at least. But I don't own an iPod, so that's okay.
get the t5 awd.
If I get the S40, I'm not going to get the AWD. I don't need AWD here in Oregon, and the T5 FWD gets 10-20% better fuel mileage. And I might get the 2.4i. It's slower, but it's a lot cheaper, and it handles exactly the same as the T5. They downgraded the engine but not the chassis or the suspension. And I'm more into handling than straight-line performance.
Such a hard decision...I like both cars a lot.
Originally posted by steve666
One other thing:
Don't EVER base your car buying decision on Consumer Reports. A bigger rag can't be found. They are absolutely clueless about cars and electronics.
Perhaps they can handle home appliances but thats about it.
I think Consumer Reports has the largest privately-owned car testing facility in the states. Their reliability reports are based on people reporting all problems they have had with particular cars to the organization. other than that, they are the only major tester who doesn't allow cars to use their ratings as a basis for advertising, so they are clearly not biased.
Just because Consumer Reports gives your car bad reliability/whatever ratings, however, doesn't mean that you're not allowed to still like your car.
Complaints against them always just seem like sour apples to me.
Originally posted by Mitlov
Now that's got to be a bit of exaggeration, the 3-series is universally regarded by the automotive press as the best-handling sport sedan out there. And it's RWD.
I have driven both, and preferred the S40. The manual transmission in the Volvo is worlds better than the BMW manual transmission, and the suspension and steering are about equal.
My wife prefers the S60 AWD over both the BMW 3 series and the S40, while I think that the S60 is way too soft. I don't think that the "common wisdom" that BMW is best is very useful, because people like such different things that everyone will pick a different favorite.
One thing to also keep in mind is how close and nice the various dealerships are. The BMW/mini/porsche/subaru and Mazda dealerships near my house are so slimy that I refuse to buy anthing or get service there. My local Honda and Volvo dealerships are great, and the Nissan dealership is OK but not great. How good your dealership experience is will have a big impact on your total car experience.
Originally posted by progmac
Complaints against them always just seem like sour apples to me.
If you are an expert in a particular area, look at their reports from that area and you will see why people dislike them.
I look at their stereo ratings, and see ratings written by fools.
Unless the car is a hobby, anything else is hubris of the worst kind.
Originally posted by dmz
A car is just a tool. Buy a 5-7 year-old car that does what you need it to do; hauling, milage, etc. (goto kbb.com and check out what you're buying first)
Unless the car is a hobby, anything else is hubris of the worst kind.
I think that just means you're not into cars. I demand that you provide a list of all your other possessions, plus a description of your place of residence, so I can scour it for hubris by other means.
Originally posted by NOFEER
get 38-42mpg at 65
Originally posted by Mitlov
That would make it the best performing gas engine car in America, coming in with numbers just under hybrids and diesels. I'm sure it's a very fine ride, but that MPG seems a little unlikely.
Originally posted by addabox
That would make it the best performing gas engine car in America, coming in with numbers just under hybrids and diesels. I'm sure it's a very fine ride, but that MPG seems a little unlikely.
He has a computer that shows him his current instantanious mpg. The average EPA results can be improved dramatically if you watch what happens to that number in various gears. My 17 mpg car has shown instantanious results as low as 2 mpg and as high as 45 mpg depending on what I am doing.
Also, milage is much lower at low speed:
http://www.fueleconomy.gov/feg/driveHabits.shtml
the highway milage number may not factor in the most efficient gear.
Originally posted by dmz
Unless the car is a hobby, anything else is hubris of the worst kind.
Actually, cars ARE a hobby of mine. I really really like driving at a spirited pace down a twisty road. I rode sportbikes since I was 16, but a knee injury makes riding them for more than an hour rather painful nowadays. I'm looking for a compact sport sedan with very good handling and a fun powerband, but which also fulfills my practical needs (safe, fuel efficient, decent room for two people and a big dog, or four people, et cetera). Of all the cars I've looked at, these two fit the bill the best for me.
Originally posted by dmz
Unless the car is a hobby, anything else is hubris of the worst kind.
This just shows me how little we relate on the subject of cars.
The sin here is hedonism and idol worship, not hubris, and I revel in it.
BTW - do you live in a tin shack with rags for clothes? You might want to check your own hubris meter...
Originally posted by addabox
I think that just means you're not into cars. I demand that you provide a list of all your other possessions, plus a description of your place of residence, so I can scour it for hubris by other means.
Don't get me wrong, cars as art is one thing, but this business of 'look at me, I drive an _________. ¡Es Horrible!
Originally posted by dmz
Don't get me wrong, cars as art is one thing, but this business of 'look at me, I drive an _________. ¡Es Horrible!
How the heck did you get THERE from my posts?! I never once mentioned caring what other people think of the car I drive. Because I don't. I was comparing ergonomics, amenities, performance, reliability, my own personal taste in aesthetics, et cetera. Never once did I mention prestige value.
Neither of these cars are really prestigious anyway. Do you ever hear people saying "hey, look at so-and-so, he drives a VOLVO, he must really be rich?" Hell no. Same with Acura. These companies aren't exactly Mercedes-Benz or Bentley.
Originally posted by Mitlov
How the heck did you get THERE from my posts?! I never once mentioned caring what other people think of the car I drive. Because I don't. I was comparing ergonomics, amenities, performance, reliability, my own personal taste in aesthetics, et cetera. Never once did I mention prestige value.
Neither of these cars are really prestigious anyway. Do you ever hear people saying "hey, look at so-and-so, he drives a VOLVO, he must really be rich?" Hell no. Same with Acura. These companies aren't exactly Mercedes-Benz or Bentley.
You don't think maybe you're being just a teensy-weensy bit touchy?
(It was just advice, I'm not trying to divine your motives. Although, when you find yourself going into debt for wants and not needs, you should be honest as to why.)
Originally posted by Mitlov
Yeah, the lack of room on the interior is one real disadvantage of the Volvo to the TSX. I want a car that's small on the exterior (to fit into parking spaces), but I'm worried that the S40 might be a bit too small on the interior as well. EDIT: I checked their EPA interior volumes, and they're practically idential for every dimension. The Acura just looks bigger, and has bigger center console and door pockets. And the Acura is 7 inches longer, with no corresponding increase in interior or trunk space.
Now that's got to be a bit of exaggeration, the 3-series is universally regarded by the automotive press as the best-handling sport sedan out there. And it's RWD.
Actually, you can't. Not yet at least. But I don't own an iPod, so that's okay.
If I get the S40, I'm not going to get the AWD. I don't need AWD here in Oregon, and the T5 FWD gets 10-20% better fuel mileage. And I might get the 2.4i. It's slower, but it's a lot cheaper, and it handles exactly the same as the T5. They downgraded the engine but not the chassis or the suspension. And I'm more into handling than straight-line performance.
Such a hard decision...I like both cars a lot.
our dicision tree required awd--so the tsx, tl, etc were out so was the bmw (my wife drove both and said the volvo was better) also when we were looking the bmw 3 awd old design was smaller in the rear seat than the volvo and she didn't want to wait--she preferred the volvo interior--i would have gotten what ever she wanted (marriage rule 2) it was a toss between the a4 and t5 the bmw dropped out due to small rear seat. she loved her a6 and thought nothing would replace it--now she just adores this volvo zip problems for 6 months this is a really underappreciated vehicle. i am a car guy and i am impressed every time she "lets" me drive it. the t5 with fwd may have torque steer problems drive it to be sure.i would like to drive the redisigned bmw awd against this t5 awd. other cars to consider hmmmmmm i'd have to think about it. what are the absolute criteria that must be met??? as far as the mpg--no kidding with cruise this thing makes gas--i was shocked some cars do better than the epa most worse. the epa thing is a computer model for a lab. the cars that do the worst in real life mpg are THE HYBRIDS.
guess what this car guy drive???? i'll give you a hint--it has a spoiler--buat holds my two car seats (4 and 2yrs) very well---give up---toyota ....gulp....sienna minivan---i know i know but it's sweet for my family i'd like a wrxi 5sp but that has to wait 3 yrs.
Originally posted by Mitlov
Would you rather buy:
Car A, which meets your objective criteria excellently and your subjective criteria decently, or
Car B, which meets your objective criteria decently and your subjective criteria excellently.
I'm using "objective criteria" as a shorthand for performance, passenger and trunk space, reliability, fuel economy, and list of features and amenities. I'm using "subjective criteria" as a shorthand for interior design, exterior design, the sound of the car, the feel of the car, and most nebulous, the "character" of the car.
Later added:
Okay, okay. Car A is the Acura TSX; Car B is the Volvo S40. I really like the looks, interior design, and character of the Volvo, but its reliability has been hit-or-miss. The Acura is more clinical--it feels like a machine, not a living thing--but it's got fantastic handling, an enormous amount of features for the price, and I've owned three Hondas before and always been impressed by their reliability.
And:
I'm looking for a compact sport sedan with very good handling and a fun powerband, but which also fulfills my practical needs (safe, fuel efficient, decent room for two people and a big dog, or four people, et cetera). Of all the cars I've looked at, these two fit the bill the best for me.
According solely to the information you gave here about your own evaluation of these two cars (I know little about either model) as well as about your own preferences,? the Volvo.
Originally posted by Mitlov
In this case, I have three other sources that confirm that Volvo is in the middle of the pack reliability-wise, while Acura is on top of the pack.
(1) JD Power
(2) Lots of observing of Volvo owner's forums and lots of observing of Acura owner's forums.
(3) Discussions with lots of people who have owned Volvos, and lots of people who have owned Hondas/Acuras.
Sure, there are some Honda/Acura lemons out there. And there are some Volvos that run forever and a day with only scheduled maintenance. But I've run into a LOT more Volvo owners than Honda/Acura owners who have mentioned problems with their electronics or their power equipment sometime during the vehicle's life.
As for reviews of other things besides reliability (ie handling, ride quality, interior quality, et cetera)--Consumer Reports is terrible. I agree 100% there. My assessment of these cars is based on my first-hand experiences test-driving them, though I've also been known to read Motor Trend, Car & Driver, and Road & Track.
Thats the way to go. Talk to people who have actually owned the cars.
Now, Honda and Toyota are probably at the top reliability wise, but if Volvo owners have had minor problems then CR would have panned the car because they dont care if they are minor or not.
But you are researching the right way. I also suggest going to www.epinions.com