What Should Apple Call Mac OS X 10.6?(NOT LEOPARD!)

124»

Comments

  • Reply 61 of 76
    sdw2001sdw2001 Posts: 18,056member
    My choices:



    Wildcat



    Sabertooth



    Sphynx





    Personally I like either Wildcat or Sabertooth.



    Or, maybe it's time to get away from cat names and do something else, like:



    Mac OS X Sheep Dog



    Mac OS X Collie



    Mac OS X Bitch



    Mac OS X Goldfish



    Mac OS X Hamster



    Mac OS X Iguana (think of the claws!)



    Mac OS X Hermit Crab



    Max OS X Guinea Pig



    Mac OS X Akita



    Mac OS X Garden Snake



    Mac OS X Common Pond Turtle



    No really, what about other cool animals? Like Python? Hammerhead? Coyote?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 62 of 76
    smeesmee Posts: 195member
    Lol, OS X Python!!!!

    Whahooooo, yea new OS Python! lol, just messin.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 63 of 76
    Liger.



     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 64 of 76
    Either sand cat or Pallas













     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 65 of 76
    Sylvester
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 66 of 76
    Ocelot is a great name. i'd like to see the 11.x series to go with birds of pray like someone mentioned. that could be sweet.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 67 of 76
    I'm surprised nobody chose Tom.



    Anthying is OK, but not Hello Kitty.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 68 of 76
    Ocelot. I stand by my belief, thank you.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 69 of 76
    mcarlingmcarling Posts: 1,106member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by icfireball View Post


    Isn't it a little premature to think be thinking about 10.6 right now?



    I expect Apple already have a list of features they hope to include in 10.6.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 70 of 76
    I think Apple is going to change the naming scheme with 10.6.



    The name Leopard was announced, before they even knew, they'd go so heavily by the Space-theme. The grass-background from wwdc seems to reflect, that they were trying to push Leopard into a wild nature-thing. The final look and wallpaper and all the marketing material is so heavily space-oriented. I think, wwdc08 will reveal a new naming scheme.
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by icfireball View Post


    Isn't it a little premature to think be thinking about 10.6 right now?



    I dont think so. Just a few days ago Steve Jobs said OS X is in on track for Major Releases, every 12?18 Months. We will obviously get a glimpse at some 10.6 features and a Code-Name by June 08. Thats roughly 8 months from now.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 71 of 76
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by mcarling View Post


    I expect Apple already have a list of features they hope to include in 10.6.



    I expect that they are already working on 10.6 and are starting to make lists of features to put into 11.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 72 of 76
    regreg Posts: 832member
    If you don't have a wish list, you are already falling behind. Lets hope Apple doesn't feel content and lose their edge. Besides the programmers I know like to be challenged to come up with new things. They need a vision for things to come and how they should work to get there. Finder, file system and interface are areas that should be tops of their to-do-list.



    I think Apple will stay with big cats till 11. Sabertooth is my next guess.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 73 of 76
    Why do so many people think Mac OS 11 has to be a bigger release than 10.3, 10.4 or 10.5? Whats so special about 11?

    Don't you get that Apple changed their numbering-scheme from classic Mac OS to OS X!?



    I assure you, Apple will not make something insanely differnet or any bigger step with OS 11, than Tiger>Leopard for example...
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 74 of 76
    because thats how verison releases work. for example: x.y is the version number. every time x increases in number, it introduces new features, refines older features, and generally makes for a better experience. every time y increases in number, it means a complete overhaul of everything; completely new features, generally a new interface, new type of code, etc.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 75 of 76
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Bonsai1214 View Post


    because thats how verison releases work. for example: x.y is the version number. every time x increases in number, it introduces new features, refines older features, and generally makes for a better experience. every time y increases in number, it means a complete overhaul of everything; completely new features, generally a new interface, new type of code, etc.



    No.

    Plain: No!



    No Software has to completely change at a new version number.



    Especially in the case of OS X. Apple changed the numbering scheme of OS X, when they released 10.0.



    A x.1-Release in OS X-World is worth a X-Release in OS 9-World.



    Btw: It's stupid to make version-number and big innovations dependend this way. We'll stick with OS X, it's Desktop, Unix-Foundation and all for a long time. Well into OS 11. Innovation doesnt care of version-numbers. It comes, when it's done.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 76 of 76
    After Leopard should we see Snow Leopard. B)
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.