Microsoft Access??

Jump to First Reply
Posted:
in Mac Software edited January 2014
Is it possible to put the program microsoft access on my powerbook with OSX? If so, any isnight how, and where to get it would be extremely helpful.

Thanks in advance,

Matt
«1

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 26
    There is no Mac native version of Access. The only way to run it on the Mac is under Virtual PC (Windows emulation). Virtual PC and Access are both available from Microsoft.



    Since FileMaker is a cross-platform database, it might be possible to export Access data into FileMaker on Windows, and then run FileMaker on the Mac using that data. In most cases that would not be a trivial task.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 2 of 26
    The real issue at hand is that Microsoft refuses to release a Macintosh compatible version of Access AND refuses to open up the formats and protocols used by Access so unless you are using Windows you can't get anything that supports Access fully. This way, once a company starts using an Access server they're pretty much locked out from ever switching from MS Windows.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 3 of 26
    For anything other than a tiny database, Access is garbage.



    It's a neat idea that has a terrible implementation and GUI.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 26
    Does anyone think this is a missing application (whether by MS or someone else) on the Mac?



    I mean FileMaker is a bit more $ and perhaps higher end than Access in many ways.



    Is there a need for a "prosumer" database application on the Mac?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 26
    There was a news item a few days ago that provided a link to the Jet Engine you need to import Access data files into FileMaker:



    http://www.actualtechnologies.com/product_access.php



    I saved the link as it might be handy for me in the future, but it makes FileMaker closer to Access in at least one way - importing data.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 6 of 26
    mr. memr. me Posts: 3,221member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Chris Cuilla

    Does anyone think this is a missing application (whether by MS or someone else) on the Mac?



    I mean FileMaker is a bit more $ and perhaps higher end than Access in many ways.



    Is there a need for a "prosumer" database application on the Mac?




    There is no need for "prosumer" DBMS when full-on pro systems can be had for so little. We know that FileMaker is a great cross-platform DBMS from Apple subsidiary FileMaker, Inc. It is the No. 1 DBMS on the Mac and No. 2 on Windows. Even more powerful 4th Dimension can be had for just $49.00 at the academic price. Apple bundles OpenBase with MacOS X 10.4. There are several really wonderful database options on MacOS X. And yet, you clamor for Access
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 7 of 26
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Mr. Me

    There are several really wonderful database options on MacOS X. And yet, you clamor for Access [/B]



    The reason i clamor, as you say, for Access is because I am in college and it is required for oone of my classes. And yes I could use one of the many computer labs on campus, which looks like what I am going to have to do, however I would rather sit in the comfort of my own room then venture out into the cold RI nights.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 8 of 26
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Mr. Me

    There are several really wonderful database options on MacOS X. And yet, you clamor for Access



    Ummm...I wasn't clamoring for anything. I was asking everyone's opinion about the need for such a thing. \



    P.S. Quoting academic pricing to those without access to it is kinda silly.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 9 of 26
    dave k.dave k. Posts: 1,306member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by kim kap sol

    For anything other than a tiny database, Access is garbage.



    It's a neat idea that has a terrible implementation and GUI.




    I couldn't disagree with you more. Access is incredibly powerful. What are you comparing it to? FileMaker Pro?



    Dave
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 10 of 26
    mr. memr. me Posts: 3,221member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Chris Cuilla

    Ummm...I wasn't clamoring for anything. I was asking everyone's opinion about the need for such a thing. \



    P.S. Quoting academic pricing to those without access to it is kinda silly.




    Although this is no longer the case, the academic price for 4th Dimension was $0.00 about a year ago. But the fact remains, at $0.00, $49.00, or full price, 4th Dimension is an awesome product and more than worth the asking price. Lest you forget, elsewhere I also mentioned OpenBase, which is part of the MacOS X 10.4 bundle and is bundled with new professional Macs. Some may think that a free professional DBMS is silly, but I don't.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 11 of 26
    pbg4 dudepbg4 dude Posts: 1,611member
    Where is this OpenBase in OS X? CoreData uses the SQLlite engine. The only reference I can find to OpenBase is in WebObjects documentation, and WebObjects certainly isn't free.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 12 of 26
    mr. memr. me Posts: 3,221member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by PBG4 Dude

    Where is this OpenBase in OS X? CoreData uses the SQLlite engine. The only reference I can find to OpenBase is in WebObjects documentation, and WebObjects certainly isn't free.



    OpenBase installs in your Applications folder when you install MacOS X 10.4. This is where you should find it if you buy a professional Mac with MacOS X 10.4 preinstalled.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 13 of 26
    Simply put, Access is a very powerful database. Anyone from a beginner to an expert can create database applications. Not only can you use Access as a stand-alone database and as a data source for other apps, but you can use it as a front-end interface to a back-end database server so you do not even need to use the Jet engine.



    I would put Access on my iBook if it was available, but that is not going to happen because it would be one less "Windows only" application keeping people on Windows. Active-X might be a factor but Microsoft has the skills to overcome any obstacle that pops up in their quest to port their applications to the Mac. Personally, though, I am hoping for a true relational database to be included in iWork.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 14 of 26
    Active-X might be a factor? Ha! The whole reason active-x was invented was to prevent netscape users and mac users from being able to use certain applications online
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 15 of 26
    pbg4 dudepbg4 dude Posts: 1,611member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Mr. Me

    OpenBase installs in your Applications folder when you install MacOS X 10.4. This is where you should find it if you buy a professional Mac with MacOS X 10.4 preinstalled.



    So you're saying it doesn't come on the standalone DVD then?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 16 of 26
    mr. memr. me Posts: 3,221member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by PBG4 Dude

    So you're saying it doesn't come on the standalone DVD then?



    I'm saying that it does.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 17 of 26
    pbg4 dudepbg4 dude Posts: 1,611member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by Mr. Me

    I'm saying that it does.



    Well, I must be missing it somehow as I did a Find on the Tiger install DVD and had no hits on OpenBase. There were OpenSSL and the OpenGLSDK packages, but no OpenBase.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 18 of 26
    Quote:

    Originally posted by PBG4 Dude

    Where is this OpenBase in OS X? CoreData uses the SQLlite engine. The only reference I can find to OpenBase is in WebObjects documentation, and WebObjects certainly isn't free.



    WebObjects is now a part of Xcode tools, and is completely free. WebObjects hadn't done so well in the marketplace after (a) Apple aquired NextStep and (b) Apple nixed Obective-C support in recent versions, so they made it free a year or so ago.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 19 of 26
    mr. memr. me Posts: 3,221member
    Quote:

    Originally posted by PBG4 Dude

    Well, I must be missing it somehow as I did a Find on the Tiger install DVD and had no hits on OpenBase. There were OpenSSL and the OpenGLSDK packages, but no OpenBase.



    Look. The MacOS X 10.4 DVD installs OpenBase on your system. I do not know the names of its files on the distribution DVD, nor do I care. If you want to use OpenBase, install MacOS X 10.4 and use it. If you want to "look" for it, then that's your privilege.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 20 of 26
    You have to install the developer tools and WebObjects to get OpenBase. Then it will be in your Applications folder.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.