ThinkSecret Shows Off More Leopard 9A343 Screenshots

2»

Comments

  • Reply 21 of 27
    feynmanfeynman Posts: 1,087member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Hobbes View Post


    In a way, they're natural companions in making a case for what's distinctiveness and unique about Macs. Also, if iLife/iWork have some CoreAnimation goodies, it would certainly make sense to show them off at the same event.



    For sure. So you say don't count on March for a release date, when would you speculate based on what you've seen?



    Are these new features going to extend the release out longer so once they are announced Apple will give developers more time to program or will they release the OS and then talk about how to develop accordingly at WWDC?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 22 of 27
    hobbeshobbes Posts: 1,252member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Feynman View Post


    For sure. So you say don't count on March for a release date, when would you speculate based on what you've seen?



    I've no idea, though May/June seems to me like a *far* more realistic release date than March.



    As for iLife, some have speculated that it'll be 10.5-only, others that it'll have some extra features for 10.5 but will still run on 10.4. I suspect the latter, with a release in March, but again, no idea.



    Quote:

    Are these new features going to extend the release out longer so once they are announced Apple will give developers more time to program or will they release the OS and then talk about how to develop accordingly at WWDC?



    Developers will probably need to tweak some customized UI elements, but nothing that can't be handled in 60 days or so...
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 23 of 27
    Dammit Hobbes, you better be right about this.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 24 of 27
    hobbeshobbes Posts: 1,252member
    I am.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 25 of 27
    Marvinmarvin Posts: 15,585moderator
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Hobbes View Post


    A new private framework that currently points to a bundle named Aqua. Application resources seem to have been redirected to use CoreUI.



    I wonder if the generic nature of the name would suggest replaceable interfaces akin to the window managers that Linux has?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 26 of 27
    feynmanfeynman Posts: 1,087member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Hobbes View Post


    I am.



    But then in the "Latest Leopard build from Apple suggests much work ahead" thread you state that you're speculating:



    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Hobbes View Post


    It's an API that makes creating animation *dramatically* easier, and -- I'm speculating now -- I believe could also allow for certain animations to be much more easily dynamically generated by the OS itself. It's not that it wasn't possible to do this before, exactly, but it's so much easier to do with Core Animation (something like 10x less the code is required) that IMO it's unthinkable that Apple would introduce this and not use it, *especially* when their competition finally has a savvy graphics compositing system and is all blinged out.



     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 27 of 27
    hobbeshobbes Posts: 1,252member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Feynman View Post


    But then in the "Latest Leopard build from Apple suggests much work ahead" thread you state that you're speculating:



    I have no idea what Leopard will look like, and whether it'll just be a refreshed UI (but more than simply a new theme) or a refreshed UI with new applications and features that introduce the nascent elements of something much more ambitious and advanced.



    However, I'm completely confident that Apple has a new, updated UI in development that makes heavy use of CoreAnimation and that's been withheld from current Leopard seeds -- and will be unveiled in the next few weeks.



    I have no direct inside knowledge, but the many, many clues are there, both blatantly open for all to see, and NDA'd (not too hard to find with just a little digging).
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.