Who thinks OS X is way to complicated!

124»

Comments

  • Reply 61 of 63
    jidojido Posts: 125member
    [quote]Originally posted by Michaelm8000:

    <strong>If you want to suft the net check, E-mail, Right a letter, or make an iMove OS X is great. But if you want to Try to fix your system, setup users with selected folder they can acsses, mess with network settings, connect to a server, anything slightly advanced OS X is not intuitive and takes time and ether far amount of computer knolage or a users manual. This kinda pisses me off! OS X has SO much potental in these areas! Right now they are just flat out to hard to do to call them selves a part of a MAc OS.



    Dose anyone else feel the same way?</strong><hr></blockquote>



    Most of these things are very easy in Mac OS X SERVER. If you want to do advanced administrator tasks in Mac OS X, get the right software (i.e. server sw). Otherwise you are stuck with NetInfo and the command line.



    Just my 2c
  • Reply 62 of 63
    sc_marktsc_markt Posts: 1,402member
    This may be off the subject but does anybody have any idea how much faster VPC 5.0 would run if it you could run it in Darwin? The reason I ask is that I read the VPC 5.0 will never be as fast as in classic because of several layers (quartz, aqua, etc) and multitasking. Well, Darwin has much less layers so wouldn't VPC run faster?



    - Mark
  • Reply 63 of 63
    bradbowerbradbower Posts: 1,068member
    How exactly could Connectix MAKE VirtualPC without frameworks, a windowing system, or a GUI? <img src="graemlins/bugeye.gif" border="0" alt="[Skeptical]" />
Sign In or Register to comment.