<strong>Yeah it took me all of 10 minutes to fake those Finder prefs. So if someone was bent on making fake screenshots they could have, but it would have taken quite a while to get that level of detail. Who knows... </strong><hr></blockquote>
Do you often waste time like that? Or was this a special occasion?
Actually Ybot brings up a very good point with the Interface Builder comment. I hadn't even thought of that, being so used to people Photoshoping their fakes (which is easy to spot when people don't know how to use PS well).
I'm actually now inclined to think maybe we are looking at fakes. It is dirt simple to make things like this with IB now...can't believe I overlooked that one. Hey, I think I'll go make some fakes of my own just for giggles!
<strong>I'm actually now inclined to think maybe we are looking at fakes. It is dirt simple to make things like this with IB now...can't believe I overlooked that one.</strong><hr></blockquote>
The problem is just that two different people made the exact same fakes then.
When the hell is Microsoft going to get the memo that spring-loaded folders are good? I mean, the whole cut/copy/paste thing is super-cool, but can't Windows have both?
I am happy to see it coming back to OSX, moving files around now in OSX is highly annoying. <img src="graemlins/bugeye.gif" border="0" alt="[Skeptical]" />
I dunno why everyone is so opposed to white on black. I think its a great option. Aqua is cool, but Quartz really allows for easy manipulation of the look of the GUI and I don't understand why people (some who, I might add, were vigorusly opposed to aqua to begin with) cant stand any kind of change. I think that the white on black here is specifically for people who don't like or have trouble with the current gamma of Aqua the way it is. Is it so hard to believe that apple would think to do this? If you don't like it, don't use it, its just an option.
The problem is just that two different people made the exact same fakes then.</strong><hr></blockquote>
I don't follow you there...what's to say one screenshot guy didnt get his from the other guy and post them using a slightly different cropping or something similar?
The thing that has me wondering is *why* they'd have a contextual _submenu_ for mounting a disk image. Or was that just a "proof of concept" kind of thing (i.e., "yes, we can do contextual submenus")?
Comments
<strong>Yeah it took me all of 10 minutes to fake those Finder prefs. So if someone was bent on making fake screenshots they could have, but it would have taken quite a while to get that level of detail. Who knows...
Do you often waste time like that? Or was this a special occasion?
I'm actually now inclined to think maybe we are looking at fakes. It is dirt simple to make things like this with IB now...can't believe I overlooked that one. Hey, I think I'll go make some fakes of my own just for giggles!
<strong>I'm actually now inclined to think maybe we are looking at fakes. It is dirt simple to make things like this with IB now...can't believe I overlooked that one.</strong><hr></blockquote>
The problem is just that two different people made the exact same fakes then.
I am happy to see it coming back to OSX, moving files around now in OSX is highly annoying. <img src="graemlins/bugeye.gif" border="0" alt="[Skeptical]" />
<strong>I sure wish that scheduled wake and sleep are implemented soon.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Me too! I want wakeup and sleep items too.
-AK
<strong>
The problem is just that two different people made the exact same fakes then.</strong><hr></blockquote>
I don't follow you there...what's to say one screenshot guy didnt get his from the other guy and post them using a slightly different cropping or something similar?
The thing that has me wondering is *why* they'd have a contextual _submenu_ for mounting a disk image. Or was that just a "proof of concept" kind of thing (i.e., "yes, we can do contextual submenus")?
Krishen