Apple and Nike to sell Nike+Amp bracelet for iPods

Jump to First Reply
Posted:
in iPod + iTunes + AppleTV edited January 2014
Apple Computer and Nike plan to introduce a new wireless wristband device that will allow runners to interact with their iPods without constantly fiddling with the players' sweat-slicked Click-Wheel.



According to a report in Men'sHealth, the $80 device will act as a wrist-mounted Bluetooth remote and let users browse the songs on their iPod and check running times without that constant fumbling that often ensues while attempting to maintain focus on a run.



The device will sync up with the existing Nike+iPod running system, displaying information on an illuminated LED display "hidden beneath the matte-finish face of the bracelet." Meanwhile, the iPod may remain tucked away in a runner's pocket or armband.



Further features of the device, expected to be released under the name Nike Amp+, are unclear from the report. However, a single included marketing image suggests that gadget may hold potential to deliver one of the most frequently-requested components for the Nike+iPod system: a heart rate monitor.



Since beginning their foray into the wireless iPod accessory market earlier this July, Apple and Nike have sold over 450,000 of the Nike+iPod sport kits. The $30 system includes a wireless Bluetooth mode that inserts under the heel of a Nike+ compatible running shoe and a transceiver that plugs into an iPod nano.



Nike+iPod wristband | Image copyright: Men'sHealth



The Nike+iPod kit gathers data such as distance, calories burned, time and pace. The data is then stored on the iPod and easily uploaded through iTunes to nikeplus.com, a personal service site where runners can track their own progress and challenge other runners.



In recent months, Nike has been working on new functionality for nikeplus.com, such as adding a new 'route finder' to the web software that will let runners easily map and share their favorite running routes.



The shoemaker has also been working to expand its Nike+ enabled footwear line, for which there are now over a dozen different models.
«13

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 47
    So how long until the Nike iPod?



    I say 18 months, if not sooner.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 2 of 47
    This is nothing but good news. More incremental sales for both Apple and Nike. Quick analysts, to the analyscanner!
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 3 of 47
    This made me think of something.



    What if instead of a watch with buttons on it, Nike instead made a glove with the buttons on the palm side? The watch still requires you to upset your arm motion and use both arms while running, but a glove would just require you to bend in your fingers to push a button, which is easier.



    I guess if you decide to stop and do push-ups or pull-ups though, you're screwed.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 47
    wilcowilco Posts: 985member
    If I weren't crippled and deaf, I'd be all over this!
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 47
    macgregormacgregor Posts: 1,434member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by bborofka


    This made me think of something.

    The watch still requires you to upset your arm motion and use both arms while running, but a glove would just require you to bend in your fingers to push a button, which is easier.



    Yeah and special Spidey-webbing ejects out of hidden nozzles too!!
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 6 of 47
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by bborofka


    This made me think of something.



    What if instead of a watch with buttons on it, Nike instead made a glove with the buttons on the palm side? The watch still requires you to upset your arm motion and use both arms while running, but a glove would just require you to bend in your fingers to push a button, which is easier.



    I guess if you decide to stop and do push-ups or pull-ups though, you're screwed.



    As a runner, I hate anything that can distract me. The shuffle is just enough. I would not want to wear a mini while exercising...too big and too much visual information. A glove would be a very bad idea. Even a watch can be a pain sometimes.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 7 of 47
    eckingecking Posts: 1,588member
    This seems pretty cool but it's more expensive than the current kit!
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 8 of 47
    sandausandau Posts: 1,230member
    this doesn't look right to me. especially with the shuffle G1 bubble where the play/pause button is, that was dropped with the G2, I don't see it coming back (and i miss it, it had a nice 'feel' to it). it also doesn't seem designed very nike or apple. and what bluetooth dongle do you have to attach to your ipod that already has a nike+ dongle on it? Or do you toss out your old nike+ and just use the shoe part? I cry bogus!!
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 9 of 47
    celcocelco Posts: 211member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by wilco


    If I weren't crippled and deaf, I'd be all over this!







    Hmm wonder how fit the average mac user is.







     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 10 of 47
    slewisslewis Posts: 2,081member
    Null.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 11 of 47
    I wonder if this little dodacky will allow me to sync up my Bluetooth stereo headset with the nike bluetooth adaptor and hence my iPod. Cool if it does.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 12 of 47
    chuckerchucker Posts: 5,089member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Slewis






    I really need to look into buying a Nano+Nike kit. I could use another Hobby and it would give me an excuse to buy an iPod (I never really needed one before you ask) Nano.



    Recommended reading.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 13 of 47
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by SpamSandwich


    As a runner, I hate anything that can distract me. The shuffle is just enough. I would not want to wear a mini while exercising...too big and too much visual information. A glove would be a very bad idea. Even a watch can be a pain sometimes.



    A glove wouldn't be that too bad actually. I doubt that a glove will appear but nevertheless I see it as a good idea. As a year round runner, a lot of us (guys and girls) wear gloves during winter sessions. Its amazing how cold your hand can get.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 14 of 47
    Apple should team up with other sports companies too. I'm a swimmer, not a runner - I want an iPod in my Speedos
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 15 of 47
    othelloothello Posts: 1,054member
    i want an ipod bike add-on. like the running one but with a sensor on the bike for tracking distance, altitude etc. i cycle rather than run and that would make a big difference...
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 16 of 47
    palegolaspalegolas Posts: 1,362member
    I guess the question is: Will there soon be new iPods with Bluetooth? Or will they continue with the bluetooth add on? As I understand it the Nike+ running thing already is bluetooth.

    Quote:

    The $30 system includes a wireless Bluetooth mode that inserts under the heel of a Nike+ compatible running shoe and a transceiver that plugs into an iPod nano.



     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 17 of 47
    chuckerchucker Posts: 5,089member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by othello


    i want an ipod bike add-on. like the running one but with a sensor on the bike for tracking distance, altitude etc. i cycle rather than run and that would make a big difference...



    Ditto. I'd be all over the iPod nano if such an add-on came out.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 18 of 47
    I am going to cry bogus on this one also. So, when the Nike+ came out, Apple was very specific in sayin gthe connection between the dondle and the Nano was NOT bluetooth, and that it was a proprietary wireless connection. Why would they all of a sudden say it was a bluetooth device? I cry bogus, I think the image we are seeing is some clever photoshoping, a previous design idea, or someone's dream ad (ie. iPhone spec commercial on google video). We'll just have to see..
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 19 of 47
    mr. hmr. h Posts: 4,870member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by TheExile


    Apple was very specific in sayin gthe connection between the dondle and the Nano was NOT bluetooth, and that it was a proprietary wireless connection.



    They were? Must have missed that. Do you have a link?
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 20 of 47
    chuckerchucker Posts: 5,089member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Mr. H


    They were? Must have missed that. Do you have a link?



    It uses a proprietary 802.11-based method.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.