Adobe is barred from distributing Indesign
<a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-000100396dec19.story?coll=la-headlines-busines s" target="_blank">http://www.latimes.com/business/la-000100396dec19.story?coll=la-headlines-busines s</a>
IN 1.5, not a big deal as 2.0 is soon out.
IN 1.5, not a big deal as 2.0 is soon out.
Comments
Case-in-point: Sun vs. Microsoft over Java implementation
VERDICT: Microsoft broke contract with Sun
Real World Results: All Java is now Microsoft based
Mac Guru
I hadn't heard about Adobe stealing someone else's software for InDesign. Lame.
<strong>Quark is fine, I don't know why people dog it so much (especially people who don't use it). Is it just an Adobe love-fest thing?<hr></blockquote></strong>
I've used it for year for paginating classified and making ads. It's a POS. The only reason it's still around is all the rest of the DTP and layout apps out there are even bigger POS. Indesign 2.0 if far better than Quark, Indesign 1.2 blew
[quote]<strong>
I hadn't heard about Adobe stealing someone else's software for InDesign. Lame.</strong><hr></blockquote>
No they used some code out of another piece of software in version 1.5
Version 2.0 wont have this. It's the very same thing MS did with Apple.
I was waiting for that. haha
God, you need help.
You sound like a goddam Aggie bitching about the Longhorns all the time.
<strong>
I was waiting for that. haha
God, you need help.
You sound like a goddam Aggie bitching about the Longhorns all the time.</strong><hr></blockquote>
I was just pointing out similar things that happened in the past. You know.. that is the normal thing to do when arguing such things. I didn't mean to trample on your MS ideology.
[ 12-20-2001: Message edited by: Sinewave ]</p>
Mac Guru
Gig 'em
Mac Guru
Gig 'em
Quark works and I have to use it, but I hope InDesign 2 is better so I can switch.
<strong>
God, you need help.
You sound like a goddam Aggie bitching about the Longhorns all the time.</strong><hr></blockquote>
Find a new analogy would ya? Seems like every time you don't like something someone else says, you call them down on it and then call them a gomer or an aggie. There is a world outside of Texas collegiate football...and frankly, no one outside of Texas cares about the in-state rivalries there.
But [regarding college football I will say this]: The Rose Bowl is a no-win situation. Can't think of two teams who deserve verbal abuse more than Miami and Nebraska. GUHhh. Bastards. You know something is wrong with the universe when there is neither a Big Ten nor a Pac Ten team in the Rose Bowl....
By the way, Quark is a POS, and I have used it, and decided immediately thereafter I didn't want to do that anymore. Even an incomplete ID 1.5 is a better product IMO (at least with small documents).
[ 12-20-2001: Message edited by: Moogs ? ]</p>
Actually, there isn't a world outside of Texas collegiate football.
I apologize for injuring your delicate sensibilities. Would it be better for me to use a Washington Generals/Harlem Globetrotters analogy? How about an North Carolina/Duke analogy?
Sounds like you're protesting too much, got an obsession with NCAA football yourself?
The Pac-10 does not deserve a Rose Bowl shot, they were weak this year. Nebraska is the best 1-loss team.
--
Once again, I'm the odd-man out, but I kind of like Quark. Of course, I've only used it on Dual800 G4s and equivalent PCs so I didn't notice much performance nastiness. I've used InDesign 1.2 and it wasn't enough, 1.5 might be better but I've never used it. Here's hoping 2.0 is far better than Quark. And then here's hoping that the next Quark blows ID2.0 out of the water, and so on and so forth.
<strong>How about no sports references on a computer message board?</strong><hr></blockquote>
Excellent suggestion.
<a href="http://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/pressroom/pressreleases/200112/20011220triosettles.html" target="_blank">http://www.adobe.com/aboutadobe/pressroom/pressreleases/200112/20011220triosettles.html</a>
I got three words for ya
Mac Guru
Mac Guru