Best BitTorrent/P2P client for Mac?

Posted:
in Mac Software edited January 2014
Hey,



I've been looking for a decent P2P software for Mac.



It seems that the selection is pretty limited...



I understood the best eMule client is aMule (which is not very good...)

What is the best BitTorrent client?

And best overall P2P software?
«1

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 29
    Azureus.



    It's a huge resource hog, but it does it's job fairly well.
  • Reply 2 of 29
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by KingOfSomewhereHot View Post


    Azureus.



    It's a huge resource hog, but it does it's job fairly well.



    I use bittorrent.
  • Reply 3 of 29
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Rich-Myster View Post


    I use bittorrent.



    Which BitTorrent client? Can you post a link?
  • Reply 4 of 29
    Moderator Edit: Do not post links to stolen software. People work hard to write this stuff - if you can't afford it, don't use it. Any further infractions will see the emergence of the hammer.
  • Reply 5 of 29
    No. BAD Randy. BAAAAAD.
  • Reply 6 of 29
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Rich-Myster View Post


    I use bittorrent.



    Quote:
    Originally Posted by randyjohnston View Post


    Quote ye not bannable material.



    But what client do you use to download these?
  • Reply 7 of 29
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by lirand View Post


    But what client do you use to download these?



    http://www.acquisitionx.com/
  • Reply 8 of 29
    gongon Posts: 2,437member
    Transmission is probably the nicest Bittorrent client on the Mac. Azureus is clunky but if you want to tweak every little detail, then it's the best.
  • Reply 9 of 29
    lirandlirand Posts: 174member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Gon View Post


    Transmission is probably the nicest Bittorrent client on the Mac. Azureus is clunky but if you want to tweak every little detail, then it's the best.



    Is Transmission better than Acquisition? Why?
  • Reply 10 of 29
    gongon Posts: 2,437member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by lirand View Post


    Is Transmission better than Acquisition? Why?



    I have only tried Acquisition a little, and never for Bittorrent. It was okay for the other stuff. But for an infrequent user, I think the biggest thing is that Acquisition costs money while Transmission doesn't. Transmission:



    Is open source

    Has a very clean, simple user interface, is a good OS X citizen as far as I can tell

    Under active development, new versions often

    Does little thoughtful things like auto-loads torrent files from your Downloads folder if you want it to

    Supports Growl notifications, UL/DL badging in Dock

    Multi-platform (not available for Windows, but who cares )



    I really don't have anything bad to say about it. It's not even version 1.0 yet but works great.
  • Reply 11 of 29
    lirandlirand Posts: 174member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Gon View Post


    Transmission is probably the nicest Bittorrent client on the Mac. Azureus is clunky but if you want to tweak every little detail, then it's the best.



    Sounds good Too bad there isn't a decent eMule client for the Mac... :-/
  • Reply 12 of 29
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by lirand View Post


    Sounds good Too bad there isn't a decent eMule client for the Mac... :-/



    http://www.bittorrent.com/
  • Reply 13 of 29
    lirandlirand Posts: 174member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Rich-Myster View Post


    http://www.bittorrent.com/



    Is it better than Transmission? Why?
  • Reply 14 of 29
    Gents - I can only assume that you're using P2P to transfer things like legal audio/video, podcasts, and legal software. Please be careful here as any talk or links to piracy will put me in a cranky mood.



    You won't like me when I'm cranky.
  • Reply 15 of 29
    lirandlirand Posts: 174member
    I never talked about pirating anything. Just looking for a good P2P client. That's it.
  • Reply 16 of 29
    lirandlirand Posts: 174member
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by Gon View Post


    I have only tried Acquisition a little, and never for Bittorrent. It was okay for the other stuff. But for an infrequent user, I think the biggest thing is that Acquisition costs money while Transmission doesn't. Transmission:



    Is open source

    Has a very clean, simple user interface, is a good OS X citizen as far as I can tell

    Under active development, new versions often

    Does little thoughtful things like auto-loads torrent files from your Downloads folder if you want it to

    Supports Growl notifications, UL/DL badging in Dock

    Multi-platform (not available for Windows, but who cares )



    I really don't have anything bad to say about it. It's not even version 1.0 yet but works great.



    Transmission is great! Thanks !
  • Reply 17 of 29
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by lirand View Post


    Transmission is great! Thanks !



    your welcome
  • Reply 18 of 29
    ak1808ak1808 Posts: 108member
    Transmission is definitly the way to go:



    - clean Mac interface

    - very robust feature set

    - very CPU/RAM friendly

    - Universal Binary

    - Open Source, totally free





    And here is a tipp for Leopard users:



    Don't forget to EXCLUDE the folder for your incomplete torrent downloads from your Time Machine backup.

    While you are downloading the temporary, incomplete file is likely to change every hour. So for a 1 GB file, Time Machine will create a 1 GB copy every hour, filling up your backup quickly with entirely unnecessary data.
  • Reply 19 of 29
    BitTyrant, which is based on Azureus.



    Otherwise, Trasmission or Bits on Wheels.
  • Reply 20 of 29
    I use transmission, and have no need to look for any other program. It's simple, lightweight, and has a great UI.
Sign In or Register to comment.