Everything bellow is related to Formula 1 Racing, but works well in different scenarios.
F1 driver, Rubens Barrichello, left Ferrari F1 team when they were at the top of their performance, and moved to underdog BAR Honda.
We know that in F1 racing, Ferrari is all there is - history, passion, unique team culture, most influential name in racing... beautiful Italian girls ... and I'm not even their supporter. In short, they are as cool as F1 goes, and as rich as anyone else - if not much more. And they are in Italy!
Yet, Rubens decided he'd rather be No.1 driver (or equal at least) in piss-poor performing Honda than No.2 in Ferrarblah blah blah...ad nauseum
the old comparing PCs to Cars thingy long ago become an official logical fallacy. =
apple could have been the "ms" of early years got fat and happy, but MS never looked at itself as a hardware company Gates knew that hardware would end up a commodity product and software was the driving force, also IBM was both and locked
apple always i think thought of itself as both software and hardware, and showed that IBM model of integration with hardware/ software AT THE CONSUMER level (not hot ugly mainframes ) empowered the INDIVIDUAL
apple fell away from innovation and stagnated it failed, but phoenix of SJ rose to re-focus the energy to the new apple
ipod/ itunes proved a new paradigm, integration with innovation rocks
apple did an end run around the stagnant enterprise, who cares what you have its what all the workers are bringing in that counts
that is how apple will get into enterprise, all the workers and employees bring in a device forcing enterprise to raise its dinosaur heads and move.
apple wouldn't be the company today without the failure of the early years, many companies lose focus and go back to basics, fundamentals but it takes vision
also from failure people started to listen to SJ
I would just modify that first statement.
You CAN learn more from failure than from success.
In the rat's a** of history, we see that most don't learn from either.
Comments
Everything bellow is related to Formula 1 Racing, but works well in different scenarios.
F1 driver, Rubens Barrichello, left Ferrari F1 team when they were at the top of their performance, and moved to underdog BAR Honda.
We know that in F1 racing, Ferrari is all there is - history, passion, unique team culture, most influential name in racing... beautiful Italian girls ... and I'm not even their supporter. In short, they are as cool as F1 goes, and as rich as anyone else - if not much more. And they are in Italy!
Yet, Rubens decided he'd rather be No.1 driver (or equal at least) in piss-poor performing Honda than No.2 in Ferrarblah blah blah...ad nauseum
the old comparing PCs to Cars thingy long ago become an official logical fallacy. =
While we are on the subject of reminiscing.
you learn more from failure than success
apple could have been the "ms" of early years got fat and happy, but MS never looked at itself as a hardware company Gates knew that hardware would end up a commodity product and software was the driving force, also IBM was both and locked
apple always i think thought of itself as both software and hardware, and showed that IBM model of integration with hardware/ software AT THE CONSUMER level (not hot ugly mainframes ) empowered the INDIVIDUAL
apple fell away from innovation and stagnated it failed, but phoenix of SJ rose to re-focus the energy to the new apple
ipod/ itunes proved a new paradigm, integration with innovation rocks
apple did an end run around the stagnant enterprise, who cares what you have its what all the workers are bringing in that counts
that is how apple will get into enterprise, all the workers and employees bring in a device forcing enterprise to raise its dinosaur heads and move.
apple wouldn't be the company today without the failure of the early years, many companies lose focus and go back to basics, fundamentals but it takes vision
also from failure people started to listen to SJ
I would just modify that first statement.
You CAN learn more from failure than from success.
In the rat's a** of history, we see that most don't learn from either.
the old comparing PCs to Cars thingy long ago become an official logical fallacy. =
It depends. There are arguments when you can fit them together like a glove.
It depends. There are arguments when you can fit them together like a glove.
Oh sure, but then you just have a computer in a car in a glove, and no good can come of that.
"Zune phone home"
Oh sure, but then you just have a computer in a car in a glove, and no good can come of that.
I don't know. I'd like a good pair of computerized gloves I could use in a car.