"You only have to look at recent problems with the iPhone 4 to see not everything Apple produces is gold dust," a source told the publication. "We all take our ITV brand very seriously and we'll do everything in our power to protect it."
A statement that shows us that even morons can run a broadcasting company.
"You only have to look at recent problems with the iPhone 4 to see not everything Apple produces is gold dust," a source told the publication. "We all take our ITV brand very seriously and we'll do everything in our power to protect it."
A statement that shows us that even morons can run a broadcasting company.
Quote:
"You only have to look at recent problems with the iPhone 4 to see not everything Apple produces is gold dust," a source told the publication. "We all take our ITV brand very seriously and we'll do everything in our power to protect it."
Gold dust huh? The iPhone must be made of diamonds and pearls because I still can't find one for my girlfriend. SMH.
ok, lets stop the nonsense of people being "furious" and people siding with X or Y
this situation DOESNT EVEN EXIST.
Apple have not even hinted at this, its a third party rumour based on NOTHING!
Why cant people have some cop-on and make comments/arguments IF the rumour becomes a reality.
Otherwise lets just start a debate on the rumour that Obama is allegedly going to kill all OAP's to help rid the economy of deadwood.
Get the point?
You do understand this is a website based on rumours - that's what is discussed 90% of the time. Most of the rumours have some basis, and this does seem likely. We all know it's heresay and nothing has been announced at this stage, however, this is a perfectly valid discussion based on coverage from the last few days.
Seriously, acting this way over a rumor makes these guys look like a bunch of complete idiots. Of course Apple would reach out to them first. They didn't just take the iOS name, cisco agreed to let them use it.
Just curious, are they competing well with the BBC? I'd never heard of iTV before, my understanding is that Apple originally stayed away from the name because of the eyeTV and possible confusion there.
You do understand this is a website based on rumours - that's what is discussed 90% of the time. Most of the rumours have some basis, and this does seem likely. We all know it's heresay and nothing has been announced at this stage, however, this is a perfectly valid discussion based on coverage from the last few days.
So you wouldn't mind if someone posted a rumor over the internet that your sister was a whore and you are an only child?
money talks. ITV will shut their traps once the free money, aka licensing fees, start rolling in.
PEACE!
Unfortunately, ITV already offer a free streaming service in the UK, much as BBC iPlayer and 4OD - free of charge streaming content is already a reality in the UK, and charging for it is going to prove difficult!
You do understand this is a website based on rumours - that's what is discussed 90% of the time. Most of the rumours have some basis, and this does seem likely. We all know it's heresay and nothing has been announced at this stage, however, this is a perfectly valid discussion based on coverage from the last few days.
No, this is a news & reviews based website. Rumours get printed as well, but the website is not based on it. Have a look at the home page and count how many stories are rumours and not fact/reviews.
Fine to discuss a rumour, the reactions of some are just nuts, most especially the ITV heads being furious and commenting on the iphone 4 issue. Very unprofessional at that level. They should know better and confirm before opening their mouth.
Broadcasting was invented to print money. It is run by guys in loud checked sports jackets named Herb Tarlek.
It's very different here in the UK - our major broadcaster (the BBC) is funded by the public through a license fee and doesn't have commercials. It's own produced content is freely available within the UK through the fantastic BBC iPlayer. They still produce some of the finest television in the world, although more and more crap is creeping in.
This has all been taken a bit too seriously, I think. Quite often I see rumours written about that were in various American publications, and I wonder how reputable they are, etc. Now that there is a case of a British newspaper getting involved, I can balance my views on the subject more easily.
The Mirror is an uber-tabloid. A quick look at their website today shows that their top stories are something about some X-Factor contestant, something about Jedward, and some paparazzi pictures of female celebrities in unflattering poses.
More than likely, the "source" quoted in the article is "Keith on the desk next to me."
So, we have a rumour that the AppleTV will be renamed to the iTV. Then we have a not-very-reputable newspaper quoting a (probably) spurious "source" talking about something totally unconfirmed. So, if either the iTV rumour is wrong, or the source isn't a real source after all, the whole thing turns out to be nothing more than nothing.
What's worse is that people here have already started taking sides in some dispute which in all probability doesn't exist.
Comments
A statement that shows us that even morons can run a broadcasting company.
"You only have to look at recent problems with the iPhone 4 to see not everything Apple produces is gold dust," a source told the publication.
You'd have to watch ITV for a long time to see that every programme they produce isn't a pile of shite.
Yes, and this on a day with an official interview from ITV's chief executive saying the corporation is in a mess...
A statement that shows us that even morons can run a broadcasting company.
I'm struggling to think of a broadcasting company not run by morons.
this situation DOESNT EVEN EXIST.
Apple have not even hinted at this, its a third party rumour based on NOTHING!
Why cant people have some cop-on and make comments/arguments IF the rumour becomes a reality.
Otherwise lets just start a debate on the rumour that Obama is allegedly going to kill all OAP's to help rid the economy of deadwood.
Get the point?
iTV and ITV -- totally different. Capitalization is everything!
Check ITV's trademark - the "i" is in lower case...
"You only have to look at recent problems with the iPhone 4 to see not everything Apple produces is gold dust," a source told the publication. "We all take our ITV brand very seriously and we'll do everything in our power to protect it."
A statement that shows us that even morons can run a broadcasting company.
"You only have to look at recent problems with the iPhone 4 to see not everything Apple produces is gold dust," a source told the publication. "We all take our ITV brand very seriously and we'll do everything in our power to protect it."
Gold dust huh? The iPhone must be made of diamonds and pearls because I still can't find one for my girlfriend. SMH.
I'm struggling to think of a broadcasting company not run by morons.
LMAO.
ok, lets stop the nonsense of people being "furious" and people siding with X or Y
this situation DOESNT EVEN EXIST.
Apple have not even hinted at this, its a third party rumour based on NOTHING!
Why cant people have some cop-on and make comments/arguments IF the rumour becomes a reality.
Otherwise lets just start a debate on the rumour that Obama is allegedly going to kill all OAP's to help rid the economy of deadwood.
Get the point?
You do understand this is a website based on rumours - that's what is discussed 90% of the time. Most of the rumours have some basis, and this does seem likely. We all know it's heresay and nothing has been announced at this stage, however, this is a perfectly valid discussion based on coverage from the last few days.
Check ITV's trademark - the "i" is in lower case...
But is it registered, i.e., accompanied with the universally recognized, ® or TM symbol? Or even copyrighted, i.e., with the © symbol?
Someone forgot to take their medicine.....
Seriously, acting this way over a rumor makes these guys look like a bunch of complete idiots. Of course Apple would reach out to them first. They didn't just take the iOS name, cisco agreed to let them use it.
Just curious, are they competing well with the BBC? I'd never heard of iTV before, my understanding is that Apple originally stayed away from the name because of the eyeTV and possible confusion there.
PEACE!
You do understand this is a website based on rumours - that's what is discussed 90% of the time. Most of the rumours have some basis, and this does seem likely. We all know it's heresay and nothing has been announced at this stage, however, this is a perfectly valid discussion based on coverage from the last few days.
So you wouldn't mind if someone posted a rumor over the internet that your sister was a whore and you are an only child?
But is it registered, i.e., accompanied with the universally recognized, ® or TM symbol? Or even copyrighted, i.e., with the © symbol?
Yes. It sure is. it's TM here in the UK, you don't mark a trademark in the UK with the © symbol, that's for copyright, not trademark. But that's irrelevant, the logo is not likely to be used by apple, just the name, and a trademark is MORE than a name, it's the exact font, usage etc. etc.
I'm struggling to think of a broadcasting company not run by morons.
Broadcasting was invented to print money. It is run by guys in loud checked sports jackets named Herb Tarlek.
money talks. ITV will shut their traps once the free money, aka licensing fees, start rolling in.
PEACE!
Unfortunately, ITV already offer a free streaming service in the UK, much as BBC iPlayer and 4OD - free of charge streaming content is already a reality in the UK, and charging for it is going to prove difficult!
Said, that if she played with her hair, she's probably keen.
She's playing with her hair, well regularly,
So I reckon I could well be in.
You do understand this is a website based on rumours - that's what is discussed 90% of the time. Most of the rumours have some basis, and this does seem likely. We all know it's heresay and nothing has been announced at this stage, however, this is a perfectly valid discussion based on coverage from the last few days.
No, this is a news & reviews based website. Rumours get printed as well, but the website is not based on it. Have a look at the home page and count how many stories are rumours and not fact/reviews.
Fine to discuss a rumour, the reactions of some are just nuts, most especially the ITV heads being furious and commenting on the iphone 4 issue. Very unprofessional at that level. They should know better and confirm before opening their mouth.
Broadcasting was invented to print money. It is run by guys in loud checked sports jackets named Herb Tarlek.
It's very different here in the UK - our major broadcaster (the BBC) is funded by the public through a license fee and doesn't have commercials. It's own produced content is freely available within the UK through the fantastic BBC iPlayer. They still produce some of the finest television in the world, although more and more crap is creeping in.
The Mirror is an uber-tabloid. A quick look at their website today shows that their top stories are something about some X-Factor contestant, something about Jedward, and some paparazzi pictures of female celebrities in unflattering poses.
More than likely, the "source" quoted in the article is "Keith on the desk next to me."
So, we have a rumour that the AppleTV will be renamed to the iTV. Then we have a not-very-reputable newspaper quoting a (probably) spurious "source" talking about something totally unconfirmed. So, if either the iTV rumour is wrong, or the source isn't a real source after all, the whole thing turns out to be nothing more than nothing.
What's worse is that people here have already started taking sides in some dispute which in all probability doesn't exist.