I wonder how they were able to find someone who never used an Apple or Samsung product in that area. It they did then that person must have been living in a cave!
Fromt what I understand tey can't always do that so they just have to vet people based on how they think they will vote. I were Apple or Samsung I wouldn't want anyone that was so unaware of technology not to know about these companies.
No you're HYPOCRITES for questioning the Judges motives and impartiality rather can simply accepting that it was his unbiased decision based on the facts and the evidence presented to him.
If you think the British Judge is corrupt who is to say that the American Judge is not also corrupt.
There's 330 million contained in that "you're". Go to a Houme Depout and get a smaller instrument for which to swath with.
No you're HYPOCRITES for questioning the Judges motives and impartiality rather can simply accepting that it was his unbiased decision based on the facts and the evidence presented to him.
If you think the British Judge is corrupt who is to say that the American Judge is not also corrupt.
Prove it! Show any evidence that he said the judge was corrupt. If Apple won the case you could claim as TS did the outcome was wrong and in no way is that a statement or implication that you think the judge or jury is corrupt. But that boat has sailed for you since you've already laid ground for any potential outcome that is not in Samsung's favour.
No doubt you're the same people who said the British Judge who dismissed Apples' claim a few days ago was either stupid, biased, corrupt or incompetent.
You don't like it when someone says the same thing about an American Judge do you. HYPOCRITES.
No, not me. I believe my comments consisted of something along the lines of "different country, different laws, different outcome".
Regardless, why bother to do a simple search to see what comments were made when you can just make something up instead?
Oh, okay. I never did that, however. Not sure anyone else did, either. I just said the decision made was a terrible one.
Ok I apologise to you if you didn't but plenty of people on here did.
You are quite correct that the suggestion was made, but not, I think, by any of the serious contributors here. So you should not be surprised at offense being taken at your original post, which really was quite uncalled for unless you have some prior examples of the US legal system exhibiting bias of that kind.
Oh, okay. I never did that, however. Not sure anyone else did, either. I just said the decision made was a terrible one.
Nor did I. I simply stated why I disagreed with the judge's call, without resorting to personal attacks.
Frankly, I don't know why you bother to respond to this one. He's just set on arguing with everyone hoping to pick a fight with someone. So not worth my time.
Thank god for Jury selection. It must work sometimes.
You're assuming I'd be biased. I simply relish the opportunity to listen to engineers from two great engineering companies and possibly learn about their designs and design processes. Sure, I am biased in my product preference, but that does not mean I am not rational and fair in the face of evidence.
And of course once the verdict is read, appeals, appeals, appeals. Suppose Samsung loses...do they have to pay and take change their interface and designs? What if they win?
It's the official position of US-based AppleInsider users. ????
This should have been the US in 1847, and darn it, we won't let you forget it!
If you hadn't foolishly attacked us and tried to take over Canada, we wouldn't have had to beat you back to the headwaters of the Mississippi and burn the White House to the ground. You are just lucky Canadians are so polite and nice that we gave all the land back gratis.
If you hadn't foolishly attacked us and tried to take over Canada, we wouldn't have had to beat you back to the headwaters of the Mississippi and burn the White House to the ground. You are just lucky Canadians are so polite and nice that we gave all the land back gratis.
That's okay but today's battles are fought with corporations and RiM has met their waterloo at the hands of Apple at whatever city RiM is headquartered.????
Nor did I. I simply stated why I disagreed with the judge's call, without resorting to personal attacks.
Frankly, I don't know why you bother to respond to this one. He's just set on arguing with everyone hoping to pick a fight with someone. So not worth my time.
I didn't quote you on my OP. It's got nothing to do with you. Go waste your time on someone else.
You're assuming I'd be biased. I simply relish the opportunity to listen to engineers from two great engineering companies and possibly learn about their designs and design processes. Sure, I am biased in my product preference, but that does not mean I am not rational and fair in the face of evidence.
You're right I did assume that based on the tone of your OP. I apologise. I'm not so sure the court case would be as exciting as you might think. If you're that interested and have the time you can probably sit in open court and watch the proceedings.
Bee a man Yaun, leave and don't forget to take your single-digid IQ with you
F U C K Y O U MORON
Shaun, really. Whether you truly believe your statements are sincere or if there is a different enticement for you to write what you write, how come the only likes you get are from people that are bound to get banned as well for the very same reason? Think about it, while looking into the mirror.
Comments
Fromt what I understand tey can't always do that so they just have to vet people based on how they think they will vote. I were Apple or Samsung I wouldn't want anyone that was so unaware of technology not to know about these companies.
Originally Posted by Shaun, UK
No you're HYPOCRITES for questioning the Judges motives and impartiality…
Oh, okay. I never did that, however. Not sure anyone else did, either. I just said the decision made was a terrible one.
Being a juror in a juicy murder case used to be a fantasy of mine. But oh how I'd love to be a deciding factor in this case.
There's 330 million contained in that "you're". Go to a Houme Depout and get a smaller instrument for which to swath with.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tallest Skil
Oh, okay. I never did that, however. Not sure anyone else did, either. I just said the decision made was a terrible one.
Ok I apologise to you if you didn't but plenty of people on here did.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harbinger
Being a juror in a juicy murder case used to be a fantasy of mine. But oh how I'd love to be a deciding factor in this case.
Thank god for Jury selection. It must work sometimes.
Prove it! Show any evidence that he said the judge was corrupt. If Apple won the case you could claim as TS did the outcome was wrong and in no way is that a statement or implication that you think the judge or jury is corrupt. But that boat has sailed for you since you've already laid ground for any potential outcome that is not in Samsung's favour.
Quote:
what is being called one of the most important patent cases in recent U.S. history.
Somehow...I doubt that.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaun, UK
No doubt you're the same people who said the British Judge who dismissed Apples' claim a few days ago was either stupid, biased, corrupt or incompetent.
You don't like it when someone says the same thing about an American Judge do you. HYPOCRITES.
No, not me. I believe my comments consisted of something along the lines of "different country, different laws, different outcome".
Regardless, why bother to do a simple search to see what comments were made when you can just make something up instead?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tallest Skil
Oh, okay. I never did that, however. Not sure anyone else did, either. I just said the decision made was a terrible one.
Nor did I. I simply stated why I disagreed with the judge's call, without resorting to personal attacks.
Frankly, I don't know why you bother to respond to this one. He's just set on arguing with everyone hoping to pick a fight with someone. So not worth my time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shaun, UK
Thank god for Jury selection. It must work sometimes.
You're assuming I'd be biased. I simply relish the opportunity to listen to engineers from two great engineering companies and possibly learn about their designs and design processes. Sure, I am biased in my product preference, but that does not mean I am not rational and fair in the face of evidence.
And of course once the verdict is read, appeals, appeals, appeals. Suppose Samsung loses...do they have to pay and take change their interface and designs? What if they win?
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tallest Skil
It's the official position of US-based AppleInsider users. ????
This should have been the US in 1847, and darn it, we won't let you forget it!
If you hadn't foolishly attacked us and tried to take over Canada, we wouldn't have had to beat you back to the headwaters of the Mississippi and burn the White House to the ground. You are just lucky Canadians are so polite and nice that we gave all the land back gratis.
That's okay but today's battles are fought with corporations and RiM has met their waterloo at the hands of Apple at whatever city RiM is headquartered. ????
Quote:
Originally Posted by Suddenly Newton
Nor did I. I simply stated why I disagreed with the judge's call, without resorting to personal attacks.
Frankly, I don't know why you bother to respond to this one. He's just set on arguing with everyone hoping to pick a fight with someone. So not worth my time.
I didn't quote you on my OP. It's got nothing to do with you. Go waste your time on someone else.
[IMG]http://forums.appleinsider.com/content/type/61/id/9364/width/500/height/1000[/IMG]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harbinger
You're assuming I'd be biased. I simply relish the opportunity to listen to engineers from two great engineering companies and possibly learn about their designs and design processes. Sure, I am biased in my product preference, but that does not mean I am not rational and fair in the face of evidence.
You're right I did assume that based on the tone of your OP. I apologise. I'm not so sure the court case would be as exciting as you might think. If you're that interested and have the time you can probably sit in open court and watch the proceedings.
Quote:
Originally Posted by PhilBoogie
Bee a man Yaun, leave and don't forget to take your single-digid IQ with you
F U C K Y O U MORON
Shaun, really. Whether you truly believe your statements are sincere or if there is a different enticement for you to write what you write, how come the only likes you get are from people that are bound to get banned as well for the very same reason? Think about it, while looking into the mirror.