Funny or Die's 'iSteve' hits the web one day early with 78-minute run time

Posted:
in General Discussion edited January 2014
The Steve Jobs parody biopic "iSteve" has been released one day ahead of schedule, and coming in at 1 hour and 18 minutes, is as long as many feature-length films.

iSteve
Screenshot of Justin Long as Steve Jobs in "iSteve." | Source: Funny or Die


"iSteve" was originally slated for debut on Monday, but comedy website Funny or Die pushed back the release due to the Boston Marathon bombing. The film was rescheduled to air tomorrow, but it appears that those interested can can watch it now.

Starring Justin Long (Dodgeball, Jeepers Creepers) in the title role, "iSteve" is the longest Funny or Die project to date, and with a run time of nearly 80 minutes, comes very close to being a full-fledged feature. Alongside Long is Jorge Garcia (Lost) as Steve Wozniak, James Urbaniak playing Bill Gates and Michaela Watkins filling the role of Melinda Gates. Ryan Perez directs.

While a parody, "iSteve" is the first film to take on the Apple cofounder's life story since his death in October 2011. An independent biopic featuring Ashton Kutcher, titled "Jobs," was screened at this year's Sundance Festival in January, but has yet to see a theatrical release.

A big-budget Sony-backed film is in the works with a screenplay from Aaron Sorkin (writer, The Social Network), though that project is said to be years away from completion.
«1

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 36
    v5vv5v Posts: 1,357member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by AppleInsider View Post



    The Steve Jobs parody biopic "iSteve" has been released one day ahead of schedule, and coming in at 1 hour and 18 minutes, is as long as many feature-length films.




    [...]


     

    Starring Justin Long (Dodgeball, Jeepers Creepers) in the title role, "iSteve" is the longest Funny or Die project to date, and with a run time of nearly 80 minutes, comes very close to being a full-fledged feature.


     


    That's good news, because, as we all know, "long" equals "good." It's always better to make sure questionable scenes, lines and shots are left in, because even though they may drag down the pacing or distract from the primary plot line, they will make the movie longer, and, ipso facto, better.


     


    image

  • Reply 2 of 36
    timbittimbit Posts: 331member
    First 10 min are decent. Nothing like a movie made for theatres but decent nonetheless. I'll watch the rest tomorrow
  • Reply 3 of 36
    So is it funny or die?
  • Reply 4 of 36
    gtrgtr Posts: 3,231member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Suddenly Newton View Post



    So is it funny or die?


     


    I can confirm that I have watched this and found, not only that it was funny*, but that I died.


     



     


    Ironically, I believe "jOBS" will be, unintentionally, funnier.


     


    EDIT: Please note that when I mentioned it was funny, I was not referring to going-to-the-circus fun or fly-fishing-in-Montana fun. It was more shoving shards of broken glass up your ass and then sitting in a tub of Tabasco sauce fun.

  • Reply 5 of 36
    gtr wrote: »
    I can confirm that I have watched this and found, not only that it was funny, but that I died.

    <img alt="" class="lightbox-enabled" data-id="23663" data-type="61" height="310" src="http://forums.appleinsider.com/content/type/61/id/23663/width/350/height/700/flags/LL" style="; width: 350px; height: 310px;" width="350">


    Ironically, I believe "jOBS" will be, unintentionally, funnier.

    Inclusive or?
  • Reply 6 of 36
    tallest skiltallest skil Posts: 43,388member


    All these new Steve Jobs movies are going to spawn another generation of anti-Apple trolls spewing the lies and misconceptions therein as "historical fact".


     


    We seem to have forgotten that. image

  • Reply 7 of 36

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Tallest Skil View Post


    All these new Steve Jobs movies are going to spawn another generation of anti-Apple trolls spewing the lies and misconceptions therein as "historical fact".


     


    We seem to have forgotten that. image



    Most of the population could give a shit less about Steve Jobs. If they have their iPhone and iPad you could be running Apple and no one would care. I still wonder how Apple became so powerful with all the anti-Apple trolls in the world. Oh wait that's a figment of your imagination.

  • Reply 8 of 36
    gtrgtr Posts: 3,231member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by extremeskater View Post


    Most of the population COULDN'T give a shit about Steve Jobs.



     


    Fixed that for you.


     


    For God's sake, if you're going to try and insult someone, please ensure you get the insult right.


     


    image

  • Reply 9 of 36
    apple ][apple ][ Posts: 9,233member


    This movie is terrible! I would like to get my minutes back, thank you very much.


     


    I tried to keep an open mind before clicking on the link and watching the movie. I had never seen anything from Funny or Die before, so I didn't know what to expect.


     


    I watched the first half of the movie, and I regret that I did. My criticism is not really directed towards any of the actors. I just found the story to be pretty dumb, and not really that interesting or funny. I read that it took three days to write the movie and five to film? Well, it shows. One of the disadvantages of the internet is that there is no quality control. I don't discriminate between movie budgets, and I'm going to judge a low budget movie just like I would judge a higher budget movie. If I'm watching a movie, do I give a crap about how much it cost to make? No, I do not. I care about my time and if what I am watching is worthy of said time. Either a movie is good or it is not. They should have perhaps made a short skit instead of trying to go for a full length movie. And maybe they should have spent just a little more time on a better story, just maybe.


     


    I totally get that a comedy movie plays loose with facts and it's purpose is not to be accurate, but this movie seemed more to be an exercise in how many historical inaccuracies they could jam into it, rather than trying to be funny, because I wasn't exactly laughing my ass off. I was maybe expecting some even crazier stuff, like something out of Monty Python, The Naked Gun or even wilder. The humor in this movie seemed pretty tame, and pretty lame, at least for my taste, and the historical freedom taken in the story seemed to not be that funny or serve much purpose. Often, the truth can be funnier than fiction. So, I'm going to have to give this movie two thumbs down. And that is my review of the first half of the movie. Don't stay tuned for my review of the second half, because it's not coming. 

  • Reply 10 of 36


    It was OK, you can tell it was rushed and low budget.  I laughed about 4 times. 


     


    Would I recommend it, hell no. 

  • Reply 11 of 36
    apple ][apple ][ Posts: 9,233member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by punkndrublic View Post


    It was OK, you can tell it was rushed and low budget.  I laughed about 4 times. 


     


    Would I recommend it, hell no. 



    It sounds like you're contradicting yourself a bit there.


     


    If you can't recommend it, then I would argue that it's not OK.

  • Reply 12 of 36
    gtrgtr Posts: 3,231member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by DeanSolecki View Post



    Inclusive or?


     


    I'd love to field that question. There is only one problem.


     


    I am dead.

  • Reply 13 of 36

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by Apple ][ View Post


    It sounds like you're contradicting yourself a bit there.


     


    If you can't recommend it, then I would argue that it's not OK.



    I was being nice, for all the work they put into it.  But yeah you're right I was lol

  • Reply 14 of 36

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by GTR View Post


     


    Fixed that for you.


     


    For God's sake, if you're going to try and insult someone, please ensure you get the insult right.


     


    image



    Wasn't trying to insult anyone. However I am glad we have you around to correct a typo. Most likely the extent of your usefulness.

  • Reply 15 of 36
    gtrgtr Posts: 3,231member

    Quote:

    Originally Posted by extremeskater View Post


    Wasn't trying to insult anyone. However I am glad we have you around to correct a typo. Most likely the extent of your usefulness.



     


    If you're not trying to insult anybody you sure need a lot more practice.


     


    image


     


    P.S. I noticed you're from Georgia. Would you like me to type slower?

  • Reply 16 of 36
    bugsnwbugsnw Posts: 717member


    Pretty bad. I watched the whole thing and I can't figure out why. I need a rape shower.

  • Reply 17 of 36
    cash907cash907 Posts: 893member
    The only funny part was when Hurley kept getting snubbed like he wasnt even there.

    The rest was garbage. And where was PC? Mac isn't funny without PC.
  • Reply 18 of 36


    Watched it.  Agree it wasn't that funny.


     


    But, I looked at the bright side:  3 days to write, 5 days to film and it says it was cut on iMovie.  It was interesting to see what a group could put together so fast.

  • Reply 19 of 36
    timmilleatimmillea Posts: 244member
    The highlight for me was Justin Long as Steve Jobs screaming at the Justin Long character for his poor acting ability (20 takes and counting) interrupted by a fist-fight with Bill Gates in front of the cameras - i.e. the real Mac and PC. Also loved the portrayal of Wozniak as a sad loser that no one, except Steve, loved and the virtual reality sex Steve had with Belinda Gates! There were many funny moments.
  • Reply 20 of 36
    asciiascii Posts: 5,936member


    Things I liked:


     


    - The working vintage computers


    - The Melinda Gates subplot


    - George Lucas scene


    - Justin Long describing Mac Guy Justin Long as "a smarmy piece of sh*t" 

Sign In or Register to comment.