Viral YouTube video of plane-to-plane AirDrop bogus, deleted by author
A viral video allegedly depicting a pilot sending a photo of another plane a long-distance AirDrop has been refuted by the recipient's airline, and has been deleted.

Frequent YouTube poster LouB747 posted the video on Aug. 3. The video depicted him in the pilot seat communicating from 35,000 feet, with the other Singapore Airlines plane at 36,000 feet in close proximity.
The Singapore Airlines pilot denied that the AirDrop happened, though.
"Our pilot was only replying in jest to the radio message from the captain of the other flight," the airline told IBTimes UK. "Photos were exchanged by email later, however."
The video has since been deleted by the author.
AppleInsider noted that the video couldn't be authenticated on Friday, but confirmed the possibility of it with a naval aviator.

Frequent YouTube poster LouB747 posted the video on Aug. 3. The video depicted him in the pilot seat communicating from 35,000 feet, with the other Singapore Airlines plane at 36,000 feet in close proximity.
The Singapore Airlines pilot denied that the AirDrop happened, though.
"Our pilot was only replying in jest to the radio message from the captain of the other flight," the airline told IBTimes UK. "Photos were exchanged by email later, however."
The video has since been deleted by the author.
AppleInsider noted that the video couldn't be authenticated on Friday, but confirmed the possibility of it with a naval aviator.
Comments
So, in true Mythbusters fashion, it's plausible that it works -- just not confirmed by this particular video.
Plus, the naval aviator we asked if it was possible? I've known him for 23 years.
I'm on board, literally and figuratively. Let's fire up an indiegogo!
2) Why can’t someone name their iPhone “SingTriple7”?
Think about the timeline of events how this was denied:
1) video goes viral
2) media contacts commercial airline
3) commercial airline top brass internal conversation "Um, this may not be a good look for us, there may be some liability involved now or in future if our pilots start engaging in this behavior"
4) Public statement "it never happened"
This reminds me of a picture someone took of Flight Attendant standing in the opening of the non-running jet engineer. The person who took the picture complained to the airline and the airline said it was against company policy for anyone to be doing that other than a mechanic. Turned out later this was a long standing tradition in the airlines for new pilots and attendant to stand in the engine to get their pictures taken. The issue was they were seen by a passenger that person complained about safety issues.
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/real-fake-viral-video-claims-pilot-sent-photos-via-airdrop-singapore-airlines-jet-35000ft-1633552
Shouldn't that be "sonic boom"?