Justice Department sues to block AT&T takeover of Time Warner, report says
AT&T's $85.4 billion bid to acquisition Time Warner is in jeopardy as reports on Monday claim the U.S. Department of Justice is set to file a lawsuit aimed at blocking the high-profile merger.
Earlier today, the Justice Department said it will make an announcement regarding a "major antitrust matter," news that several media outlets linked to AT&T's merger with Time Warner. Bloomberg, citing unnamed sources, was first to report on the coming coming lawsuit, followed by Politico and Reuters.
AT&T later confirmed the suit to CNBC, but failed to detail the Justice Department's legal action.
Announced over a year ago, AT&T's takeover of Time Warner has come under fire for what some view as a contentious consolidation of power. AT&T, a "big four" American telecommunications powerhouse, operates a wide array of phone, internet and TV businesses, while Time Warner owns big cable brands including HBO, CNN, TBS and the Cartoon Network.
Time Warner's proprietorship of CNN is at the heart of at least one theory regarding the Justice Department's unconventional move. In its report on the matter, CNN notes President Trump vowed to block the deal during his campaign, and has consistently taken to Twitter to criticize the news network for disseminating "fake news." Those tweets continue, the latest coming last week, in what CNN says could constitute evidence of presidential interference.
For its part, AT&T has been preparing for a legal scrum with the DOJ, the sole entity capable of blocking the takeover after FCC chairman Ajit Pai said his commission would not review the merger earlier this year. Last week, AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson said his company would seek an expedited hearing if met with a DOJ challenge.
Prior to the merger announcement last year, Apple was rumored to have held preliminary talks with Time Warner over a potential tie-up, but those discussions failed to bear fruit. Still, with fingers in content streaming, Apple reportedly closely monitored AT&T's moves in the lead-up to its $85.4 billion agreement with Time Warner.
Earlier today, the Justice Department said it will make an announcement regarding a "major antitrust matter," news that several media outlets linked to AT&T's merger with Time Warner. Bloomberg, citing unnamed sources, was first to report on the coming coming lawsuit, followed by Politico and Reuters.
AT&T later confirmed the suit to CNBC, but failed to detail the Justice Department's legal action.
Announced over a year ago, AT&T's takeover of Time Warner has come under fire for what some view as a contentious consolidation of power. AT&T, a "big four" American telecommunications powerhouse, operates a wide array of phone, internet and TV businesses, while Time Warner owns big cable brands including HBO, CNN, TBS and the Cartoon Network.
Time Warner's proprietorship of CNN is at the heart of at least one theory regarding the Justice Department's unconventional move. In its report on the matter, CNN notes President Trump vowed to block the deal during his campaign, and has consistently taken to Twitter to criticize the news network for disseminating "fake news." Those tweets continue, the latest coming last week, in what CNN says could constitute evidence of presidential interference.
For its part, AT&T has been preparing for a legal scrum with the DOJ, the sole entity capable of blocking the takeover after FCC chairman Ajit Pai said his commission would not review the merger earlier this year. Last week, AT&T CEO Randall Stephenson said his company would seek an expedited hearing if met with a DOJ challenge.
Prior to the merger announcement last year, Apple was rumored to have held preliminary talks with Time Warner over a potential tie-up, but those discussions failed to bear fruit. Still, with fingers in content streaming, Apple reportedly closely monitored AT&T's moves in the lead-up to its $85.4 billion agreement with Time Warner.
Comments
I agree, but Comcast got in first so they got away with it, everyone else is paying the price they government is putting the breaks on things so no other can now come together.
"Recent leaked reports suggest trouble for the proposed merger of AT&T and Time Warner, an $85 billion deal first announced over a year ago. Last Wednesday, government sources claimed the Department of Justice’s antitrust division was demanding that AT&T sell Turner Broadcasting channels, including CNN, as a condition for approving the deal — and that AT&T had refused, setting up a possible court challenge.
Later stories reported it was AT&T that had offered to sell CNN. But CEO Randall Stephenson immediately denied both versions, and reiterated that the company will not let go of either CNN or the deal itself, pledging to fight the government if necessary"
For vertical mergers, the government hasn’t won a single court case. Not one.
If it was Time Warner Cable, I could understand, but this is just, plain stupid.
I wouldn't be surprised if we discover that there were a couple of well-placed phone calls involved...
If you're only talking about cellular, then it might work but not the rest of the businesses AT&T and Times Warner are involved in.
That's interesting. I actually wasn't aware of that. In fact, I found Time Warner cable doesn't exist as a brand anymore. I'm still not sure I like the idea of the merger. There is far too much consolidation of power in media as it is. You basically have Disney, Comcast/NBC Universal, Time Warner and 21st Century Fox (who may sell to Disney).
You do not understand this market. there are many place in US where people do not have choice. I am lucky, I have Comcast for all 3 services, I have Verizon, I have DirecTV and Dish, I can play them against each other for Video, but internet I have Comcast and VZ. Phone I have Comcast and VZ plus all the other third parties out there. Most places people only have one service along with Satellite if you have clear line of sight to the southwest. The issue is unless you get all three from VX or Comcast they really do not cut you a deal.
Content cost drive the cost of your triple play services, the cost are being driven by content owners, and when the cable operators own the content they get to set the price to you and to their competitors. You can bet that Comcast does not charge as much to themselves for their content as they charge Directv.
So many customer do not go elsewhere, you can cut of video content from Comcast, but they just up your internet costs to make up for the lost as you got to online services, but after to piece it all together, you bill is not much better than if you stayed where you were.
And, as @Fahlman points out, as a separate issue, your post conflates Time Warner Cable (which has already been sold) with Time Warner.
It is "bid to AQUIRE". "Acquisition" is a noun.