Cellebrite executive insists iPhone unlocking has a 'public safety imperative'
Cellebrite offers its services to law enforcement for the welfare of the public, an executive of the security firm known for breaking the security of iOS and other devices claims in an interview, while also stressing the firm's tools are not a major risk to the privacy of iPhone users in general.
Cellebrite's Universal Forensic Extraction Device (UFED), used to acquire data from smartphones
"There's a public safety imperative here," chief marketing officer Jeremy Nazarian tells Forbes, claiming the firm's capabilities are useful to help against "major public threats in any community," such as homicides, crimes against children, and drug-related gang activity.
During the brief interview, Nazarian declined to offer details about how Cellebrite was able to access an iPhone 8 or iPhone X, a service it recently started marketing to law enforcement agencies. The firm reasons that providing small details about its methods would allow Apple engineers to fix any flaws in iOS' security, forcing Cellebrite to come up with new methods, so prefers to keep such information as secret as possible.
"We feel an obligation to those serving the public safety mission to ensure those capabilities are preserved, to the extent that they can be," Nazarian states in defense.
The chief marketing officer also attempted to ease fears that the same tools and service Cellebrite provides to government security agencies was not able to be used in illegal ways.
"It's not like this is over the wire listening technology... it requires physical access. It's not like anyone is listening to your iPhone or my iPhone," advises Nazarian. "There's nothing inherent in the technology that means it's open to misuse."
The comments from Nazarian arrive one week after the security firm reportedly saw a year-on-year increase in revenue, jumping 28 percent in the fourth quarter of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016. While not explanation for the rise is advised, it is most likely Cellebrite's raised profile following its involvement in the San Bernardino investigation has helped it gain more custom from government agencies.
Cellebrite's Universal Forensic Extraction Device (UFED), used to acquire data from smartphones
"There's a public safety imperative here," chief marketing officer Jeremy Nazarian tells Forbes, claiming the firm's capabilities are useful to help against "major public threats in any community," such as homicides, crimes against children, and drug-related gang activity.
During the brief interview, Nazarian declined to offer details about how Cellebrite was able to access an iPhone 8 or iPhone X, a service it recently started marketing to law enforcement agencies. The firm reasons that providing small details about its methods would allow Apple engineers to fix any flaws in iOS' security, forcing Cellebrite to come up with new methods, so prefers to keep such information as secret as possible.
"We feel an obligation to those serving the public safety mission to ensure those capabilities are preserved, to the extent that they can be," Nazarian states in defense.
The chief marketing officer also attempted to ease fears that the same tools and service Cellebrite provides to government security agencies was not able to be used in illegal ways.
"It's not like this is over the wire listening technology... it requires physical access. It's not like anyone is listening to your iPhone or my iPhone," advises Nazarian. "There's nothing inherent in the technology that means it's open to misuse."
The comments from Nazarian arrive one week after the security firm reportedly saw a year-on-year increase in revenue, jumping 28 percent in the fourth quarter of 2017 compared to the same period in 2016. While not explanation for the rise is advised, it is most likely Cellebrite's raised profile following its involvement in the San Bernardino investigation has helped it gain more custom from government agencies.
Comments
And I agree with what they’re doing. I don’t think governments should ever be snooping on their citizens or invading their privacy or not allowing them to pursue secure privacy, but there will sometimes be instances where cracking phones would be helpful and governments should be doing everything they can to be able to crack them. However, they should not be lazy and just decide that citizens can’t have proper security just so the government can have easy access to private property.
I think Apple should be free to try to make its phone impenetrable, and people should be free to attempt to hack them.
To me, the most important thing is that some thief or police officer can't break into my phone easily. If it costs a ton of money, that means that any law enforceable officer is going to have to get multiple approvals, and that adds enough layers of protection for me to free comfortable. That means the police at a minimum are going to need to have a very good reason for suspecting the person of a serious crime. And a thief isn't going to steal my information if it costs them a ton of money.
Read this piece: https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2016/11/how-bill-marczak-spyware-can-control-the-iphone
You could say that Cellbrite might have connections to the Israeli hackers mentioned in the above article. That could explain how they were able to get into the iPhone 5c for the FBI.
One thing that has never been mentioned is that what information was extracted from that 5c and if it was useful to the investigation.
It seems to me if there was pertinent information that would help the investigation, the FBI would have mentioned it and explained that because of that, there needs to be a "backdoor" to iOS.
The one point tinfoil hat people make that is true is, as long as you have something that can connect to the internet, you are vulnerable. It doesn't mean that you have been compromised, just that you are vulnerable.
Educate yourself on how you can keep yourself secure. Start with complex passwords and check everything you own that connects to the internet and make sure there aren't any firmware updates to prevent you from being compromised.
Lastly, stop sharing every F@cking detail about yourself on social media.
It is all too easy for people to find out all sorts of things about you that make up vunerable to Identity theft.
I never put the correct answer to things like Mother's Maiden Name or First School.
Those are a matter of public record in many countries.
It is your job to make life really hard for the hackers and especially this mob who will take great delight in hacking into your iPhone.
Lie about your past at every opportunity except where it matters.
If it’s open, the community can locate and contribute to finding weaknesses instead of allowing the likes of Cellebrite to find weaknesses they plan to keep secret to the general public.
That would be great.
Ever notice that Android is never brought up in these kind of discussions? Android users should be extremely concerned.
If a company like Cellebrite is tasked with breaking into your phone there's a heckuva good and valid reason behind it IMO and I say best of luck.