Finding a perfectly sized Apple Watch band may get easier in the future

Jump to First Reply
Posted:
in Apple Watch edited February 11

There's got to be a better way to find the right Apple Watch band size for your wrist than trying out countless ones, or printing out paper guides -- and Apple thinks it has the answer.

Apple Watch next to a smartphone showing a wrist measurement app
How it used to be when finding the right size Apple Watch band was complicated



The Apple of today is very different from when it used to stick to Steve Jobs's famous quadrant of laptop, desktop, consumer, and professional computers. And perhaps the single clearest indicator of that is the single most confusing choice buyers have to make -- which Apple Watch band to get.

Apple's online store has seemingly countless combinations of Apple Watch Series, Apple Watch types, and Apple Watch bands, and that's probably never going to go away. But there is one thing that Apple thinks it can improve, and that's the confusion over which size band you need for your wrist.

You're still going to be on your own over whether you want the smaller or larger Apple Watch model, but size is different. Apple has simplified this over the years, seemingly chiefly by preferring to sell looped bands rather than ones with buckles at specific sizes.

Nonetheless, certain ones such as the "49mm Natural Titanium Milanese Loop," have to come in three different sizes. And even with the many different Sport or Alpine loops, many are listed as "One Size (Fits Most)," despite the actual size varying.

For instance, right alongside that "Fits Most" line, an Apple Watch band may be described as fitting 150-190mm wrists. But it could instead be described as fitting 145-220mm ones.

It's still better than when some Apple Watch bands had to come in nine different sizes. For several years, Apple Watch buyers online had to go through a "Start your measurement" process, which was particular un-Apple-like in its elegance or simplicity.

One was to download a printable tool and then wrap it around your wrist. " For a more accurate measurement," Apple used to helpfully say, "you can use a piece of sticky tape to hold the wider end in place."

The other option was to use a measuring tape and a crafter's collection of "paper, pen, ruler, sticky tape, and scissors." Again, though, you end up cutting out a paper band.

Even has Apple has managed to consign this mess to history, it has been looking to go much further and use technology to give accurate wrist measurements. First applied for in 2022, a patent named "Touchless Wrist Measurement" has now been granted.

"Existing measuring techniques have various disadvantages with respect to measuring a person's wrist," says Apple in the patent. "Such techniques may require special measuring equipment such as a body measuring ruler or tape that require contact with the person's wrist and that may be cumbersome to use and subject to error."

The patent proposes instead that either the user or Apple Store staff use a scanner, which could be an iPhone "that includes [a] depth sensor."

"[The] electronic device is placed on a surface with the depth sensor facing up," says Apple, "and a user may rotate their hand/wrist above the electronic device while at least two depth map images of the wrist are captured during a wrist scanning process."

"[The] depth data includes at least two depth map images of a wrist from different angles sufficiently separated to accurately represent the wrist's circumference," continues Apple. "For example, one of the depth map images of the user's wrist may be captured with the palm facing the depth sensor and the other of the depth map images of the user's wrist is captured with the palm facing to the side (e.g., approximately 90 degree rotation)."

Detail from the patent showing one system for scanning a user's wrist
Detail from the patent showing one system for scanning a user's wrist



As yet another example of how Apple is far from behind the industry on artificial intelligence, this patent proposal includes specific use of machine learning. "[The] depth data is input into a machine learning (ML) model that outputs a measurement corresponding to circumference of the wrist and/or a watch band size," says the patent.

There's a bit more to it, and the patent application runs to over 9,000 words of different configurations of sensor. But the ultimate aim is to take the measurements and then, "a watch band size recommendation is provided based on the output."

The patent is credited to six inventors, including four who have previously worked on AR measuring tools for the Measure app.



Read on AppleInsider

Comments

  • Reply 1 of 10
    AppleZuluapplezulu Posts: 2,394member
    Using a tape measure on your wrist is perhaps low-tech and vaguely inelegant, but calling watch band sizing the “single most confusing choice buyers have to make” is just a bit (or a lot) hyperbolic, isn’t it?

    I’m imagining a slow motion, black-and-white Ronco commercial clip of a complete imbecile getting hopelessly tangled up in a tape measure. 

    But hallelujah! We’ve got a LiDAR wrist measurement tool! It’s easy! It slices! It dices! It makes a perfect omelette in seconds!
    nicmartmichelb76
     2Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 2 of 10
    I never understood why Apple didnt start with asking me what Apple Watch size / band I currently use. Cant be too hard for them to figure out which size braided solo loop for me to buy if I have a 44mm watch with L sport band on the third hole. Users who dont currently own an Apple Watch can be prompted to borrow a friends or start with household items. This seems like an over complication of a simple problem.
    rare commentwilliamlondon
     1Like 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 3 of 10
    602warren said:
    I never understood why Apple didnt start with asking me what Apple Watch size / band I currently use. Cant be too hard for them to figure out which size braided solo loop for me to buy if I have a 44mm watch with L sport band on the third hole. Users who dont currently own an Apple Watch can be prompted to borrow a friends or start with household items. This seems like an over complication of a simple problem.
    This is exactly right and, I think, actually how the printable paper bands work (I vaguely recall that the sizes match up with the sport band's adjustment holes).  Maybe the L v S/M created too much confusion...
    williamlondon
     0Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 4 of 10
    A good way to create a database of the physical attributes of customers hand and wrist.

    useful information when you’re in the business of designing wearables like wristbands, watches and maybe even rings or gloves for VR headsets.
    michelb76entropyswilliamlondon
     2Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 5 of 10
    AppleZuluapplezulu Posts: 2,394member
    If there is updated info in this article, I'm not sure what it is. Though at the top of the "latest news" section, in February '25, the article is from 2022.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 6 of 10
    A good way to create a database of the physical attributes of customers hand and wrist.

    useful information when you’re in the business of designing wearables like wristbands, watches and maybe even rings or gloves for VR headsets.
    They wouldn't keep the information...it's rather useless. And wouldn't be worth the cost of storage of tens of millions of people wrist size. Might be nice for the customer to keep it for next time.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 7 of 10
    AppleZulu said:
    If there is updated info in this article, I'm not sure what it is. Though at the top of the "latest news" section, in February '25, the article is from 2022.
    I think it may be because the patent has been granted, so it took almost 3 years from the submission date.
     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
  • Reply 8 of 10
    DAalsethdaalseth Posts: 3,273member
    It reminds me of the old joke from the early Space Age: The US found ballpoint pens didn’t work properly in zero-g so NASA spent a million dollars to engineer one that would. The Russians used a pencil. 

    So Apple is developing a system that scans your wrist and computes the circumference of your wrist to tell you what size band you need. Meanwhile I am wearing an AW10 with an aftermarket band. It’s a stretchy band and looks very much like a braided solo-loop, however it’s adjustable. I put it on the watch, set it to a comfortable point, locked it in place, and from then on I use the stretchy to take it off and on. 

    There is a simpler solution.
    edited February 11
    williamlondon
     0Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 9 of 10
    DAalsethdaalseth Posts: 3,273member
    A good way to create a database of the physical attributes of customers hand and wrist.

    useful information when you’re in the business of designing wearables like wristbands, watches and maybe even rings or gloves for VR headsets.
    They wouldn't keep the information...it's rather useless. And wouldn't be worth the cost of storage of tens of millions of people wrist size. Might be nice for the customer to keep it for next time.
    OMG they would definitely not keep that info. No that’s too dangerous. Imagine the security implications if the Chinese got ahold of every American’s wrist size. 

    LOL /s
    williamlondon
     0Likes 1Dislike 0Informatives
  • Reply 10 of 10
    macguimacgui Posts: 2,553member
    This is hilarious. Leave it to Apple to build a nuclear-powered mousetrap when a cheap Victor works very well, however inelegant it may be.

    Using a cloth tape isn't a big deal. I modified one with a loop so I can just loop it over my wrist and draw it snug and read the size. The cutout paper band is the same thing and has worked well enough for me in choosing a Solo Loop. 

    For two-piece bands formula should be simple: wrist size + watch size = band range. I'm in between two band ranges. One leaves the tail of the band a little short, the other a little long.

    If the high-tech device was there and a staffer said "Stick your hand in the box Maud'Dib", why not. This feels like "We've got uber cool tech and Sammie doesn't".


     0Likes 0Dislikes 0Informatives
Sign In or Register to comment.