Twitter loses half its ad revenue, still weighed down by debt
Twitter hasn't become cash flow positive yet, Elon Musk has confirmed, with a "heavy debt load" and advertising revenue dropping to half its usual amount not helping matters for the billionaire.
Elon Musk
In March, Musk offered a prediction that Twitter had a chance of being cash flow positive by the second quarter of 2023. In a Saturday tweet, Musk admits the micro-blogging site hasn't met the mark.
In response to a question about refactoring debt, Musk told followers "We're still negative cash flow, due to ~50% drop in advertising revenue plus heavy debt load." Twitter needs to "reach positive cash flow before we have the luxury of anything else," he added.
Twitter's problems stem from a number of issues compounding the problem. For a start, the "heavy debt load" is caused by interest payments on debt Twitter took on when Musk acquired it and took it private.
According to Reuters, the annual interest payments cost Twitter around $1.5 billion.
The 50% drop in ad revenue is also an issue for the company, which has stumbled in its relationship with advertisers post-acquisition. This period allegedly included Apple as an advertiser who apparently veered away from Twitter, but later made a return.
Twitter has also undertaken a severe cost-cutting initiative, including multiple mass layoffs of employees, and in some cases, failing to pay bills and rent.
Musk's comments surface as Twitter is under attack from Threads, a rival platform that has seen considerable short-term success. Naturally, shortly after launch, Twitter threatened to sue Meta for copying it.
Read on AppleInsider
Comments
Musk buys it and starts pulling every lever he can find, many of which were clearly marked DO NOT TOUCH THIS LEVER.
Now the company is bleeding value, invisible to the public, and got its lunch eaten by Meta in less than a week of competition.
Oh, and a new half-billion liability based on Lever #2.
You really should do some fact checking rather than just blindly repeating whatever he says.
Give me a break. He does and says stupid shit from time to time - true, but he never loses. The platform is a much more fun place to be right now and I bet you my iPad that it won’t fail 😉
Twitter whet public in 2013 and didn't do any post IPO funding from investors until 2021. From 2021 to being purchased in October of 2022 they did four and half to those were after Musk agreed to buy the company. So please, back up your statement. Using the publicly available data show how the 1.2 billion they made in 2018 and the 1.4 billion they made in 2019 were not actual profit and due to investor funding that wasn't happening and hadn't happened in years. Musk on the other hand has had to do investor funding since purchasing Twitter to keep it afloat.
At the time of purchase twitter had less than 600 million in debt and 2 billion in cash on hand. Their revenue for the final year was -221 million. Since Musk purchased the company they have jumped to over 13 billion in debt, have had to do a funding round of 3 billion to help pay for their debt and apparently seen their revenue cut in half. Twitter is demonstrably in far worse shape now than it was prior to being purchased by Musk and it 100% his doing.
And if you think Twitter's old leadership had an issue with lying bout business then you need to check out the following from Musk:
In 2018 he said he had "secure" enough funding to take Tesla private, he hand't
Production of the Tesla semi was suppled to be in 2020, didn't happen and still behind it's scheduled ramp
A fleet of Tesla robotaxis were supposed to happen in 2020, now he is saying 2024
The Cybertruck was going to be released in late 2021, still not available
Since 2016 Tesla has been charing customers 10k, now15k for full self driving as an add on, but has yet to ship the final product.
You, like the previous poster, could do with some fact checking rather than just accepting the myth of Elon. The only company he has involvement with that is profitable is Tesla. About half of it's profits are due to government credits rather than actual sales. The rest of his companies lose money and exist on investors. Somehow you have managed to get the entire situation backwards. The man is a fraud.
When you buy a company you buy their assets and liabilities. The money you pay goes to thee owners, in the case of Twitter it went to the shareholders.
Twitter had 2 billion in cash and less than 600 million in debt when Musk purchased it. He took out 13 billion in loans when he purchased the company and had Twitter to take on the loans. So the heavy debt load he is taking about is 100% his own doing. Somehow he failed to mention that.